Footnotes, 69.

The Court reiterates that it does not consider Jane Doe’s self-serving affidavit that was not subject to cross-examination to carry any relevant weight in its decision regarding individual voter intimidation. See Section (II)(B)(1)(a)(4) supra.Assuming that the Court were to consider the evidence relating to Plaintiff Jane Doe, however, the evidence is lacking for the Court to confidently conclude that Davis and Somerville or TTV successfully launched a challenge in Clarke County.

Nor does the Court find Fair Fight’s assertion that voters were calling the organization feeling that the challenges to their vote was intimidating to be sufficient evidence to carry Plaintiffs’ burden of showing Defendants’ intimidation in this case. See note 53 supra.