Ppl not Politicians
-=-=
===
3 IN 1 DAY
Trump hit with jaw dropping negative poll in Missouri for the first time
2 Missouri Republicans have already lost several of its lawsuits as part of the ongoing effort to change the congressional maps less than two months before the 2026 election. Now they're facing another blow.
"Law Dork" Chris Geidner posted on BlueSky that the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in again on the temporary restraining order a federal district court issued blocking changes to the electoral maps.
It has been a tough road for Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, a Republican, who got a ruling from the state Supreme Court blocking the maps. He then ran to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, demanding that they step in. They did, and Hoskins decided that the district court superseded the state Supreme Court. A law school professor explained that that isn't how it works.
Hoskins on Tuesday emailed election officials, instructing them to break the law and use the map the court ruled against. His email prompted the state Supreme Court to ask why it shouldn't hold Hoskins in contempt of court for defying its ruling. Hoskins had until noon on Wednesday to submit an excuse to the Missouri high court, but instead, he begged the district court to step in and protect him.
In the early morning hours of Thursday, they released a ruling saying that they would not.
The only higher court that can overrule the state Supreme Court is the U.S. Supreme Court, and in its ruling, it made it clear that it deferred to the state Supreme Court.
Hoskins rushed to the U.S. Supreme Court again — but on Thursday morning, they struck it down once again.
There are no noted dissents from the Supreme Court justices.
It makes a definitive ruling that the maps used for the 2026 election will be the 2022 maps, not the new ones the GOP wants to use.
KSDK News political reporter Mark Maxwell, "The U.S. Supreme Court has stayed the federal order that barred Missouri from using any map but the new one. That leaves the state court's ruling as the only one in effect. Election officials and Denny Hoskins are prohibited under court order from using HB1."
Missouri Solicitor General Louis Capozzi said that he submitted a brief to the federal judges and even gave a big thanks to President Donald Trump's Solicitor General John Sauer "and his team for filing a brief in our support on behalf of the United States."
Less than an hour later, the Supreme Court shut it all down.
Michigan State University Law School Professor Quinn Yeargain responded," This has been a stupid journey from beginning to end, and I hope that it culminates in sanctions for Hoskins and the rest of these disgusting ghouls."
Hoskins faces off against the Missouri Supreme Court in a hearing at 11 a.m. EST over his contempt charges.
3
Missouri Secretary of State Denny Hoskins, a Republican, had a tough hearing before the Missouri state Supreme Court on Thursday, in which the state attorney general's office was forced to defend him against contempt charges for refusing to comply with a ruling they issued on the usage of congressional maps for the upcoming 2026 election.
Like many states, Missouri Republicans attempted to redraw lines to eliminate Democratic seats and help President Donald Trump keep as many GOP members of Congress as possible.
Ultimately, the hearing closed with Chief Justice W. Brent Powell telling the attorney general's office, "I would tell your client, the secretary of state, not to venture far from Jefferson City until this contempt ruling is decided."
It wasn't the only verbal smackdown delivered by the conservative state court.
Chuck Hatfield, counsel for People Not Politicians, the group that sued over the use of the 2026 maps, began the hearing by walking through the quickly changing legal situation, but Hoskins knowingly ignored the ruling and told local election officials not to follow the law. To him, that is worthy of a contempt ruling.
Missouri's AG's office lawyer claimed that Hoskins was in a difficult position because one court said one thing and another court said another. The reason for that, however, is that Hoskins went to the federal court when he didn't like the ruling from the state Supreme Court. He also asked the federal court to intervene to protect him from being held in contempt. The judge refused.
The justices didn't appear to buy into it, asking whether Hoskins fully understands that the law changing to the new maps, known as House Bill 1 (HB1), never went into effect. Chief Justice Powell, along with other justices, asked multiple times and in different ways whether Hoskins fully grasped that the maps were never legally changed. The AG office's lawyer appeared to play around with the admission, saying that Hoskins understands that now, but before, he was in a difficult position.
"We’re in a precarious situation," a frustrated Powell said. He urged them all to "get on the same page" and "find a way to save some of these elections so they are valid and we can sit the congressional delegation that our state is entitled to."
One justice cut in to say that they have a larger concern that the secretary of state could turn around and use maps that aren't law.
According to the attorney general's lawyer, Secretary of State Hoskins "acknowledges that this court's injunction is back in full force and effect" and is "evaluating next steps." In fact, the lawyer said multiple times that he hadn't had much time to confer with Hoskins since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling about an hour prior to the contempt hearing. So, Hoskins is still "evaluating the situation."
"I mean, it's just English," one justice said.
The justice explained that Hoskins could easily have waited until he had a final ruling on the matter as a whole, but instead, he chose the decision he wanted most and broadcast it to local officials, thereby causing more confusion. They asked what direction he had given to officials, and the AG's office said that there wasn't any.
A justice cut in to say that actually wasn't the case. The most recent message from the secretary of state's office was not to follow the law and the ruling by the state Supreme Court.
The hearing ended with Hoskins committing to telling the local officials that he lost in court and that they must comply with the 2022 maps.
As for his contempt, the justices said that he shouldn't leave town any time soon.
-=-=
-===
AN 9 26
In deep red Missouri, Republican State Attorney General Catherine Hanaway is lashing out the state's supreme court ruling over a recent ruling on the state's election map — a ruling she attacked as "legal fiction." Hanaway is now taking up the matter with the U.S. Supreme Court. And according to Mark Maxwell, political editor for KSDK News in St. Louis, this legal battle is a recipe for "absolute chaos."
On Friday, September 4, according to Politico's Gregory Svirnovskiy, Hanaway "asked the U.S. Supreme Court for an emergency stay of a Missouri High Court ruling that found the state cannot use new, heavily gerrymandered districts in the November election."
Hanaway, in her filing, told U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, "A federal-election-administration disaster is unfolding in Missouri."
According to Svirnovskiy, "Hanaway's plea came after the Missouri Supreme Court, on Thursday, put the brakes on a congressional map drawn by Republicans last year with the backing of President Donald Trump and ordered a Democrat-organized referendum on the GOP's map proposal, which would have likely given Republicans a 7-1 advantage by eliminating the Kansas City district held by longtime Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.), be put to a vote this fall. The court ruled that the November elections must proceed in accordance with the map Missouri used in 2022, which still saw Republicans favored in six of the state's eight districts."
The Missouri Independent's Rudi Keller reports that Hanaway believes the Missouri Supreme Court expressed a "legal fiction" when "it ruled that putting the state's new congressional map to a referendum means Missouri must use its previous district lines in November."
Keller notes that Tuesday, September 8 "is the deadline for changing the November 3 ballot" in Missouri. And Kavanaugh, according to Keller, asked "other parties to weigh in on the application for an emergency stay."
Hanaway wrote, "Ultimately, if what applicants seek is this court's blessing to implement (the 2025 map) in contravention of Missouri law, they must secure an order affirmatively establishing the secretary's authority to use it. That requires an injunction, not a stay.”
KSDK News' Maxwell, in his tweet, explained why this legal fight could cause major problems in the midterms.
Maxwell tweeted, "In a reply brief to the US Supreme Court, Missouri Attorney General Catherine Hanaway signals local election officials could defy the state Supreme Court and proceed with the old HB1 'Missouri First' map, which would be absolute chaos. The state court explicitly forbade this."
Keller notes that this legal battle finds the ACLU and the Campaign Legal Center allied with the group People Not Politicians — for which they filed an amicus brief — and on the opposite side from Hanaway and her allies.
According to Keller, "The American Center for Law and Justice filed a brief supporting (Missouri Secretary of State Denny) Hoskins. In St. Louis, U.S. Rep. Bob Onder, State Sen. Rick Brattin, and two voters filed their lawsuit in the Eastern District court on Friday, with People Not Politicians seeking to intervene to have the case dismissed."