Einhorn Stephen Chem
---
nyt
---
Climate Change Denial Sees a Resurgence in Trump’s Washington
A conference near the White House drew hundreds of people who reject the scientific consensus on climate change. The mood was triumphant.
A man stands in front of a crowd with a slide on a screen. The slide reads, “More CO2 will be a very significant benefit to agriculture and forestry!”
William Happer, a Princeton professor emeritus of physics who has argued that global warming is good for humanity, during a presentation at the Heartland Institute’s International Climate Change Conference in Washington on Wednesday.Credit...Caroline Gutman for The New York Times
Maxine Joselow
By Maxine Joselow
Reporting from Washington
April 9, 2026
Climate change is a hoax perpetrated by “leftist politicians.” Fossil fuels are the greenest energy sources. More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will be harmless.
These were some of the false claims made at a conference on Wednesday held by groups that reject the overwhelming scientific consensus on climate change. What might have seemed like a fringe event in years past this time boasted a prominent keynote speaker: Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and one of President Trump’s possible choices for the next attorney general.
“We aren’t just following blind obedience to whatever the dire, doom-and-gloom prediction of the day is,” Mr. Zeldin said at the conference, which drew around 220 attendees to the basement ballroom of a hotel in downtown Washington.
“We won’t sign up for the script that the world is imminently about to end,” Mr. Zeldin added, drawing applause from the crowd, which had given him a standing ovation before his speech.
The event made clear that climate change deniers are experiencing a triumphant resurgence in Mr. Trump’s Washington after years of feeling sidelined by the scientific and political establishments.
A man holds a pamphlet that reads, "Fossil Fuels are the Greenest Energy Sources."
A vast majority of scientists agree that climate change is real and that it is caused by burning fossil fuels like oil, gas and coal. They expect average global temperatures to rise 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above preindustrial levels within the next decade, unleashing dire impacts that include more deadly heat waves, coastal floods, water shortages and crop failures.
Earth has already warmed about 1.2 degrees Celsius (2.3 degrees Fahrenheit) since the Industrial Revolution, scientific estimates suggest.
Mr. Trump, however, has derided the scientific consensus on global warming as “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world.” And Mr. Zeldin has said that the E.P.A. is “driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion” by rolling back dozens of regulations that burdened the fossil fuel industry.
The conference on Wednesday brought together people with varying levels of skepticism of the scientific consensus. Some attendees flatly denied that the planet was warming, while others recognized the trend but argued that it was not an emergency and that the potential solutions were too costly.
The event was organized by the Heartland Institute, a research organization that says it promotes free-market solutions and that has attacked mainstream climate science for decades. Other sponsors included the CO2 Coalition, a nonprofit group that claims falsely that planet-warming carbon dioxide is beneficial to humans.
The influence of both groups waned under the Biden administration, which embraced the science behind climate change and pushed policies designed to address it. Mr. Zeldin’s appearance at the conference underscored how the groups’ sway has grown in the Trump era.
Image
A sign reads "thank you for emitting/"
:{:{A display at the event.}:
James Taylor of the Heartland Institute poses for a portrait.
Last month, the CO2 Coalition successfully nominated an eye doctor with no background in air pollution science to a committee that advises the E.P.A. on the latest air pollution research. On Wednesday, the group gave out tote bags, pamphlets, mints and blue-and-green stress balls that resembled miniature Earths to conference attendees. The white lettering on the stress balls read: “Don’t stress. There is no climate crisis.”
Next to the CO2 Coalition’s booth, a chemist and businessman from Wisconsin, Stephen Einhorn, was distributing copies of his own pamphlet, whose cover promised to reveal “what the climate activists don’t know or don’t want you to know.”
Threats to library funding end with a settlement by Trump Administration.
Anna Paulina Luna calls for the quick expulsion of Eric Swalwell from the House.
:{:{Trump’s explanation for the image of him as Jesus: “I thought it was me as a doctor.”}:
“I’m very happy that Trump appointed Zeldin,” Mr. Einhorn said in an interview. “I’m surprised at how much progress he’s made toward informing the American people what the actual science is, which is that we have a wonderful climate. We’re blessed. There’s nothing to worry about.”
The Heartland Institute does not disclose its funders. In the past, it has received financial support from oil and gas interests as well as the Mercer Family Foundation, an influential donor to conservative causes.
“Because we’re not as well-funded by industry as people think, we don’t have a fancy green room,” James M. Taylor, the president of the Heartland Institute, said in an interview outside the main ballroom.
The group receives around $4 million each year from foundations and individuals, Mr. Taylor said. If the Heartland Institute had recently received funding from the fossil fuel industry, he added, he wasn’t aware of it.
Pausing to reflect, Mr. Taylor said the second Trump administration had done more for the climate change denial movement than any other administration in history. He pointed to the E.P.A.’s extraordinary move in February to renounce the federal government’s legal authority to combat climate change.
“This is absolutely a moment of triumph,” Mr. Taylor said, adding, “It’s nice to be winning.”
Image
A stack of books including "Climate Change Reconsidered."
Patrick Morrisey, the governor of West Virginia, stands behind a podium.
:
In addition to Mr. Zeldin, the speakers at the conference included West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican who has built a career opposing federal climate regulations.
“I’m very hopeful that we’re going to keep the White House for a number of terms, but let’s take advantage of where we are now,” Mr. Morrisey said.
William Happer, a professor emeritus of physics at Princeton University who has argued that global warming is good for humanity, delivered the lunchtime address. He dismissed concerns about rising carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere over a relatively carbon-intensive lunch of roasted chicken breast, cannellini bean ragù and ricotta cheesecake.
EDF Action, the political arm of the Environmental Defense Fund, put up posters outside the conference that protested the event and highlighted the effects of climate change nationwide.
“Climate denial won’t lower insurance costs,” one poster read, referring to high home insurance premiums in areas prone to wildfires, hurricanes and other disasters fueled by rising global temperatures.
The conference was set to continue on Thursday with a speech by John Clauser, a Nobel physics laureate who has claimed, falsely, that clouds have a net cooling effect on the planet.
Maxine Joselow covers climate change and the environment for The Times from Washington.
A version of this article appears in print on April 10, 2026, Section A, Page 12 of the New York edition with the headline: Gathering Shows Upswing of Climate Denial Groups. Order Reprints | Today’s
---
---
[### Climate Change Denial Sees a Resurgence in Trump's ...
The New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › climate-change-deniers-trump](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/09/climate/climate-change-deniers-trump.html)
5 days ago — Climate Change Denial Sees a Resurgence in Trump's Washington. A conference near the White House drew hundreds of people who reject the ...Read more
Videos
[Steve Einhorn: Climate Change: What They Rarely Teach In ... YouTube · Tom Nelson
Jun 10, 2024](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI3Y646AkJs)
YouTube · Tom Nelson
42:01
I've worked on climate change for a dozen years and I wrote this book called climate change what they rarely teach in college.
[L+L Podcast Episode 51 - Stephen Einhorn on Climate ... YouTube · The Fund For American Studies
Aug 2, 2023](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vge7tQoT9-Y)
YouTube · The Fund For American Studies
44:49
10 key moments in this video
[Climate Change Experts Spar at UW-Madison Diversity of ... MacIver Institute · MacIverInstitute
Nov 7, 2025](https://www.maciverinstitute.com/videos/special-presentations/climate-change-experts-spar-at-uw-madison-diversity-of-thought-forum)
MacIver Institute · MacIverInstitute
[
2:32](https://www.maciverinstitute.com/videos/special-presentations/climate-change-experts-spar-at-uw-madison-diversity-of-thought-forum)
[“Climate Change: What They Rarely Teach In College” with ... YouTube · Cornell Review
Mar 15, 2023](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_40eVopWEc)
YouTube · Cornell Review
112 views Mar 15, 2023
On Wednesday March 8th, the Cornell Review brought alumnus Stephen Einhorn ‘64 to campus to talk about his recently published book, "Climate Change: What They Rarely Teach In College."
seinhorn@capitalmidwestwest.com
must nake problem big scary or no way to grift
97% john cook
bbc Researchers say that the biggest threat to coral reefs is climate change, with estimates that 90% of reefs will succumb to rising temperatures by 2050. The second biggest threat is the suffocating threat posed by algal blooms, triggered by the runoff of nutrients from sewage and farming. Sunscreen is now seen as one of a number of other, lesser threats including ocean acidification.
agw = religion
55:02
55 minutes, 2 seconds
the politics until people understand the science of what's happening because we
55:09
55 minutes, 9 seconds
always hope hey the science consensus 97 of all scientists believe that we have a
55:16
55 minutes, 16 seconds
serious problem okay so let me tell you where that came from John Cook
55:22
55 minutes, 22 seconds
uh wrote an article about 15 years ago on this and he claimed that 97 of 12 000
55:31
55 minutes, 31 seconds
papers all confirmed that human activity was the major cause of global warming
55:39
55 minutes, 39 seconds
fossil fuels carbon dioxide in the atmosphere all that stuff but when you actually go through his
55:46
55 minutes, 46 seconds
papers it's not true because most two-thirds of the papers had no comment whatsoever about human
55:54
55 minutes, 54 seconds
activity and where he got it was 33 out of 34 remaining actually
56:02
56 minutes, 2 seconds
mentioned that there is a human factor not that it was important it was only one percent that mentioned that human factors were important at that time
56:10
56 minutes, 10 seconds
so it takes 33 divides it by 34 and gets 97 and that's the basis of this but it's not true
56:18
56 minutes, 18 seconds
because we've had groups we've had 30 000 scientists claim including Edward Teller with different um meetings and so
56:27
56 minutes, 27 seconds
claim there is no problem whatsoever but these are ignored and then we're told that these people aren't real scientists the way that other scientists were
...
0:32
32 seconds
our community we also strive to keep everyone informed of developments both on campus and Beyond whereas whether it
0:40
40 seconds
is updates from our faculty senate or the recent launch of the equal protection project by a law school in Cornell Law School our law school
0:48
48 seconds
Professor uh locally part of our mission is to host events that inform the public and we hope tonight's event climate
0:57
57 seconds
change what they rarely teach in college will be no exception with that I will introduce tonight's speaker Stephen Einhorn is an alumnus of Cornell
1:06
1 minute, 6 seconds
University he graduated from Cornell in 1964 with a bachelor's degree in chemistry and went on to earn his
1:13
1 minute, 13 seconds
Masters in polymeric materials from Brooklyn Polytech Institute Mr Einhorn then led a mergers and Acquisitions
1:20
1 minute, 20 seconds
company for over three decades specializing in transactions within the chemicals industry and today he is a general partner at wisconsin-based
1:28
1 minute, 28 seconds
Capital Midwest fund Mr einorn is also the author of The recently published book climate change what they rarely teach in college please join me in
1:37
1 minute, 37 seconds
welcoming Stephen Einhorn okay good evening
...I'm going to speak about global warming and climate change
2:21
2 minutes, 21 seconds
and it's going to be just as exciting foreign but first I wanted to talk about
2:29
2 minutes, 29 seconds
those who believe that climate change is a serious problem because there are a lot of folks who are
2:36
2 minutes, 36 seconds
afraid of what climate change may cause what problems we may have and these the leaders of this group are
2:45
2 minutes, 45 seconds
really the climate activists or or alarmists because they believe that something should be done and done right now
2:54
2 minutes, 54 seconds
now if you don't believe that there's a serious problem with global warming and climate change
3:01
3 minutes, 1 second
then you're called the climate denier but climate denier is much too close
3:08
3 minutes, 8 seconds
to Holocaust deniers and these That's The Six Million Jews that were killed and the 10 million that were murdered by the Nazis in World War
II they deny that this occurred so no one should ever call viewer denier
3:26
3 minutes, 26 seconds
because you're not denying climate change what you're doing is you're accepting that during the year the climate changes summers are different
3:33
3 minutes, 33 seconds
than Winters that's just how it is and you're also a realist uh because at
3:40
3 minutes, 40 seconds
least it appears and I'm going to give some reasons for this uh that we don't have any major catastrophe ahead of us
3:49
3 minutes, 49 seconds
there's nothing in sight and there's virtually nothing that's going to to happen
3:57
3 minutes, 57 seconds
so my talk tonight is as you know climate change what they really
4:05
4 minutes, 5 seconds
it's a Magic Machine it goes by itself what they uh rarely uh teach in college and I brought in a
4:13
4 minutes, 13 seconds
number of copies of my book which you could have but there is a catch because if you take a copy of my book I expect
you must pay 100K?
china pays nothing as you;d expect
greta t 2030 irreverse, promotes guilt and misery, not good for ppl
ippc wolrd’s leading activists
7:54
7 minutes, 54 seconds
2016 as you can see over here was our warmest year the warmest year during our lifetimes
8:02
8 minutes, 2 seconds
how many of you knew this okay this is a very important fact
record cold both agw is “remarkable claim”
trenberth grfx
cold kills more
gore inc truth bk? 80% vs 4%; water vapor never appears
no problem with sea level rise
in room 6:13
26 minutes, 13 seconds
there's a very famous Professor David Cohen he said anyone who believes a fact Checker at face value is an idiot; more fact checkers more likely to be true
agw no effect on wildfires, 80% caused by humans error
coral reefs disapear over 20 yrs greta; Palau, acidic 2000 bleaching, no suntan ocean or trash; gt barrier reef largest, come back farm runoff, still show the dead parts bc good politivally
polar bears gone by 2100 3x as in 1970 bc shot affirm action cute alarmists need $
gore predict 16 animals hi tree frog --> invasive
to become extinct it's a Hawaiian tree frog well they've become invasive in Hawaii and the concentrations are up to
golden toad already gone 10 yrs fungus not // agw
greta 30k facing extint; only 2/ yr yale?
FF worse heart disaese LA ozone particle, 190/100K vs 210
100K to decommis wind turbine?
solar req toxics, will 2x world plastic waste
wind and solar kill 1 m birds yr, incinerates
30’s whale loud sound blast diring installation humpback ny
lithuim carbonate 100k to brk even on lifecycle 20 yrs
agw biggest wealth transfer in hist; poor do not buy tesla, subisidy/tax credit 1 trillion
gore 300m one of richest in world
...37:43
37 minutes, 43 seconds
here's another example these are the humpback whales we now have 30 percent less over the New York in the New York Waters this is because
37:53
37 minutes, 53 seconds
the loud sound glass from boats during the installation of the wind turbines it interferes with the whale's hearing and
38:01
38 minutes, 1 second
Communications they go offshore and they die we haven't exactly proven the connection but we do know that we have 30 percent
38:09
38 minutes, 9 seconds
less humpback whales than when we started putting in wind energy so of course we have to talk about Tesla
38:18
38 minutes, 18 seconds
everybody knows that electric vehicles save energy and they're good for the environment except are they
38:25
38 minutes, 25 seconds
one car requires 140 pounds of lithium carbonate and processes 500 000 pounds
38:33
38 minutes, 33 seconds
of Earth if you're in California you average 5200 miles per year driving a Tesla it'll take a hundred thousand
38:42
38 minutes, 42 seconds
miles to break even on the energy that you use between the creation and the demolition of the
38:49
38 minutes, 49 seconds
card it's going to take you almost 20 years to get even climate change is perhaps the greatest
38:58
38 minutes, 58 seconds
wealth transfer to the rich in history did you know that well since you didn't know it let me read it again
39:06
39 minutes, 6 seconds
climate change is perhaps the greatest wealth transfer to the rich in history frightening we're transferring money to wealthy
39:14
39 minutes, 14 seconds
people the poor don't buy Teslas there's been two and a half million so
39:21
39 minutes, 21 seconds
they sell an average price of 66 000 people per car not one poor person has bought a Tesla
39:29
39 minutes, 29 seconds
deported by wind turban so get the benefits from tax credits or subsidies and the poor don't buy solar panels which get the benefits of subsidies and
39:38
39 minutes, 38 seconds
tax credits and this is not a little deal guys this is a trillion dollars since 2000
39:46
39 minutes, 46 seconds
governments have given away to the rich a trillion dollars the deficit reduction Act was 400
39:54
39 minutes, 54 seconds
billion now that was only that's that's a 400 out of 1.7 billion for this act and that
40:01
40 minutes, 1 second
400 billion was for Teslas and cars wind turbines and solar panels I'll go his pictures here because he's
40:10
40 minutes, 10 seconds
one of the richest men in the world he's a net worth of over 300 million he pulls in over 2 million dollars a month for
40:16
40 minutes, 16 seconds
his climate change business and he's promoting that we should spend another four trillion dollars on this
40:24
40 minutes, 24 seconds
just did a couple of months ago what do you think good idea
40:31
40 minutes, 31 seconds
so this is a summary there's been no increase in temperature for six years and the sea level is not
no increase if hurric in 50 yrs
all $ go to alarmists not realists
censorship ggl
46:16
46 minutes, 16 seconds
for a hundred years you can't find it it might be on page nine of Google
46:24
46 minutes, 24 seconds
because Google has a very special way of providing the truth look up decrease in forest fires on
46:34
46 minutes, 34 seconds
Google see if you can find it but it's a challenge what about the coral reefs not dying and becoming
46:43
46 minutes, 43 seconds
extinct but for that I don't think you'll find all of these challenges and so you can't blame people
46:51
46 minutes, 51 seconds
who are actually believing that climate change is a problem because the social media
46:58
46 minutes, 58 seconds
is totally one-sided and you only get the opposite view even if it's scientifically incorrect
47:11
47 minutes, 11 seconds
okay so here's a summary part of the alarmist fake news how why is it so effective because I use forces like the
47:18
47 minutes, 18 seconds
facts bad assumptions language Distortion painting mistakes controlling funding scaring people censorship and intimidation and guilty
47:27
47 minutes, 27 seconds
it's a very powerful strategy and it works
47:36
47 minutes, 36 seconds
there are three points that I'd like you to remember the first is that the Earth has been cooler for the past six years
47:45
47 minutes, 45 seconds
it's a fact this is coming from the U.S government from the NOAA from NASA from Berkeley labs every group agrees that
47:55
47 minutes, 55 seconds
2016 was the warmest year the New York Times will report 2020 was almost as warm as 2016. almost a time
48:04
48 minutes, 4 seconds
because they got to show the becoming an increase but as I pointed out 2020 was a year we used the least amount of carbon
48:12
48 minutes, 12 seconds
dioxide in the past decade second point is that the Seas have risen at a constant rate
48:21
48 minutes, 21 seconds
with virtually no acceleration the U.N takes the opposite position but I've spoken to leaders in this or at
48:29
48 minutes, 29 seconds
least one leader and I answered can you name one spot on Earth that confirms your prediction and she couldn't
48:35
48 minutes, 35 seconds
not one spot on earth so it's not true that's what science does right you check
48:43
48 minutes, 43 seconds
reality against what you might believe
48:52
48 minutes, 52 seconds
and the third is that during the past hundred years well CO2 has continually increased we
49:00
49 minutes
become wealthier live longer more educated and there's no reason for
49:07
49 minutes, 7 seconds
this to be reversed in the future
49:15
49 minutes, 15 seconds
so this is why you should be happy there's been no global warming there's no global warming problem there's no
49:24
49 minutes, 24 seconds
climate change problem there's nothing to fear or worry about and so what we should do is we should concentrate
49:33
49 minutes, 33 seconds
on the realization of worthy goals and happiness we're blessed with a wonderful climate and we should be grateful
49:41
49 minutes, 41 seconds
thank you Mr Right Here
49:55
49 minutes, 55 seconds
uh thank you
50:05
50 minutes, 5 seconds
already been persuasive I just I should have to ask uh why do
50:11
50 minutes, 11 seconds
you think uh that I want this well why do you think that there are a lot why do you think that they exactly
50:19
50 minutes, 19 seconds
so much because it is it's it's very difficult to
50:40
50 minutes, 40 seconds
how do we what do you thought so how do you deal with the alarmist
50:46
50 minutes, 46 seconds
and the the major claims what should we do about that how do we address that
50:55
50 minutes, 55 seconds
it's really difficult it may be impossible because there are thousands of people
51:02
51 minutes, 2 seconds
making lots of money on this and we have an educational system
51:09
51 minutes, 9 seconds
at most schools most liberal schools certainly I'm going to say here at Cornell I've actually I want to ask the students
51:18
51 minutes, 18 seconds
here have any of you heard once that there might be a problem with the
51:24
51 minutes, 24 seconds
activist climate change scenario once okay let me ask another question
51:34
51 minutes, 34 seconds
I put forth a lot of thoughts here they're not my thoughts Guys these come this comes from the US government the NOAA NASA EPA
51:43
51 minutes, 43 seconds
and the think tanks I'm just a student here so how many of you think that there
51:50
51 minutes, 50 seconds
could be one professor at Universe at our University that could be hired that would expose these ideas and would receive tenure
51:59
51 minutes, 59 seconds
does anyone believe it without a chance not a tune this is a problem we all love Cornell
52:08
52 minutes, 8 seconds
and we want Cornell to be the sort of institution which accepts diverse ideas the only way this can ever happen at
52:16
52 minutes, 16 seconds
Cornell in my view is to have affirmative action for people who have the opposite opinion
52:24
52 minutes, 24 seconds
because it ain't going to happen through the the professors from what I've heard and if you hear any exception to what I just said
52:30
52 minutes, 30 seconds
please tell me anything else
52:39
52 minutes, 39 seconds
um so first uh thank you so much uh for coming uh it's again very refreshing to hear like this
52:47
52 minutes, 47 seconds
um alternative perspective especially since like at least like in my experience like I haven't always heard like well it's not
52:56
52 minutes, 56 seconds
to end uh we need to do something about it um I guess like I wanted to ask you a question like that's related to this and
53:05
53 minutes, 5 seconds
specifically to the point that you made about many um many people like profiting Wilderness
53:12
53 minutes, 12 seconds
you've seen like a rise in environmental Soldier one governance activism and then
53:20
53 minutes, 20 seconds
corporations to what extent do you think the uh
53:28
53 minutes, 28 seconds
to what extent do you believe like uh it has uh has impacted like the rise
53:36
53 minutes, 36 seconds
of ESG initiatives so living in operations um and given that
53:43
53 minutes, 43 seconds
um there have been like questions over whether yes she even I think it's actually affected um do you think that um do you believe
53:51
53 minutes, 51 seconds
that leaders um within the corporations are concerned about the alarmists and I guess
54:00
54 minutes
it's projecting so the question is how does politics and
54:09
54 minutes, 9 seconds
money affect um affect climate change policy no
54:16
54 minutes, 16 seconds
if you look over my presentation I specifically eliminate it in almost
54:24
54 minutes, 24 seconds
all cases political considerations because I think the basis for changing
54:31
54 minutes, 31 seconds
people's minds is to look at the signs what we're getting is phony science the
54:38
54 minutes, 38 seconds
UN IPC is presenting Pony science on the sea levels for example it's just not true
54:46
54 minutes, 46 seconds
and they can't prove it and they can't show it and it's contrary to all measurements of sea levels as I said there may be one or two inches
54:54
54 minutes, 54 seconds
a year a century but it's truly minimal if there is any acceleration and my theory is that we should avoid
55:02
55 minutes, 2 seconds
the politics until people understand the science of what's happening because we
55:09
55 minutes, 9 seconds
always hope hey the science consensus 97 of all scientists believe that we have a
55:16
55 minutes, 16 seconds
serious problem okay so let me tell you where that came from John Cook
55:22
55 minutes, 22 seconds
uh wrote an article about 15 years ago on this and he claimed that 97 of 12 000
55:31
55 minutes, 31 seconds
papers all confirmed that human activity was the major cause of global warming
55:39
55 minutes, 39 seconds
fossil fuels carbon dioxide in the atmosphere all that stuff but when you actually go through his
55:46
55 minutes, 46 seconds
papers it's not true because most two-thirds of the papers had no comment whatsoever about human
55:54
55 minutes, 54 seconds
activity and where he got it was 33 out of 34 remaining actually
56:02
56 minutes, 2 seconds
mentioned that there is a human factor not that it was important it was only one percent that mentioned that human factors were important at that time
56:10
56 minutes, 10 seconds
so it takes 33 divides it by 34 and gets 97 and that's the basis of this but it's not true
56:18
56 minutes, 18 seconds
because we've had groups we've had 30 000 scientists claim including Edward Teller with different um meetings and so
56:27
56 minutes, 27 seconds
claim there is no problem whatsoever but these are ignored and then we're told that these people aren't real scientists the way that other scientists were
56:36
56 minutes, 36 seconds
so it is true This is highly political and it does affect wealth in very many
56:42
56 minutes, 42 seconds
ways but that's not my goal here my goal is to concentrate on the science because my belief is if people understand the science if you believe there's no
56:50
56 minutes, 50 seconds
problem you're not going to spend money on no problem so everything else goes away
56:57
56 minutes, 57 seconds
I I know I ducked the question but I did it intentionally for the reason that I explained
57:06
57 minutes, 6 seconds
so I don't require the change and but I know a lot of things and
57:17
57 minutes, 17 seconds
um and so I imagine a number of your economics
57:34
57 minutes, 34 seconds
so so the assumptions are just like the most important thing to them and now so another time to change files
57:43
57 minutes, 43 seconds
the most fundamental equation is that equation that relates to the temperature change as you see obvious information
57:52
57 minutes, 52 seconds
and that equation has a climate sensitivity effects
58:00
58 minutes
that when anybody speaks the Mantra of climate change I ask them
58:08
58 minutes, 8 seconds
can you tell me how this equation by the sensitivity the last person I
58:15
58 minutes, 15 seconds
asked was our indeed who came and talking about this climate changes
58:38
58 minutes, 38 seconds
and so from the fundamental science I believe that
58:47
58 minutes, 47 seconds
um that's the fundamental equation um for all the other equations
58:53
58 minutes, 53 seconds
and there's probably not anybody working on a science
59:01
59 minutes, 1 second
that I haven't asked um so
59:09
59 minutes, 9 seconds
um uh last last semester I took um first longer than Chicago Cubs and essentially
59:16
59 minutes, 16 seconds
the entire class is just reaching the climate noise but one part of it but that really convinced me was a discussion of the coral reefs and that
59:25
59 minutes, 25 seconds
um and their decline in population over the past 50 years and and I don't know I guess could you explain
59:34
59 minutes, 34 seconds
more on why you think that the main cause of um well we've defined is uh pollutants in the water as opposed to
59:42
59 minutes, 42 seconds
acidification so the question is uh why are pollutants in the water
59:49
59 minutes, 49 seconds
causing the coral reefs to disappear and uh
59:56
59 minutes, 56 seconds
the answer is that whenever you eliminate the human factor they do fine
1:00:05
1 hour, 5 seconds
that's just reality look in Puerto Rico they have leaking oil that was killing the reefs in
1:00:13
1 hour, 13 seconds
Australia they had this runoff from the water in Palo they had sent the emotion they've had sunteam lunches that have
1:00:20
1 hour, 20 seconds
been eliminated for most coral reefs right now throughout the world so if the suntan lotion this is a factor
1:00:28
1 hour, 28 seconds
then why are all these places Illuminating suntan lotion where they they have they want because they want the coral reefs the great detours you make money by the tourists but if you
1:00:36
1 hour, 36 seconds
have bleach coral reefs you don't make any money so you gotta get rid of the suntan lotion it's just reality yeah why not ask him about suntan lotions and ask
1:00:44
1 hour, 44 seconds
him about what's happened in Palo and here's another part that's so sad the article that I took about Powell
1:00:53
1 hour, 53 seconds
in order to get that published the fellow had to write yeah the coral reefs are doing really well in pillow and that
1:01:01
1 hour, 1 minute, 1 second
we think that's because we eliminated um suntan oceans and we stopped the runoff from the land
1:01:09
1 hour, 1 minute, 9 seconds
but we have to acknowledge that global warming is a a major problem he had to put that
1:01:17
1 hour, 1 minute, 17 seconds
in even though there's nothing to do with his article because he couldn't get it published in a major magazine if he didn't put
1:01:25
1 hour, 1 minute, 25 seconds
that in you have to take one side of glow of of climate change and global warming or you're not going to be accepted
1:01:34
1 hour, 1 minute, 34 seconds
okay so that's just how it is good um
1:01:42
1 hour, 1 minute, 42 seconds
[Music]
1:01:48
1 hour, 1 minute, 48 seconds
[Music]
1:01:57
1 hour, 1 minute, 57 seconds
there's an NSA guy says be careful about bringing science into the debate
1:02:07
1 hour, 2 minutes, 7 seconds
of the population so I think he's correct into science
1:02:18
1 hour, 2 minutes, 18 seconds
so I I the way I go at this and what works for me
1:02:25
1 hour, 2 minutes, 25 seconds
back in 2016 my story was I knew that I couldn't understand the story I hadn't put any hours I set my office from
1:02:33
1 hour, 2 minutes, 33 seconds
Secretary of Energy it told him that I was agnostic he pulled a snotball about that I said it would take me ten
1:02:40
1 hour, 2 minutes, 40 seconds
thousand hours to make a decide um but what works for me was when a couple people proud of me and
1:02:49
1 hour, 2 minutes, 49 seconds
and I said everyone believes it and they sent me a list of famous scientists that didn't when I first thought they
1:02:58
1 hour, 2 minutes, 58 seconds
were going to be from Sheboygan State College and I'd say I don't care there might be nice people
1:03:05
1 hour, 3 minutes, 5 seconds
but that's something that's in Wisconsin be very careful she's going to stay out because it's a Stanford Harvard count like you name it I said okay they
1:03:13
1 hour, 3 minutes, 13 seconds
probably shot down a model and then the deniers are claiming therefore climate changes and so I started Googling them and and
1:03:21
1 hour, 3 minutes, 21 seconds
what really worked for me is after I find about 20 guys who were Beyond doubt knowledgeable who said it's total crap
1:03:31
1 hour, 3 minutes, 31 seconds
once you get a person to accept that truth then all of a sudden they start
1:03:38
1 hour, 3 minutes, 38 seconds
questioning everything and um there's a reason why I'm missing one is my social media feed seems to happen the old Planet can't flavors anywhere
1:03:47
1 hour, 3 minutes, 47 seconds
here we've got 93 000 followers on Twitter and I can't find a climate change or anywhere in that group so I think there is evidence that there's a
1:03:55
1 hour, 3 minutes, 55 seconds
lot of people who have no voice but don't believe it the second thing I think that's working in our favor the problem The Dilemma
1:04:04
1 hour, 4 minutes, 4 seconds
climate change is they can tell us a story forever they'll always say it's just out here again
1:04:12
1 hour, 4 minutes, 12 seconds
so it's the nastiest of all inheritance but here's what's what is happening we did discover during hope and the
1:04:19
1 hour, 4 minutes, 19 seconds
scientists were completely disaster the scientific Community let us down in every imaginable and that story is
1:04:27
1 hour, 4 minutes, 27 seconds
getting out
1:05:31
1 hour, 5 minutes, 31 seconds
for me it was Finding former National Academy of Sciences had in sense of hopes fighting the Steve coonen says
1:05:40
1 hour, 5 minutes, 40 seconds
it's it's garbage people Steve will sprattle the line not only because he's doing what you said you have to do he's
1:05:47
1 hour, 5 minutes, 47 seconds
trying to not be dismissed but if you talk to him he says the map can't possibly predict anything
1:05:54
1 hour, 5 minutes, 54 seconds
you get the guy at Stanford I'm forgetting his name he says error propagation says there's a Bible error bar on top of the house like uh like
1:06:03
1 hour, 6 minutes, 3 seconds
really soon and Harvard even got him Oxford and then she can know you can't ignore it it should be right
1:06:12
1 hour, 6 minutes, 12 seconds
Hebrew University solar physicist chair of the department bachelor's degree in 18. writes an
1:06:20
1 hour, 6 minutes, 20 seconds
article in in thorps in the last four hours before it's taken down I'm pretty sure Shabib is brilliant
1:06:30
1 hour, 6 minutes, 30 seconds
and he says there's not one shredded evidence the climate change is coming from CO2 so you can get these kind of things out so
1:06:39
1 hour, 6 minutes, 39 seconds
your point is that if you can get any doubt you got it you got it right you gotta do what the cigarette companies
1:06:46
1 hour, 6 minutes, 46 seconds
did it because to a large extent yeah but in this case we're right now so
1:06:53
1 hour, 6 minutes, 53 seconds
you've got to knock people off their their game the problem also is that to a lot of people
1:07:00
1 hour, 7 minutes
podcast here probably the person extend they see an article
1:07:08
1 hour, 7 minutes, 8 seconds
questioning it I want them to pause just a little bit Yeah so so what really happens as you point out is this is a
1:07:16
1 hour, 7 minutes, 16 seconds
religion if you've been told something 100 times it's a religion so I want to tell you a story it's in the book you
1:07:23
1 hour, 7 minutes, 23 seconds
have to read this stuff because it'll tell it to you it's a story about the citizens of Helm Helm was a film was a
1:07:32
1 hour, 7 minutes, 32 seconds
mythical town in Poland and there was a dispute a major dispute in film the question was what's more important
1:07:41
1 hour, 7 minutes, 41 seconds
the son or the Moon and they couldn't agree so they went to the rabbi and the rabbi
1:07:48
1 hour, 7 minutes, 48 seconds
studies week and said I got it the Moon is more important so why is the moon more important
1:07:56
1 hour, 7 minutes, 56 seconds
because the sun provides light when we already have lots of life and the moon provides light when we need it
1:08:04
1 hour, 8 minutes, 4 seconds
this is what we have with climate change we are people who are religious to it
1:08:10
1 hour, 8 minutes, 10 seconds
because I've given this speech six times no one has come forth with one criticism
1:08:19
1 hour, 8 minutes, 19 seconds
of anything I've written which is very unusual because my wife criticizes me every day so a student
1:08:27
1 hour, 8 minutes, 27 seconds
all right so that's what we're up against and to get away from a religion they have to accept
1:08:35
1 hour, 8 minutes, 35 seconds
one thing and my goal would be if they could just accept the fact that the seas are not rising and accelerated rate we
1:08:42
1 hour, 8 minutes, 42 seconds
win or if they can accept the fact that the last six years have been cooler we win those are the two major facts that
1:08:49
1 hour, 8 minutes, 49 seconds
someone has to understand we all know it's true I mean this is from the US government guys I didn't make this up it's a government statistics things that
1:08:57
1 hour, 8 minutes, 57 seconds
they've measured up there so anyway that's my thought corporate um so I have a question about sea level
1:09:06
1 hour, 9 minutes, 6 seconds
variety sea level's Friday the island of Nazareth which is the capital island of nauru was very close to Palau because one of the countries we
1:09:13
1 hour, 9 minutes, 13 seconds
mentioned um is sinking so to speak the Maldives and the Indian Ocean are also thinking um Indonesia has been looking at their
1:09:21
1 hour, 9 minutes, 21 seconds
Capital off around um they're really getting Jakarta because
1:09:28
1 hour, 9 minutes, 28 seconds
let's see what was their cities I mean there's so many examples of countries investing immense amounts of money into
1:09:37
1 hour, 9 minutes, 37 seconds
relocating potentially tens of millions of people because they're concerned about Civil War where are the tens of millions of people um
1:09:48
1 hour, 9 minutes, 48 seconds
my question is I I think all of your six statistics are very convincing about state level rising
1:09:55
1 hour, 9 minutes, 55 seconds
being you know not accelerating I'm just wondering and I believe them I'm just wondering why are these countries
1:10:02
1 hour, 10 minutes, 2 seconds
investing so much capital or four countries investing so much Capital because it's really nothing there were certain areas which have more
1:10:11
1 hour, 10 minutes, 11 seconds
problems as you pointed out the novels a good example is Miami Florida Miami Florida has had more flooding in
1:10:20
1 hour, 10 minutes, 20 seconds
the past 10 years than they've had in the lives 100 years but when they did the studies which was done by a university in Padawan and also
1:10:29
1 hour, 10 minutes, 29 seconds
from Florida what they found is I'm not sure I'll pronounce this right subsidence it should be s-i-d-e-n-c-e in
1:10:36
1 hour, 10 minutes, 36 seconds
other words the ground is sinking it's compacting and so you have a combination of a sea level rising slowly and actually the
1:10:44
1 hour, 10 minutes, 44 seconds
Earth compacting faster and the combination makes it look like the sea level is rising because that's the more obvious portion so I don't know of any
1:10:53
1 hour, 10 minutes, 53 seconds
place in the world where the sea is rising more than four millimeters in Europe we know for example in Stockholm Sweden it's diminishing at four
1:11:02
1 hour, 11 minutes, 2 seconds
millimeters a year so it goes between plus and minus four millimeters throughout the entire world and outside of Florida when you go to say Cuba which
1:11:11
1 hour, 11 minutes, 11 seconds
was is very close the seas are only Rising there at about three millimeters per year which means that Florida and
1:11:19
1 hour, 11 minutes, 19 seconds
what happened in Miami is they stopped doing the measurements for Miami I guess they were so controversial they just stopped doing it then but that's why I went to Cuba because cube is only 90
1:11:27
1 hour, 11 minutes, 27 seconds
miles away so we can get a fix of what's happened so probably around Miami it's actually they've seen the rising three millimeters a year and the rest is
1:11:34
1 hour, 11 minutes, 34 seconds
compaction of the earth uh which is subside so I think that's what's happening I'm not I'm not an expert on Chicago so I don't really know thank you
1:11:44
1 hour, 11 minutes, 44 seconds
uh one thing we didn't mention really at all was nuclear I think you mentioned in passing um what do you think about proposals to
1:11:52
1 hour, 11 minutes, 52 seconds
spiritual Source nuclear energy in both in um solar or whatever this is the one area
1:11:59
1 hour, 11 minutes, 59 seconds
where the lefties and the alarmists are coming around up until now they've been afraid that there's going to be nuclear disasters
1:12:08
1 hour, 12 minutes, 8 seconds
everywhere but when they've seen that nothing's happened in France for 30 40 years and France has done an incredible
1:12:14
1 hour, 12 minutes, 14 seconds
job of getting in of getting effective low-cost energy there uh I think the
1:12:22
1 hour, 12 minutes, 22 seconds
whole world is coming around and that may be one of the bright spots that we can have nuclear energy which would make a great deal of sensitive it's plentiful
1:12:29
1 hour, 12 minutes, 29 seconds
it's cheap and it really is safe they've also learned how to make very small nuclear uh facilities so you can have it
1:12:37
1 hour, 12 minutes, 37 seconds
local and then provide a lot of energy uh there so I think the world is totally supporting is heading toward the total
1:12:45
1 hour, 12 minutes, 45 seconds
support of nuclear there which was a problem because of the potential Danger yeah
1:12:52
1 hour, 12 minutes, 52 seconds
okay
1:13:03
1 hour, 13 minutes, 3 seconds
so I wanted to ask you know how may we address that subject since you need workers please
1:13:14
1 hour, 13 minutes, 14 seconds
the question is what about developing countries yes where do they stand relating to fossil fuels and renewable
1:13:22
1 hour, 13 minutes, 22 seconds
energy I'm going to give you an answer which is
1:13:30
1 hour, 13 minutes, 30 seconds
political okay right now there are many developing nations which
1:13:38
1 hour, 13 minutes, 38 seconds
could very effectively use fossil fuels and they're being Guided by the developed countries not to use fossil
1:13:46
1 hour, 13 minutes, 46 seconds
fuels but instead to use renewable energy which is really in many respects less effective for what they want to accomplish
1:13:54
1 hour, 13 minutes, 54 seconds
but I really want to keep away from the politics all together this is just my view and how you can check it out to see whether there's any accuracy to the
1:14:02
1 hour, 14 minutes, 2 seconds
did that answer the question Google which is
1:14:10
1 hour, 14 minutes, 10 seconds
you want to talk there I don't know actually another thing that I kind of
1:14:20
1 hour, 14 minutes, 20 seconds
wish you a little bit but um what about you know warming and cooling Trends pre measured warming I guess you know our
1:14:28
1 hour, 14 minutes, 28 seconds
records only go bad so far unless your graphs starting out of the late 1800s or 1900s can you speak to trying to record
1:14:36
1 hour, 14 minutes, 36 seconds
that foreign there are periods of one in 200 years
1:14:43
1 hour, 14 minutes, 43 seconds
which are called the early cooling period Then There was the early heating period this was during the Middle Ages
1:14:50
1 hour, 14 minutes, 50 seconds
and uh it just it's gone up and down over the last thousand years but a thousand years ago it was almost exactly
1:14:57
1 hour, 14 minutes, 57 seconds
the same as what it was today there are charts um Greg wrightstone wrote a book uh which has a chart in it I'm not sure
1:15:05
1 hour, 15 minutes, 5 seconds
whether my book actually does have a chart to that effectively but there have been warm periods and cold periods there also there's a theory about the earth I
1:15:14
1 hour, 15 minutes, 14 seconds
was on an axis and that changes every 18 000 years which is how we go away from an ice age because we had 18 000 years ago and why this spot was 100 feet under
1:15:23
1 hour, 15 minutes, 23 seconds
ice then and and why we're why we don't have that now the theories it's going to retail to
1:15:31
1 hour, 15 minutes, 31 seconds
another I don't know 10 000 years and then we'll all be gone there I'm not worried about ten thousand years from now I probably will any effect on it
1:15:40
1 hour, 15 minutes, 40 seconds
kind of a follow-up question uh in one of my classes here at Cornell I had a professor claim that uh Cooling in the
1:15:48
1 hour, 15 minutes, 48 seconds
1500s was a result of uh also I guess that even caused the climate change a result of uh indigenous people and other
1:15:56
1 hour, 15 minutes, 56 seconds
people dying off across the Americas uh as a result of conversation um what do you think of that claim that we
1:16:04
1 hour, 16 minutes, 4 seconds
were influencing climate several several hundred years ago there was a cooling
1:16:12
1 hour, 16 minutes, 12 seconds
due to human plagues and other factors here's the good news I know nothing about it
1:16:19
1 hour, 16 minutes, 19 seconds
so I'm not going to answer the question um the question um just going back to the point like uh
1:16:27
1 hour, 16 minutes, 27 seconds
that a lot of scientists say that we've seen a rise in temperatures in 2020 but um
1:16:35
1 hour, 16 minutes, 35 seconds
2020 was like a year we used these in that apartment and then 2021 um
1:16:43
1 hour, 16 minutes, 43 seconds
began to travel interact again and temperatures and actually uh went down
1:16:53
1 hour, 16 minutes, 53 seconds
um in your observations in your view could there have been like some sort of like a
1:17:00
1 hour, 17 minutes
delayed effect perhaps that the reduction in carbon emissions sending
1:17:06
1 hour, 17 minutes, 6 seconds
money to money the effects um later because like it just takes time
1:17:15
1 hour, 17 minutes, 15 seconds
um just wanted you here so the question is is there a delay that this carbon dioxide has in creating either heat or
1:17:24
1 hour, 17 minutes, 24 seconds
cold there's a very old joke about I sent you two planes in a helicopter to
1:17:33
1 hour, 17 minutes, 33 seconds
save you from drowning that's what I think applies it just never happens whatever if you make a hundred predictions and they're all
1:17:40
1 hour, 17 minutes, 40 seconds
wrong you try to adjust to it so every predict I showed you 100 predictions that were wrong
1:17:48
1 hour, 17 minutes, 48 seconds
um I mean Gore with his 20 feet most probable in the near future there are
1:17:55
1 hour, 17 minutes, 55 seconds
these are virtually every prediction is is wrong and it's all negative it's things we should worry about but it
1:18:04
1 hour, 18 minutes, 4 seconds
doesn't happen that's why we should be happy and graceful gracious for what what we have I want to say something about this
1:18:12
1 hour, 18 minutes, 12 seconds
question about um so really rarely published data for
1:18:21
1 hour, 18 minutes, 21 seconds
300 000 years so I asked him when I got stepped out of
1:18:30
1 hour, 18 minutes, 30 seconds
my classes
1:18:39
1 hour, 18 minutes, 39 seconds
but I was still the next year no we never did that's a good thing well
1:18:48
1 hour, 18 minutes, 48 seconds
the the first thing I would have done you know that's like that science
1:18:56
1 hour, 18 minutes, 56 seconds
um so I mean I took my piece of paper and went acrossips and lives and it seems to me it's actually a
1:19:03
1 hour, 19 minutes, 3 seconds
temperature occurs Rises faster first and oddly enough that particular what
1:19:10
1 hour, 19 minutes, 10 seconds
happens computers so so the comment is uh it's
1:19:19
1 hour, 19 minutes, 19 seconds
questionable about which comes first carbon dioxide or temperature there seems to be information both ways or
1:19:27
1 hour, 19 minutes, 27 seconds
neither way and it's just an unknown
1:19:37
1 hour, 19 minutes, 37 seconds
in the 400 to 600 000 year cycled it looks like a fabulous correlating they have found a statistically
1:19:45
1 hour, 19 minutes, 45 seconds
significant delay of CO2 formation 800 years after the warning so that he'd
1:19:54
1 hour, 19 minutes, 54 seconds
served 800 years offset which means that by definition the warming birth to the gas in the ocean sac the other thing I
1:20:02
1 hour, 20 minutes, 2 seconds
like you know the problem is when you talk with Miss Alex look let's say you're right let's say
1:20:10
1 hour, 20 minutes, 10 seconds
it's going to raise four degrees I can guarantee you you can't see it with the naked eye I will just hold first you think you can see it you can if the
1:20:18
1 hour, 20 minutes, 18 seconds
ghost is rising the thickness of a dime every year you can't see it so if you think you can see it you're against the ocean
1:20:26
1 hour, 20 minutes, 26 seconds
what was also true is then for example the glaciers which are the best case they love the glaciers so the Glaciers
1:20:35
1 hour, 20 minutes, 35 seconds
are received in 1924 2020 photo and the glacier way up the valley you go see that's a warming and
1:20:44
1 hour, 20 minutes, 44 seconds
then you ask them you know what they found underneath those lighters and the answer is 1200 year old rings
1:20:51
1 hour, 20 minutes, 51 seconds
they grew their 1200 years ago once you've confronted them with that they're like Shimano completely falls
1:21:00
1 hour, 21 minutes
apart so that's a that's a knockout punch when I place your story and you can then show plots of the ice sheets
1:21:07
1 hour, 21 minutes, 7 seconds
globally over time but that's getting science but if you say the trees underneath the Glaciers are 1200 years old so please
1:21:15
1 hour, 21 minutes, 15 seconds
shut up until you get some more reading find out what the framework is I go right I I try to knock down hard and I
1:21:25
1 hour, 21 minutes, 25 seconds
don't use the science I usually you're an idiot people but David is saying is don't argue with them
1:21:33
1 hour, 21 minutes, 33 seconds
okay I think we said we'd hold this to an hour and a half thanks every month for coming appreciate it
1:21:43
1 hour, 21 minutes, 43 seconds
thanks
1:21:45
1 hour, 21 minutes, 45 seconds
[Music]
---
no listed publisher
Climate Change: What They Rarely Teach In College: Stephen Einhorn: 9798218130244: Amazon.com: Books
Climate Change: What They Rarely Teach In College Paperback – January 1, 2023
by Stephen Einhorn (Author)
4.3 *4.3 out of 5 stars (58)
4.5 on Goodreads
25 ratings
there are many issues relating to global warming, climate change, and environmental issues upon which there is disagreement. These differing beliefs based on unsettled environmental questions cause Americans to act and behave a certain way. Is it reasonable to expect that global warming will adversely affect human life? Should we be concerned about the rise in sea levels?}:}:
Is global warming causing more hurricanes, tornadoes, and forest fires? What will likely be the impact of global warming on the future of humanity? This book dives into the empirical facts and scientific studies related to the important global warming and climate change questions to present the facts in plain English. Many of the common narratives related to global warming and climate change are disputed, with the goal to provide greater understanding and agreement on these important issues. “Climate What they Rarely Teach in College is perhaps the first interesting book about Global Warming and Climate Change written in the last 10 years.}:
The Climate Change Hoax Argument: the history and science that expose a major international deception
The Climate Change Hoax Argument: the history and science that expose a major international deception
A Very Convenient Warming: How modest warming and more CO2 are benefiting humanity
A Very Convenient Warming: How modest warming and more CO2 are benefiting humanity
Stephen Einhorn lives in Milwaukee, Wisconsin with Nancy, his wife of 57 years. He has been blessed with two sons and seven grandchildren. He graduated Cornell with a major in chemistry and received a Masters of Polymeric Materials from Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute. He attended Wharton Graduate School, U. of Pennsylvania, for one year. He has worked in a family chemical business, as a merger and acquisition consultant specializing in chemicals and as a venture capitalist concentrating on Midwestern technology companies. He is the author of a business joke book called "If You Try to Please Everybody, You Will Lose Your Ass" and has given out over 2,500 copies to relatives, friends, and whoever would accept a copy.
also bought
Exposing the Great Climate Change Lie Paperback – June 10, 2023
by Lynne Balzer (Author)
if you suspect that human-caused climate change has been greatly exaggerated by politicians and the media -- newspapers, TV, magazines, internet sources, Hollywood films etc. -- you’re right. You’ll want to know the surprising truth about what is really happening with our climate and the outrageous actions the Biden regime and other governments are taking.
The entire premise that man has hastened the warming of the earth is based on unscientific methods – such as computer modeling – rather than carefully obtained and measured data. Computer models can predict anything their makers want them to, depending on the information put into them. This is why many prominent scientists disagree with the climate change fear mongers.
Exposing the Great Climate Change Lie also explains why the solutions proposed by its proponents: solar and wind farms, biofuels and battery-powered vehicles, are not only impractical and unsustainable but actually destructive to the environment.
Even more shocking is the fact that for years people working at agencies such as NASA and NOAA have been tampering with temperature data. They’ve lowered past temperatures and raised more recent numbers to give the impression that temperatures have increased. But a real scientist never tampers with data. There would be no need for this if their premise was correct.
Whether you are a policy maker or a voter, Exposing the Great Climate Change Lie provides the essential facts you need to make informed decisions that will help determine Earth’s future. It is essential reading.
The climate alarm actually began in the 1970s when we were told that the carbon dioxide we were releasing by burning "fossil fuels" was causing the earth to cool down. Although temperatures were declining, the percentage of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere was increasing!
Then, when the temperatures warmed slightly in the 1980s, the alarmists changed their tune in lockstep and told us we were causing g_{lobal}_ warming. That term became "climate change" when the warming stopped around the year 2000. Despite the lack of any evidence, they now claim that we are having a "climate crisis".
This valuable resource explains why
- the "climate change" narrative is not based on real science
- the climate change scam has usurped the environmentalist cause,
- the world is not running out of petroleum,
- wind and solar farms are not the answer to our energy needs,
- there is no scientific consensus about human-caused global warming, and
- we have been lied to repeatedly.
The people in power who are pushing this narrative admit that this is not an environmental issue. It is an attempt to gain total control over every aspect of our lives. But knowledge is power, and the more you know about this issue, the better you can resist the propaganda.
In an 8 1/2 x 11 inch format, this book is richly illustrated with color photos and graphs as well as quotations from leading scientists who are courageously telling the truth, even if it means that their careers will be destroyed....
---
the Climate Change Hoax Argument: the history and science that expose a major international deception Paperback – April 11, 2021
by C. Paul Smith (Author)
many people believe that a consensus of scientists agree that humans are causing climate change that will cause catastrophic damage to the planet if we do not immediately enact numerous laws and practices to stop it. But those who believe insist that settled science has proved it, and they refuse to debate it, and they cannot explain scientific reasons to support it. In fact. The science does not support it—not the “human-caused” part, not the catastrophic damage part, and especially not the assertion that most scientists agree with it. The claim that humans are causing catastrophic climate change is a hoax.
The Climate Change Hoax Argument presents the history of the hoax and the science that refutes the hoax. After reading this book you will be able to discuss the basic climate principles, and you will be able to intelligently discuss and refute the claims of environmental extremists that humans are destroying the planet. Hundreds of renowned scientists from around the world dispute the claims of the IPCC that human-caused climate change is an existential threat to the world. Here are five such statements:
This is the “worst scientific scandal in the history . . . When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.” --Dr. Kiminori Itoh, environmental physical chemist (Japan) “So far, real measurements give no ground for concern about catastrophic future warming.” --Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck, chemical engineer, Abo Akademi University (Finland) The IPCC “Summaries have distorted the science.” --Dr. Philip Lloyd, nuclear physicist (South Africa) and former IPCC lead author The IPCC’s assertion of consensus in support of its AGW claim is “really outrageous and unethical.” --Dr. William M. Briggs, climate statistician and Assoc. Editor of Monthly Weather Review
“[C]urrent alarm over carbon dioxide is mistaken. . . Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science.” --Dr. Will Happer, Professor at the Department of Physics at Princeton University and Former Director of Energy Research at the Dept. of Energy “Climate Change” is the current mantra of the environmental extremists who insist that humans are destroying the earth by emitting too much CO₂ into the atmosphere. These extremists insist that the use of fossil fuels is the root cause of this pending doom, and that if all nations do not immediately take drastic steps towards eliminating fossil fuels then the earth will be destroyed in ten years. They call this an “existential threat.” But they are wrong.
Current and continued use of fossil fuels will not lead to the destruction of the earth; neither is it causing increased global warming that will cause this destruction; neither is it causing a rise of sea level that will devastate mankind; neither is it causing an increased number and intensity of tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires, floods or droughts. Science does not support a finding of increases in extreme weather.
Some scientists asserted such extremist conclusions, but more and more scientists are abandoning the politically correct global warming/climate change movement as they are beginning to see the falsehoods, deceptions, and rigged predictions of those who are using “climate change” as a pawn in their attempts to bring about a one-world socialist, totalitarian government. The purpose of this book is to educate people and to alert them that the claim of human-caused climate change is a hoax, and that those claiming it have the burden to prove it. They insist the debate is over in order to avoid their fraud from being exposed. Until now the hoax has shielded them from having to prove their case, or even to debate the science. But the charade is over.
---
The Truth about Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change: Exposing Climate Lies in an Age of Disinformation: Corsi Ph.D., Jerome R.: 9781637589205: Amazon.com: Books
the Truth about Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change: Exposing Climate Lies in an Age of Disinformation Paperback – August 22, 2022
by Jerome R. Corsi Ph.D. (Author)
this book exposes the truth that the climate change hoax is a political movement aimed at eliminating capitalism by spreading alarming disinformation that in order to “save the Earth” from global warming, we must reduce carbon dioxide emissions by switching from hydrocarbon fuels to renewable energies.
The Truth about Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change: Exposing Climate Lies in an Age of Disinformation reveals a science-based understanding of Earth’s climate and temperature that Green New Deal proponents are trying to hide. In the pages of this book, you will see scientifically documented evidence for many facts that the radical left denies.
Want to know the truth about how energy, temperature, and climate work? Read The Truth about Energy, Global Warming, and Climate Change—but prepare to be shocked. Jerome R. Corsi has conducted a tour-de-force examination of peer-reviewed climate science that exposes the neo-Marxists behind today’s anti-capitalist global warming hoax.
---