Jones, Phil

=<div><div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"></div><div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">ref 2 desmog</div><div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
</div><div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2019/11/18/how-climategate-laid-foundations-fake-news-era" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">https://www.desmog.co.uk/2019/11/18/how-climategate-laid-foundations-fake-news-era</a></div><div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
</div><div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">l<a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/nigel-lawson" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">ord Lawson</a> stepped to the curb hailing a taxi. We had both been at an event in a swish Fleet Street hotel discussing illegal phone hacking by journalists. I had followed him out onto the pavement and asked whether the hacking of scientists' emails from the servers of the British university had been unethical — as well as criminal. “It was a whistleblower,” he scowled. The black taxi took off, leaving me in a cloud of diesel.</div>Another Lord, though of a different stripe, <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/christopher-monckton" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Lord Monckton</a>, I have met many times. The one that comes to mind is when he was the star turn during a fringe event of <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/04/27/pope-francis-should-answer-exxonmobil-rather-god-imply-climate-deniers" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">climate deniers near the Vatican</a> in April 2015. I began by asking whether he, as a Catholic, believed the Pope could in fact be fallible when pronouncing climate change the challenge of our age. Before I knew where we were, the faux peer was accusing Barack Obama of being the centre of a <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/11/27/madness-viscount-monckton-descends-paris-conference" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">global Communist-Fascist conspiracy</a>.Dr <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/s-fred-singer" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">S Fred Singer</a> I interviewed at a <a href="https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/7bap4x/las-vegas-climate-change-denial-brendan-montague-101" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Heartland Institute conference in Las Vegas</a>, the United States, back in 2014. He spoke quietly and softly, explaining his role in recruiting Lawson, the former British chancellor, to the climate denial cause. This mattered because Singer is the grandfather of the denial of climate science, and has been <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2014/12/10/fred-singer-granddaddy-fake-science-retires-sepp-president" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">associated with both tobacco</a> and oil companies.These three men were influential in turning <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/climategate-10-years" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Climategate</a> into an international scandal 10 years ago now.Creating a stormThe illegal hacking of thousands of private emails between climate scientists, both at the University of East Anglia and elsewhere, and their publication in November 2009 was supposed to be the smoking gun which proved that hundreds of highly respected, indentured university scientists working around the world had conspired together to exaggerate the risks from climate breakdown.The target of the hack attack had been Pennsylvania State University <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/03/04/who-michael-mann-and-why-do-climate-deniers-hate-him" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Professor Michael Mann</a>, the author of the first <a href="https://www.carbonbrief.org/what-hockey-stick-graphs-tell-us-about-recent-climate-change" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">‘Hockey Stick’ graph</a> which showed a dramatic uptick in average global temperatures following hundreds of years of a fairly stable climate. <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2014/09/03/integrity-science-and-politics-integrity-lawson-jones" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Professor Phil Jones</a> was collateral damage: accused of academic dishonesty, hauled in front of a powerful Parliamentary committee to answer these trumped up charges, his life’s work unfairly called into question. He <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/climatechange/7180154/Climategate-Professor-Phil-Jones-considered-suicide-over-email-scandal.html" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">considered suicide</a>.Climategate should have been a storm in a teacup. The emails revealed nothing new. A few choice phrases were taken out of context, twisted, and presented as damning evidence. It was Lord Lawson who turned it into a crisis for climate science.He launched the <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/global-warming-policy-foundation" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)</a> in Parliament just in time to make best use of the faux scandal, toured the newspaper offices using his reputation as Thatcher’s one time chancellor to persuade editors to take the event seriously, and called on his Tory friends to <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2014/09/29/david-go-green-cameron-s-top-donors-financing-climate-denial" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">open their cheque-books</a> to fund his opaque think tank.The GWPF scored some initial successes. Lawson is said to have persuaded his former friend, Lionel Barber, until recently the editor of the Financial Times, to take the Climategate fiasco seriously. This in turn likely influenced the Guardian in its decision to run day after day of <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/hacked-climate-science-emails" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">coverage of the hacked emails</a>, and its reporters’ fruitless attempt to <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2012/jul/20/climategate-detective-disappointed-catch-hacker" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">find the hacker</a>.Lawson was also influential in the decision of the <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12269493" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Science and Technology Committee</a> of the House of Commons to launch its investigation — trapping Professor Jones under the cameras and the hot lights to answer evidently preposterous allegations. Lawson, even during a hearing which he had been influential in being opened, refused to say who was <a href="https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1254763/Lord-Lawson-labelled-climate-alarmists.html" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">funding his new thinktank</a>.<h3 style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); line-height: 1.28205em; margin-top: 1.28205em; margin-bottom: 1.28205em;">Manufacturing denial</h3>Alongside Lawson, <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/09/08/who-was-actually-behind-lord-lawson-s-idea-create-global-warming-policy-foundation" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Singer</a> and <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2014/09/08/lawson-and-monckton-row-over-climate-science-campainging" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Monckton were also there</a> from the very beginning and had significant roles to play in the development of the GWPF.Singer was among <a href="https://www.heartland.org/about-us/who-we-are/s-fred-singer" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">the first climate deniers</a> in the world, indeed when he entered the fray most climate scientists were aware of the complexity and contingency in the research. It was firmly established that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere caused heating, and that the amount pumped out through the use of fossil fuels was inextricably rising. But issues like the sensitivity of the atmosphere to change and how quickly this would change was still hotly debated.<a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/02/04/how-tobacco-shills-inspired-climate-denial" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Singer worked with the Atlas Economic Research Foundation</a> (now <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/atlas-economic-research-foundation" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Atlas Network</a>) in the United States. The foundation was primarily concerned with promoting free market, neoliberal economics. Friedrich von Hayek was the intellectual inspiration. He argued that any regulation would distort the market, leading to hardship.This ideology was very much in the ascendancy around the world: Lord Lawson has been its “chief architect” in the UK and as chancellor had torn apart the regime of financial regulations. But as well as causing economic collapse in many of the economies where it was tested, neoliberalism now faced the challenge posed by climate science — which would inevitably lead to calls to stop (or regulate, or tax) fossil fuel use.[pix clatham hse]The Atlas Foundation turned to Singer for help. The physicist had previously <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/no-apology-is-owed-dr-s-fred-singer-and-none-will-be-forthcoming" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">worked with the tobacco industry</a> deliberately creating smoke and mirrors around the increasing scientific consensus that smoking caused cancer. The foundation received money from the <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/atlas-economic-research-foundation" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">oil industry</a>, including <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/koch-industries-inc" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Koch Industries</a> and <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/exxonmobil-funding-climate-science-denial" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">ExxonMobil</a>, and was instrumental in <a href="https://tobaccotactics.org/index.php?title=Atlas_Network" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">founding the Institute of Economic Affairs</a> (IEA) in the UK. It was a trustee of the <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/06/11/do-you-know-when-lord-lawson-first-began-talking-about-climate-change" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">IEA — David Henderson</a> — who first approached Lord Lawson at an event hosted by the London School of Economics and persuaded him to take up the cause of climate denial.Lord Monckton also had a part to play. A viscount, Monckton was born into money, but despite his <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/aug/11/lords-climate-christopher-monckton" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">rather eccentric denials</a>, actually missed out on becoming a member of the House of Lords when hereditary peers were abolished. The viscount worked for a very short period for Thatcher’s policy unit. He later <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1370668/Inventor-to-sell-home-after-1m-puzzle-is-solved.html" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">lost £1m in prize money</a> when he launched a puzzle betting no-one could crack it. They could.Monckton became something of a hero to the climate denier community when he published a two-page rant in the <a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1533290/Climate-chaos-Dont-believe-it.html" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Sunday Telegraph</a> claiming that he alone had exposed the fatal flaw of the science of climate change. The rather eccentric ramblings had originally been drafted as a report for a private investor (<a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2015/08/06/mystery-man-behind-monckton-s-conversion-climate-denial" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">with an historic interest infracking</a>). He was also instrumental in <a href="https://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/01/lord-moncktons-summary-of-climategate-and-its-issues/" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">formulating talking points</a> from the Climategate scandal for climate science deniers across the world.[pix congress?!]Monckton — if you believe his side of the story — advised Lawson to establish the GWPF and take up his new climate denier cause — <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2014/09/08/lawson-and-monckton-row-over-climate-science-campainging" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">attacking science</a> rather than policy. He also claimed to have recommended Dr Benny Peiser — who wrote his dissertation on whether people are more athletically active in the summer — as the head of the charity. Peiser denied this version of events, desperate to distance Lawson and the think tank from the discredited and conspiracy-prone Monckton.<h3 style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); line-height: 1.28205em; margin-top: 1.28205em; margin-bottom: 1.28205em;">Political game</h3>Lawson once boasted that he was responsible for what he (modestly) called Lawson’s Law: he advised the Tory party not to fight elections based on what the electorate actually cared about, but instead to persuade the electorate to care about what the Tory party could win an election on.Lawson did not advise fake news, but it encouraged a distortion of reality that has seriously undermined our politics. It opened the floodgates.Along the way, the GWPF has gotten into bed with the wildest of right-wing neoliberal think tanks, becoming <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/55-tufton-street" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">intimately entwined</a> with those responsible for serious spin and corporate lobbying around Brexit.Lawson himself was instrumental in the Vote Leave campaign (before applying for <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/may/31/brexiter-nigel-lawson-applies-french-residency-vote-leave" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">residency in France</a>). He was happy to appeal to reactionary populism to settle scores within the Tory party.One consequence of this is that <a href="https://www.desmogblog.com/nigel-farage" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Nigel Farage</a> long ago adopted the tactics of his namesake. Farage has dabbled in climate denial. He has gone further in stirring up populism. He is the master of scapegoating. And he is forever throwing “dead cats” into the political arena, keeping us constantly focused on our relationship with the EU. And in doing so, his Brexit Party — a party <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2019/11/11/election-2019-here-are-all-brexit-party-s-climate-science-deniers" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">riddled with a Lawsonian brand of climate science denial</a> — came close to destroying Lawson’s Tory party while continuing to push the UK towards the hardest of Brexits.<h3 style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); line-height: 1.28205em; margin-top: 1.28205em; margin-bottom: 1.28205em;">Moving on</h3>Lawson, Monckton, and Singer have all quietly fallen off the radar. But their legacy, honed through the manufactured scandal of Climategate, lives on.Lawson made himself chairman of the GWPF for life, but age has — with the same inevitability as climate breakdown — taken its toll and he has retired from climate politics to his beautiful mansion in the south of France. The GWPF lost the argument. It is now ineffective, losing support, and should soon be defunct. <a href="https://www.desmog.co.uk/2014/12/10/fred-singer-granddaddy-fake-science-retires-sepp-president" target="blank" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">Singer has long retired</a> from his think tank. Monckton is still attacking the Pope, but to no effect.From climate denial and the fakest of fake news, to corporate lobbying and media spin — you reap what you sow.<div style="font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"></div><div>
</div><div></div><div>
</div><div>Phil Jones

<a href="http://deepclimate.org/2012/06/21/heartlands-james-taylor-hits-new-low-with-defamatory-false-accusations-against-noaa/">http://deepclimate.org/2012/06/21/heartlands-james-taylor-hits-new-low-with-defamatory-false-accusations-against-noaa/</a>

The NOAA’s National Climate Data Center recently <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/summary-info/national/2012/4">announced that the last 12 months were the warmest on record in the “contiguous” U.S.</a>,

extending the 2011-12 hot streak that has now eclipsed the previous

record in 1999-2000 by a half degree Fahrenheit. Apparently, that was

just  too much for the Heartland Institute’s James Taylor who used his

regular column in Forbes magazine <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2012/06/13/doctored-data-not-u-s-temperatures-set-a-record-this-year/">to accuse the NOAA of “doctoring real-world temperature data”</a>.

According to Taylor, the “alarmists” at NOAA “simply erase the actual

readings and substitute their own desired readings in their place”.

But it turns out that Taylor’s source is none other than hapless

climate blogger Steven Goddard, who recently leveled incoherent and

unsupported false accusations against James Hansen and NASA’s Gistemp

record, as well as NOAA.  Goddard also relies on the same reviled NOAA

data in his botched attempt to buttress his case that NASA is “hiding”

an 80 year cooling trend. Never mind that the U.S. “lower 48″ represents

less than 2% of the Earth’s surface area in any event, or that <a href="http://tamino.wordpress.com/2012/01/30/usa48/">past attempts to show U.S. cooling have been proven utterly wrong</a>.

If Forbes has a shred of integrity, this  sorry episode will surely

result in an abject retraction and apology to NOAA, along with the

banishment of Heartland from the magazine’s pages.  And it’s also high

time reputable commentators in the mainstream media called out the

irresponsible behaviour of Forbes and other right-wing media.

James Taylor’s rant is a swift descent into weirdness, paragraph by paragraph, until arriving at his central thesis:

<blockquote>The bureaucracy at NOAA and NASA who report the U.S.

temperature data undertake what they term “correcting” the raw data.

These corrections are not just one-time affairs, either. As time goes

by, older temperature readings are systematically and repeatedly made

cooler, and then cooler still, and then cooler still, while more recent

temperature readings are made warmer, and then warmer still, and then

warmer still.</blockquote>

In covering the latest Forbes debacle, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201206180001">Jocelyn Feng of Media Matters</a> gives a good summary of the <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ushcn/ushcn.html">U.S. Historical Climatology Network (USHCN)</a>,

the 1200 station climate data network used by NOAA in to track climate

across the U.S.  She also contacted NOAA scientist David Easterly, who

mildly observed that the “conclusions of the column sound like pure

speculation on the part of the writer.” I’ll say.

In fact, the corrections applied to the station records of the USHCN

are both reasonable and necessary to correct errors introduced in the

original observation process, as explained in the above USHCN link, and

summarized in a <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ushcn/hcntmptrends.php">2007 NOAA bulletin</a> describing version 2 of the USHCN.

<blockquote>These artificial changes include station relocations,

different instrumentation, and changes in the landscape surrounding the

station (e.g. urbanization, removal or planting of vegetation, etc.).

Some of these changes may result in “random” changes to the data. For

example, even small station relocations can result in temperature

readings that are either slightly cooler or slightly warmer than what

would have occurred at the former site. Other changes, such changes in

urbanization in the vicinity of the station or changes in observing

times, can systematically affect temperatures, e.g., add an urban

warming bias to the temperature trends. Research has shown that the data

from these kinds of changes can be corrected to a large degree based on

physical and statistical methods (e.g., see Peterson 2006).</blockquote>

The bulletin goes on to explain that improved correction schemes for

station moves and urbanization had been recently introduced as part of

version 2 of the USHCN. This gives an excellent opportunity to see the

NOAA correction process in action at that time. The following chart

compares the NOAA annual US temperature record before (version 1) and

after (version 2) these changes.
<div>
</div><div>=</div><div><h2 style="font-weight: normal; margin: 1em 0px 0.25em; overflow: hidden; padding: 0px; border-bottom-width: 1px; border-bottom-style: solid; border-bottom-color: rgb(170, 170, 170); font-family: 'Linux Libertine', Georgia, Times, serif; line-height: 1.3; background: none rgb(255, 255, 255);">Serial Accusations of Misconduct</h2>Dr Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen has accused climate scientists of misconduct on at least two occasions. She appears as a correspondent in one of the 1073 emails hacked from University of East Anglia in 2009. She is quotes as saying “[t]he hacked emails revealed attempts to manipulate peer review to E&E’s disadvantage, and showed that libel threats were considered against its editorial team. Dr Jones even tried to put pressure on my university department.” But the Muir Russell Report concluded that they “see nothing [in] Boehmer-Christiansen’s evidence that supports any allegation that CRU has directly and improperly attempted to influence the journal that she edits.” Furthermore, the emails actually show that Boehmer-Christiansen had been accusing CRU of scientific fraud, and “Jones’ response to her accusation of scientific fraud was appropriate, measured and restrained.” <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Sonja_Boehmer-Christiansen#cite_note-10" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(11, 0, 128); white-space: nowrap; background: none;">[10]</a>On the occasion of the publication of the paper Anderegg et al 2010 she is quoted as saying "It looks to me that the authors belong to an IPCC supporting group that must count as believers and belong to the beneficiaries of the man-made warming scare."<a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Sonja_Boehmer-Christiansen#cite_note-11" style="text-decoration: none; color: rgb(11, 0, 128); white-space: nowrap; background: none;">[11]</a> This is refuted by the authors declaration of no conflict of interest.</div><div></div></div></div>