Open in TheBrain

Free Republic/ freeper

---

NO MERRI POSTER FOR? PIONEER?

2ndary on trump tweets

a hub? tipping pt "keystone species" for conspiracy theory?

see bak on cultch

still boast about rathergate scalp as apotheosis of crowdsource citizen research/jrnlism?

hegseth astro vet VFF pro gulf war 2 b 43

fresno

---

2026

TRYING TO GET NYT ARTL -->

Missteps, Confusion and ‘Viral Waste’: The 14 Days That Doomed U.S.A.I.D.

---

http://www.alternet.org/media/how-misinformed-tweet-was-manufactured-major-right-wing-news

 Buzzfeed News analysis found that the top 20 fake political news stories in circulation during the election got more clicks, views, shares and reactions on Facebook than the top 20 real news stories. The vast majority of those fake stories—all but three—were “overtly pro-Donald Trump or anti-Hillary Clinton,” meaning they pinged around the conservative webosphere, where they were accepted without question by millions and then passed to the next gullible consumer.

Paul Horner, among the most prolific and successful fake news writers, recently told the Washington Post that Trump voters and other “right-wing Republicans” were almost single-handedly responsible for the $10,000 he pulls in every month, because they “post everything, believe anything,” and continue to share fake news even when they find out it isn't true. That might explain why so many fake news stories seem specially tailored for the conservative news reader.

One of Horner’s most popular stories was a fabricated interview with a made-up person who said he’d been paid to protest Trump ahead of the election. During the campaign, multiple members of Trump’s team retweeted the story, even though many sources pointed out it wasn't true. The ludicrous idea that anti-Trump demonstrators are each paid thousands of dollars by billionaire George Soros—who plays a starring role in pretty much every right-wing conspiracy—has now become conservative gospel.

Eric Tucker, a marketer in Austin, Texas, was probably very familiar with this rumor when he recently sent an erroneous tweet that launched a viral right-wing story.The New York Times decided to examine how Tucker's tweet became a major topic of conservative discussion, following its online travels step by step. On the evening of November 9, just as protests against President-elect Trump were erupting all over the country, Tucker tweeted the photo and message below to his tiny group of 40followers. 

[img]

According to the Times, Tucker heard about anti-Trump demonstrations in Austin hours after he saw the buses in the photo, and for reasons that aren’t entirely clear (except that if you look for boogeymen everywhere you will find them), assumed a connection between the two. The Times confirmed that Tucker’s photo actually features buses booked for employees of Tableau Software, which was having a conference in the city. (Tucker told the Times he did a search for nearby conferences but didn’t find anything.) Roughly four hours after the original tweet went out, it ended up on Reddit. “BREAKING: They found the buses!” the header reads. “Dozens lined up just blocks away from the Austin protests.” The thread of comments that follow indicate subreddits full of Trump supporters who, riding high on an election victory, are ecstatic to have a new conspiracy they can hang on the left.

“Alex Jones is based in Austin,” one commenter declares. “Let him know, and his crew can check it out.”

That’s followed by a lot of wishing the worst on Soros, complaints about “cucks,” suggestions thatJames O’Keefe get involved, and a lot of assumptions rooted in racism and paranoia. “Busing in violent mobs? Please tell me how this isn't inciting treason,” one person demands. This inexplicably devolves into a conversation about Obamaphones.

By the morning of November 10, the story appeared on right-wing message board Free Republic, where a user linked back to the original tweet. Here’s the point at which things quickly build momentum, picking up the pace across right-wing echo chambers. According to the Times, that same day, “Facebook pages like Robertson Family Values, which is named for but not affiliated with the stars of ‘Duck Dynasty,’ and Donald Trump Commander in Chief 2020, linked to the Free Republic discussion.” A Times screengrab of a Free Republican Facebook post repeating the Reddit message shows 307,616 shares. The paper also cites 5,000 shares of each of the aforementioned blog posts.

By now, the story had trickled upward to local news outlets. When the Austin-based affiliate for Fox called Coach USA North America bus companyto get more information, they were told by spokesperson Sean Hughes that the company wasn’t involved in any protests. Hughes even sent the station a statement clarifying that buses were in town "for a conference” and that “at no point were Coach USA buses involved in the Austin protests." The television station’s website, now empty of most of the content that appeared there, still features photos of the buses taken by Tucker, with a caption that poses thisleading question: “Were tens of thousands of protesters across the U.S. paid to walk the streets, hold signs, and chant anti-Trump sayings?”

That evening, Gateway Pundit, a major conservative blog, posted a story with the headline, “Figures. Anti-Trump Protesters Were Bussed in to Austin #FakeProtests.” They used Tucker’s original pictures, and according to the Times, linked the nonexistent busloads of fake protesters to “Soros money.” Three hours later, President-elect Trump or someone on his team took to social media to tweet about the fake story to his 16 million followers.

“Just had a very open and successful presidential election,” the message reads. “Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!”

As of this writing, the tweet has more than 71,000 retweets and 240,000 likes.

[img]

On November 11, a spokesperson for Tableau, the tech company that rented the buses for its conference attendees, sent a statement to the Austin American-Statesman. The newspaper, in turn, published an article debunking Tucker’s original tweet and all of the stories that followed. Included was an interview withEric Tucker, who praised Alex Jones and stated, “I think that it is necessary for us to risk sometimes being wrong to help develop moving the dialogue forward.”

Later in the day, according to the Times,Tucker sent a tweet that acknowledged the possibility his first suggestion may have been “flat wrong.” There was alsoa Snopes article declaring the rumor false. Instead of stopping the fake news dead in its tracks, the case essentially turned into proof that "a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes," as the old saying goes. Also, the internet loves a lie that supports its political agenda. According to the Times, “Mr. Tucker’s initial tweet continued to generate thousands of shares on Facebook through Free Republic and pages like Right Wing News and Joe the Plumber.”

[IMMUNE TO CORRECTION]

On the night of November 11, Tucker put up the tweet below, which shows his original message updated to carry a bright red “FALSE” across it. The corrected tweet, as of this writing, has a paltry 60 retweets and 66 likes. He told the Times that moving forward, "I can assure you I’m going to try my best to be balanced with the facts and be very clear about what is opinion and what is not." He also said that knowing what he knows now, he “might have still tweeted it but very differently. I think it goes without saying I would have tried to make a more objective statement.”

The same night, Tucker finally trashed the tweet that started it all. While that’s been scrubbed from social media, its impact isn’t going anywhere. Neither, coincidentally, is President-elect Donald Trump.

==

==

sw

Free Republic (FR), which identifies itself as "an online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web," is a "non-commercial, limited liability company founded and operated by Jim Robinson, a private citizen of Fresno California." [1] Free Republic's Kristinn Taylor coordinates and serves as a press contact for the pro-war lobby groups Gathering of Eagles and Move America Forward.

Although "Alliances" and "Resources" listed on the website are right-wing / conservative, the Free Republic website claims that it is "not affiliated with any political party, group, news source, government agency or anyone else." Forums include the GOP Club and RNC Caucus and do not appear to include Democratic Party links in any form. "Talk Shows" listed include such right-wing media icons as G. Gordon Liddy, Glenn Beck, Hugh Hewitt, Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Tony Snow. [2]

According to its website, Free Republic is "working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America." [3]

Contents[hide]

Contact details

Free Republic, LLC

PO Box 9771

Fresno, CA 93794

URL: http://www.freerepublic.com/home.htm

Resources

Related SourceWatch articles

References

External articles

Categories: Blogging and Bloggers | Organizations | War/peace


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic

wikipedia

Free Republic is a moderated Internet forum for activists, and chat site for self-described conservatives, primarily within the United States.[1] It presents articles and comments posted pseudonymously by registered members, known as "Freepers",[2] using screen names.

Free Republic has been involved in several organized conservative campaigns including against CBS anchor Dan Rather and against the Dixie Chicks for their antiwar statements.[3] Freepers were instrumental in exposing a lack of authenticity in the so-called "Killian memos".

[edit] Local chapters and forum policies

There are local chapters "unconnected with Free Republic", organized through ping lists, e-mail, and Free Republic mail.[4][5] Some are only "ping list" groups, members who include their names in a list to be "pinged" on news articles of a certain nature. Some cover presidential events (daily picture, prayer, and speech threads), some focus on contemporary conservative issues such as the Second Amendment, the pro-life movement, or opposing gay marriage. The more active chapters organize live protests, which they call "Freeps." Since the 2000 election, these are often counter-protests, responses to protests by opposition groups, or small rallies.

[edit] History

[edit] 1996-2000: Clinton Administration

Founded in September 1996 as a sole proprietorship by Founder, Chairman and President James C. "Jim" Robinson[6] of Fresno, California, Free Republic opened to the general public in February 1997. Robinson filed for LLC status on September 11, 1998.[7] It has always been a for-profit company and donations have never been tax exempt.[8]

Free Republic gained popularity during the Clinton impeachment from 1997 till 1999, a time when it was linked on the Drudge Report as "Whitewater Archives," when protests and write-in campaigns were organized through the website. [BOSSIE?]

Many were also introduced to the site through an impeachment rally in Washington, attended by over 3000 participants, called the "March for Justice," broadcast live on Halloween 1998 by C-SPAN. Featured speakers included Alan Keyes, Bob Barr, Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson of B.O.N.D. and Larry Klayman. Ann Coulter, Lucianne Goldberg and Matt Drudge also attended.[9] Other Free Republic events over the years have also been televised by C-SPAN.[10][11]

Drudge dropped the link to Free Republic by February 1999, "because they were doing racist stuff over the (imaginary) [Clinton love child]... I click on and I see this headline, "Nigger Baby."" Drudge quickly restored the link, but later dropped it again for unknown reasons.[12] As of April 2008 the Free Republic link is back on Drudge.[13]

In its early years, Free Republic generally allowed its members to post copyrighted news stories in entirety to its forum, regardless of whether permission had been granted by content owners, until the site was sued in 1998 by The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times for copyright infringement. The newspapers obtained a permanent injunction, although stipulated damages of $1 million were reduced to $10,000 during settlement negotiations which allowed the defendants to drop their appeal.[14] The case, often cited when arguing cyberlaw, is called L.A. Times v. Free Republic.

From 1996-2000, the bulletin board was virtually unmoderated.This policy was central to the website's "fair use" defense in the copyright infringement litigation, wherein it stated "(t)he website operated by the defendants, www.freerepublic.com, permits anyone who wishes to post news articles or other items and to post commentary about the article as well ... no censorship is made and all views are permitted.".[15] This supposed light moderating hand did not prevent the permanent banishment from the site of such "controversial" contributors as crime author Dan E. Moldea, "What Really Happened" website host Mike Rivero, and Internet poet, David Martin.[16] Salon.com's Jeff Stein observed in 1999 that: "[A] swelling number of haters have turned up the volume of death threats, gay-bashing, name-calling and conspiracy theories tying the father of Republican front-runner George W. Bush to drug-dealing by the CIA."[2] Robinson "famously blasted George W. Bush's presidential candidacy back in 2000, before a dramatic late-campaign about-face that saw him emerge as one of the GOP ticket's biggest supporters."[17] These shifts signalled internal battles comparable to the nomination controversies of 2007 "as its founder and chief administrator first cleansed commenting ranks of Bush supporters, then, later, rallied to his support."[17]

White House Press Secretary and former Fox News commentator Tony Snow was a registered member of Free Republic. Snow was not afraid to 'mix it up' with the Freepers who sometimes disagreed with his political philosophy and who called him a "pansy".[18][19]

Free Republic had been criticized during the pre-moderation period for the actions of several of its members. In 1999, FReepers ran a campaign to make fake donations to the legal defense fund of Julie Hiatt Steele, who had been charge with obstruction of justice during then-President Bill Clinton's impeachment trial. Hundreds of fraudulent[20] transactions from this campaign cost Ms. Steele around $4000.[21] Some threatened to assassinate Clinton, like this from February 2001: "If he keeps on he's going to make me come up there. There is only one solution to the Klintons, two 45 rounds and a nice little spot in Marcy Park." [22]

When the bar manager of an Austin, Texas restaurant called 9-1-1 to notify authorities that an underage Jenna Bush had attempted to purchase liquor in June 2001, the bar manager's personal information including her home address, date of birth, driver's license number and physical description was posted on FreeRepublic, along with calls for punitive action.[23] The Clinton threat and some of the bar manager's personal information were removed by Robinson when brought to his attention, and the authors' posting privileges were revoked. He said that the site had had to "delete relatively few posts" over time for violations of its "no-violence" policy despite Free Republic's popularity and ease of registration.[24] [25]

[edit] 2001-2004: Bush's first term and Killian documents

In January 2001, the forum organized the inaugural "Free Republic Gala and Count the Silverware Ball".[26] It was attended by radio personality James Golden, who was one of the first high-profile conservatives to invest in the site and the Reverend Jesse Lee Peterson of B.O.N.D.[27]

During the 2004 election, Jerome Corsi, a Swift Boat Vet and co-author of the book Unfit for Command that attacked the Vietnam war record of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, apologized in the national media for comments that he made on Free Republic under the user name "jrlc." [28]

One of the first responses to "Memogate", the controversy surrounding CBS News' use of documents of questionable origin during the 2004 presidential campaign, came on Free Republic the night of the broadcast.[29] When the "Killian memos" (which were allegedly created during the 1970s) were shown during a CBS News broadcast, a Republican lawyer going by the pseudonym of "Buckhead"[30] mentioned the memos' proportional spacing and made the claim that such printing was "not widespread until the mid to late 90's".[31] Buckhead's post and some responses spread across the blogosphere rapidly, and were picked up by the Drudge Report the following afternoon.[32] Within minutes of Buckhead's post, there was some dispute as to whether the Executive line of IBM typewriters had proportionally spaced fonts at the time, arising from a comment on the Power Line blog. The dispute made headlines when an investigative panel set up to examine authenticity issues with the documents "was not able to reach a definitive conclusion".[33] Canadian journalist Ivor Tossell later opined that Free Republic was "central to the network of websites that uncovered the forged memos about Bush's Vietnam service that appeared on CBS News and ultimately cost Dan Rather his job."[34] The Columbia Journalism Review wrote, "But on close examination the scene looks less like a victory for democracy than a case of mob rule."[35]

For more details on this topic, see Killian documents authenticity issues.

MD4Bush Incident

In October 2004, the "MD4Bush" account was created to investigate the source of false rumors that Democratic Mayor of Baltimore Martin O'Malley had committed adultery.[36] These rumors were suspected to be coming from the camp of Governor of Maryland Robert Ehrlich.[36] O'Malley was a likely (and eventual) opponent of Ehrlich in the 2006 gubernatorial race.[36] Using this alias, MD4Bush allegedly lured Joseph Steffen, aide to Ehrlich, who had a Free Republic membership as "NCPAC," into contact.[36] MD4Bush then allegedly brought up the O'Malley rumors, and baited Steffen into giving responses on the FR "private message" system, appearing to take credit for spreading the rumors.[36]

Ehrlich fired Steffen when the contents of these messages were published in the Washington Post on February 9, 2005.[37] "Kristinn Taylor, a spokesman for FreeRepublic.com, said [Maryland Democratic Party communications director] Ryan O'Doherty's Democratic Party address was one of at least three used to operate the identity of MD4BUSH."[38] Taylor charged that Post reporter Matthew Mosk's access to the MD4Bush account was a violation of the Free Republic users agreement, and they were "looking into whether the Washington Post violated the Electronic Communications Privacy Act when Post reporter Matthew Mosk accessed the Free Republic account of MD4Bush."[39] The e-mail address used in October 2004 to open the MD4Bush account was later changed to rodoherty@mddems.org, then changed for a third time. Anyone who had the password to the MD4Bush account could change the e-mail registration address at any time. It is not known how many people may have had access to that password. The e-mail address information obtained does not shed light on the actual users of the MD4Bush account, nor does it reveal whether someone attached the Ryan O'Doherty e-mail address to the account without his knowledge.[40]

[edit] 2005-2009: Bush's second term

In January 2005, Free Republic organized an unofficial Inaugural Ball at the Washington Plaza Hotel to celebrate the reelection of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney and to honor the men and women serving in the United States Armed Forces. The event was promoted to feature then Arkansas Republican Governor Mike Huckabee and his rock band Capitol Offense.[41][42]

[edit] Dixie Chicks boycott
“It's scary how much power they do have. They can take down someone single-handedly and I don't think Americans are aware of that." — Natalie Maines of the Dixie Chicks, speaking about Free Republic.[43]”

The band Dixie Chicks and lead singer Natalie Maines claim that Free Republic was instrumental in fueling a nationwide boycott of their music, which was organized by some former fans and radio stations after Maines made anti-Bush comments in 2003. In their 2006 documentary Shut Up and Sing as well as in interviews, the Dixie Chicks have often mentioned Free Republic in reference to the boycott, which sharply reduced sales of their CDs and concert tickets.

Jim Robinson, waving the American flag at right, musters about two dozen other Freepers for the March for Justice II rally at the Upper Senate Park on the United States Capitol grounds on Thursday, April 7, 2005.

Maines was quoted as saying: "It's scary how much power they do have. They can take down someone single-handedly and I don't think Americans are aware of that."[43] "And I think it was originally started by the Free Republic. And they were very organized in calling radio stations across the country and telling them that they would never listen to their station, when they didn't even live in that town." Kristinn Taylor of Free Republic's dominant Washington D.C. chapter attended the screening of the documentary, hosted by the liberal advocacy group Center for American Progress. He was invited to join in a discussion after the screening and complimented the director on the film.[44][45][46]

For more details on this topic, see Dixie chicks#Political controversy.

[edit] Allegations of unfair treatment of Giuliani supporters

In 2007, moderators removed the posting privileges of many members who supported the presidential campaign of then current Republican front-runner Rudy Giuliani. The New York Observer reported:

Starting in April 2007 ... members sympathetic to the former mayor's candidacy claim to have suffered banishment from the site. They were victimized, they say, by a wave of purges designed to weed out any remaining support for the Giuliani campaign...[17]

Robinson himself endorsed Fred Thompson and was an enthusiastic backer of his campaign.[47] Robinson has frequently banned fellow conservatives and others who don't completely share his political mindset.[48] Among those claiming to have been permanently banned are several participants in the debate over the violent death of Bill Clinton's Deputy White House Counsel, Vince Foster. They include Hugh Turley of FBICover-up.com, David Martin of DCDave.com, and Dan E. Moldea of Moldea.com.[49] During and after the 2008 U.S. Presidential election, according to political commentator Sean Hannity, "[E]veryone I knew basically left because of so much childish, immature personal attacks. The propensity there to eat their own. And a lot of the people -- most of the people -- I knew that were on it left."[50]

[edit] Influencing online polls

Media web sites, including newspapers, television networks, and America Online, run occasional "polls" that do not use the sampling methods of formal opinion polls, but instead invite all Internet users to respond. Some Free Republic forum messages, usually captioned "Freep this poll!", urge Free Republic members to vote en masse in these polls, to deliberately skew results and render the polls useless. Members are also urged to "'Freep' C-Span's 'Washington Journal' with telephone calls pointing out media bias."[51]

"Whenever a poll is posted on Free Republic.com, everybody goes and votes the right way, and there's nothing wrong with that," says Marinelle Thompson, Freeper and founder of gun rights group Second Amendment Sisters. "We just do it for a laugh. It doesn't really mean anything." The polls can also be manipulated, said Vlae Kershner, SF Gate News Director (and poll writer): "People are finding a way of getting around our system that only allows one vote, and they're voting hundreds of times. It's not thousands of people voting one way; it's one or two people voting hundreds of times."[52]

Occasionally, if the current results of an online poll are unfavorable to them, Freepers will "reverse freep" it, voting against their own views to pad the opposing vote to the point where it loses credibility.[53]

[edit] 2009-: Obama administration

James von Brunn, the white supremacist who killed a security guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC on June 10, 2009, posted an article on another site questioning the citizenship of President Barack Obama (a view held by so-called "birthers"); the article was then pasted into a thread on Free Republic. The thread was deleted by moderators after the shooting, but later restored when a review found that it had not violated posting guidelines against racism and anti-Semitism.[54]

In July 2009, after Obama's eleven-year-old daughter Malia was photographed wearing a t-shirt with the peace symbol, a Free Republic thread featured racially charged comments about Obama's wife and children, using such terms as "ghetto street trash". After the thread was criticized, it was suppressed and placed under review. It was then restored to the site intact. Only after further criticism did site administrators remove it a second time.[55] In an email response to the incident, Jim Robinson called Obama an "American-hating Marxist pig."[55]

:{

}:

2018 update: 

James von Brunn, the white supremacist who killed a security guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. on June 10, 2009, posted an article on another site questioning the citizenship of President Barack Obama (a view held by so-called "birthers"); the article was then pasted into a thread on Free Republic. The thread was deleted by moderators after the shooting, but later restored when a review found that it had not violated posting guidelines.[50]

In July 2009, after Obama's eleven-year-old daughter Malia was photographed wearing a T-shirt with the peace symbol, a Free Republic thread featured racially charged comments about Obama's wife and children, using such terms as "ghetto street trash". After the thread was criticized, it was eventually suppressed and placed under review. It was then restored to the site intact. Only after persistent criticism did site administrators remove it a second time.[51] In an email response to the incident, Jim Robinson called Obama an "American-hating Marxist pig."[51]

In April 2012, after Rick Santorum's suspension of his presidential campaign left Mitt Romney the presumptive Republican nominee, Robinson posted: "FR will never support the abortionist, homosexualist, socialist, mandate loving, constitution trampling liar Mitt Romney,"[52] and indeed, initially, Robinson, the Free Republic site, and many 'Freepers' did not embrace the candidacy of presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney. Robinson posted to the site, "I'd rather shut the place down than be involved in any effort to install abortionist/gay rights pushing RINOS like Romney or Giuliani into the White House!! Do NOT push this crap on FR. Take your business elsewhere!!"[53]

The site conducted another membership purge in 2016, expelling all members of the Stop Trump movement opposed to the 2016 presidential campaign of Donald Trump.[54]

[edit] References

  1. ^ "Conservatives 'fed up' with protesters". USATODAY. March 31, 2003. Retrieved 2008-02-07.
  2. ^ a(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-Stein_1-0) b(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-Stein_1-1) "Free for all at Free Republic". Salon.com. 1999-07-13.
  3. ^ CBS News. http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/complete_report/CBS_Report.pdf.
  4. ^ "Free Republic's Reply Memorandum." *Los Angeles Times v. Free Republic.* U.S. District Court, C.D.Cal., Case No. 98-7840. November 1, 1999.
  5. ^ Paragraph 55
  6. ^ Robinson, James C. Biographical Resume
  7. ^ California LP/LLC Search Number 199825410007 Free Republic LLC
  8. ^ Morrow, Margaret M., J. Tentative Order Case No. CV 98-7840-MMM (AJWx) Los Angeles Times et al. vs. Free Republic et al.
  9. ^ Political Research Associates *The Public Eye* Spring 1999, Volume XIII, No. 1
  10. ^ [1], fetched 2006-12-30
  11. ^ York, Anthony April 2, 2001 *Katherine Harris, woman of the year?* Salon.com, fetched 2006-12-30
  12. ^ Jewishworldreview.com
  13. ^ Drudge Report
  14. ^ Techlawjournal.com
  15. ^ Document: Free Republic's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, 10/18/99
  16. ^ See Martin's exchange with Moldea at the end of the article
  17. ^ a(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-observer_16-0) b(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-observer_16-1) c(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-observer_16-2) Free Republic Purge: Conservative Web Site Bans Giuliani Supporters | The New York Observer
  18. ^ Fair.org
  19. ^ Salon.com
  20. ^ Usdoj.gov
  21. ^ Slaton, Joyce (January 29, 2003). "FReep This / How the right-wing is making itself heard". The San Francisco Chronicle.
  22. ^ Salon.com Politics | A poster crosses the line on Free Republic forum
  23. ^ Salon.com Politics | The jihad against Chuy's
  24. ^ "A poster crosses the line on Free Republic forum". Salon.com. 2001-02-09.
  25. ^ "The jihad against Chuy's". Salon.com. 2001-06-06. Retrieved 2006-12-11.
  26. ^ Class of 67 Class Notes 03/21/2001
  27. ^ The FreeRepublic Inaugural Ball & Count The White House Silverware Party
  28. ^ Anti-Kerry book author sorry for slurs
  29. ^ CBS News Report of the Investigative Panel p 163
  30. ^ Wallsten, Peter. "Blogger alleging CBS memos as frauds is GOP lawyer." Los Angeles Times, 18 September 2004.
  31. ^ "The Seattle Times: Nation & World: "Buckhead," who said CBS memos were forged, is a GOP-linked attorney". The Seattle Times.
  32. ^ " '60 Minutes' Documents on Bush Might Be Fake." Drudge Report Archives. (Retrieved February 5, 2007.)
  33. ^ Dobbs, Michael, and Allen, Mike. "Some Question Authenticity of Papers on Bush." The Washington Post, September 10, 2004.
  34. ^ Tossell, Ivor. "Free Republic: glass ant farm for zealots" The Globe And Mail, 20 October 2006.
  35. ^ CJR January/February 2005: Blog-Gate
  36. ^ a(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-snyder_35-0) b(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-snyder_35-1) c(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-snyder_35-2) d(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-snyder_35-3) e(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-snyder_35-4) Snyder, David and Mosk, Matthew. "Uproar Brings Focus on Role Of Bloggers." Washington Post, 11 February 2005.
  37. ^ Rivera, Ray. "Ehrlich Firing Probe Advances." Washington Post, 3 November 2005.
  38. ^ "Democrat's e-mail address tied to postings." Baltimore Sun, Dec. 16, 2005
  39. ^ Sprueill, Stephen. "Did the *Washington Post* Violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act?" *National Review Online, November 10, 2005.*
  40. ^ WBAL report
  41. ^ Free Republic Inaugural Ball 2005
  42. ^ Taylor, Kristinn (January 19, 2005). "Inauguration: Free Republic". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
  43. ^ a(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-Haysen_42-0) b(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-Haysen_42-1) Haysen, Kirsten. "Not Ready to Make Nice." Adelaide Now, October 7, 2006. Retrieved February 4, 2007.
  44. ^ Washington Whispers - Nation & World (usnews.com)
  45. ^ Film: Shut Up and Sing Takes A Candid Look At Pop Music's Most Fearless Women | 12/6/2006
  46. ^ Dixie Chicks Whine About Being Put on Free Republic's 'Hate List' | NewsBusters.org
  47. ^ Hackbarth, Sean. Jim Robinson, founder of Free Republic has 'endorsed' Fred Thompson. Fred Thompson campaign press release. 3 January 2008.
  48. ^ http://vdare.com/misc/gheen_050211_shot.htm
  49. ^ The Improbability of the D.C. Madam's Suicide, David Martin, June 10, 2008. See May 31, 2008, email from Martin to Moldea near the bottom of the page.
  50. ^ http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/archives/sean_hannity_vs_free_republic/
  51. ^ Media Bias Activist Handbook: What Can One Person Do?
  52. ^ "FReep This"
  53. ^ Langer, Gary (2007-08-28). "Online Ballots: Let the Clicker Beware". ABC News. Retrieved 2007-08-30.
  54. ^ Hesse, Monica (2009-06-12). "Notoriety Trumps Preservation as Some Web Sites Scrub Hateful Posts". The Washington Post. ISSN 0740-5421. Retrieved 2009-06-14.
  55. ^ a(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-sun_54-0) b(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Republic#cite_ref-sun_54-1) Parry, Chris (July 12, 2009). "Conservative Free Republic blog in free speech flap after racial slurs directed at Obama children". The Vancouver Sun. Archived from the original on January 4, 2010.

[edit] External links