Open in TheBrain

How Infants Learn About the Visual World Johnson 2010

<p>Jun 15, 2011 10:44 PM

&#160;

Scott Johnson &#160;UCLA

&#160;

visual world of young infants... &#160;fragmented and unstable... &#160;(rather than coherent objects) its

surfaces that move in unpredictable ways.

&#160;

3 kinds of learning in infants &#160;to learn know of the visual world:

<b>learning via associatio</b>n

<b>learning via active assembly</b> and

learning via visual-manual exploration;

&#160;

illustration... figure 1 &#160;two girls in a garden.... house hidden by trees.

&#160;

vision can be bottom-up... &#160;encoding color, luminance, distance, texture, orientation distance,

motion and so forth.

&#160;

vision also needs top-down know. &#160;that aids interpreetation....

eg &#160;red and blue patches are clothes worn by the girls.

&#160;

both operate continuously in mature sighted individuals.

&#160;

r infants restricted to bottom-up processing cuz they lack know?

&#160;

arguments btnw &#160;LEARNED or CONSTRUCTED &#160;visual world &#160;vs

UNLEARNED or INNATE system of object know. in humans.

&#160;

2) &#160;CONSTRUCTIVISM vs NATIVISM??

&#160;

perennial Q of infant epistemology... &#160;is &#160;know. &#160;BUILT-IN???

&#160;

2.1 &#160;Constructivist Theory

&#160;

Piaget was first. &#160;1954. &#160;hiding a toy under a cover and then observing kids trying to retrieve it.

&#160;

He positing.... that objects ... early in life... were disconnected forms that moved capriciously and randomly...

&#160;

there would be no know of objects wihtou know of space.... &#160;inseparable.

&#160;

1161

<b>Objectification was Piaget’s term for knowledge of the self and external objects as distinct

entities, spatially segregated, persisting across time and space, and obeying causal constraints</b>.

Piaget suggested that objectification is rooted in the <b>child’s recognition of her own

body as an independent object </b>and her own movements as movements of objects through

space, corresponding to movements of other objects she sees. This recognition, in turn, was

thought to <b>stem exclusively from exploration of objects via manual activity—that is, object

knowledge is constructed by the child</b>.

&#160;

But... skilled reaching and grasping is NOT available til after age 4-6 months...

&#160;

til this time &#160;objects consist of little more than fleeting images.

&#160;

Active intentional searech behavior marks the inception of objectification.

&#160;

As the ACTION SYSTEMS DEVELOP &#160;then develps the capacity to interacgt iwth objects and

discover their properties.

&#160;

PIAGET is widely accepted... BUT...

kids &#160;2-4 months old &#160;can maintains reps of partly or fully occluded objects...

so &#160;(the reasoning goes) &#160;it cannot depend on action systems that they have not yet dvleoped

=&#62; &#160;therefore, it must rely on built-in &#160;innate know.

&#160;

2.2 &#160;NATIVIST THOERY

&#160;

<b>A central tenet of nativist theory is that some kinds of initial, unlearned knowledge form</b>

<b>a central core around which more diverse, mature cognitive capacities are elaborat</b>ed

(Spelke, 1990.)

&#160;

That is, <b>some kinds of knowledge, including concepts of objects as coherent and continuous across occlusion, are

innate.</b> Philosophical discussions of innateness are ancient. <b>Plato</b> and Descartes, for example,

proposed that some ideas, such as <b>concepts of geometry or God or justic</b>e

&#160;

so, &#160;modern nativists focus on LEARNABILITY... &#160;how can infants possibly learn abt hidden objects

unless it's built-in?

&#160;

Scott J &#160;(author) &#160;questions this assumption and this logic. &#160;he asserts that &#160;infants cud be expoiting

other means of learning abt objects &#160;(and that &#160;object know. is NOT built-in).

&#160;

3) &#160;developmental change in infants' object perception....

&#160;

Piaget’s observations led him to conclude that <b>newborn infants have no true concepts of</b>

<b>objects or space (Piaget, 1952</b>). <b>Neonates can discriminate among visible objects and track</b>

<b>their motions, but when objects move out of sight or the baby’s gaze falls elsewhere, previously</b>

<b>encountered objects cease to exist for the infan</b>t. The<b> first inklings of object concep</b>ts

come from recognition memory, say when <b>infants smile upon mother’s return, beginning a</b>

<b>few months after birt</b>h. Knowledge of objects as complete and coherent across gaps in perceptual

contact imposed by occlusion did not come until later, after <b>infants can grasp and</b>

<b>reach objects and thereby come to more fully appreciate properties such as solidity, volum</b>e,

<b>and existence independent of the infa</b>nt. These concepts did not come all at once. Piaget

described one important concept as ‘‘r<b>econstruction of an invisible whole from a visible</b>

<b>fractio</b>n,’’ and it was evinced by retrieval of an object from under a cover when only a part

of the object was visible. An appreciation of continued existence despite complete occlusion

was evinced by removal of a obstacle hiding a desired toy, or<b> pulling away a cover from a</b>

<b>parent’s face during peekabo</b>o. These behaviors were not seen consistently until 6–8 months

or so, marking for Piaget the advent of a wholly new set of object and spatial concepts.

&#160;

Scott J. &#160;disputes Nativist interpretations... &#160;infants r NOT doing percpetual completion.

most resch on infants IS broadly consistent with Piaget.

Infants don't repres. &#160;fully occluded objects til middle of first year of life.

&#160;

1164

&#160;

1176 &#160;cognit development is constrained by expanding motor control over actions that provide

incr detailed info abt objects and events in the world.

&#160;

6) &#160;How infants learn abt objects

&#160;

1181 &#160;7) Concluding Remarks

&#160;

natural scenes are richly structures and have a high degree of redundancy.

&#160;

by 2 months infants <b>have several hundred hours of viewing experienc</b>e: &#160;<b>40 hrs per week * 10 weeks = 400 hour</b>s.

&#160;

so, in principle , infants could learn about partly or fully occluded objects just by making associations.

BUT.. &#160;studies by Johnson (and students) &#160;indicate that <b>passive experience may be insufficien</b>t ...

so may REQUIRE modeling accounts of object perception. &#160;(infants must model objects using active assembly)

&#160;

<b>ACTIVE ASSEMBLY and visual-manual exploration</b> provide info &#160;to the infant about her own control of an event

and simultan generate multimodal info.

&#160;

For complex perceptual completion, such as 3D object completion, &#160;&#160;the coordination of posture, reaching, grasping, and

visula inspection seem critical: &#160;&#160;<b>Only the visual-manual skills involved in generating changes in</b>

<b>object viewpoint - rotating, fingering, and transferring while looking - were related to 3d object completio</b>n.

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;

&#160;</p>

Attachments