Open in TheBrain

Link Label Convention

If you’d like, I can now link this ownership thought as a parent/child of your team thoughts (Baysox, Keys, IronBirds, etc.) to tighten that part of the graph.

I made it a jump thought and set link label as "Owner"

Nice. That’s a clean modeling choice.

With Attain Sports & Entertainment as a jump thought labeled “Owner”, you now have:

If you’d like, I can help you:

Ok, I would like that

Got relationships

Let’s do this in two parts: a link-label convention and then a plan to apply it across your Baseball brain.


1. Proposed link-label convention

These are semantic labels you can apply to links (mostly jumps) between thoughts:

Ownership & org structure

Baseball relationships

People & roles :(style="background-color:#d8e0ffff"):}:**:{:{(template)}:

You’re already correctly using Owner as a label; we’ll keep that as the core for Attain.


2. Applying this to "Attain Sports & Entertainment"

Right now, Attain has only one related thought:

Next steps I recommend (you can do these manually, or I can help as you go):

  1. Create / confirm team thoughts for each Attain property:
    • Chesapeake Baysox (franchise + 2025/2026 season thoughts if you’re tracking by year)
    • Frederick Keys (franchise + High‑A era seasons)
    • Spire City Ghost Hounds
    • Loudoun United FC
    • Any USL Super League Washington, D.C. thought if you add it later
  2. For each of those team or season thoughts, add a jump:
    • From team/season → Attain Sports & Entertainment
    • Set link label to: Owner
  3. Optionally add back-links from Attain, depending on how you like to navigate:
    • Children or jumps from Attain Sports & Entertainment → each owned team
    • Also label those links Owner for consistency.

If you tell me which of these team thoughts already exist (names), I can:

and then decide how to link them

Link as jumps to Attain Sports & Entertainment

Lets look at your #1 regarding