Open in TheBrain

Cunningham, R Duke

<p><b>===</b>

<b>thomas frank: duke put price menu for bribes wwww</b></p>

<p>

&nbsp;AG Lam fired for going after him aggressively

&nbsp;===</p><p><strong>February 17, 2005:</strong> Mistrial declared in first

Medicare fraud trial against San Diego's Alvarado Hospital, after jury

fails to reach a verdict. U.S. Attorney Carol Lam suggests a retrial is

likely.

<strong>March 2, 2005:</strong> Attorney

General Alberto Gonzales' Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson emails White House

Counsel Harriet Miers, recommending removal of Carol Lam and several

others as "weak U.S. Attorneys who have been ineffectual managers and

prosecutors, chafed against Administration initiatives, etc."

<strong>June 12, 2005:</strong> Front-page story in <em>The San Diego Union Tribune</em>

reveals that a defense contractor paid an inflated price for Rep. Duke

Cunningham's San Diego-area house. Within days, U.S. Attorney Carol Lam

launches an investigation.

<strong>November 28, 2005:</strong> Cunningham pleads guilty to accepting $2.4 million in bribes from defense contractors. He resigns his congressional seat.

<strong>March 3, 2006:</strong> Cunningham is sentenced to eight years, four months in prison.

<strong>April 4, 2006:</strong>

Mistrial declared in second Medicare fraud trial against San Diego's

Alvarado Hospital, after jury fails to reach a verdict. U.S. Attorney

Carol Lam had personally tried the case.

<strong>Early May, 2006:</strong> U.S. Department of Health and Human Services threatens to cut Medicare and Medicaid funds to San Diego's Alvarado Hospital.

<strong>May 11, 2006:</strong> Front-page story in the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>

reports that the U.S. Attorney's office in Los Angeles is probing ties

between House Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis (R-CA) and

lobbyist Bill Lowery, whose clients include alleged Cunningham

co-conspirator Brent Wilkes.

<strong>May 11, 2006:</strong>

General Alberto Gonzales' Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson e-mails a deputy

in the White House Counsel's office asking to discuss, "The real problem

we have right now with Carol Lam that leads me to conclude that we

should have someone ready to be nominated on 11/18, the day her 4-year

term expires."
</p> <strong>May 12, 2006:</strong> FBI

agents search the home and office of former CIA Executive Director Kyle

Foggo, best friend of alleged Cunningham co-conspirator Brent Wilkes. <p>==
</p><p>this town: flipped off constits, homos, dem leaders " lined up and shot" 177

<b>===</b>

<b>Randall Harold "Duke" Cunningham</b> is a former <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Republican_Party" title="Republican Party" class="mw-redirect">Republican</a> member of the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=United_States_House_of_Representatives" title="United States House of Representatives" class="mw-redirect">United States House of Representatives</a>. He represented <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=California_District_50&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="California District 50 (page does not exist)">California's 50th Congressional District</a> from 1991 to 2005.

On November 28, 2005 Cunningham pleaded guilty to graft and resigned from Congress. He admitted taking "$2.4 million in bribes mostly from <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Defense_contractors" title="Defense contractors">defense contractors</a> in exchange for government business and other favors."<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051129/ap_on_go_co/congressman_s_house;ylt=AlcLvRLhreOP3lh184f6A8as0NUE;ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-" class="external autonumber" title="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051129/ap_on_go_co/congressman_s_house;ylt=AlcLvRLhreOP3lh184f6A8as0NUE;ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-" rel="nofollow">[1]</a></p>

<p>

Ultimately he pleaded guilty to federal charges of <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Conspiracy_%28crime%29&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Conspiracy (crime) (page does not exist)">conspiracy</a> to commit bribery, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mail_fraud&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Mail fraud (page does not exist)">mail fraud</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Wire_fraud&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Wire fraud (page does not exist)">wire fraud</a>, and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tax_evasion&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Tax evasion (page does not exist)">tax evasion</a>. On March 3, 2006, Cunningham was sentenced to eight years and four months in prison and was ordered to pay $1.8 million in restitution.</p>

<p>

A special election to fill the vacancy left by Cunningham was held on April 11, 2006, but no single candidate won a simple majority. A new special election was held on June 6, 2006, and Republican <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Brian_Bilbray" title="Brian Bilbray">Brian Bilbray</a> defeated Democrat <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Francine_Busby&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Francine Busby (page does not exist)">Francine Busby</a> 49% to 45%. <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20060607-0052-7n7duke.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20060607-0052-7n7duke.html" rel="nofollow">[2]</a> Bilbray will serve the rest of Cunningham's term. The two will face off again in the general election to be held on November 7, 2006.

He is married to <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Nancy_Cunningham" title="Nancy Cunningham" class="mw-redirect">Nancy Cunningham</a>.</p>

<table id="toc" class="toc" summary="Contents"><tbody><tr><td>

<div id="toctitle">

<h2>Contents</h2>

<span class="toctoggle">[<a href="javascript:toggleToc()" class="internal" id="togglelink">hide</a>]</span></div>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Bio"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">Bio</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Background"><span class="tocnumber">1.1</span> <span class="toctext">Background</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Congressional_career"><span class="tocnumber">1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Congressional career</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Iraq_War"><span class="tocnumber">1.2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Iraq War</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Flag_burning_amendment"><span class="tocnumber">1.2.2</span> <span class="toctext">Flag burning amendment</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-4"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#109th_Congress.2C_House_of_Representatives"><span class="tocnumber">1.2.2.1</span> <span class="toctext">109th Congress, House of Representatives</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Meet_the_Cash_Constituents"><span class="tocnumber">2</span> <span class="toctext">Meet the Cash Constituents</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Campaign_Contributions_from_Defense_Industry"><span class="tocnumber">2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Campaign Contributions from Defense Industry</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Controversy"><span class="tocnumber">3</span> <span class="toctext">Controversy</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Del_Mar_Real_Estate.22Deal.22"><span class="tocnumber">3.1</span> <span class="toctext">Del Mar Real Estate "Deal"</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Realtor_was_campaign_contributor"><span class="tocnumber">3.1.1</span> <span class="toctext">Realtor was campaign contributor</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Subsequent_Rancho_Santa_Fe_Real_Estate.22Deal.22"><span class="tocnumber">3.1.2</span> <span class="toctext">Subsequent Rancho Santa Fe Real Estate "Deal"</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Tom_DeLay_Defended_Cunningham"><span class="tocnumber">3.1.3</span> <span class="toctext">Tom DeLay Defended Cunningham</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Boat_purchases_and_sale"><span class="tocnumber">3.2</span> <span class="toctext">Boat purchases and sale</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Kelly_C"><span class="tocnumber">3.2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Kelly C</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Boat.233_and_Brent_Wilkes"><span class="tocnumber">3.2.2</span> <span class="toctext">Boat #3 and Brent Wilkes</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Wilkes.2FADCS_Investigation"><span class="tocnumber">3.3</span> <span class="toctext">Wilkes/ADCS Investigation</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Wilkes_trial"><span class="tocnumber">3.3.1</span> <span class="toctext">Wilkes trial</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-4"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Wilkes_convicted"><span class="tocnumber">3.3.1.1</span> <span class="toctext">Wilkes convicted</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#War_Profiteering.3F"><span class="tocnumber">3.4</span> <span class="toctext">War Profiteering?</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Money_Laundering.3F"><span class="tocnumber">3.5</span> <span class="toctext">Money Laundering?</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Leaves.2432.2C000_in_driveway"><span class="tocnumber">3.6</span> <span class="toctext">Leaves $32,000 in driveway</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Post-conviction"><span class="tocnumber">3.7</span> <span class="toctext">Post-conviction</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Honored_in_Washington"><span class="tocnumber">3.8</span> <span class="toctext">Honored in Washington</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Use_of_classified_bills_for_personal_gain"><span class="tocnumber">3.9</span> <span class="toctext">Use of classified bills for personal gain</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Charges_for_Wilkes_and_Foggo"><span class="tocnumber">3.10</span> <span class="toctext">Charges for Wilkes and Foggo</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Wilkes.27_lawyers_subpoena_members_of_Congress"><span class="tocnumber">3.11</span> <span class="toctext">Wilkes' lawyers subpoena members of Congress</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#House_tries_to_quash_Wilkes_subpoenas"><span class="tocnumber">3.11.1</span> <span class="toctext">House tries to quash Wilkes subpoenas</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Wilkes_subpoena_push_expanded"><span class="tocnumber">3.11.2</span> <span class="toctext">Wilkes subpoena push expanded</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Wilkes.27_defense_attempts_to_exclude_evidence"><span class="tocnumber">3.11.3</span> <span class="toctext">Wilkes' defense attempts to exclude evidence</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-3"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Subpoenas_Withdrawn"><span class="tocnumber">3.11.4</span> <span class="toctext">Subpoenas Withdrawn</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Committees_and_Affiliations"><span class="tocnumber">4</span> <span class="toctext">Committees and Affiliations</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Committees_in_the_109th_Congress.282005-2006.29"><span class="tocnumber">4.1</span> <span class="toctext">Committees in the 109th Congress (2005-2006)</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#More_Background_Data"><span class="tocnumber">5</span> <span class="toctext">More Background Data</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-1"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Resources_and_Articles"><span class="tocnumber">6</span> <span class="toctext">Resources and Articles</span></a>

<ul>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#Resources"><span class="tocnumber">6.1</span> <span class="toctext">Resources</span></a></li>

<li class="toclevel-2"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#SourceWatch_Resources"><span class="tocnumber">6.2</span> <span class="toctext">SourceWatch Resources</span></a></li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

</td></tr></tbody></table>

<p><a name="Bio" id="Bio">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h2><span class="mw-headline">Bio</span></h2>

<p><a name="Background" id="Background">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Background</span></h3>

<p>"Randy "Duke" Cunningham was born December 8, 1941, in Los Angeles, California. After earning his bachelors degree in 1964 and his masters in education in 1965 from the University of Missouri, Cunningham began his career as an educator and a coach at Hinsdale (Ill.) High School. He later expanded his education experience as the Dean of the School of Aviation at National University in San Diego."<a href="http://cunningham.house.gov/Biography/" class="external autonumber" title="http://cunningham.house.gov/Biography/" rel="nofollow">[3]</a>

Cunningham served in the U.S. Navy 1966 until his retirement in 1987. He "became one of the most highly decorated pilots in the Vietnam War. As the first fighter ace of the war, Cunningham was nominated for the Medal of Honor, received the Navy Cross, two Silver Stars, fifteen Air Medals, the Purple Heart, and several other decorations."<a href="http://cunningham.house.gov/Biography/" class="external autonumber" title="http://cunningham.house.gov/Biography/" rel="nofollow">[4]</a> After returning from Vietnam in 1972, he became an instructor at the Navy's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOPGUN" class="extiw" title="w:TOPGUN">TOPGUN</a> school for fighter pilots at Miramar Naval Air Station in San Diego.</p>

<p>

In 1985 Cunningham earned a Master of Business Administration from National University, a San Diego night school. He retired from the Navy in 1987 as a commander, settling in Del Mar, a suburb of San Diego. He became nationally known as a CNN commentator on naval aircraft in the run-up to the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Persian_Gulf_War&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Persian Gulf War (page does not exist)">Persian Gulf War</a>.

<a name="Congressional_career" id="Congressional_career">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Congressional career</span></h3>

<p>Cunningham's visibility as a CNN commentator led several Republican leaders to approach him about running in what was then the 44th District. The district had been held for eight years by <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=United_States_Democratic_Party" title="United States Democratic Party">Democrat</a> <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jim_Bates&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Jim Bates (page does not exist)">Jim Bates</a>, and was considered the most Democratic district in the San Diego area. However, Bates was bogged down in a <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Scandal&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Scandal (page does not exist)">scandal</a> involving charges of <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sexual_harassment&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Sexual harassment (page does not exist)">sexual harassment</a>. Cunningham won the Republican nomination in 1990 and hammered Bates about the scandal, promising to be "a congressman we can be proud of." He won by just one percentage point.

After the 1990 census, redistricting renumbered the 44th District as the 51st and created the 50th District, splitting off a significant portion of San Diego County. Even though the 51st District (renumbered as the 50th after the 2000 census) is only the third most Republican-leaning district in the county, Cunningham was reelected six times with no less than 55 percent of the vote.

<a name="Iraq_War" id="Iraq_War">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Iraq War</span></h4>

<p>Cunningham voted for the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002" title="Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002">Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002</a> that started the Iraq War.<sup id="cite_ref-0" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-0" title="">[1]</a></sup></p>

<div style=" margin: 0.5em 0.75em 0.5em 0.75em; border-collapse: collapse; background: #dce8f8; border: 1px solid #5c79b5; padding: .25em .25em 0.25em .25em;"><span>For more information see the chart of <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=U.S._House_of_Representatives_votes_on_the_Iraq_War" title="U.S. House of Representatives votes on the Iraq War">U.S. House of Representatives votes on the Iraq War</a>.</span></div>

<p>

&nbsp;

<a name="Flag_burning_amendment" id="Flag_burning_amendment">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Flag_burning_amendment" title="Flag burning amendment">Flag burning amendment</a></span></h4>

<p>The "<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Flag_burning_amendment" title="Flag burning amendment">flag burning amendment</a>", also known as the <b>flag desecration amendment</b>, was sponsored by Rep. Cunningham in the 109th Congress. The Amendment would alter the First Amendment of the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=United_States_Constitution" title="United States Constitution">United States Constitution</a> to allow Congress to ban the burning or desecration of American flags.</p>

<dl>

<dd>The most recent proposed flag burning constitutional amendments have used the following text:</dd>

<dd>"The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States."</dd>

</dl>

<p><a name="109th_Congress.2C_House_of_Representatives" id="109th_Congress.2C_House_of_Representatives">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h5><span class="mw-headline">109th Congress, House of Representatives</span></h5>

<p>The flag burning amendment passed the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=U.S.House_of_Representatives" title="U.S. House of Representatives" class="mw-redirect">U.S. House of Representatives</a> on June 22, 2005. The vote was 286-130 in favor, with Democrats voting against by 77-117 and Republicans voting in favor by 209-12.<sup id="cite_ref-1" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-1" title="">[2]</a></sup> The amendment was sponsored by Rep. Cunningham (who has since been <strong class="selflink">convicted on corruption charges</strong>) and was cosponsored by 196 other representatives.<sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-2" title="">[3]</a></sup> (<a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/house/1/votes/296/" class="external text" title="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/109/house/1/votes/296/" rel="nofollow"><i>Washington Post</i> vote analysis.</a>)/senate/2/votes/189/ <i>Washington Post</i> vote analysis.])</p>

<dl>

<dd><i>Main article: <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Flag_burning_amendment" title="Flag burning amendment">flag burning amendment</a></i></dd>

</dl>

<p><a name="Meet_the_Cash_Constituents" id="Meet_the_Cash_Constituents">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h2><span class="mw-headline">Meet the Cash Constituents</span></h2>

<table class="prettytable"><tbody><tr><th colspan="3">Links to more campaign contribution information for Randy "Duke" Cunningham

from the Center for Responsive Politics' <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org" rel="nofollow">OpenSecrets.org</a> site.</th></tr><tr><td>Fundraising profile:</td><td><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00007050" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00007050" rel="nofollow">2006 election cycle</a></td><td><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allsummary.asp?cid=N00007050" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allsummary.asp?cid=N00007050" rel="nofollow">Career totals</a></td></tr><tr><td>Top contributors by organization/corporation:</td><td><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00007050" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00007050" rel="nofollow">2006 election cycle</a></td><td><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allcontrib.asp?cid=N00007050" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allcontrib.asp?cid=N00007050" rel="nofollow">Career totals</a></td></tr><tr><td>Top contributors by industry:</td><td><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/indus.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00007050" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/indus.asp?cycle=2006&cid=N00007050" rel="nofollow">2006 election cycle</a></td><td><a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allindus.asp?cid=N00007050" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/allindus.asp?cid=N00007050" rel="nofollow">Career totals</a></td></tr></tbody></table>

<p><a name="Campaign_Contributions_from_Defense_Industry" id="Campaign_Contributions_from_Defense_Industry">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Campaign Contributions from Defense Industry</span></h3>

<p>At $14,500, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peregrine_Semiconductor_Corporation" title="Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation">Peregrine Semiconductor Corporation</a> (not the same as Peregrine Systems, Inc) was Cunningham's third highest campaign <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00007050&cycle=2004" class="external text" title="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.asp?CID=N00007050&cycle=2004" rel="nofollow">contributor</a> in the 2003-2004 election cycle, only surpassed by <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Titan_Corporation" title="Titan Corporation">Titan Corporation</a> and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Lockheed_Martin" title="Lockheed Martin">Lockheed Martin</a>, which were tied in first place at $15,000 each. Coming in at #4 was Wade's MZM Inc., tied with <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cubic_Corporation" title="Cubic Corporation">Cubic Corporation</a> at $12,000.

<a name="Controversy" id="Controversy">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h2><span class="mw-headline">Controversy</span></h2>

<p><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Category:Members_of_Congress_under_investigation" title="Category:Members of Congress under investigation">Members of Congress under investigation</a>

<a name="Del_Mar_Real_Estate.22Deal.22" id="Del_Mar_Real_Estate.22Deal.22">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Del Mar Real Estate "Deal"</span></h3>

<p>On July 6, 2005, according to the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Department_of_Justice" title="Department of Justice" class="mw-redirect">Department of Justice</a>, it was announced that the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=FBI" title="FBI" class="mw-redirect">FBI</a> had "opened an inquiry" into Cunningham's sale of his Del Mar, CA house to a defense contractor. <a href="http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/109695.shtml" class="external autonumber" title="http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/109695.shtml" rel="nofollow">[5]</a> Prosecutors said in the documents [filed August 25, 2005,] that "Cunningham sold the house in return for his influence in Congress, where he serves on the House subcommittee that oversees <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pentagon" title="Pentagon">Pentagon</a> spending." <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050826-9999-1n26duke.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050826-9999-1n26duke.html" rel="nofollow">[6]</a>

"Cunningham demanded and received this money in return for being influenced in the performance of his official acts as a public official," prosecutor Jason Forge said in the papers." <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050825-1640-bn24duke.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050825-1640-bn24duke.html" rel="nofollow">[7]</a>

In November 2003, Cunningham had sold his home to <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mitchell_J._Wade" title="Mitchell J. Wade" class="mw-redirect">Mitchell J. Wade</a>, "a campaign contributor and close friend." Reportely, "Wade paid $1.7 million for the 3,826-square-foot house... He put it back on the market soon after and eventually took a $700,000 loss when he resold it in October 2004. During that span, home prices in San Diego County rose an average of nearly 25 percent. <a href="http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/109588.shtml" class="external autonumber" title="http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/109588.shtml" rel="nofollow">[8]</a>

"Meanwhile, Wade's little-known company, Washington, D.C.-based <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=MZM_Inc." title="MZM Inc.">MZM Inc.</a>, was increasing its federal contracting business. In 2004, MZM tripled its revenue and nearly quadrupled its staff, according to the company's Web site." <a href="http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/109588.shtml" class="external autonumber" title="http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2005/07/109588.shtml" rel="nofollow">[9]</a> With the help of government contracts secured by Cunningham, Wade's Washington-based firm generated $150 million in revenue from 2002-2006. <a href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" rel="nofollow">[10]</a>

In return for Cunningham's help, Wade also provided many lavish gifts to the congressman. These included a Victorian china hutch, silver candlesticks, leaded glass doors, Persian and Indian rugs, a sleigh bed, Restoration and Louis Philippe commodes, a four-wheel-drive Chevy Suburban, a secondhand Rolls Royce, and use of Wade's 42-foot yacht, the Duke-Stir (where Cunningham briefly lived rent-free). <a href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" rel="nofollow">[11]</a>

According to Cunningham's estranged wife, Nancy, Wade paid the couple's daughter, Carrie Cunningham, $4,000 for two weeks' work and gave April Cunningham, their other daughter, $2,500 as a wedding present. <a href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" rel="nofollow">[12]</a>

<a name="Realtor_was_campaign_contributor" id="Realtor_was_campaign_contributor">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Realtor was campaign contributor</span></h4>

<p>The realtor who arranged the deal between Cunningham and Mitchell Wade was <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Elizabeth_Todd&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Elizabeth Todd (page does not exist)">Elizabeth Todd</a>, who chose the sale price. Cunningham "claimed that Wade had 'received comparables from an independent source establishing the value of the home'." However, "other news accounts seem to suggest that the 'independent source' was Elizabeth Todd, who happens to be a major campaign contributor to Cunningham. ... In the 2001-2 cycle, Elizabeth Todd and her husband donated $3000 to Cunningham's campaign."<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_06_12.php#005821" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_06_12.php#005821" rel="nofollow">[13]</a>

"From July 1997 to May of 2004, the Todd family <a href="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/com_ind/C00242446/P-T/" class="external text" title="http://query.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/com_ind/C00242446/P-T/" rel="nofollow">gave $11,500</a> in campaign contributions to the Duke's campaigns. ... 'family' refers to "Elizabeth, her husband <a href="http://resource.realtor.com/display/default.asp?sect=17&id=18157240&rt=104420" class="external text" title="http://resource.realtor.com/display/default.asp?sect=17&id=18157240&rt=104420" rel="nofollow">Whitney Todd</a> and someone named 'Richard B. Todd' who we'll go out on a limb and say is related to them since he lists the same PO Box and is a 'consultant' for the Todds' company" <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_06_12.php#005828" class="external text" title="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_06_12.php#005828" rel="nofollow">found</a>

<a name="Subsequent_Rancho_Santa_Fe_Real_Estate.22Deal.22" id="Subsequent_Rancho_Santa_Fe_Real_Estate.22Deal.22">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Subsequent Rancho Santa Fe Real Estate "Deal"</span></h4>

<p>In December 2003 Duke paid <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Douglas_Powanda" title="Douglas Powanda">Douglas Powanda</a>, former Vice President in charge of sales at <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peregrine_Systems,_Inc." title="Peregrine Systems, Inc.">Peregrine Systems, Inc.</a>, $2.55 million for a new house in <a href="http://www.dukecunningham.org/images/cunningham-rancho-santa-fe-home-5.jpg" class="external text" title="http://www.dukecunningham.org/images/cunningham-rancho-santa-fe-home-5.jpg" rel="nofollow">Rancho Santa Fe</a> (<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=7094+Via+Del+Charro,+Rancho+Santa+Fe,+CA&spn=0.015321,0.017123&t=k&hl=en" class="external text" title="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=7094+Via+Del+Charro,+Rancho+Santa+Fe,+CA&spn=0.015321,0.017123&t=k&hl=en" rel="nofollow">7094 Via Del Charro</a>) The Cunninghams paid cash for the 7,628 square foot house. <a href="http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/06/21/news/top_stories/61005205223.txt" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/06/21/news/top_stories/61005205223.txt" rel="nofollow">[14]</a><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_06_19.php#005874" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/week_2005_06_19.php#005874" rel="nofollow">[15]</a></p>

<p>

Eight former Peregrine Systems executives, including Powanda, were facing criminal charges October 6, 2004, "involving what U.S. prosecutors ... called a multi-billion dollar securities fraud. ... Six of the same defendants also face charges brought by the U.S. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Securities_and_Exchange_Commission" title="Securities and Exchange Commission">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> in a civil lawsuit accusing the former executives of attempting to cover up a massive accounting fraud at the company." <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20041006-1349-tech-peregrine-sec.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20041006-1349-tech-peregrine-sec.html" rel="nofollow">[16]</a>

<i>NOTE: Some news reports have confused Peregrine Systems with Peregrine Semiconductor, but they are completely separate companies.</i>

<a name="Tom_DeLay_Defended_Cunningham" id="Tom_DeLay_Defended_Cunningham">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Tom DeLay Defended Cunningham</span></h4>

<p>On June 14, 2005, then-House Majority Leader <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Thomas_D._DeLay" title="Thomas D. DeLay">Tom DeLay</a> defended Cunningham after calls from congressional <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Democratic_Party" title="Democratic Party" class="mw-redirect">Democrats</a> to investigate the Republican appropriator for selling his San Diego (Del Mar) home to a defense contractor whose firm had received $65 million in federal funds in 2004.

"Duke Cunningham is a hero," DeLay said, "He is an honorable man of high integrity" Patrick O'Connor reported in <i>The Hill</i> in June 2005.<a href="http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/061505/delay.html" class="external text" title="http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/061505/delay.html" rel="nofollow">reported</a>

Between January 1, 2004, and March 31, 2005, Cunningham voted with Tom DeLay 96% of the time. <a href="http://houseofscandal.org/members/Randy%20DukeCunninghamCA-50.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://houseofscandal.org/members/Randy%20DukeCunninghamCA-50.html" rel="nofollow">[17]</a>

<a name="Boat_purchases_and_sale" id="Boat_purchases_and_sale">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Boat purchases and sale</span></h3>

<p><a name="Kelly_C" id="Kelly_C">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Kelly C</span></h4>

<p>"Cunningham bought the 65-foot flat-bottom riverboat <i>Kelly C</i> from then-Rep. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sonny_Callahan" title="Sonny Callahan" class="mw-redirect">Sonny Callahan</a>, R-Ala., for $200,000 in 1997." <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20050705-9999-1n5duke.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20050705-9999-1n5duke.html" rel="nofollow">[18]</a>

"Five years after buying the <i>Kelly C</i> for $200,000, Cunningham sold it in 2003 to New York developer <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Thomas_Kontogiannis&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Thomas Kontogiannis (page does not exist)">Thomas Kontogiannis</a> for $600,000, even though boats typically decrease in value. Kontogiannis, who had been convicted in a bid-rigging scheme involving the New York public schools, had sought Cunningham's help in exploring the possibility of a pardon from President <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George_W._Bush" title="George W. Bush" class="mw-redirect">Bush</a> and the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Justice_Department" title="Justice Department" class="mw-redirect">Justice Department</a>. Cunningham put Kontogiannis in touch with a Washington law firm and recommended 'two or three' lawyers to talk to, said the Long Island businessman," Dean Calbreath and Jerry Kammer <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050910-9999-7m10boat.html" class="external text" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050910-9999-7m10boat.html" rel="nofollow">wrote</a> September 10, 2005, for Copley News Service.</p>

<p>

Kontogiannis "further acknowledged that a mortgage company owned by his daughter and nephew provided Cunningham with two loans totaling $1.1 million so the congressman could buy his home in Rancho Santa Fe. The businessman said he eventually paid off one of those loans in partial payment for the yacht." <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20050705-9999-1n5duke.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20050705-9999-1n5duke.html" rel="nofollow">[19]</a>

<a name="Boat.233_and_Brent_Wilkes" id="Boat.233_and_Brent_Wilkes">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Boat #3 and Brent Wilkes</span></h4>

<p>"First there was the <i>Kelly C</i>. Then there was the <i>Duke Stir</i>. And now a third boat has emerged in the ongoing saga of favors offered to Rep. Randy 'Duke' Cunningham by business executives whose companies won millions of dollars in government contracts with Cunningham's support," Calbreath and Kammer <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050910-9999-7m10boat.html" class="external text" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050910-9999-7m10boat.html" rel="nofollow">reported</a> for the Copley News Service on September 10, 2005.

"<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Brent_Wilkes" title="Brent Wilkes" class="mw-redirect">Brent Wilkes</a>, the Poway defense contractor whose home and offices were raided last month by federal agents, allowed Cunningham use of a 14.5-foot, 170-horsepower fiberglass boat several years ago when it was docked near Cunningham's yacht in Washington, D.C.," they wrote.

"Although the boat – which has since been sold – was typically kept on a trailer at the Washington Harbor, it was sometimes moored behind Cunningham's 65-foot <i>Kelly C</i> at the Capital Yacht Club. At the time, the <i>Kelly C</i> was Cunningham's home in the nation's capital," Calbreath and Kammer wrote.

"Like Wade, Wilkes received Cunningham's support in his efforts to secure federal contracts for ADCS, which converts paper documents into a digital format. Since 1997, Wilkes and other ADCS insiders have given nearly $70,000 to Cunningham and his political action committee," Calbreath and Kammer said. "During that period, Wilkes' company gained at least $80 million in contracts from the Pentagon."

<a name="Wilkes.2FADCS_Investigation" id="Wilkes.2FADCS_Investigation">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Wilkes/ADCS Investigation</span></h3>

<p>On August 18, 2005, San Diego area newspapers "reported the search by FBI, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Internal_Revenue_Service" title="Internal Revenue Service">Internal Revenue Service</a> and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Defense_Department" title="Defense Department" class="mw-redirect">Defense Department</a> agents at the offices of <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ADCS,_Inc." title="ADCS, Inc.">ADCS, Inc.</a> and the home of its chief executive, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Brent_Wilkes" title="Brent Wilkes" class="mw-redirect">Brent Wilkes</a>, a major contributor to Republican politicians." Wilkes is a former business associate of <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mitchell_Wade" title="Mitchell Wade">Mitchell Wade</a>, the head of MZM Inc., "under investigation by a San Diego grand jury." <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/17/AR2005081702005.html?nav=rss_business" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/17/AR2005081702005.html?nav=rss_business" rel="nofollow">[20]</a></p>

<dl>

<dd>"According to federal databases, ADCS has received $80 million in Defense Department contracts since 1999, mostly for converting documents into digital form using proprietary software. Wade is a former consultant to ADCS who met Cunningham through his work for the San Diego company, according to sources familiar with the relationship.</dd>

</dl>

<dl>

<dd>"The Pentagon's inspector general previously investigated several ADCS contracts because of complaints 'alleging favoritism and inappropriate actions,' and he concluded in 1999 that they were awarded as the result of irregular procedures. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Louis_A._Kratz&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Louis A. Kratz (page does not exist)">Louis A. Kratz</a>, an assistant deputy undersecretary of defense, said in a recent interview that he had requested the IG probe. Both Cunningham and Wilkes had called him seeking the release of funds for ADCS, he said.</dd>

</dl>

<dl>

<dd>"Kratz said he had never before experienced anything close to their 'meddling' and 'arrogance.' Wilkes 'implied that it was his money,' Kratz said, though the funding was earmarked for a program, not a company. The document conversion program was later killed, Kratz said."</dd>

</dl>

<p><a name="Wilkes_trial" id="Wilkes_trial">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Wilkes trial</span></h4>

<p>A contracting official with the Department of Defense, Paul Behrens, testified on October 10, 2007 at Wilkes’ trial that he received three phone calls from Cunningham in 1998 and felt he was being pressured on behalf of Wilkes. Behrens was a contracting technical representative on a project converting government projects relating to the Panama Canal from paper to digital form, with Wilke’s firm ADCS Inc. as a subcontractor.<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-3" title="">[4]</a></sup>

Behrens said he felt much of the work by ACDS was shoddy or could not be verified as having been done. He said he had “adversarial” conversations with Wilkes over the work. Seconds after Behrens told Wilkes he could not approve invoices submitted for work that could not be verified, Wilkes’ Watergate Hotel suite phone rang, Behrens testified. It was Cunningham, who told him that it was “crucial for the national security” that progress on the Panama project go forward, Behrens said. Behrens said he received two more phone calls from Cunningham later. <sup id="cite_ref-4" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-4" title="">[5]</a></sup>

The jury was also shown a memo from the time of the project with a bill for $135,000 where Behrens wrote that “the government received nothing of value” for the work. Behrens said that each time he repeatedly asked Wilkes for documentation that the work had been done and inventories on purchases the government was being billed for, Wilkes insisted his company be paid according to the contract payment schedule. <sup id="cite_ref-5" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-5" title="">[6]</a></sup>

The defense argued that Wilkes was demanding payment from the government because the main contractor was not paying ACDS for the work the company had done. Geragos said Wilkes had borrowed money to do the project but was then in a “tight spot”. Geragos had Behrens acknowledge Wilkes issued a stop-work order on the project until he was paid for the work he had done. <sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-6" title="">[7]</a></sup>

<a name="Wilkes_convicted" id="Wilkes_convicted">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h5><span class="mw-headline">Wilkes convicted</span></h5>

<p>Wilkes was convicted on November 5, 2007 on all 13 counts of conspiracy, bribery, money laundering, and wire fraud. The individual counts carry maximum sentences ranging from 5 to 20 years. His attorney, Geragos, said "I don’t believe this case was proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Obviously I’m very disappointed. I think he shares the confidence that we’ll get it reversed."<sup id="cite_ref-7" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-7" title="">[8]</a></sup>

U.S. attorney in San Diego, Karen Hewitt, said "This case demonstrates our firm commitment that those who bribe federal officials shall face criminal consequences for their wrongdoing." The jury forewoman said jurors were disappointed not to hear from Cunningham. "It would have been nice to hear his perspective on what happened, seeing that he’s at the center of all this," she said. The jury spent under four full days deliberating before returning the verdict.<sup id="cite_ref-8" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-8" title="">[9]</a></sup>

Geragos told the judge he intended to appeal on grounds that grand jury secrets were deliberately and illegally disclosed to the news media before Wilkes was indicted in February, 2007. He said he intended to subpoena at least two reporters to determine if the leaks came from the prosecution team. U.S. District Judge Larry Burns told Geragos his prospects for getting the verdict dismissed on only that basis were small.<sup id="cite_ref-9" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-9" title="">[10]</a></sup>

Attorneys representing Wilkes in a separate federal case said they may ask for him to remain free after sentencing in order to prepare for trial. In the second case, Wilkes was charged with offering former CIA executive director Kyle “Dusty” Foggo, a childhood friend, a job and treating him to golf vacations in return for help getting contracts. Both men had pleaded not guilty to 30 counts of fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering.<sup id="cite_ref-10" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-10" title="">[11]</a></sup>

<a name="War_Profiteering.3F" id="War_Profiteering.3F">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=War_profiteering" title="War profiteering">War Profiteering</a>?</span></h3>

<p>Josh Marshall of <i>The Hill</i> wrote that all this "should prompt us to ask the question: If Mitchell Wade and Co. had to lavish so much money on Duke Cunningham to get sufficient help to land all these contracts, were MZM's services really the best on offer?" <a href="http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/JoshMarshall/062305.html" class="external text" title="http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Comment/JoshMarshall/062305.html" rel="nofollow">wrote</a>.

"And if they were, why was MZM having such a tough time landing contracts — as reported in the <i>Union-Tribune</i> and the <i>North-County Times</i> — before the company's CEO got so intimately involved in upgrading Cunningham's accommodations in D.C. and back in the district?

"On its website, MZM says it's involved in providing 'force protection' and dealing with improvised explosive devices, the homemade roadside bombs that are killing and maiming so many American soldiers and Marines in <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Iraq" title="Iraq">Iraq</a>.

"So we must also ask: Are there American servicemen and servicewomen in Iraq making do with second- or third-best because of Cunningham's new house and fancy waterborne digs in D.C.?"

<a name="Money_Laundering.3F" id="Money_Laundering.3F">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Money_laundering" title="Money laundering">Money Laundering</a>?</span></h3>

<p>Cunningham also has ties to the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Sure_Foundation" title="Sure Foundation">Sure Foundation</a>, "a charitable foundation started by defense contractor <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mitchell_Wade" title="Mitchell Wade">Mitchell Wade</a> and his wife."

As it turns out, the charity is "headquartered in the same Washington town house as Wade's defense contracting firm, MZM Inc. Wade's wife, Christiane, is the foundation's president, and he is its treasurer. Cunningham's wife, Nancy, and one of his daughters, April, are listed as members of the foundation's advisory board," Jerry Kammer of Copley News Service <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050624-9999-1n24sure.html" class="external text" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20050624-9999-1n24sure.html" rel="nofollow">reported</a> June 24, 2005.

<a name="Leaves.2432.2C000_in_driveway" id="Leaves.2432.2C000_in_driveway">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Leaves $32,000 in driveway</span></h3>

<p>In the last days preceding his sentencing, Cunningham left $32,000 in $20 and $100 bills stuffed in Ziploc bags jammed in a metal box in his driveway. When his wife, Nancy Cunningham, told Duke that she had turned over his money to her lawyer, he berated her. He had intended the money to be for her, but Nancy claimed she had no other choice. She stated, "He just doesn't understand...he claims he's innocent, that he's been railroaded by the government, that he shouldn't be in prison. He says he signed the plea agreement under duress." <a href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20060828&s=kelley082806" rel="nofollow">[21]</a>

<a name="Post-conviction" id="Post-conviction">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Post-conviction</span></h3>

<p>On May 17, 2006, the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Ethics_Committee" title="House Ethics Committee">House Ethics Committee</a> announced that it was initiating an investigation into the Cunningham affair and whether it involved other members of Congress. A joint statement by ethics committee chairman <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Doc_Hastings" title="Doc Hastings">Doc Hastings</a> (R-Wash.) and Democratic ranking member <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Howard_Berman" title="Howard Berman">Howard Berman</a> (D-Calif.) said:</p>

<dl>

<dd>"There have been continuing reports regarding [Cunningham's] conduct, the conduct of his alleged co-conspirators, and others, that, if true, raise serious issues concerning violations of House Rules and standards... Most recently, reports have suggested that federal officials are investigating whether Representative Cunningham and possibly other Members and staff were provided hotel rooms, limousines, and other services in exchange for performing official acts." <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051701779.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051701779.html" rel="nofollow">[22]</a></dd>

</dl>

<p>The statement is likely referring to the two California contractors that Cunningham plead guilty to accepting bribes from, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Brent_Wilkes" title="Brent Wilkes" class="mw-redirect">Brent Wilkes</a> and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mitchell_J._Wade" title="Mitchell J. Wade" class="mw-redirect">Mitchell J. Wade</a>. Wade has told federal investigators that Wilkes used a limousine service to pick up prostitutes and Cunningham and take them to hotel suites. Authorities are investigating whether other members of Congress were involved in the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Congressional_Bribery_and_a_DC_Sex_Scandal" title="Congressional Bribery and a DC Sex Scandal">Congressional Bribery and a DC Sex Scandal</a> and Hastings and Berman have stated that other ethics committee investigations could be initiated against other members of Congress and Hill staffers if this is the case. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051701779.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051701779.html" rel="nofollow">[23]</a>

On May 18, a week after the Pentagon's Defense Criminal Investigative Service complained that Cunningham was not cooperating with its investigation, Cunningham's lawyer stated that "he will cooperate with that investigation just as he is cooperating with all the others," referring to the new <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Ethics_Committee" title="House Ethics Committee">ethics committee</a> investigation. Cunningham's lawyer, however, refused to comment further on the nature of that cooperation. <a href="http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/05/19/news/top_stories/21_21_195_18_06.txt" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/05/19/news/top_stories/21_21_195_18_06.txt" rel="nofollow">[24]</a>

<a name="Honored_in_Washington" id="Honored_in_Washington">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Honored in Washington</span></h3>

<p>On July 13, 2006, <i>The Hill</i> reported that the U.S. Capitol Historical Society announced it will honor several lawmakers, including Cunningham, "for their hard work, service, time and the sacrifices made in upholding the office with which they were entrusted." Cunningham, of course, is unable to attend the event as he is currently serving his prison term. He qualifies for the honor, however, because he is a retiring member of Congress. The society opted not to exclude anyone, even those convicted of a crime. Also invited is former House Majority Leader <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tom_DeLay" title="Tom DeLay" class="mw-redirect">Tom DeLay</a> (R-Texas). <a href="http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/UndertheDome/071306.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/UndertheDome/071306.html" rel="nofollow">[25]</a>

<a name="Use_of_classified_bills_for_personal_gain" id="Use_of_classified_bills_for_personal_gain">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Use of classified bills for personal gain</span></h3>

<p>On July 23, 2006, an independent investigation by Michael Stern, a private investigator hired by the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Select_Committee_on_Intelligence" title="House Select Committee on Intelligence" class="mw-redirect">House Select Committee on Intelligence</a>, found that Cunningham often persuaded aides to slip items into classified bills that would benefit both him and his associates. Intelligence and defense-related bills are written in private for the purposes of national security. Often, members of Congress do not even bother to read these pieces of legislation. Therefore, it is dependent upon members of Congress and select aides with security clearances to ensure that legislation is appropriate. Stern found that while some aides were reluctant to aid Cunningham in adding self-serving clauses in these bills, Cunningham often harassed them to do so. Stern announced that he would like to interview Cunningham in prison to learn more about how he influenced the system. <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2227488&page=1" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2227488&page=1" rel="nofollow">[26]</a>

As of September 13, 2006, Cunningham had not been subpoenaed to testify regarding these actions in front of the committee due to a disagreement between members over the utility of such an action. Rep. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jane_Harman" title="Jane Harman">Jane Harman</a> (D-Calif.) has expressed her desire to subpoena Cunningham, but Committee Chairman <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peter_Hoekstra" title="Peter Hoekstra" class="mw-redirect">Peter Hoekstra</a> (R-Mich.) has opposed the measure. While he would like to speak to him, he cites the fact that his lawyer has indicated that Cunningham would simply invoke the Fifth Amendment in such a scenario. <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/cunningham/20060912-1609-ca-congressman-bribery.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/cunningham/20060912-1609-ca-congressman-bribery.html" rel="nofollow">[27]</a>

<a name="Charges_for_Wilkes_and_Foggo" id="Charges_for_Wilkes_and_Foggo">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Charges for Wilkes and Foggo</span></h3>

<p>In February 2007, a San Diego based federal grand jury charged the CIA’s former No. 3 person Kyle “Dusty” Foggo, and defense contractor Brent Wilkes with 11 felonies, including fraud, conspiracy and money laundering. The indictment stated that the two, “created and used shell companies and straw men to conceal … Wilkes’s financial interest and role in CIA contracts, and to launder money obtained from CIA contracts". <a href="http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021407/wilkes.html" class="external autonumber" title="http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/021407/wilkes.html" rel="nofollow">[28]</a>

<a name="Wilkes.27_lawyers_subpoena_members_of_Congress" id="Wilkes.27_lawyers_subpoena_members_of_Congress">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Wilkes' lawyers subpoena members of Congress</span></h3>

<p><a name="House_tries_to_quash_Wilkes_subpoenas" id="House_tries_to_quash_Wilkes_subpoenas">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">House tries to quash Wilkes subpoenas</span></h4>

<p>On September 26, 2007 attorneys for the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_of_Representatives" title="House of Representatives" class="mw-redirect">House of Representatives</a> asked a federal judge to quash subpoenas for twelve congressmen in the trial of defense contractor <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Brent_Wilkes" title="Brent Wilkes" class="mw-redirect">Brent Wilkes</a>, who was charged with bribing Cunningham. Wilkes’ attorneys sent the subpoenas to former Speaker <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Dennis_Hastert" title="Dennis Hastert">Dennis Hastert</a>, Republican Whip <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Roy_Blunt" title="Roy Blunt">Roy Blunt</a>, and ten other U.S. representatives on August 13, 2007. His attorneys had also asked for internal investigative documents and correspondence from the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Intelligence_Committee" title="House Intelligence Committee" class="mw-redirect">House Intelligence Committee</a>. Wilkes had pleaded not guilty to 25 counts of bribery, fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy. House lawyers argued that the Constitution protected members of Congress from being forced to disclose communications part of their official duties. Wilkes attorney Mark Geragos did not specify what questions he would ask lawmakers on the witness stand because he said it would compromise the right to a fair trial. <sup id="cite_ref-11" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-11" title="">[12]</a></sup>

<a name="Wilkes_subpoena_push_expanded" id="Wilkes_subpoena_push_expanded">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Wilkes subpoena push expanded</span></h4>

<p>On September 27, 2007 it was reported that <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Brent_Wilkes" title="Brent Wilkes" class="mw-redirect">Brent Wilkes</a>’ lawyers had issued subpoenas to several senators and administration figures in addition to twelve representatives. At least two of the additional subpoenas had not been served. In a filing by the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_of_Representatives" title="House of Representatives" class="mw-redirect">House’s</a> lawyers seeking to quash the twelve subpoenas, the House’s general counsel said that he had been advised by an investigator for Wilkes’ layer Mark Gregos that subpoenas were issued for Sens. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Larry_Craig" title="Larry Craig">Larry Craig</a> (R-Idaho), <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Daniel_Inouye" title="Daniel Inouye" class="mw-redirect">Daniel Inouye</a> (D-Hawaii), <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Carl_Levin" title="Carl Levin">Carl Levin</a> (D-Mich.) and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jay_Rockefeller" title="Jay Rockefeller" class="mw-redirect">Jay Rockefeller</a> (D-W.Va.). Administration officials include White House Chief of Staff <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Joshua_Bolten" title="Joshua Bolten" class="mw-redirect">Joshua Bolten</a>, Secretary of Defense <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Robert_Gates" title="Robert Gates" class="mw-redirect">Robert Gates</a>, and Deputy Secretary of Defense <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Gordon_R._England" title="Gordon R. England">Gordon R. England</a>.

Spokesmen for Sens. Levin, Rockefeller, Craig and Inouye said that they had not been served with subpoenas. Rockefeller’s spokesman noted that the Senate legal counsel had said that they had not received anything. Gregos did not explain the rationale behind the subpoenas, but Wilkes had previously said that his gifts to Cunnigham were part of a corrupt system of which he was a victim. <sup id="cite_ref-12" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-12" title="">[13]</a></sup>

<a name="Wilkes.27_defense_attempts_to_exclude_evidence" id="Wilkes.27_defense_attempts_to_exclude_evidence">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Wilkes' defense attempts to exclude evidence</span></h4>

<p>The trial of Wilkes was set to begin Wednesday, October 3, 2007, a day later than originally planned. Judge Larry Alan Burns of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California in San Diego re-set the trial date after Wilkes’ defense team filed several motions to exclude evidence and requesting that the trial be delayed. Wilkes’ attorney, Geragos, sought to exclude all evidence and testimony relating to the alleged patronage of prostitutes by Wilkes and Cunningham on the grounds that it would unfairly prejudice the jury, denying Wilkes the right to a fair trial under the fifth amendment and sixth amendment. Geragos said that the government’s goal in presenting such evidence is to “sully Mr. Wilkes in the eyes of the jury.”

The government’s trial memorandum summarized the case against Wilkes as paying for Cunningham to stay at the Hapuna Beach Prince Hotel, lavish catered meals, rounds of golf and diving trips in addition to the claim of providing prostitutes. On October 1, 2007, the judge was set to consider a motion filed by the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_of_Representatives" title="House of Representatives" class="mw-redirect">House of Representatives</a> general counsel to quash subpoenas issued to twelve members of congress. <sup id="cite_ref-13" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-13" title="">[14]</a></sup>

<a name="Subpoenas_Withdrawn" id="Subpoenas_Withdrawn">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h4><span class="mw-headline">Subpoenas Withdrawn</span></h4>

<p>On Tuesday, October 2 Geragos withdrew the subpoenas of the 12 House members after Judge Burns said he was prepared to quash them. The judge said he would consider enforcing them if Wilkes’ lawyers could show that the congressmen had specific information relevant to the defense. In the pretrial hearing, House Deputy Counsel <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Kerry_Kircher&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="Kerry Kircher (page does not exist)">Kerry Kircher</a> said legislators were shielded by constitutional protections designed to prevent members of Congress from being forced to disclose communications that are part of their duties. Geragos said the congressmen should be forced to testify because of the case’s importance. "It’s almost as if these House members are saying, 'How dare you subpoena us?’” Geragos said. "But we’ve got members who were on these plane flights with Mr. Cunningham, who were going to these dinners hosted by Mr. Wilkes. There’s a whole host of events that have nothing to do with the legislative process."<sup id="cite_ref-14" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-14" title="">[15]</a></sup>

The subpoena requests included documents that contained details of earmarks Cunningham requested for Wilkes, evidence of bribes offered or paid to Cunningham or other members of Congress by Wilkes and others, and internal investigative documents and correspondence from the <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Intelligence_Committee" title="House Intelligence Committee" class="mw-redirect">House Intelligence Committee</a>. Some of the information was provided for the defense. <sup id="cite_ref-15" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-15" title="">[16]</a></sup>

Geragos told reporters that he planned to file new subpoenas against <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Dennis_Hastert" title="Dennis Hastert">Dennis Hastert</a> (R-Ill.), and California Republicans Reps. <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_Doolittle" title="John Doolittle">John Doolittle</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Duncan_Hunter" title="Duncan Hunter">Duncan Hunter</a>, <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Darrell_Issa" title="Darrell Issa">Darrell Issa</a>, and <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jerry_Lewis" title="Jerry Lewis">Jerry Lewis</a>. He also said that he was trying to serve a subpoena for White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten. <sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference"><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham#cite_note-16" title="">[17]</a></sup>

<a name="Committees_and_Affiliations" id="Committees_and_Affiliations">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h2><span class="mw-headline">Committees and Affiliations</span></h2>

<p><a name="Committees_in_the_109th_Congress.282005-2006.29" id="Committees_in_the_109th_Congress.282005-2006.29">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Committees in the 109th Congress (2005-2006)</span></h3>

<ul>

<li>Former member <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Appropriations_Committee" title="House Appropriations Committee" class="mw-redirect">House Appropriations Committee</a></li>

<li>Former member <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Labor,_Health_and_Human_Services_Committee&action=edit&redlink=1" class="new" title="House Labor, Health and Human Services Committee (page does not exist)">House Labor, Health and Human Services Committee</a>

<ul>

<li>Education Appropriations Subcommittee</li>

<li>Defense Subcommittee</li>

</ul>

</li>

<li>Former member <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=House_Select_Committee_on_Intelligence" title="House Select Committee on Intelligence" class="mw-redirect">House Select Committee on Intelligence</a> (first named 107th Congress by Speaker of the House <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Dennis_Hastert" title="Dennis Hastert">Dennis Hastert</a>)

<ul>

<li>Chairman, Subcommittee on Human Intelligence Analysis and Counterintelligence on the House Select Committee on Intelligence</li>

</ul>

</li>

</ul>

<p><a name="More_Background_Data" id="More_Background_Data">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h2><span class="mw-headline">More Background Data</span></h2>

<ul>

<li><a href="http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=H0596103" class="external text" title="http://www.vote-smart.org/bio.php?can_id=H0596103" rel="nofollow">Background information on Randy "Duke" Cunningham from Project Vote Smart</a></li>

</ul>

<ul>

<li><a href="http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=H0596103" class="external text" title="http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=H0596103" rel="nofollow">Interest group scorecard ratings for Randy "Duke" Cunningham from Project Vote Smart</a></li>

</ul>

<ul>

<li><a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/c000994" class="external text" title="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/c000994" rel="nofollow">Voting record for Randy "Duke" Cunningham from the Washington Post database</a></li>

</ul>

<ul>

<li><a href="http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/cgi-bin/newmemberbio.cgi?lang=&member=CA50&site=congressmerge" class="external text" title="http://www.congressmerge.com/onlinedb/cgi-bin/newmemberbio.cgi?lang=&member=CA50&site=congressmerge" rel="nofollow">Information on Randy "Duke" Cunningham from Congress Merge</a></li>

</ul>

<p><a name="Resources_and_Articles" id="Resources_and_Articles">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h2><span class="mw-headline">Resources and Articles</span></h2>

<p>See also <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Randy_%22Duke%22_Cunningham/articles_and_commentary" title="Randy " duke="duke" cunningham="" articles="" and="" commentary="commentary">Randy "Duke" Cunningham/articles and commentary</a>

<a name="Resources" id="Resources">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">Resources</span></h3>

<ul>

<li><a href="http://cunningham.house.gov/Biography/" class="external text" title="http://cunningham.house.gov/Biography/" rel="nofollow">Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham</a>'s official biography.</li>

<li><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/NewsSearch?sb=-1&st=%22randy%20%27duke%27%20cunningham%22" class="external text" title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/NewsSearch?sb=-1&st=%22randy%20%27duke%27%20cunningham%22" rel="nofollow">Washington Post News archive on Randy "Duke" Cunningham</a></li>

<li><a href="http://dukecunningham.org/" class="external text" title="http://dukecunningham.org/" rel="nofollow">"The Unauthorized Randy 'Duke' Cunningham Page"</a> posted on <i>dukecunningham.org</i> website.</li>

<li><a href="http://houseofscandal.org/members/Randy%20DukeCunninghamCA-50.html" class="external text" title="http://houseofscandal.org/members/Randy%20DukeCunninghamCA-50.html" rel="nofollow">"Just how tangled up in Tom DeLay's Scandal is Randy Duke Cunningham?"</a> <i>Tom DeLay's House of Scandal</i>.</li>

<li><a href="http://www.acepilots.com/vietnam/cunningham.html" class="external text" title="http://www.acepilots.com/vietnam/cunningham.html" rel="nofollow">"Randy Cunningham. F-4 Phantom Pilot, Navy Ace in Vietnam"</a> posted on <i>acepilots.com</i> website.</li>

<li><a href="http://www.au.af.mil/au/goe/eaglebios/02bios/cunnin02.htm" class="external text" title="http://www.au.af.mil/au/goe/eaglebios/02bios/cunnin02.htm" rel="nofollow">"Randy "Duke" Cunningham"</a> posted on <i>au.af.mil</i> website.</li>

<li><a href="http://www.jaxxattaxx.com/usd/syn/duke.htm" class="external text" title="http://www.jaxxattaxx.com/usd/syn/duke.htm" rel="nofollow">"Rep Randy 'Duke' Cunningham (R) Shenanigans Program & Worksheet."</a> Details and supporting article links are provided below and a good summary of the events to date. *<a href="http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/09/11/news/columnists/observer/17_52_579_10_05.txt" class="external text" title="http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005/09/11/news/columnists/observer/17_52_579_10_05.txt" rel="nofollow">provided</a> by John Van Doorn in the September 10, 2005, <i>North County Times</i>. Another good summary.</li>

</ul>

<p><a name="SourceWatch_Resources" id="SourceWatch_Resources">&nbsp;</a></p>

<h3><span class="mw-headline">SourceWatch Resources</span></h3>

<ul>

<li><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=William_B._Adams" title="William B. Adams">William B. Adams</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Congressional_Bribery_and_a_DC_Sex_Scandal" title="Congressional Bribery and a DC Sex Scandal">Congressional Bribery and a DC Sex Scandal</a></li>

<li><a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Republican_%27culture_of_corruption%27" title="Republican 'culture of corruption'">Republican 'culture of corruption'</a></li>

</ul>

<p>===

halfway house, requests gun &nbsp;http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/randy_duke_cunningham_gun_rights_restore_atf.php</p>