webodec3ARCHIVEPreview
Open in TheBrain

bradbury, steven e s q

pow mofo pending

clarence clerk liar

---

an 1 25

Trump's own supporters on Saturday lashed out as the President-elect announced the nomination of a contributor to Project 2025.

Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign distanced himself from Project 2025, the conservative Heritage Foundation's blueprint for a Republican presidential administration. The project was found by polls to be devastating for Republicans, and Trump did what he could to disassociate from those who headed it.

But over the weekend, the former and incoming president announced he would be bringing on someone who had a role in the document.

ALSO READ: Trump intel advisor Devin Nunes still dismisses Russian election meddling as a 'hoax'

"I am pleased to announce that Steven Gill Bradbury will be the next United States Deputy Secretary of Transportation," Trump wrote. "For the entirety of my First Term, Steven served as the General Counsel of the Department of Transportation, where he helped rebuild our crumbling Infrastructure, and cut regulations that were killing jobs and our incredible Small Businesses. He previously clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas."

Trump added, "Steven will work with our fantastic Secretary of Transportation Nominee, Sean Duffy, to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN."

Not all Trump's supporters were happy with the move.

David W. Reinauer, a conservative Christian who has posted pro-Trump material, said, "Oh great! Another satanic (f)reemason from the Heritage freemason society!"

"The 'conservative deep state' of the USA," he added. "Let's hope it is a SPOTLIGHT like most of the rest."

Another self-identified "MAGA" supporter, @blacklisterd, said, "We already have roads. Close it down."

A user who celebrated Trump's election win, @Cheshiret, said the President-elect was making appointments to an "unconstitutional agency.

3/21

...Transportation Department's inspector general asked the Justice Department in December to consider a criminal probe into then-Secretary Elaine Chao over her alleged misuse of office, documents made public Wednesday said, including her alleged use of staff for personal tasks like sending Christmas ornaments to fami...The Justice Department and the US Attorney's Office in Washington, however, declined to pursue the case in the final weeks of the Trump administration, stating there "may be ethical and/or administrative issues to address but there is not predication to open a criminal investigation," according to Transportation Department Deputy Inspector General Mitch Behm's 38-page report detailing his office's extensive ethics concerns surrounding Chao's conduct.

"We concluded that a formal investigation into potential misuses of position was warranted," Behm wrote in a letter accompanying the report.<...https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/20/politics/transportation-inspector-general/index.html...had been requested by the Democratic leadership of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which asked the IG's office to investigate Chao's "possible conflicts of interest," including various reports that her office was giving "preferential treatment to Kentucky." Behm wrote that his preliminary review did not find "a sufficient basis" to formally investigate those claims but an investigation into potential misuse of office was warranted.

Chao, who is married to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, had used agency staff for tasks that "appear to be personal in nature," the report stated, citing its investigation.

This included tasking staff with editing her father's Wikipedia page and sending a copy of his book "to a well-known CEO of a major U.S. corporation," the inspector general's report said, citing a review of emails and interviews with department staffers.

Investigators said that, in one instance, Chao allegedly directed political appointees on her staff to reach out to the Department of Homeland Security regarding a work permit application for a student "who was a recipient of Chao family's philanthropy," the report stated. Inspector general investigators said Chao allegedly made plans to include family members during a planned work trip to China that was ultimately canceled, the report added.

The inspector general report said Chao declined to respond to questions as part of the investigation, but DOT General Counsel Steven Bradburyprovided a memo in September that emphasized the cultural value of supporting family.

"Anyone familiar with Asian culture knows it is a core value in Asian communities to express honor and filial respect toward one's parents, and this ingrained value of love, respect, and filial piety always takes precedence over self-promotion and self-aggrandizement. ... As the eldest daughter, she is expected to assume a leadership role in family occasions that honor her father and her late mother," the memo argued.

A spokesperson for Chao said the Justice Department's decision not to pursue the case "exonerates" Chao.

"This report exonerates the Secretary from baseless accusations and closes the book on an election-year effort to impugn her history-making career as the first Asian American woman appointed to a President's Cabinet and her outstanding record as the longest tenured Cabinet member since World War II," the spokesperson for Chao told CNN.

A spokesperson for McConnell declined to comment.

Chao faced swift backlash from Democrats on Wednesday evening after the inspector general report became public.

"The DOT Inspector General's report, in addition to documents we obtained, demonstrate that Secretary Chao used her official position and taxpayer resources for the benefit of herself and her family," House Oversight Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, a New York Democrat, said in a statement.

That message was echoed by Rep. Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat who's the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, who said in a statement: "Public servants, especially those responsible for leading tens of thousands of other public servants, must know that they serve the public and not their family's private commercial interests."

Republican House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ranking member Sam Graves of Missouri, however, defended Chao's "tireless work" in a statement that said her tenure would not be "diminished" by the investigation.

Chao had resigned from her role in January following the US Capitol insurrection, writing at the time that she was "deeply troubled" by the "entirely avoidable" incident.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury

Steven Gill Bradbury[1][2] (born September 12, 1958) is an American attorney and government official who served as the General Counsel of the United States Department of Transportation.[3] He previously served as Acting Assistant Attorney General (AAG) from 2005 to 2007[4] and Principal Deputy AAG from 2004 to 2009,[5]: 132 heading the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) in the U.S. Department of Justice during President George W. Bush's second term.

During his tenure in OLC, he authored a number of significant classified opinions providing legal authorization for waterboarding[6] and other so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques", which are frequently described as torture.[7] Bradbury was nominated to be the Assistant Attorney General for OLC but individual Democratic Senators put holds on his nomination, preventing the full Senate from voting on it, and Democratic leaders in the Senate instituted pro forma sessions of the Senate during scheduled recesses to prevent the President from giving him a recess appointment.[8][9] Bradbury continued to serve as theacting chief of OLC until the end of the Bush Administration on January 20, 2009.

Prior to becoming General Counsel of the Department of Transportation, Bradbury was a partner at the Washington D.C. office of Dechert LLP.[10][11] In June 2017, he was nominated by President Donald Trump to become General Counsel of the United States Department of Transportation.[12] On November 14, 2017, Bradbury was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 50–47 for the position.[13][14] On September 10, 2019, he was further authorized to perform the functions and duties of the Office of the Deputy Secretary of Transportation as the Acting Deputy Secretary.[15][16] On December 21, 2020, his official title was changed to remove the "acting" designation, but with him continuing to perform the duties of the position.[17]

On January 7, 2021, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao submitted her resignation to President Donald Trump due to the 2021 United States Capitol attack.[18] As the official performing the functions and duties of the Office of the Deputy Secretary of Transportation, Bradbury became the acting Secretary of Transportation as of January 12, 2021.[19] He remained in office until the change of administration on January 20, 2021.

Early life and education:{:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[e}:

Bradbury was born September 12, 1958, in Portland, Oregon,[1] the youngest of four children. His father, Edward T. Bradbury,[20] died when he was 11 months old, and his mother supported the family by working nights and taking in laundry to supplement their Social Security income.[21] He grew up in the Sunnyside neighborhood, where he attended Washington High School. He was student body president his senior year.[22] Bradbury was the first in his family to graduate from college, earning a B.A. from Stanford University in 1980 with a major in English.[21]

After working in publishing and as a legal assistant in New York in the early 1980s, Bradbury attended the University of Michigan Law School, where he received his J.D., magna cum laude, in 1988.[20] He was aneditor for the Michigan Law Review[20] and a member of the Order of the Coif.[10] In October 1988, following graduation, he married Hilde Kahn, his law school classmate.[20]

Career[

From 1988 to 1990, Bradbury worked as an associate at Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C. In 1990–1991, he served as a law clerk to Judge James L. Buckley on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. After working as an Attorney-Adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel from 1991 to 1992, he served as a law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court of the United States from 1992 to 1993.[10][21]

Following his clerkship for Justice Thomas, Bradbury practiced law withKirkland & Ellis[21] in Washington, D.C., first as an associate from 1993 to 1994 and then as a partner from 1994 to 2004. In 1998, Bradbury was named one of the top 40 lawyers under 40 by Washingtonian.[23] In his law practice at Kirkland & Ellis, he focused on antitrust (mergers and litigation), securities law (including class action litigation and regulatory investigations), and various other regulatory, constitutional, and commercial litigation matters, both at the trial and appellate levels.

Office of Legal Counsel[

In April 2004, Bradbury left private practice after being appointed as the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the OLC under Assistant Attorney General Jack Goldsmith,[24] becoming Acting Assistant Attorney General in February 2005.[25][5]: 132  He was nominated by President George W. Bush to be the Assistant Attorney General for OLC on June 23, 2005.[2][26] The delay between his appointment and nomination was seen by some within the Justice Department as a "trial period", in which he would be susceptible to pressure. In May 2005, during this "trial period", Bradbury issued a set of opinions authorizing the use of torture; his nomination to lead the OLC occurred one month later.[21][27][28][29][5]: 142 

His nomination was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee in November 2005 but was never voted on by the full Senate, due to Senate holds placed by four Democratic Senators. Their resistance was due in part to his memoranda concerning the use of torture during interrogations in the War on Terror[30] and due to questions about his role in NSA warrantless surveillance programs.[31][8][24] Bradbury's nomination was returned to the President under Rule XXXI, Paragraph 6 of the United States Senate at the end of 2005.[26] President Bush unsuccessfully nominated him twice more in 2006,[32][33] once in 2007,[34] and for the fifth time in 2008.[35] Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid offered to confirm 84 other stalled nominees in exchange for the White House withdrawing Bradbury's nomination, but this offer was declined by the Bush administration.[36]

In August 2004, Bradbury issued a memorandum concluding that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution secures an individual right to keep and bear arms.[37] This opinion was cited throughout an amicus curiae brief by the Department of Justice[38] reasoning which was adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States in District of Columbia v. Heller.[39]

In 2007, Bradbury approved an OLC opinion to the Social Security Administration that endorsed granting social security benefits to the non-biological child of a same-sex union.[40]

Bradbury received a number of awardsand honors while at OLC, including the Edmund J. Randolph Award for outstanding service to the Department of Justice, the Secretary of Defense Medal for Outstanding Public Service, theNational Security Agency's Intelligence Under Law Award, the Director of National Intelligence's Intelligence Community Legal Award, and the Criminal Division's Award for Outstanding Law Enforcement Partnerships.[10][11][3]

Torture memos[

Main article: Torture memos

In May 2005, in response to requests from the CIA, Bradbury authored the "2005 Bradbury Memo"[5]: 133  confirming that 13 so-called "enhanced interrogation techniques" did not constitute torture, including waterboarding,[6] nudity,[5]: 133  walling,[41] stress positions, slapping or striking a prisoner,[42][9][6] exposure to extreme temperatures,[7][9] dousing with cold water,[43] and forced sleep deprivation of up to 180 hours (7+1⁄2 days).[43][44][45][24][46][41][47] A second memorandum, the "Combined Techniques Memo"[5]: 133  found that the techniques did not constitute torture, even when used in combination.[48][49][25][5]: 137–138  Bradbury's memoranda found the CIA's practices to be lawful if applied in accordance with specified conditions.[42][5]: 134  Later in May, Bradbury signed a third memo, the "Article 16 Memo",[5]: 145–151  which contained the opinion that the CIA's use of these techniques did not violate the Article 16 of the United Nations Convention against Torture, which forbids "other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment which do not amount to torture".[50]: 351  These memoranda were described by Democrats as an attempt to sidestep anti-torture laws and subvert a 2004 public Justice Department legal opinion characterizing torture as "abhorrent".[7] The Obama Administration released these memoranda on April 16, 2009.[51]

In April 2006, Bradbury issued a "Memorandum for the Files" approving Appendix M of the 2006 Army Field Manual for interrogations.[52][53][54]

In response to the 2006 Supreme Court decision Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, Bradbury described sections of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions as "hopelessly vague", singling out its ban on "outrages upon person dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment"[55] and arguing that military tribunals should admit evidence obtained via torture.[56][57]

In July 2007, Bradbury issued the "2007 Bradbury Memo"[5]: 151  addressing the legality of a subset of interrogation techniques in light of Hamdan and other developments, including intervening legislation such as the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and the December 2005 Detainee Treatment Act. The 2007 memo provided legal authorization and OLC approval for a more limited set of actions for use when interrogating high-value detainees. This approval encompassed six listed techniques, including temporary food deprivation (no less than 1,000 calories/day), sleep deprivation by being forced to hold a "standing position for as many as four days", and several types of physical striking.[58][59]

In February 2008, Bradbury testified before a subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee about the legality of waterboarding and other torture techniques. During questioning, Bradbury stated that the administration did not deem techniques to be torture unless they inflicted pain that was both severe and long-lasting.[6] This testimony was criticized by numerous civil liberties advocates and legal scholars.[6] Bradbury did not offer an opinion if waterboarding was illegal under the Detainee Treatment Act or the Military Commissions Act of 2006, but stated that these laws "would make it much more difficult to conclude that the practice was lawful today".[6]

Near the end of the Bush Administration, Bradbury signed two memoranda for the files; these said that, during his tenure OLC had determined that certain legal propositions, previously stated in ten OLC opinions issued between 2001 and 2003 concerning executive power in the War on Terror, no longer reflected the views of OLC and "should not be treated as authoritative for any purpose". In addition, his memo said that some of the underlying opinions had been withdrawn or superseded and that "caution should be exercised" by the Executive Branch "before relying in other respects" on the other opinions that had not been superseded or withdrawn.[60][61]

On April 15, 2009, Bradbury's successor, Acting Assistant Attorney General David J. Barron withdrew four OLC memoranda pertaining to CIA interrogations, including three signed by Bradbury.[62][63]

A 2009 report from the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility cited "serious concerns about some of his analysis" but noted that "these issues did not rise to the level of professional misconduct."[47][64][5]: 258–259  The OPR noted that other Bush administration lawyers "found Bradbury's reasoning flawed, politically motivated and simply wrong" and that Bradbury's memos amounted to "legal rationalizations" that "were simply written with the goal of allowing the CIA torture program to continue."[64]

Post-OLC career[

Following his term in OLC, Bradbury returned to private practice as a partner at Dechert LLP in Washington, D.C., where he specialized in antitrust, administrative litigation and enforcement actions, general commercial litigation, and appellate matters.[10][11]

In February 2012, Bradbury testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on H.R. 3702, the "Due Process Guarantee Act of 2011".[64]

During the 2012 presidential election, Bradbury served as an advisor to Mitt Romney's campaign on matters of national security law.[65][49]

In the wake of the 2013 global surveillance disclosures, Bradbury testified before Congress and authored several editorials in defense of the National Security Agency's surveillance programs, including the collection of telephone metadata.[66]

U.S. Department of Transportation[

In June 2017, he was nominated by President Donald Trump to become General Counsel of the United States Department of Transportation.[12][67] Bradbury's nomination was opposed by a coalition of human rights groups,[68] including the American Civil Liberties Union, Human Rights Watch, Center for Victims of Torture, and the Center for Constitutional Rights.[69][29] Following a preliminary hearing by the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee, Senator Tammy Duckworth announced that she had placed a hold on Bradbury's nomination.[70] The Senate operates by unanimous consent, granting any single Senator the ability to prevent action.[70] Overruling Duckworth's hold, Republican Senators on the**Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee**voted to advance Bradbury's nomination, which was still subject to confirmation by a full Senate vote.[71][72] On November 14, 2017, Bradbury was confirmed for the position in a50–47 vote, largely along party lines.[13][14] Two Republican Senators, John McCain and Rand Paul, voted against Bradbury's confirmation, both citing his involvement in the torture program as the reason for their votes.[13][73][74] Bradbury was sworn into office on November 28, 2017.[3]

After former Deputy Secretary of Transportation Jeffrey A. Rosen was nominated to serve as Deputy Attorney General, Bradbury was selected by President Trump to concurrently perform the functions and duties of the Deputy Secretary of Transportation.[15]After Secretary Elaine Chao resigned on January 11, 2021, due to the riots at the United States Capitol incited by President Donald Trump, Bradbury took the position of Acting Secretary of Transportation.Lana Hurdle succeeded Bradbury as Acting Secretary of Transportation on January 20, 2021.[75]

Notes[

  1. ^ Bradbury was initially conferred the title of Acting Deputy Secretary until December 21, 2020 when the "acting" distinction was removed

References:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

  1. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-questionnaire_2-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-questionnaire_2-2) "Responses for Steven Gill Bradbury, Nominee for General Counsel, Department of Transportation". senate.gov. Archived from the original on May 25, 2020. Retrieved June 5, 2018.
  2. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Nomination_3-1) "Presidential Nomination: Steven Gill Bradbury". whitehouse.gov. n.d. Retrieved October 21, 2016 – via National Archives.
  3. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-USDOTBio_4-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-USDOTBio_4-2) "Steven G. Bradbury". United States Department of Transportation. November 30, 2017. Archived from the original on December 20, 2017. Retrieved December 22, 2017.
  4. ^ Kepplinger, Gary L. (June 13, 2008). Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998-Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice (Report). Government Accountability Office. Retrieved June 1, 2017.
  5. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-3) e(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-4) f(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-5) g(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-6) h(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-7) i(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-8) j(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-9) k(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-OPR_6-10) Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (July 29, 2009). Investigation into the Office of Legal Counsel's Memoranda Concerning Issues Relating to the Central Intelligence Agency's Use of "Enhanced Interrogation Techniques" on Suspected Terrorists (PDF) (Report). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved May 29, 2017.
  6. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-rough_7-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-rough_7-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-rough_7-3) e(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-rough_7-4) f(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-rough_7-5) Eggen, Dan (February 17, 2008). "Justice Official Defends Rough CIA Interrogations". The Washington Post. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  7. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-NYT-2008-01-24_8-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-NYT-2008-01-24_8-2) Shenon, Philip; Lichtblau, Eric (January 24, 2008). "Justice Nomination Seen as Snub to Democrats". The New York Times. Retrieved December 28, 2015.
  8. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-proforma_9-1) Barrett, Ted; Kilaru, Vandana (December 26, 2007). "Webb opens, closes vacant Senate session". CNN. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  9. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-latimes2007-10-06_10-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-latimes2007-10-06_10-2) Miller, Greg; Schmitt, Richard B. (October 6, 2007). "CIA doesn't use torture, Bush says". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  10. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-DechertBio_11-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-DechertBio_11-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-DechertBio_11-3) e(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-DechertBio_11-4) "Steven G. Bradbury". Dechert. n.d. Archived from the original on March 4, 2018. Retrieved December 26, 2015.
  11. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-Intelligencer_12-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-Intelligencer_12-2) Passarella, Gina (July 13, 2009). "DOJ Lawyer Who Argued Legality of Waterboarding Scores BigLaw Partnership". The Legal Intelligencer. Archived from the original on October 14, 2017. Retrieved December 28, 2015.
  12. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-politico-usdot_13-1) Morin, Rebecca (June 5, 2017). ":{'Torture memo' author nominated for Trump administration post":(style="padding-left:0.2em"):}:. Politico. Retrieved June 6, 2017.
  13. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-politico-confirmation_14-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-politico-confirmation_14-2) Schor, Elana; Gardner, Lauren (November 14, 2017). "Senate confirms Bradbury after fight over 'torture memos':{":(style="padding-right:0.2em"):}:. Politico. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
  14. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-hill-confirmation_15-1) Zanona, Melanie (November 14, 2017). "Senate confirms 'torture memo' author to lead Transportation Dept legal office". The Hill. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
  15. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Deputy_16-1) "Steven G. Bradbury General Counsel". transportation.gov. Archived from the original on January 9, 2021. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  16. ^ "Meet Key Officials". Archived from the original on September 16, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  17. ^ "Meet Key Officials". Archived from the original on December 21, 2019. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  18. ^ Duncan, Ian; Laris, Michael; Dawsey, Josh (January 7, 2021). "Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao resigns, saying she is 'deeply troubled' by violence at the Capitol". The New York Times. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  19. ^ "Steven G. Bradbury Acting Secretary of Transportation". transportation.gov. Archived from the original on January 16, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  20. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-kahn_21-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-kahn_21-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-kahn_21-3) "Hilde Kahn Is Married To Steven G. Bradbury". The New York Times. October 17, 1988. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  21. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-NYTSecret_22-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-NYTSecret_22-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-NYTSecret_22-3) e(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-NYTSecret_22-4) Shane, Scott; Johnston, David; Risen, James (October 4, 2007). "Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations". The New York Times. Retrieved December 26, 2015.
  22. ^ Duin, Steve (April 24, 2008). "Once upon a time at WaHi". The Oregonian. Archived from the original on June 8, 2011. Retrieved March 24, 2010.
  23. ^ Eisler, Kim (July 1, 2006). "40 Lawyers under 40". Washingtonian. Retrieved December 2, 2017.
  24. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-ThinkProgress_25-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-ThinkProgress_25-2) Khanna, Satyam (October 16, 2007). "Durbin, Feingold, Kennedy Demand Bush Withdraw Nominee For DOJ Office Of Legal Counsel". ThinkProgress. Retrieved December 26, 2015.
  25. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Pfiffner_26-1) Pfiffner, James P. (May 2, 2010). *Torture As Public Policy: Restoring U.S. Credibility on the World Stage*. Abingdon-on-Thames, United Kingdom: Routledge. ISBN 978-1594515095. Retrieved November 8, 2021. After Alberto Gonzales was confirmed as the Attorney General in February 2005, Steven Bradbury was designated as acting director of OLC, and he drafted two memos that authorized the CIA to use combinations of several techniques at the same time.
  26. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-PN652_27-1) PN652 — Steven G. Bradbury — Department of Justice. Congressional Record (Report). December 21, 2005. Retrieved November 10, 2019.
  27. ^ Kirk, Michael (October 16, 2007). "Cheney's Law". FRONTLINE. PBS. Cheney's Law. Retrieved May 29, 2017. Scott Shane: Some people at Justice told us that that was essentially a trial period during which he had to demonstrate to the White House that he wasn't going to make any big trouble. Narrator: Bradbury wrote a top secret opinion to authorize the harshest techniques yet for CIA interrogations. Scott Shane: These are very harsh techniques which had not been approved in decades of U.S. practice, including slapping people, keeping them in cold rooms, sleep deprivation, bombarding them with music, and even water boarding, the simulated drowning. This opinion, we're told, gives expansive approval to the combination of those different tactics. Narrator: Steven Bradbury passed his trial period. The president nominated him permanent head of the Office of Legal Counsel.
  28. ^ Horton, Scott (February 22, 2010). "Quid Pro Quo". Harper's Magazine. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
  29. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-eviatar_30-1) Eviatar, Daphne (June 26, 2017). ":{'Torture Memo' Author Should Be Disqualified From Department Of Transportation Job":(style="padding-left:0.2em"):}:. The Huffington Post. Retrieved July 16, 2017.
  30. ^ Shane, Scott (October 29, 2007). "U.S. struggles with taint of torture". The New York Times. Retrieved August 28, 2016.
  31. ^ Nomination of Steven Bradbury. Congressional Record (Report). Vol. 153. October 16, 2007. p. S12890. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  32. ^ PN1190 — Steven G. Bradbury — Department of Justice. Congressional Record (Report). Retrieved November 10, 2019.
  33. ^ PN2171 — Steven G. Bradbury — Department of Justice. Congressional Record (Report). Retrieved November 10, 2019.
  34. ^ PN39 — Steven G. Bradbury — Department of Justice. Congressional Record (Report). Retrieved November 10, 2019.
  35. ^ PN1200 — Steven G. Bradbury — Department of Justice (Report). Retrieved November 10, 2019.
  36. ^ Reilly, Daniel W. (February 6, 2008). "Bush ups the ante in nomination fight". Politico. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
  37. ^ Steven G. Bradbury; Howard C. Nielson Jr.; C. Kevin Marshall (August 24, 2004). "Whether the Second Amendment Secures an Individual Right: Memorandum Opinion for the Attorney General" (PDF). Office of Legal Counsel. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 14, 2006. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  38. ^ "Brief for Amici Curiae: Former Senior Officials of the Department of Justice in Support of Respondent" (PDF). American Bar Association. February 2008. Retrieved August 28, 2016.
  39. ^ See 554 U.S. 570, 128 S. Ct. 2753 (2008). A review of the opinion for the Court in Heller reveals that it closely tracks the August 2004 OLC opinion in both the structure and substance of its legal analysis.[according ^to whom?]
  40. ^ "Justice for Gays". The Washington Post. July 5, 2008. Retrieved December 27, 2015.
  41. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-time_42-1) Scherer, Michael (April 21, 2009). "Scientists Claim CIA Misused Work on Sleep Deprivation". Time. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  42. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Mazzetti_43-1) Mark Mazzetti; Scott Shane (April 16, 2009). "Interrogation Memos Detail Harsh Tactics by the C.I.A." The New York Times. Retrieved April 17, 2009.
  43. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Salon20100309_44-1) Mark Benjamin (March 9, 2010). "Waterboarding for dummies". Salon. Retrieved October 26, 2019. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Steven Bradbury wrote in a May 10, 2005, memo authorizing continued use of waterboarding
  44. ^ Bradbury, Steven G. (May 10, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 6, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  45. ^ Bradbury, Steven G. (May 10, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  46. ^ Bradbury, Steven G. (May 30, 2005). "Memorandum for John Rizzo" (PDF). ACLU. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 12, 2011. Retrieved October 24, 2011.
  47. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-HuffPo2017_48-1) Reilly, Ryan J. (March 30, 2017). ":{'Torture Memo' Author Spotted At Trump White House":(style="padding-left:0.2em"):}:. The Huffington Post. Washington, D.C. Retrieved June 1, 2017.
  48. ^ Wheeler, Marcy (May 18, 2009). "The 13 people who made torture possible". Salon.com. Retrieved October 25, 2019.
  49. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Savage-2012-09-27_50-1) Savage, Charlie (September 27, 2012). "Election to Decide Future Interrogation Methods in Terrorism Cases". The New York Times. Retrieved August 28, 2016.
  50. ^ United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (December 3, 2014). Committee Study of the Central Intelligence Agency's Detention and Interrogation Program, foreword by Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Dianne Feinstein, Findings and Conclusions, Executive Summary (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on December 9, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2017. Declassification Revisions December 3, 2014
  51. ^ de Vogue, Ariane (April 16, 2009). "DOJ Releases Controversial 'Torture Memos':{":(style="padding-right:0.2em"):}:. ABC News. Retrieved June 1, 2017.
  52. ^ Bradbury, Steven G. (April 13, 2006). "Memorandum for the Files: Re: Legal Review of Department of Defense Draft Documents Regarding Treatment and Interrogation of Detainees" (PDF). Office of Legal Counsel. United States Department of Justice. Retrieved November 8, 2021 – via ACLU.org.
  53. ^ Wheeler, Marcy (March 22, 2010). "Bush DOD Structured Authorization Memo to Provide Torture Blank Check". Firedoglake. Retrieved June 8, 2021.
  54. ^ Kaye, Jeff (May 1, 2013). "The Torture Memo Obama Never Rescinded". Firedoglake. Retrieved November 8, 2021.
  55. ^ Bradbury, Steven G. (September 18, 2006). "Ask the White House". whitehouse.gov. Archived from the original on August 10, 2017. Retrieved August 28, 2016 – via National Archives. But other provisions of Common Article 3 are hopelessly vague and subject to almost unlimited interpretation – such as its prohibition on 'outrages upon person dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment.'
  56. ^ Diamond, John; Biskupic, Joan (July 11, 2006). "Geneva Conventions cover Gitmo detainees". USA Today. Retrieved December 28, 2015.
  57. ^ Zernike, Kate (July 13, 2006). "White House Prods Congress to Curb Detainee Rights". The New York Times. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  58. ^ Steven G. Bradbury (September 3, 2009). "Memorandum for John A. Rizzo Acting General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency Re: Application of the War Crimes Act, the Detainee Treatment Act, and Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions to Certain Techniques that May Be Used by the CIA in the Interrogation of High Value al Qaeda Detainees" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  59. ^ Eviatar, Daphne (August 27, 2009). "Memos Suggest Legal Cherry-Picking in Justifying Torture: DOJ Lawyers' Analysis Changed Little Despite New Legal Backdrop". The Washington Independent. Archived from the original on August 29, 2009. Retrieved December 28, 2015.
  60. ^ "Department of Justice Releases Nine Office of Legal Counsel Memoranda and Opinions". United States Department of Justice. March 9, 2009. Archived from the original on April 22, 2009. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  61. ^ Lee, Chisun (March 3, 2009). "Bush Admin Quietly Rejected Own 'Highly Questionable' Counterterrorism Stances". ProPublica. Retrieved May 29, 2017.
  62. ^ Barron, David J. (April 15, 2009). "Withdrawal of Office of Legal Counsel CIA Interrogation Opinions" (PDF). The Washington Post. Retrieved July 10, 2016. Four previous opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel concerning interrogations by the Central Intelligence Agency are withdrawn and no longer represent the views of the Office.
  63. ^ Miller, Greg; Meyer, Josh (April 17, 2009). "Obama assures intelligence officials they won't be prosecuted over interrogations". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  64. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-smackdown_65-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G.Bradbury#cite_ref-smackdown_65-2) Smith, Jordan Michael (July 18, 2012). "Franken's torture smackdown". Salon. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
  65. ^ Rosenthal, Andrew (September 27, 2012). "Will Waterboarding Make a Comeback?". The New York Times. Retrieved August 28, 2016.
  66. ^ Bradbury, Steven G. (July 22, 2013). "NSA phone collection efforts shouldn't be constrained". The Washington Post. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  67. ^ White House Office of the Press Secretary (June 5, 2017). "President Donald J. Trump Announces Intent to Nominate Personnel to Key Administration Posts". whitehouse.gov (Press release). Washington, D.C. Retrieved June 7, 2017 – via National Archives.
  68. ^ Savage, Charlie (June 28, 2017). "Trump Nominee Who Wrote Bush-Era Torture Memos Is Scrutinized". The New York Times. Retrieved July 7, 2017.
  69. ^ "Groups Express Concern Over Trump Nominee for Role in Torture" (Press release). Human Rights Watch. June 22, 2017. Archived from the original on July 18, 2017. Retrieved July 7, 2017.
  70. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="user-select:none;top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_G._Bradbury#cite_ref-Maizland_71-1) Maizland, Lindsay (June 29, 2017). "Steven Bradbury wrote the memos authorizing torture. Trump wants him back in government". Vox.com. Washington, DC. Retrieved October 26, 2019.
  71. ^ Reilly, Ryan J. (August 8, 2017). "Purple Heart Vet 'Incredulous' Her Senate Colleagues Approved Trump Nominee Who Authored 'Torture Memos':{":(style="padding-right:0.2em"):}:. Huffington Post. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
  72. ^ Zanona, Melanie (August 2, 2017). "Senate panel votes to confirm 'torture memo' author over objections from Dems, Duckworth". The Hill. Retrieved August 26, 2017.
  73. ^ Diaz, Daniella (November 15, 2017). "McCain cites torture justification for opposing DOT counsel". CNN. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  74. ^ Ducharme, Jamie (November 15, 2017). "John McCain Tried to Block a Routine Trump Appointment Over Torture". Time. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  75. ^ "President Joe Biden Announces Acting Federal Agency Leadership". The White House. January 21, 2021. Retrieved January 21, 2021.

External links:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

Legal officesLegal officesLegal offices

Preceded by

Daniel Levin

Acting

United States Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel

Acting

2005–2009

Succeeded by

David Barron

Acting

Preceded by

Kathryn B. Thomson

General Counsel of the United States Department of Transportation

2017–2021

Succeeded by

John Putnam

Acting

Preceded by

Jeffrey A. Rosen

United States Deputy Secretary of Transportation

Acting

2019–2021

Succeeded by

Polly Trottenberg

Preceded by

Elaine Chao

United States Secretary of Transportation

Acting

2021

Succeeded by

Lana Hurdle

Acting

hide

Authority control 

hide

Authority control 
General
National libraries

Categories: 

https://fedsoc.org/contributors/steven-bradbury

not all

Executive Orders on Guidance: Implications and Next Steps

Executive Branch Review Week Teleforum

Teleforum

Speakers:

Steven G. Bradbury • John Walke • Adam White

Topics:

Administrative Law & Regulation

Sponsors:

Regulatory Transparency Project

Seventh Annual Executive Branch Review Conference

May

8

2019

Wednesday

9:00 a.m.

EST

Seventh Annual Executive Branch Review Conference

Regulatory Reform "Report Card"

The Mayflower Hotel

1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

Topics:

Administrative Law & Regulation • Federalism • Federalism & Separation of Powers

Sponsors:

Administrative Law & Regulation Practice Group • Civil Rights Practice Group • Corporations, Securities & Antitrust Practice Group • Criminal Law & Procedure Practice Group • Environmental Law & Property Rights Practice Group • Federalism & Separation of Powers Practice Group • Financial Services & E-Commerce Practice Group • Free Speech & Election Law Practice Group • Intellectual Property Practice Group • International & National Security Law Practice Group • Labor & Employment Law Practice Group • Litigation Practice Group • Professional Responsibility & Legal Education Practice Group • Religious Liberties Practice Group • Telecommunications & Electronic Media Practice Group

more

Pending Litigation and the New Administration

This event has concluded.

Feb

8

2017

Wednesday

1:00 p.m.

Pending Litigation and the New Administration

Teleforum

Speakers:

Steven G. Bradbury • William S. Consovoy

Topics:

Litigation • Federalism & Separation of Powers

Sponsors:

Litigation Practice Group

The Second Annual Mike Lewis Memorial Teleforum

This event has concluded.

Jan

24

2017

Tuesday

1:00 p.m.

The Second Annual Mike Lewis Memorial Teleforum

Teleforum

Speakers:

Steven G. Bradbury • Phillip Carter • Adam Klein

Topics:

Federalism & Separation of Powers • International & National Security Law

Sponsors:

International & National Security Law Practice Group

The President vs. Congress: Zivotofsky v. Kerry

This event has concluded.

Jun

8

2015

Monday

2:00 p.m.

The President vs. Congress: Zivotofsky v. Kerry

Teleforum

Speakers:

Steven G. Bradbury • Eugene Kontorovich

Topics:

Federalism & Separation of Powers • International & National Security Law

Sponsors:

International & National Security Law Practice Group

IS It Legal? Legal Authority for the Campaign Against the Islamic State

Oct

22

2014

Wednesday

6:00 p.m.

EST

IS It Legal? Legal Authority for the Campaign Against the Islamic State

DC Young Lawyers Chapter and The Alexander Hamilton Society

Mayflower Hotel

1127 Connecticut Ave NW

Washington, DC 20036

Speakers:

John B. Bellinger • Steven G. Bradbury • Rachel L. Brand • Sarah Hawkins Warren

more

Topics:

International & National Security Law • Foreign Policy • International Law & Trade

Sponsors:

DC Young Lawyers Chapter

2014 National Student Symposium

Mar

7

2014

Friday

3:00 p.m.

EST

2014 National Student Symposium

Security vs. Freedom: Contemporary Controversies

University of Florida Levin College of Law

309 Village Dr

Gainesville, FL 32611

Topics:

Civil Rights • Constitution • Foreign Policy • International Law & Trade • Security & Privacy • Supreme Court • International & National Security Law

more

Sponsors:

Florida Student Chapter

Fraud on the Market? - Oral Argument Preview of Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund

This event has concluded.

Mar

4

2014

Tuesday

3:00 p.m.

Fraud on the Market? - Oral Argument Preview of Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund

Teleforum

Speakers:

Steven G. Bradbury • Michael Klausner

Topics:

Administrative Law & Regulation • Litigation • Financial Services & E-Commerce • Corporations, Securities & Antitrust • Criminal Law & Procedure

more

Sponsors:

Litigation Practice Group • Corporations, Securities & Antitrust Practice Group

The NSA, Security, Privacy, and Intelligence Symposium

Feb

24

2014

Monday

10:30 a.m.

EST

The NSA, Security, Privacy, and Intelligence Symposium

International & National Security Law Practice Group

Jones Day LLP

51 Louisiana Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Topics:

International Law & Trade • Security & Privacy • International & National Security Law

Sponsors:

International & National Security Law Practice Group

NSA Court Decision

This event has concluded.

Dec

19

2013

Thursday

4:00 p.m.

NSA Court Decision

Teleforum

Speakers:

Steven G. Bradbury• Orin S. Kerr

Topics:

Administrative Law & Regulation • Civil Rights • Telecommunications & Electronic Media • Federalism & Separation of Powers • Criminal Law & Procedure • International & National Security Law • Intellectual Property

more

Sponsors:

International & National Security Law Practice Group

The Federalist Society: How Conservatives Took the Law Back ...

https://books.google.com › books

Michael Avery, ‎Danielle McLaughlin · 2021 · ‎Law

Chief Counsel, Immigration Subcommittee of Senate Judiciary Committee; ... Legal Counsel Attorneys Jay Bybee, Alberto Gonzales, and Steven G. Bradbury with ...

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

News Conference on California Fuel Economy Standards

Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler held a news conference to announce their effort to block California from setting its…

1,400 VIEWS

AUGUST 20, 2019

LAST AIRED AUGUST 29, 2019

National Space Council Meeting

Vice President Pence chaired the sixth public meeting of the National Space Council at the Smithsonian’s Udvar-Hazy Center in Chantilly, Virginia. At the top of the meeting, the vice…

1,535 VIEWS

APRIL 5, 2019

LAST AIRED APRIL 5, 2019

Panel with Counsels at Federal Agencies

The Republican National Lawyers Association held its national policy conference in Washington, DC. This panel focused on the Trump administration’s deregulation efforts at the…

68 VIEWS

NOVEMBER 3, 2016

LAST AIRED NOVEMBER 7, 2016

Access to the Courts

Federal appellate attorneys were among the panelists at a discussion on whether federal courts would reverse recent rulings that have made suing in court more difficult for individuals. The…

380 VIEWS

MAY 16, 2015

LAST AIRED MAY 16, 2015

Reauthorizing the Patriot Act

Neema Singh Guliani and Steven Bradbury talked about the reauthorization of parts of the Patriot Act and its effectiveness since its passage shortly after September 11, 2001. They responded…

500 VIEWS

FEBRUARY 4, 2014

LAST AIRED FEBRUARY 21, 2014

Government Surveillance Programs

Legal experts testified on U.S. surveillance programs and techniques in relation to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Members of the committee expressed concern that there was no…

1,600 VIEWS

OCTOBER 29, 2013

LAST AIRED NOVEMBER 2, 2013

National Security Agency Programs

Top intelligence officials defended the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance program, saying spying on foreign leaders was fundamental to intelligence gathering. Their testimony came…

3,279 VIEWS

JULY 9, 2013

LAST AIRED AUGUST 12, 2013

Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, Legal Perspectives

Legal experts talked about legal and constitutional questions about the National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance programs leaked to the press by Edward Snowden. “Legal/Constitutional…

736 VIEWS

JULY 17, 2013

LAST AIRED JULY 22, 2013

NSA Data Collection and Surveillance Oversight, Panel 2

The House Judiciary Committee held an unclassified hearing on the Obama administration’s use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) revealed by former National Security Agency…

329 VIEWS

SEPTEMBER 14, 2007

LAST AIRED SEPTEMBER 15, 2007

Attorney General Gonzales Farewell

At a farewell ceremony for Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Justice Department employees and others praised his career and accomplishments and reminisced about working with him. The…

247 VIEWS

JULY 26, 2006

LAST AIRED JULY 10, 2007

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

Witnesses testified about domestic surveillance programs and legislation proposed by Senator Specter and the White House to submit the legislation to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance…

254 VIEWS

SEPTEMBER 6, 2006

LAST AIRED SEPTEMBER 8, 2006

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act

The witnesses testified about legislative proposals to update the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Topics included rules for domestic and foreign intelligence gathering,…

194 VIEWS

JULY 12, 2006

LAST AIRED JULY 17, 2006

Military Commissions

The House Armed Services Committee held a hearing on standards and rules for military commissions and tribunals. Witnesses testified about the Bush administration’s decisions on detainee…

108 VIEWS

JULY 11, 2006

LAST AIRED JULY 15, 2006

Military Commissions and Detainee Rights

The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the rights of detained enemy combatants in response to the ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld in favor of a detainee in…

304 VIEWS

FEBRUARY 8, 2006

LAST AIRED FEBRUARY 8, 2006

Domestic Surveillance Program

Mr. Bradbury talked about the Bush administration’s rationale of the National Security Agency’s surveillance program. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales testified on February 6 before the…

27 VIEWS

FEBRUARY 8, 2006

LAST AIRED FEBRUARY 8, 2006

Domestic Surveillance Program

Mr. Bradbury talked about the Bush administration’s rationale of the National Security Agency’s surveillance program. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales testified on February 6 before the…