Will chamberlain natcon
---
:{:{BOUGHT REBOOT HUMAN EVENTS AFTER KLAYMAN FAIL? RAHEEM KASSAM IKIP}:
POSOBIEC}:
BOSSERT CLARK?!
SEE ARTL III DAVIS
---
---
REVEAL
Behind the Tweet That Became the Rallying Cry for the Insurrection
by Stan AlcornNovember 24, 2021
*This story is a collaboration withMother Jones.
On the evening of Monday, Nov. 2, 2020, the 35-year-old attorney who would jump-start the #StopTheSteal hashtag says he was meeting with Trump campaign officials in Philadelphia.
The city was a Democratic stronghold in a state Donald Trump won to secure the presidency in 2016 and needed to win again to remain in the White House. It was also a city long dogged by Republican accusations of election fraud. Will Chamberlain had driven up from Washington, D.C., to chase these allegations as a last-minute volunteer with the group Lawyers for Trump.
But Chamberlain wasn’t merely a lawyer. Although he had briefly worked at a commercial litigation firm in Los Angeles after passing the bar, he left that job in the spring of 2016, moved to D.C. and spent the Trump years running MAGA Meetups, relaunching a right-wing magazine and generally reinventing himself as a pro-Trump social media figure. When the campaign realized he had roughly 150,000 followers on Twitter, his role changed. “They figured out I’d be more useful doing stuff that wasn’t just legal,” Chamberlain told me.
He would still be on the lookout for “irregularities” – broken machines, verbal abuse of Republican officials, violations of law – but he wouldn’t be collecting affidavits or filing legal briefs. “If anything bad happened,” Chamberlain recalled, “we would put it out on social media.”
The next morning, at 8:19 a.m. on Election Day, he tweeted a video of a confrontation outside a polling place that would succeed beyond his wildest dreams. He wasn’t the first to make use of the #StopTheSteal hashtag, but according to an analysis conducted for Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting by the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, his tweet was the first to go viral. When it did, it took a little-known slogan of far-right activists and, in a matter of hours, transformed it into a ubiquitous rallying cry of what would become a nationwide movement to overturn the 2020 election.
Looking back, Chamberlain calls the movement that led to the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 “disappointing,” “frustrating,” and “scary,” but he is also quick to disown any personal responsibility.
“We weren’t thinking we were setting the stage for this massive campaign. All we were thinking was, like, this is a catchy hashtag,” he recalls. “I guess I underestimated how crazy certain people could get.”
It’s now clear that the ramifications of what’s become known as the Big Lie didn’t end with the events of Jan. 6. Far from it. A year later, a persistent, overwhelming majority of Republicans continue to believe the 2020 election was stolen from Trump. That false belief has been used to justify a wave of new voting restrictions, with the Brennan Center for Justice documenting 33 laws in 19 states, many of which experts say disproportionately disenfranchise people of color, college students, elderly voters and disabled voters. At least 10 Republicans who questioned the election results are seeking to oversee future elections in battleground states as candidates for secretary of state. A recent CNN poll found that a majority of Americans believe it is at least somewhat likely that an elected official will overturn an upcoming election to favor their political party. Only 6% say our democracy is not in danger.
This state of affairs wasn’t created by a single tweet. The edifice of #StopTheSteal was constructed on a foundation of false claims of widespread election fraud that predates Trump’s candidacy. But by tracing the convoluted journey of the tweet that started #StopTheSteal, you can see exactly how these long-standing beliefs, the singular rhetoric of Trump, and the evolving online and offline organizing tactics of the far right came together to create an unprecedented misinformation cascade. The dynamics that made this possible haven’t gone away. In fact, in some ways, the prospects for our upcoming elections are even worse.
On Election Day in Philadelphia, Will Chamberlain was paired with another volunteer, a local GOP activist and former state Senate candidate named Gary Feldman. As a Philadelphia resident, Feldman was able to register as an official Republican poll watcher, allowing him to legally enter voting locations to observe the process firsthand – he’d later say he was “the eyes and the ears of the president.” The plan was for the two of them to spend the day driving around Philadelphia, looking for what Chamberlain calls “shenanigans.” Should they see anything that fit that description, Feldman would investigate while Chamberlain would wait outside, taking pictures and videos and broadcasting his findings on Twitter.
Philadelphia has a long history of this kind of semi-official partisan videography. In 2008, when Barack Obama was running against John McCain, a recent college graduate working for the local GOP shot a video of a member of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense standing outside a polling place holding a nightstick. No voter claimed to be intimidated and no criminal charges were filed, but the video was endlessly replayed on Fox News after right-wing operative Mike Roman posted it to his Election Journal website. The idea of reviving this approach at the Philadelphia polls in 2020 came directly from Trump himself.
It happened at the end of the first presidential debate in September, when moderator Chris Wallace of Fox News tried to pin Trump down on a question he’d been publicly evading: “Will you urge your supporters to stay calm during this extended period, not to engage in any civil unrest?” Wallace asked. “And will you pledge tonight that you will not declare victory until the election has been independently certified?”
Instead of encouraging calm and making the pledge, Trump famously replied: “I’m urging my supporters to go into the polls and watch very carefully because that’s what has to happen. I am urging them to do it. As you know, today there was a big problem. In Philadelphia, they went in to watch. They’re called poll watchers, a very safe, very nice thing. They were thrown out. They weren’t allowed to watch. You know why? Because bad things happen in Philadelphia.”
While Trump had been summoning the specter of fraud in Philadelphia since his first campaign, the “big problem” he was referring to happened that morning. It was opening day for a number of satellite election offices the city of Philadelphia had created to help its residents register and turn in ballots as part of a newly expanded mail-in voting program. Someone had walked into one of these offices, camera rolling, seeking to “observe,” and been politely turned away.
Andrew Wellbrock, now deputy attorney general in New Jersey and recently assistant district attorney in Philadelphia and leader of the city’s Election Task Force, says this was clearly the right move. Under Pennsylvania law, poll watching is something that only credentialed observers do, and only on Election Day at polling locations set up to ensure voter privacy. The video showed someone with no relevant credentials showing up at an office neither logistically nor legally set up to accommodate them. “It would be like someone saying they have a poll watcher certificate to come watch me do my work in my office,” Wellbrock says. “It’s just not how the law works.”
The video was tweeted out by Roman, who was Trump’s Election Day operations director. He offered a very different analysis. “TRUMP observers are being blocked entry to all of the satellite voting locations in Philly!! What are they hiding?” he tweeted. Trump and his two adult sons’ retweets went further. “This is Biden’s only hope to cheat you out of an election by preventing a fair and honest election,” tweeted Donald Trump Jr.
The Trump campaign followed up the tweets and debate complaints with a lawsuit, but it was thrown out eight days later. But the courtroom loss did nothing to extinguish the excluded-poll-watcher narrative, as the reaction to Chamberlain’s tweet would soon make spectacularly clear.
Chamberlain told me that the first tip he and Feldman got on Election Day was that a polling site at a funeral home in South Philadelphia wasn’t admitting Republican poll watchers. Chamberlain and Feldman raced to the scene.
When they arrived, Feldman walked inside, only to be promptly ejected while Chamberlain recorded video on his phone. “I have a citywide watcher’s certificate,” Feldman says in the video, holding up the slip of yellow paper. “Not for this location,” one of the poll workers responds.
As it turned out, Feldman was right, and the poll workers were wrong. “It was all a mistake,” the election judge who denied Feldman’s entry told me when I reached him by phone. (Reached by email, Feldman declined to answer my questions.)
It was the kind of misunderstanding that happens at every election without affecting the outcome and that the Philadelphia district attorney’s Election Task Force typically resolves over the phone. Feldman and Chamberlain needed only to call the Election Task Force’s hotline, and one of the more than 90 lawyers on call could have directed the poll workers to let Feldman in. But, as Chamberlain told me and the Election Task Force confirmed, they didn’t call.
“That’s not what they wanted,” Wellbrock says. “They wanted a show. They wanted that headline.”
Or more to the point: They wanted that tweet.
The tweet went out at 8:19 a.m.
Two minutes later, its viral journey began, with a retweet from Jack Posobiec.
Posobiec was a correspondent and host at the pro-Trump cable network One America News, but his real power came from Twitter, where he regularly posted hundreds of times a day.
“I would argue that Jack is the worst actor in the history of that website,” says Michael Edison Hayden, an investigative reporter at the Southern Poverty Law Center, who wrote a series of articles on how Posobiec built an audience by spreading conspiracy theories, inspiring harassment campaigns and working with White supremacists. Posobiec is “very good at setting the right-wing media agenda,” says Joan Donovan, research director at Harvard’s Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy. “He tends to have a very loyal and dedicated fan base that knows what to do when he tweets something.”
By the 2020 election, Posobiec had amassed a Twitter following of 1.2 million that included right-wing influencers such as Trump himself – a fact that Posobiec leveraged to maximum effect. “Remember, folks, the President watches this space closely,” Posobiec tweeted months before the election. “That’s right Jack,” Trump tweeted in response. “Keep up the good work!”
When Posobiec tweeted Chamberlain’s video, his pro-Trump Twitter network sprang into action, with immediate retweets from a Trump campaign staffer and from Paul Joseph Watson, aka @PrisonPlanet, the British protege of Trump ally and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones.
Kate Starbird, faculty director of the University of Washington Center for an Informed Public, says in an email that this was a typical beginning for viral election misinformation. “We’ve talked about that kind of effect as a ‘spotlight’ tweet (where a user with a larger following casts a spotlight on a tweet/user with a smaller following and helps it take off).”
If Posobiec’s followers missed his initial tweet, no matter; he would spotlight the poll-watching video three more times in the space of three minutes. After the last of these, at 8:32 a.m., Donald Trump Jr. took notice and tweeted it, twice, to his 6 million followers.
Thanks to these prominent retweets, by 20 minutes after its release, Chamberlain’s video had been viewed nearly 200,000 times; in an hour, it was approaching half a million. In their analysis for the Election Integrity Partnership, researchers at the Center for an Informed Public documented more than 600,000 tweets related to Chamberlain’s video. That doesn’t include posts on other platforms where it was quickly reproduced, such as Instagram, Facebook and TikTok.
The engine powering this viral spread was what the Center for an Informed Public calls “repeat spreaders”: a small number of influencers with large follower counts who disseminated not one but many false or misleading narratives about the 2020 election. Their analysis ranked Posobiec, Trump Jr. and Roman among the 21 most prominent, alongside right-wing media figures like @BreitbartNews and Sean Hannity, as well as Twitter-specific influencers like “Cat Turd” and the QAnon account @prayingmedic.
Throughout the 2020 election season, these accounts acted as misinformation tastemakers, taking tweets from more obscure accounts like Chamberlain’s and then broadcasting them to their larger followings. While Posobiec happened to be the first to find Chamberlain’s tweet, it was their collective action that made them potent. One researcher I spoke with compared the swarm of influencers retweeting a new nugget of conspiratorial content to a flock of crows descending on a single french fry.
“You just need to hit one person in this network of right-wing influencers, and then it will spread to all the others,” says Center for an Informed Public graduate researcher Andrew Beers.
As Chamberlain’s video spread, the claims attached to it grew increasingly detached from the mundane reality it depicted. The first of Trump Jr.’s tweets amplified a quote tweet that prefaced it by saying, “Look, we don’t need any pesky poll-watchers interfering with the result that has already been preordained by Democrat officials.” The second: “They’re straight up stealing Philadelphia.” The front page of Breitbart News soon read: “ ‘The Steal Is On’ in Pennsylvania: Poll watchers denied access.”
It’s a pattern Starbird calls “participatory disinformation,” and it would occur again and again all across the country on Election Day and in the days and weeks and months thereafter. Trump voters who’d been primed for months with MAGA-world narratives of hacked voting machines, dead voters and rampant mail fraud, while being urged by the president to “watch very carefully,” ventured out to collect “evidence” that appeared to support their suspicions. Influencers, in turn, found these fragments and repackaged them into more compelling posts, which they then spread to their much larger audiences. If you were glued to far-right media, you saw not just scattered anecdotes, but a ubiquitous, consistent narrative repeated across social media, TV and radio. “(It) starts to take on the character of something that must be true because a lot of people are saying it,” Donovan says. “And that’s really what media manipulators and disinformers bank on. That’s what their strategic advantage is.”
The ultimate manifestation of this shows up at the end of Chamberlain’s tweet in the form of a hashtag.
“Stop the Steal” was not invented by Chamberlain. Its first incarnation was in 2016 when longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone picked up on Trump’s talk of a “rigged election” and founded an organization called Stop the Steal to prevent Ted Cruz from “stealing” the Republican primary. In the general election, Stop the Steal turned its attention to Hillary Clinton, signing up activists to monitor “key precincts” to thwart an alleged Democratic plot to hack voting machines and “flood the polls with illegals.” Posobiec was Stone’s point person in Philadelphia, where, in a haphazard premonition of 2020, he drove around the city with a local GOP staffer while telling his livestream followers that he was documenting “voter fraud.” (A Reveal producer was riding shotgun, so you can hear this play out firsthand.) The stunt had limited reach, and when Trump won the election, it was quickly forgotten.
Viral lies LINK
From wild anti-vaccine conspiracy theories to “Stop the Steal” and QAnon, we examine how misinformation swiftly spreads online – and the lives it disrupts.
June 5, 2021
The name and strategy were revived in 2018 by associates of Stone, including Posobiec and future Stop the Steal protest ringleader Ali Alexander, to claim election fraud in Broward County, Florida. In September 2020, Alexander said on a livestream, “I’m thinking of bringing ‘Stop the Steal’ out of retirement.” (He also insisted, “Every precinct in the country needs a Republican poll watcher. Every precinct in the country needs a Republican poll watcher.”) That same day, Posobiec sent a tweet (later deleted) that said simply, “#StopTheSteal 2020 is coming …” In a brief phone conversation, Posobiec said of this and other tweets about #StopTheSteal and false election fraud allegations, “I share things for my followers that they might find interesting,” before declining to comment further.
For his part, Chamberlain admits that he had discussed using the hashtag in advance of the 2020 election with other right-wing Twitter users, including Posobiec. But he claims that when he employed #StopTheSteal, he didn’t mean to imply that the election was actually being stolen. “In that context,” he explains, “the ‘steal’ is shenanigans. Basically Election Day shenanigans.”
This is, needless to say, not how it was understood online.
The handful of #StopTheSteal tweets that preceded Chamberlain’s hadn’t gotten any traction, but as soon as his caught fire, people borrowed its hashtag and attached it to a rapidly multiplying mass of conspiracy theories, from dead people voting to ballots invalidated by Sharpies.
“(Chamberlain’s) one original tweet pretty much sets the “#StopTheSteal” hashtag into motion,” Starbird says. “Where it begins with that one incident and then starts to snowball and pick up/incorporate other incidents/narratives as it goes.”
In a brief, punchy, alliterative phrase, it grouped these disparate stories together, implied they were proof of a plot to “steal” the election and called Twitter users to action to “stop the steal.”
At its Election Day peak, tweets tagged #StopTheSteal were posted more than 10,000 times an hour. Riding the wave of the hashtag’s viral success, the next day, Alexander would launch a #StopTheSteal website – StopTheSteal.us – and Women for America First would launch a Stop the Steal Facebook group to organize on-the-ground protests. The last of these protests would take place at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. “To use a favorite term that all of you people really came up with: We will stop the steal,” Trump told the crowd. And the crowd roared.
While the Stop the Steal movement mutated and metastasized, Chamberlain’s tweet and the narrative attached to it continued to shape right-wing election-related discourse and policy.
As the vote totals in key swing states began to favor Joe Biden, the real-world protests that sprung up in Phoenix, Philadelphia, Detroit, Atlanta and elsewhere focused their “Stop the Steal” chants on those doing the counting. The story of wrongfully excluded Republican election observers lived on – only now, it was the tabulation of ballots they claimed to be unable to witness.
Two days after the election, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) went on Fox News and falsely claimed, “By throwing the observers out, by clouding the vote-counting in a shroud of darkness, they are setting the stage to potentially steal an election.”
“THE OBSERVERS WERE NOT ALLOWED INTO THE COUNTING ROOMS,” Trump tweeted that Saturday, after the Associated Press declared him the loser in Pennsylvania and the nation as a whole. “BAD THINGS HAPPENED WHICH OUR OBSERVERS WERE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE.”
Even after the votes had been fully counted and certified in Pennsylvania (with Republican poll watchers observing), Republican legislators held a hearing at a Wyndham hotel in Gettysburg that used the stories of poll watchers to hint at more elaborate conspiracies. “The issues are galore,” Doug Mastriano, a Republican state senator representing south-central Pennsylvania, said in a lengthy opening statement that compared the election to the Civil War. “You’re going to hear about poll watchers being denied access, where election software vendors refuse to testify before the General Assembly. What do they got to hide?” Among the witnesses called were Republican observers of both Election Day voting and the subsequent counting of votes. One of those witnesses was Gary Feldman.
Feldman’s appearance was brief, and news coverage of the event focused instead on the rambling false claims made by Rudy Giuliani and Trump himself, who participated by phone. But on the conspiratorial fringe, the hearing was treated as a pivotal event, with Trump’s recently indicted ex-adviser Steve Bannon referencing it repeatedly on his podcast, and Mastriano capitalizing on it to elevate his own profile.
Mastriano would gain infamy as an early champion of so-called private “audits” of election results, like the Cyber Ninjas in Arizona, hunting for fake ballots with telltale “bamboo fibers” (and still finding that Biden won the election). On Jan. 6, Mastriano joined the pro-Trump mob on the Capitol grounds and even chartered buses for his constituents.
By April 2021, Mastriano went on to co-sponsor all four Pennsylvania Senate bills on the Brennan Center’s list of restrictive voting bills, as well as the Poll Watcher Empowerment Act, which, among other provisions, seeks to penalize “any election officials who block, impede, or otherwise intimidate a poll watcher while performing his or her official duties on Election Day.” If passed, it would mean that an election judge could be jailed for months for making the same mistake that briefly kept Feldman out of a polling place.
The Pennsylvania bill is one of more than 40 pieces of proposed legislation in 20 statesseeking to give poll watchers more power. The most infamous was the omnibus voting bill in Texas, which was delayed but not defeated when Democratic lawmakers took the dramatic step of fleeing the state.
The Texas bill was signed into law in September, and its poll-watching provisions go further than anything proposed in Pennsylvania. It explicitly grants watchers “free movement” at voting sites, specifying they should be able to get close enough to “see and hear” election workers’ actions. It not only makes it a crime for election workers to obstruct watchers, but it also prohibits them from removing watchers who violate the law, unless they personally witness the violation. Multiple federal lawsuits have challenged these provisions as unconstitutional and discriminatory, saying they will increase voter intimidation and curtail election officials’ ability to keep voters safe and their ballots secret. “That is a recipe for making elections more chaotic and less secure,” says Tommy Buser-Clancy of the ACLU of Texas.
The centering of partisan watchers also underlies even seemingly unrelated voting restrictions. The Texas law rolls back the drive-thru and 24-hour voting that boosted turnout in heavily Democratic Harris County in 2020. Those forms of voting were explicitly attacked as insecure because they couldn’t easily be observed by partisan poll watchers.
“Taking that argument to its logical conclusion, you can only have in-person Election Day voting,” says Alex Gulotta, All Voting Is Local Arizona state director. “It’s not about observing voting; it’s about stopping voting.”
There’s a certain historical irony to Republican legislators casting partisan poll watchers as election integrity’s last line of defense.
Two hundred years ago, poll watchers were called “party agents” and were anything but neutral referees. In a time before lists of registered voters, opposing party agents actively debated and horse traded their fellow citizens’ voting rights, according to Cornell University professor Richard Bensel, author of “The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century.” “Poll watching in the sense that the Republicans mean it today didn’t exist,” Bensel says.
In the modern era, partisan poll watching evolved to serve a different function. Republican “ballot security programs” enlisted poll watchers to show up in the 1960s to enforce state literacy requirements, challenging voters standing in line to read aloud passages from the Constitution and demanding they leave the voting line if they could not. In 1982, the Democratic National Committee filed a lawsuit alleging that Republicans in the 1981 elections had hired local law enforcement officers to patrol Black and Latino districts in New Jersey and question prospective voters about their qualifications. The lawsuit resulted in a consent decree that enjoined the Republican National Committee from similar activities until the decree expired in 2017. This meant the 2020 presidential election was the first in 40 years in which the Republican National Committee could openly sponsor and promote efforts to monitor the polls.
Many Democrats feared the result would be widespread voter intimidation, particularly after the Trump campaign claimed it would deploy a 50,000-strong Army for Trump led by Roman. When this “army” failed to materialize, voting rights historian J. Morgan Kousser was not surprised. He says the expense and challenging logistics, not to mention the possibility of a backlash, meant the rhetoric was always “puffery,” aimed more at fashioning a narrative than a genuine effort to recruit volunteers to do the boring work of observing the functioning of the country’s hundreds of thousands of voting locations. “For a long time, there has been a feeling in the election law community that these laws (allowing partisan poll watchers) had two purposes,” Kousser says. “One was to intimidate people, particularly Blacks and Latinos, from voting by giving them the idea that it is going to be difficult and may be dangerous to vote. And the other is that it’s simply one of the things that they’re doing to play to their base, to play up the idea that there is a lack of voter integrity.”
The RNC’s election integrity director, Josh Findlay, recently claimed the party would be stepping up its official poll-watching efforts in 2022. Even if this promise proves to be more “puffery,” as long as there are large numbers of Republican voters who believe election fraud is widespread, there will likely be some who will do their own unofficial poll watching. And if nothing else changes, there will also be a network of activists ready to transform their efforts into viral narratives on social media. Only five of the top 20 “repeat spreaders” of 2020 election misinformation identified by the Center for an Informed Public have been kicked off Twitter. The other 16 – including Posobiec, Trump Jr. and Roman – remain active and have millions more followers than they did last November.
In a recent report, the Center for an Informed Public pointed out that researchers and journalists have repeatedly found that a small number of influential “superspreaders” drive the spread of misinformation on social media. They suggested a solution could be for social media platforms to hold influential accounts to a higher standard, instead of doing the opposite. “It’s an incredibly obvious solution that they don’t want to do,” says Andrew Beers, a graduate researcher at Center for an Informed Public, “for I think very obvious political reasons.”
*This story was edited by Marianne Szegedy-Maszak, Nina Martin and Andrew Donohue.
*Stan Alcorn can be reached at salcorn@revealnews.org. Follow him on Twitter:@stan_alcorn.
---
---
The right-wing media campaign to denaturalize and deport American citizens
Naturalized citizens have the rights and privileges of those born in the United States, but conservative pundits are looking for ways to remove them from the country
Written by John Knefel
Published 03/26/25 MMA
Right-wing media figures are escalating a long-running campaign to give the president vast powers to denaturalize and deport naturalized citizens, a generally rare occurrence that would represent a significant new front in President Donald Trump’s campaign to restrict immigration and limit citizenship in the United States.
On March 19, Article III Project founder and MAGA media influencer Mike Davis told Axios: “What's going to be on the horizon are denaturalization cases.”
“You're going to have Hamas supporters who have been naturalized within the last 10 years, and they are eligible to lose their status as citizens and get deported,” he added. “It's worth it."
The article reported that Trump’s campaign to restrict immigration through the Supreme Court is being “spearheaded” by Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy.
Naturalized U.S. citizens are people born outside of the United States who have gone through a lengthy process to secure the rights and privileges of somebody born in the country. Since the end of the Cold War it has been unusual for the U.S. to denaturalize citizens, with only about 11 instances per year between 1990 and 2017, according to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.
In recent years, conservative pundits and think tanks have sought to drastically increase those numbers. MAGA media figures have targeted pro-Palestinian organizers, a high-profile journalist, and, in at least one instance, a sitting member of Congress in their campaigns to denaturalize citizens, which are frequently directed at people who are (or are perceived to be) Muslim. These threats are extreme, even by right-wing media standards — and where MAGA punditry often falls light on specifics, white papers from conservative think tanks look to offer a veneer of policy respectability to the calls for ramping up denaturalization.
Trump 2.0 looks to “turbocharge” Trump 1.0 denaturalization initiatives
The first Trump administration attempted to bring 1,600 either civil or criminal denaturalization cases — though it fell far short, with one estimate putting the number of cases brought at 168. The second Trump administration is attempting to revive those efforts, in part by including the section of the U.S. Code that controls revoking citizenship in one of the administration’s Day 1 executive orders.
Less cryptically, Trump adviser Stephen Miller wrote on X (formerly Twitter) in 2023, “We started a new denaturalization project under Trump. In 2025, expect it to be turbocharged.”
Citation
From Stephen Miller's account on X/Twitter
Miller was responding to MAGA influencer Jack Posobiec, who had written, “We used to strip foreign-born anarchists and communists of citizenship and deport them. Laws still on the books. Just planting seeds.” Now, those seeds appear to be taking root.
MAGA media goes all in on denaturalization
The Article III Project’s Mike Davis is perhaps the loudest voice in MAGA media pushing for Trump to ramp up denaturalization efforts, which he frequently directs at pro-Palestinian activists. The calls for denaturalization are part of a larger right-wing media campaign to smear pro-Palestinian protests, Palestinians being considered for refugee relocation, and Palestinian activists like Mahmoud Khalil — a green card holder arrested and detained by ICE.
- On October 22, 2023, Davis wrote on X that he was “calling for the denaturalization of naturalized American citizens who support Hamas.” He continued: “For those naturalized within the last 5 years, their current support of Hamas is prima facie evidence they lied on their citizenship applications.” Twitter/X, [10/22/23]
- Barely a week later, Davis appeared on Fox News’The Ingraham Angleand promised, “When President Trump is back in office, he’s going to revoke all these visas of these Hamas supporters and I think he’s going to resume the denaturalization process for naturalized American citizens who lied on their applications for citizenship and support the terrorism.” Host Laura Ingraham earlier praised the “wisdom” in Trump’s Muslim Ban, to which Davis added, “Maybe it’s not such a good idea to import people from Third World, Marxist hellholes who hate America and everything we stand for.” Fox News, *The Ingraham Angle*, [10/30/23]
- The next month, Davis wrote that journalist Mehdi Hasan was “on my Lists 2 (indict), 4 (detain), 6 (denaturalize), and 3 (deport). I already have his spot picked out in the DC gulag.” Davis’ added: “But I’ll put him in the women’s cell block.” Hasan is a naturalized U.S. citizen who also holds U.K. citizenship. Twitter/X, [11/20/23, 10/9/20]
- :{:{In January 2024, Davis appeared on a Rumble streaming show and said one of Article III Project’s aims was to “push to have these Hamas supporters, their visas revoked, they’re thrown out of our country — if they’re naturalized citizens, having them denaturalized and get them the hell out of America.” He continued: “They’re trash and they need to get the hell out of America because they don’t share our Judeo-Christian values. And if you cheer on terrorists, then you’re a terrorist — you’re a terrorist supporter.” Rumble,:(style="background-color:#ffbb16ff"):}: *The Yossi Schmidt Show*, [1/16/24]}:
- In March 2024, Davis responded to a video posted on X of a Palestinian woman confronting Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) by writing, “We must revoke visas, denaturalize citizens, and deport Hamas supporters.” Davis also denied the existence of Palestinian national identity, a common and racist anti-Palestinian trope. Twitter/X, [3/3/24; The Palestine Chronicle, 3/29/23]
- Days later, Davis again reacted to a video of a pro-Palestinian demonstration by writing: “Revoke their visas. Denaturalize them. Send. Them. Home.” Twitter/X, [3/6/24]
Although Davis may be the loudest advocate for denaturalizing citizens, he’s far from alone in MAGA media.
- Davis’ Article III Project colleague Will Chamberlain also called for Mehdi Hasan to be denaturalized and deported. On March 15, Hasan wrote on X: “Abolish ICE.” Chamberlain responded: “Denaturalize and deport Mehdi Hasan.” In a follow-up post four days later, he wrote: “Update: I have created a March Madness bracket to celebrate Mehdi’s imminent deportation. Winner gets to personally escort Mehdi to his repatriation flight.” Chamberlain also threatened to deport Derek Guy, a popular commentator on men’s fashion, writing, “Don’t worry, we’ll get around to you as well. I hear tailoring is a thriving industry in Vietnam.” Twitter/X, [3/15/25, 3/19/25, 3/16/25]
- Steve Bannon’sWar Roomco-host Natalie Winters and guest Theo Wold, who served as deputy assistant for domestic policy in the first Trump administration, both agreed that increased denaturalizations were necessary if Trump regained the presidency. “There’s a lot of discussion of mass deportations and the feasibility of that — I think it’s fair to say we're at a point where you almost need denaturalizations too,” Winters said. “Is that something that is legally plausible? Is that something that could be pursued in a second Trump administration?” Wold clarified that “denaturalization works on a case-by-case or individual basis,” adding, “Our country has been replete with instances where people engage in falsifying relationships in order to obtain green cards or eventually get citizenship under false pretenses.” Real America’s Voice, *War Room*, [8/13/24]
- The next month, Winters escalated her rhetoric: “It’s not just mass deportations, it’s mass denaturalizations — I think that’s an important component, the other side of the coin, which is feasible and legally doable.” Her comments came during an interview with Davis, who nodded along and smiled. Real America’s Voice, *War Room*, [9/21/24]
- In the midst of a manufactured right-wing media scandal built on a mistranslation of a speech given by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk made what he called “the case to denaturalize and deport Ilhan Omar.” He added, “It’s important to ask the question: How do we prevent more Ilhan Omars from coming into the country, from representing us in our government and potentially being an insurgent?” He ended his presentation by calling Omar “a perfect embodiment of the ingratitude of now the Third World, foreigner, left-wing insurgency within the United States Congress,” concluding that “she speaks like a sleeper cell. … She should be denaturalized, and she should be deported back to where she came from.” Media Matters, [1/31/24; Salem Media Group, The Charlie Kirk Show, 1/31/24, 1/31/24]
MAGA media rely on bombast and maximalist threats to drive attention, but they aren’t the only actors in the right-wing media and policy ecosystem making demands for denaturalization. Their commentary is complimented by the work of conservative think tanks, which attempt to provide an air of sophistication to support the Trump administration’s policies.
Project 2025 offers anodyne-sounding policy to support discriminatory denaturalization efforts
One of the most influential forces behind the Trump 2024 campaign and now second term is Project 2025, a sprawling and unpopular effort organized by The Heritage Foundation to provide policy and staffing options in the event that the former president retook the White House. Over 100 conservative groups sat on Project 2025’s advisory board including nativist think tank the Center for Immigration Studies, which the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated as a hate group. (The Axios article that quoted Davis also quoted an attorney from CIS, highlighting the group’s central role in the right’s effort to restrict immigration and push for increased rates of denaturalization.)
- Project 2025’s almost 900-page policy book,Mandate for Leadership, calls for the “reimplementation of the USCIS [U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services] denaturalization unit—an effort to maintain integrity in the system by identifying and prosecuting criminal and civil denaturalization cases, in combination with the Department of Justice, for aliens who obtained citizenship through fraud or other illicit means.” Mandate’s denaturalization prescription was just one element of Project 2025’s radically anti-immigrant agenda. Project 2025, *Mandate for Leadership*, accessed [3/20/25; Media Matters, 3/20/24]
- In 2018, Project 2025 partner the Center for Immigration Studies published an article headlined: “Denaturalization and Gang Membership.” The piece discussed a bill proposed by then-Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), now Trump’s administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, that would use immigration law against “naturalized individuals who are, or were, gang members, associates, or affiliates, or who provide material support to such gangs,” to “have their citizenship revoked through denaturalization.” Although CIS’ argument may have seemed narrow, the Trump administration’s decision to extraordinarily render 238 Venezuelans to El Salvador on grounds of gang membership — despite contradictory U.S. intelligence assessments — shows how the authority endorsed by Zeldin and CIS can be used for far broader ends. Center for Immigration Studies, [3/7/18; CBS News, 3/20/25; The New York Times, 3/20/25]
- In 2021, CIS published an article headlined: “DHS to Let Immigration Cheats Keep U.S. Citizenship” which argued a proposed Biden-era policy “imposes such onerous restrictions that it has the practical effect of ending civil denaturalization.” The article concluded that “immigration cheats … are surely cheering on Secretary Mayorkas to sign the memo.” Despite the characterization by CIS, civil denaturalization is often a discriminatory tool wielded against vulnerable populations. A study from the Open Society Justice Initiative found that over the first two years of the first Trump administration, the Department of Justice had filed “nearly three times as many civil denaturalizations” as “the average … over the previous eight administrations.” An analysis of the study by Asian-Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus added “that 49% of all civil denaturalization cases filed targeted citizens whose country of origin is a ‘special interest country’–a label often used as a proxy for Muslim-majority countries or countries with significant Muslim populations–which includes India, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and Pakistan.” Center for Immigration Studies, [10/14/21; Open Society Justice Initiative, 2019; House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, 3/1/22]
Denaturalization as a tool for political oppression
The premise underlying the right’s anti-immigration arguments — sometimes implicit, sometimes explicit — is that certain categories of people don’t have fundamental civil rights and their entire life is contingent on the whims of an increasingly fascistic federal government. These efforts are about reproducing a social hierarchy where some individuals are protected less than others in the eyes of the law based on their religion, national origins, or political beliefs.
Now, as right-wing media and their allies in the Trump administration wage an all-out campaign against immigrants — both inside the United States and at border crossings, directed at those with and without legal authorization to live in the country — their attacks targeting naturalized citizens are poised to open the latest front in that war.
---
abandon std test LSAT thus cannot certify anything, gop shd not approve ANY dem judges; cannot do law based on equity
https://www.thefirsttv.com/watch/woke-u-the-next-generation-of-communists/
Length 41:31
The American communists have completely taken over the education system from the elementary level to the universities. This didn’t happen overnight. So how did it happen and why? Jesse Kelly is joined by James Lindsay to dissect the Marxification of Education
expertitis; emot learning linda darling hammond; castle? accreditation iowa quit; brainwash agenda 2030, political; CRT; tchrs lose lic 50K fine; dylan mulvaney dancing; commies driven into deepest blue hideyhole; dude has cavid trooper
while Auron MacIntyre provides his angle as a from a former public school teacher. Plus, Will Chamberlain gives a solution that many conservatives can easily follow. For more like this, check out Jesse Kelly’s book: The Anti-Communist Manifesto at JesseKellyBook.com
https://www.amazon.com/Anti-Communist-Manifesto-Jesse-Kelly/dp/1668010879
a rallying cry striking at the roots of today’s major issues, Jesse Kelly uses his trademark bombast, intelligence, and humor to take down the most dangerous philosophy in history and address its resurgence in America. The Anti-Communist Manifesto is for anyone who feels alienated by political and popular culture in the United States and recognizes the danger of communism as it threatens to rip apart America’s social fabric.
:{:{}:
Discover a fresh look at the daily assault on our freedoms from the insidious communist movement in this country. More than a political statement, this book is an insightful drive through history, philosophy, and current events with one of the most entertaining and fearless conservatives in America at the wheel.
From weaponizing race, sex, and gender to hijacking our schools, communism threatens to destroy our cherished American way of life. Featuring practical tools and tactics to not only identify communists but also defend the United States from this malicious enemy, The Anti-Communist Manifesto is an instructive guide for all patriots.}:
---
DUCK 10 25
Apr 23, 2025Human Events Daily host Jack Posobiec spoke with Article III Project Senior Counsel Will Chamberlain about the invasion at the southern border, the constitutional implications of recent court decisions, and what happens when the judiciary steps into the role of commander-in-chief, as was recently seen with the Trump administration and the ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
YouTube
##
Oct 6, 2025On this edition of Human Events Daily, Jack Posobiec welcomes Will Chamberlain (Article III Project) to unpack two urgent stories:Judicial Overreach: Rogue f...
Created by:Real America's Voice8 min
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Southern Poverty Law Center
Jack Posobiec's Rise Tied to White Supremacist Movement
Jack Posobiec, a correspondent for One America News Network (OANN) whose work has been embraced by President Trump, collaborated for years with white supremacists, neo-fascists and antisemites, a Hatewatch investigation has determined.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Jack_Posobiec
Jack Posobiec - Wikipedia
Jack Michael Posobiec III (/ pəˈsoʊbɪk / pə-SOH-bik; born December 14, 1984) [1][2] is an American alt-right [3] political activist, television correspondent, [4] conspiracy theorist, [5] and former United States Navy intelligence officer. [6] Posobiec is known for his pro- Donald Trump comments on Twitter, and has used white supremacist and antisemitic symbols and talking points ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
pointreport.org
Jack Posobiec and Will Chamberlain Discuss the SAVE Act and the ...
Jul 11, 2024The discussion between Jack Posobiec and Will Chamberlain highlights the importance of the SAVE Act in securing America's elections. By focusing on measures like voter ID requirements and the use of paper ballots, the Act seeks to bolster public confidence in the electoral process and ensure that democracy continues to function effectively.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Will Chamberlain to Jack Posobiec: "We Should All Be ... - Facebook
WATCH: Will Chamberlain joined Jack Posobiec on Human Events to discuss the latest in Alvin Bragg's bogus case against President Trump, how the prosecution is politicizing this case to hurt Trump, and the real motivation of this case.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
pod.wave.co
Podcast Summary - Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec
Oct 6, 2025Podcast Summary - Human Events Daily with Jack Posobiec Episode Title: Portland is in Open Rebellion Against the US Government, And NJ Governor's Race is in the Balance Air Date: October 6, 2025 Host: Jack Posobiec Notable Guests: Will Chamberlain (Article 3 Project), Scott Pressler (Early Vote Action)
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
One News Page
Will Chamberlain Joined Jack Posobiec For A - One News Page
Will Chamberlain Joined Jack Posobiec For A Legal Analysis Of President Trump's New York Trial.. News video on One News Page on Thursday, 30 May 2024
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
maxm.news
JACK POSOBIEC and WILL CHAMBERLAIN: The courts don't get to decide when ...
Apr 23, 2025Human Events Daily host Jack Posobiec spoke with Article III Project Senior Counsel Will Chamberlain about the invasion at the southern border, the constitutional implications of recent court decisions, and what happens when the judiciary steps into the role of commander-in-chief, as was recently seen with the Trump administration and the southern border.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Semafor
Ron DeSantis drops Will Chamberlain, a prominent conservative ... - Semafor
In March 2019, Chamberlain bought Human Events, a once-influential conservative magazine that had struggled for relevance online. As publisher and editor, he pushed it in a populist, pro-Trump direction, adding influencer Jack Posobiec as a podcaster and senior editor.
- 2
---
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Human_Events
Human Events - Wikipedia
Human Events was founded in 1944 by Felix Morley, William Henry Chamberlin, Frank Hanighen, and Henry Regnery. [3][4][5] Morley was previously editor of The Washington Post from 1933 to 1940. [6] Regnery formerly worked for the Resettlement Administration, a New Deal -era federal agency. [4] In its early years, Human Events was "a small-circulation weekly news sheet concentrating on foreign ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Reveal
Behind the Tweet That Became the Rallying Cry for the Insurrection
Throughout the 2020 election season, these accounts acted as misinformation tastemakers, taking tweets from more obscure accounts like Chamberlain's and then broadcasting them to their larger followings. While Posobiec happened to be the first to find Chamberlain's tweet, it was their collective action that made them potent.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Media Matters for America
The right-wing media campaign to denaturalize and deport American ...
Mar 26, 2025Right-wing media figures are escalating a long-running campaign to give the president vast powers to denaturalize and deport naturalized citizens, a generally rare occurrence that would represent ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Human Events
Thought Leader Jack Posobiec Joins Human Events Team as Senior Editor
Thought Leader Jack Posobiec Joins Human Events Team as Senior Editor Human Events is thrilled to announce the hiring of the extremely talented and influential Jack Posobiec as Senior Editor. Most recently, Posobiec served as a correspondent and host for One America News Network. He is also a veteran Navy intelligence officer who focused on China. Read more about this exciting announcement ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Human Events
Welcome | Human Events | humanevents.com
WILL CHAMBERLAIN: AI's national security facade threatens American intellectual property Defense-oriented AI applications typically require fine-tuning on specialized datasets—decades of government satellite imagery and weather data rather than episodes of Yellowstone....
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
The New Yorker
The Alt-Right Branding War Has Torn the Movement in Two
The white supremacists now own the "alt-right" label. Their right-wing opponents are aligning themselves against it, working to establish a parallel brand.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
X
https://twitter.com › JackPosobiec
Twitter. It's what's happening / Twitter
We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
X
https://twitter.com › willchamberlain
Twitter. It's what's happening / Twitter
We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
AllSides
https://www.allsides.com › news-source › human-events-media-bias
Human Events - AllSides
Human Events Bias Rated Lean Right in March 2022 Independent Review Human Events describes itself as "the flagship conservative outlet of populist and nationalist thought." An AllSides March 2022 Independent Review returned an initial bias rating of Lean Right for Human Events. The reviewer noted Human Events is transparent about its bias, and that well-known conservative Jack Posobiec was ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
PA Legal Ads
https://www.palegalads.org › journals › pdf › 108_CCLJ__6_10_.pdf
Bucks County Law Reporter - PA Legal Ads
Bucks County Law Reporter Reporting the Decisions of the Civil, Criminal and Orphans' Divisions of the Court of Common Pleas of the Seventh Judicial District of Bucks County. Oficially designated by the Rules of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pa., as the Legal Periodical for the Publication of Legal Notices.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
The Post Millennial
https://thepostmillennial.com › the-splc-smears-jack-posobiec-jews-respond
SPLC launches hit piece on Jack Posobiec ... - The Post Millennial
SPLC launches hit piece on Jack Posobiec, prominent Jews stand up for him The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has recently taken aim at Jack Posobiec of One America News (OANN), charging him with ties to "far-right extremists" and targeting "Jewish journalists with antisemitic hate."
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
YouTube
##
Suddenly Charlie Kirk's Friend Jack Posobiec Stole The Show In Trump's Meeting. - YouTube
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
New York Times
White House Condemns Tucker Carlson Interview With Holocaust ...
Sep 6, 2024Mr. Carlson's guest on "Tucker on X" made a variety of false claims about the Holocaust and World War II.
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
IMDb
https://www.imdb.com › name › nm4553198
Brett Cooper - IMDb
Brett Cooper. Actress: Heathers. Brett Cooper is an American Conservative Political Commentator and Actress. Brett hosts her own show called The Comments Section (2022) produced by The Daily Wire. Brett has also appeared in various acting roles in her career. Brett Cooper was born in Bellingham, Washington. Brett Cooper graduated from University of California Los Angeles majoring in English ...
- Only include results for this siteRedo search without this siteBlock this site from all resultsNEW
Share feedback about this site
Daily Beast
https://www.thedailybeast.com › maga-pundits-target-random-supreme-court-clerks-after-roe-leak
MAGA Pundits Target Random Supreme Court Clerks After Leak
That conspiracy theory was promoted by right-wing figure Jack Posobiec, a frequent Chamberlain collaborator.
https://twitter.com › willchamberlain
Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) / Twitter
Will Chamberlain Retweeted Pedro L. Gonzalez @emeriticus · Him refusing to go to New York would create an unprecedented crisis and challenge to the establishment But it would also deprive his campaign of a much needed and wanted public relations and fundraising opportunity Quote Tweet Steve Deace @SteveDeaceShow ·
CHAMBERLAIN: Regulate Big Tech To Protect Conservative Speech
In 2020, there are only two types of conservatives: those who are in favor of regulating Facebook and Twitter to protect conservative speech, and those who are wrong. Will Chamberlain is the publisher of Human Events and Senior Counsel at the Internet Accountability Project. Tags : big tech google twitter Scroll down for comments Will Chamberlain
https://theiap.org › media › press › twitter-shadow-bans-iaps-will-chamberlain
Twitter Shadow Bans IAP's Will Chamberlain - Internet Accountability ...
WASHINGTON - Twitter's campaign to silence conservatives continued today as it shadow banned Will Chamberlain, a Big Tech critic and Senior Counsel for the Internet Accountability Project. Despite Chamberlain's high profile, his name does not populate among the first results after searching Twitter.
https://nationalconservatism.org › national-conservatism-a-statement-of-principles
National Conservatism: A Statement of Principles
The following statement was drafted by Will Chamberlain, Christopher DeMuth, Rod Dreher, Yoram Hazony, Daniel McCarthy, Joshua Mitchell, N.S. Lyons, John O'Sullivan, and R.R. Reno on behalf of the Edmund Burke Foundation. The statement reflects a distinctly Western point of view.
https://twitter.com › willchamberlain › status › 1627320241964437511
Will Chamberlain on Twitter: ""Whoa whoa whoa, we conservatives are ...
Will Chamberlain. @willchamberlain ... Less whining and more doing is the strategy that conservatives should have employed from the beginning. It would have saved lots of time. Don't argue with liberal flakes. They love the attention and there's no upside for conservatives. 3
https://www.theamericanconservative.com › national-conservatism-a-statement-of-principles
National Conservatism: A Statement Of Principles
Conservative Partnership Institute Michael Brendan Dougherty National Review Will Chamberlain Internet Accountability Project Timon Cline Modern Reformation Edward Corrigan Conservative...
National Conservatism: A Statement of Principles
Editor's note: The following statement was drafted by Will Chamberlain, Christopher DeMuth, Rod Dreher, Yoram Hazony, Daniel McCarthy, Joshua Mitchell, N.S. Lyons, John O'Sullivan, and R.R. Reno on behalf of the Edmund Burke Foundation.The statement reflects a distinctly Western point of view. However, we look forward to future discourse and collaboration with movements akin to our own in ...
https://humanevents.com › author › will-chamberlain
Will Chamberlain | Human Events | humanevents.com
Articles by Will Chamberlain. Co Publisher and executive opinion editor. Share. OPINION. The Persecution of Jeffrey Clark. On Wednesday, December 1st, the January 6th Select Committee in the House of Representatives recommen... OPINION, SPECIAL COLLECTION. Make Cupertino Great Again. ...
https://www.theamericanconservative.com › author › wchamberlain
Will Chamberlain - The American Conservative
Will Chamberlain October 8, 2020 ... Become a member and enjoy the very best from The American Conservative in print & digital. Become a Member . The American Ideas Institute is a nonprofit, non ...
https://nationalconservatism.org › natcon-2-2021 › presenters › will-chamberlain
Will Chamberlain - National Conservatism Conference, 2021
Will Chamberlain - National Conservatism Conference, 2021 A CONFERENCE IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA OCTOBER 31 - NOVEMBER 2, 2021 Will Chamberlain Will Chamberlain is a lawyer and the publisher of Human Events. Will worked as an attorney at the Competitive Enterprise Institute's Center for Class Action Fairness in Washington, DC. Participants
---