Footnotes, 60.

Neither does Section 230 require any particular quality control over the challenges made. The only statutory requirement is that the challenge “specify distinctly the grounds of such challenge[.]” O.C.G.A. § 21-2-230(a). Thus, even though the Court finds that TTV failed to make reasonable quality control efforts in creating their voter files, they still, based on the trial evidence, provided the reason for the challenges submitted to counties. See, e.g., PX 71 (Mark Williams challenge in Gwinnett County indicating a question of voter eligibility “[b]ased on available data from the United States Postal Service and other commercially available sources . . . .”). At that point, the determination to pursue an eligibility inquiry (or conversely, to dismiss a challenge as being without probable cause) is left with the county Boards of Elections. See O.C.G.A. § 21-2-230(b) (2019). In making this conclusion, the Court, in no way, is condoning TTV’s actions in facilitating a mass number of seemingly frivolous challenges. The Court, however, cannot under the operative legal framework say that these actions were contrary to Georgia law (which is unchallenged by Plaintiffs).