fee & dividend carbon tax
<font size="4" face="Times New Roman">see main</font><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div><p><a href="http://grist.org/climate-energy/sanders-and-boxer-introduce-fee-and-dividend-climate-bill-greens-tickled-pink/"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" color="#000000">http://grist.org/climate-energy/sanders-and-boxer-introduce-fee-and-dividend-climate-bill-greens-tickled-pink/</font></a></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) unveiled ambitious climate and energy legislation on Thursday. In our current sclerotic political environment, it has pretty much zero chance of passing in the Senate and negative chance of passing in the House. But <a href="http://350.org/en/about/blogs/big-day-climate-capitol-hill">many</a> <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/02/14/1596391/the-newly-proposed-carbon-tax-will-fight-global-warming-protect-low-income-americans-and-reduce-the-deficit/">climate activists</a> <a href="http://www.citizenvox.org/2013/02/14/climate-change-bill-sen-sanders-sen-boxer-public-citizen/">like it</a>, and <a href="http://heartland.org/press-releases/2013/02/14/heartland-institute-experts-react-carbon-tax-bill-us-senate">many climate deniers hate it</a>, and the San Francisco Chronicle calls it “<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/default/article/Boxer-s-push-is-a-twist-on-carbon-tax-4277210.php">radical</a>,” so let’s find out what all the fuss is about.</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Here’s a quick summary of the Climate Protection Act of 2013 <a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9d529c99-b278-4d14-b36f-f33f58cc2f3d">from Sanders’ office</a>: “Under the legislation, a fee on carbon pollution emissions would fund historic investments in energy efficiency and sustainable energy technologies such as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass. The proposal also would provide rebates to consumers to offset any efforts by oil, coal or gas companies to raise prices.”</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">It’s what green wonks call a<b> “<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">fee and dividend” bill</span>. The </b><i><b>Chronicle</b></i><b> describes it as a “variant on a carbon tax”:</b></font></p><blockquote><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">It would impose a fee on carbon emissions at their source, such as coal mines, raising the price of fossil fuel energy.</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">But instead of giving the proceeds to the government, three-fifths of the money would be refunded to U.S. residents.</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Such rebates could run into hundreds of dollars. The idea is modeled loosely on Alaska’s “permanent fund” that distributes royalties from the state’s oil and gas industry to every Alaskan resident. …</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>The Sanders-Boxer bill would impose a $20 per ton tax on carbon or methane equivalent, rising 5.6 percent each year for 10 years, on the nation’s [2,869] largest fossil fuel producers. Imported fossil fuels from countries that do not impose a similar tax would also pay. </b>…</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">The tax would raise an estimated $1.2 trillion </span>over a decade and reduce greenhouse gas emissions 20 percent from 2005 levels. Three-fifths of the tax would be rebated to “every legal U.S. resident,” which might make it more politically feasible than if it went to the government.</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The rest of the money would go to incentives for clean energy and research.</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">A version of the “fee and dividend” idea is a favorite of NASA climate scientist James Hansen and climate activist Bill McKibben, founder of 350.org.</font></p></blockquote><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">More from <i><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/283189-sen-boxer-plans-to-get-climate-bill-to-floor-by-summer">The Hill</a></i>:</font></p><blockquote><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 153, 0);">The bill also would require the gas drilling industry to disclose chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking.</font></blockquote><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">And still more, from <a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/021413-2pager.pdf">Sanders’ two-page summary</a>, on the bill’s aims:</font></p><blockquote><ul><li><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Weatherizing 1 million homes per year …;</font></li></ul><ul><li><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Tripling the budget for ARPA-E breakthrough energy research and development;</font></li></ul><ul><li><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Creating a Sustainable Technologies Finance Program that would, through public-private partnerships, leverage $500 billion for investments in wind, solar, geothermal, advanced biomass and biofuels, ocean and tidal energy, hydropower, advanced transportation projects, and energy efficiency technologies;</font></li></ul><ul><li><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Investing in domestic manufacturing and energy-intensive industries to promote energy efficiency and mitigate impacts of a carbon price; and</font></li></ul><ul><li><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Funding $1 billion a year in worker training and transition programs to help move workers into jobs in the clean energy economy.</font></li></ul></blockquote><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">If you want still still more, here’s <a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/0121413-ClimateProtectionAct.pdf">full text of the bill</a> [PDF], and <a href="http://www.sanders.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/021413-SustainableEnergyAct.pdf">a companion bill</a> [PDF] that would eliminate some subsidies for fossil-fuel companies.</font></p><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/283189-sen-boxer-plans-to-get-climate-bill-to-floor-by-summer">says</a> she intends to move the legislation through her committee and to the Senate floor by this summer. Many greens will be rallying behind her, but how many fellow senators will? We’ll keep you posted …</font></p><div class="margin-bottom-x2"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Lisa Hymas is senior editor at Grist. You can follow her on <a href="http://twitter.com/lisahymas">Twitter</a> and <a href="https://plus.google.com/106507937998378546064">Google+</a>.</font></div><p><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> </font></p><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Read more: <a href="http://grist.org/climate-energy/" title="View all posts in Climate & Energy" rel="category tag">Climate & Energy</a>, <a href="http://grist.org/politics/" title="View all posts in Politics" rel="category tag">Politics</a></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">=</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">heritage hit</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">d<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">errick Morgan</span></font></div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" /></font><div class="expert-cardexpert-title" style="box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.23; letter-spacing: -0.00625rem; margin: 0.5rem 0px 1rem; word-break: break-word; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Former Vice President for the Institute for Economic Freedom and Opportunity</font></div><div class="expert-cardexpert-mini-bio" style="box-sizing: inherit; line-height: 1.57; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Derrick Morgan is no longer a staff member at The Heritage Foundation.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy">https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy</a></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Boxer–Sanders Carbon Tax Would Empower EPA to Crush Booming Energy Economy</b></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">April 12, 2013 20 min read Download Report</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Derrick Morgan</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Former Vice President for the Institute for Economic Freedom and Opportunity</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Derrick Morgan is no longer a staff member at The Heritage Foundation.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>In his 2013 State of the Union speech, President Barack Obama called on Congress to pursue a solution to climate change, or else he would do it on his own. The same week, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D–CA) and committee member Bernie Sanders (I–VT) introduced the first major bill that would institute a carbon tax, the Climate Protection Act of 2013 (Boxer–Sander</b>s).</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">One glaring problem with the bill is that it would not preempt regulation of greenhouse gases by federal agencies.</span><b> Even worse, the bill effectively turns the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator into a venture capitalist,<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"> industrial planner, trade referee, and social welfare agent. </span>Boxer–Sanders would:</b></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>
</b></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"><b>Inflict high costs on families</b>, especially those in carbon-intensive states;</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Thwart energy investment and development;</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Destroy manufacturing jobs;</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"><b>Risk triggering a trade war;</b></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Waste money;</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"><b>Fail to provide environmental benefits</b>; and</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"><b>Impose a massive tax </b>and leave a<b> command-and-control regulatory regime</b> in place for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Congress should instead stop the Administration from regulating greenhouse gas emissions and ensure that the <b>oil and natural gas economic renaissance</b> is not obstructed by federal regulation.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Get exclusive insider information from Heritage experts delivered straight to your inbox each week. Subscribe to The Agenda >></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The Bill</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Citing a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report on a generic carbon tax, the sponsors of the bill estimate that it will raise $1.2 trillion over 10 years by imposing a tax at the rate of $20 per ton of CO2.</b> The bill increases the tax rate by 5.6 percent each year until the 12th year, when the EPA Administrator is required to submit a report to Congress recommending a fee for subsequent years (without action, the fee would continue at the 12th-year rate). The tax would increase the price of conventional fuels like oil, natural gas, and especially coal.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The bill apportions 60 percent of incoming revenue from the tax for a rebate program administered by the EPA with a newly created Office of Environmental Rebate Advocate.[1] Forty percent of the revenues goes to a Pollution Reduction Trust Fund to mitigate economic effects on energy-intensive and trade-exposed industries ($7.5 billion a year); fund a Department of Energy (DOE) weatherization assistance program for low-income persons ($5.0 billion a year); provide job training, education, and transition assistance for individuals employed by the fossil fuel industry who are seeking to work at clean energy jobs ($1.0 billion a year); and support DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy research ($2.0 billion a year). Any remaining funds would be applied to deficit reduction.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">In addition, Boxer–Sanders imposes a Carbon Equivalency Fee—essentially a tariff on goods with high carbon content. Revenues from this new trade barrier would be divided evenly between transportation and environmental objectives.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Increases Costs on Families</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Although the bill does not indicate how rebates would be apportioned among legal U.S. residents</b>, it is important to understand the purpose behind a carbon tax to predict how such a rebate scheme would work.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The major point of a carbon tax is to “put a price on carbon” to capture what proponents of climate legislation identify as an externality cost (a cost borne by society at large). If one could determine the correct “price” of a ton of CO2—presumably a tax in the amount equal to the supposed damage caused by the ton of CO2—then, the thinking goes, those who purchase the product would be absorbing the externality. Of course, determining any externality price of CO2 is very difficult considering the unsettled state of the science with respect to how much man-made emissions affect the Earth’s temperature.</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">If one assumes that the tax will be passed on to consumers, as the director of the CBO does, the tax will make it more expensive to drive a car, heat or cool a home, or buy goods made with energy. Consumers will do less of those things, thus emitting less CO2. It is important to note that such changes in behavior will clearly lower one’s comfort and enjoyment—make one worse off—in ways that are not quantifiable using economics. The simple fact is that affordable conventional fuels have vastly increased humankind’s productivity, health, and standard of living. One goal of the legislation is to reduce CO2; proponents say it will reduce GHG emissions by 20 percent from 2005 levels by 2020.[2]</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">[table 1]</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">In short, a higher price will discourage consumption of fuels that emit greenhouse gases. As then-Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner explained, it is necessary for the price of energy to increase if “you’re going to change how people use energy.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn3" name="ftnref3" id="ftnref3" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[3]</a> While prices for oil and natural gas will increase, coal prices will increase the most. (See Table 1.)</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Because energy is an input for nearly every good or service, a carbon tax would harm families again and again, directly through energy prices and indirectly through higher prices for goods and services.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn4" name="ftnref4" id="ftnref4" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[4]</a> As CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf has said:</font></p><blockquote style="box-sizing: inherit; padding-left: 2.5rem; border-left: 1px solid rgb(217, 227, 233); margin: 1.875rem 19.3438px 3.125rem 101.552px; line-height: 1.875rem; display: flex; clear: none; width: auto; float: none;" gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b"><font size="4"><font face="Times New Roman">[A]t any point in which we are putting a price on carbon emissions, that would be passed through to the cost that consumers face on energy products but also all other products that are made using fossil fuels…. I don’t know if there are any goods that use no energy in their production. It seems to me unlikely.</font></font><a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn5" name="ftnref5" id="ftnref5" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" color="#000000">[5]</font></a></blockquote><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">While the tax would hit families differently based on income, geography, how far they travel, their occupation, and a myriad of other factors, the legislation tells the Administrator only that a maximum of 1 percent of the revenues from the tax can be used to administer the program; that a new bureaucracy (the Office of Environmental Rebate Advocate) should be created to assist households in regaining some of the money they had to pay; and that, to the extent possible, the rebates should be coordinated with other federal and state payment mechanisms and be made electronically on a monthly basis.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><a href="https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files//media/images/reports/2013/04/bg2783/bg2783_table2_825.jpg" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" color="#000000"><img height="728" src="https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files//media/images/reports/2013/04/bg2783/bg2783_table2_600.jpg" width="600" alt="Carbon Tax Would Raise Taxes on Families in Most States by Hundreds of Dollars or More" style="box-sizing: inherit; height: auto; border: none; max-width: 100%;" /></font></a></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>A “rebate” program that will spend hundreds of billions of dollars over 10 years should not be delegated to an unelected bureaucrat.</b> The bill’s ambiguous language could allow lawmakers to claim their intent to make families whole and then blame the ultimate shortcomings on the EPA Administrator, who would have authority to design the rebate program.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Any rebate under Boxer–Sanders will not make American families whole. First, only 60 percent of the revenue from the carbon tax is used for rebates, so at least 40 percent of the carbon tax will not make it back to families who face higher costs.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Second, some American families use more energy derived from fossil fuels than others. If the rebate were based on how much of the tax the family pays, then the price signal would be significantly reduced, working against the goal of carbon reduction. It is far more likely, therefore, that the Administrator would ultimately issue a per capita rebate. Tyson Slocum of Public Citizen, quoted in Senator Sanders’ press release about the legislation, suggests as much. Moreover, the two-page summary of the bill suggests that the rebate program would be based on Alaska’s dividend program, which is distributed per eligible recipient.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn6" name="ftnref6" id="ftnref6" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[6]</a> Such a per capita rebate program would return a smaller portion of the carbon tax paid by Americans in high-carbon states and those who use more fossil fuel energy, such as those who live in rural communities. For example, rural families drive 27,700 miles per household vs. 17,600 miles for urban households.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn7" name="ftnref7" id="ftnref7" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[7]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Some states have higher carbon intensity than others. According to EPA data on CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion,<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn8" name="ftnref8" id="ftnref8" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[8]</a> Boxer–Sanders’ sponsors live in states with very low carbon intensity: Senators Boxer and Sanders are from California (No. 48) and Vermont (No. 49), respectively. Both of these states have less than half the carbon intensity of Pennsylvania (No. 21). Families and individuals in states with a higher carbon intensity will pay more in taxes. Table 2 shows the CO2 intensity, as well as a rough approximation of the gross tax<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn9" name="ftnref9" id="ftnref9" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[9]</a> and net tax<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn10" name="ftnref10" id="ftnref10" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[10]</a> for a family of four, in the 50 states and the District of Columbia.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">These rough estimates demonstrate the unfairness to residents of different states. The emissions data, based on end-use fossil fuel combustion, include electricity power generation. Some states, like Wyoming, West Virginia, and North Dakota, export large amounts of electricity and have small populations, so their carbon tax numbers are particularly inflated regarding the tax impact on their residents. As electricity producers absorb the carbon tax, they will likely pass it on to their customers, some of whom reside elsewhere. (Also, assuming that the emissions will be taxed and passed on to consumers one way or another, taxes will be higher than these numbers indicate in states that import electricity.) Income and job loss will likely be more prevalent in states that export electricity.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Even taking eighth-ranked Indiana as an example, the tax and rebate differences are quite substantial. An average family of four in Indiana would emit about 133 metric tons of CO2 a year. At $20 per ton, that amounts to a carbon tax of about $2,663 in year one. A family of four in Vermont would emit 38.5 metric tons of CO2 and pay $771. Those are the gross taxes. Assuming (generously) that administration of the program would be insignificant and that fully 60 percent of the revenue raised would be recycled to residents, that totals about $67.3 billion. Divided by a population of 308,745,538<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn11" name="ftnref11" id="ftnref11" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[11]</a> (minus an estimated 10.346 million illegal immigrant<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn12" name="ftnref12" id="ftnref12" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[12]</a>), the rebate would amount to $225 per capita, or $902 for a family of four in both states. Using those assumptions, and setting aside other economic damage from the legislation, the Indiana family would be worse off by $1,760 for the first year, while the Vermont family would be better off by $131. (A hypothetical California family would be better off by $106.) Each year, the tax would increase by 5.6 percent, making the differences between the states grow.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Not only would the tax take money directly from the pockets of American families in the form of direct and indirect taxes; it also would slow economic growth and reduce family incomes. In analyzing Boxer–Sanders, The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis found lower income for a family of four of more than $1,000.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn13" name="ftnref13" id="ftnref13" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[13]</a></font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Thwarts Energy Renaissance of Jobs, Investment, and Growth</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Ronald Reagan once remarked that “government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it</span>.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn14" name="ftnref14" id="ftnref14" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[14]</a> Boxer–Sanders both taxes conventional fuels and threatens to regulate the hydraulic fracturing that has unlocked substantial quantities of oil and natural gas.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">A new tax and additional regulation could not come at a worse time. America remains stuck in a stubborn, lackluster “recovery” and has an unemployment rate near 8 percent and 3 million fewer jobs than when the recession began.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn15" name="ftnref15" id="ftnref15" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[15]</a> A rare bright spot in this disappointing economy is the oil and gas boom that is occurring on state and private lands. More than 9 million Americans work in the oil and natural gas industry,<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn16" name="ftnref16" id="ftnref16" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[16]</a> and hundreds of thousands more work in coal mining<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn17" name="ftnref17" id="ftnref17" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[17]</a> (although coal production is challenged by competition from cheaper natural gas and the Obama Administration’s numerous policies that adversely affect coal).<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn18" name="ftnref18" id="ftnref18" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[18]</a> These jobs pay wages that are well above average and often do not require advanced education.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn19" name="ftnref19" id="ftnref19" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[19]</a> Production of conventional fuels, particularly natural gas and oil, is booming in places like North Dakota.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn20" name="ftnref20" id="ftnref20" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[20]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The economic gains being made now have the potential to be long-lasting. The United States has the largest reserves of conventional fuels—oil, coal, and natural gas—in the world,<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn21" name="ftnref21" id="ftnref21" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[21]</a> and the International Energy Agency predicts that America will be the world’s largest oil producer by the beginning of the next decade and could be a net exporter of oil by the end of the next decade.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn22" name="ftnref22" id="ftnref22" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[22]</a> America’s natural gas and coal supplies are even more plentiful.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Placing a carbon tax on conventional fuels would lower investment, employment, and wealth in this growing industry.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn23" name="ftnref23" id="ftnref23" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[23]</a> It would be bad enough to place a tax on our plentiful resources, hampering economic growth, increasing prices for families, and destroying jobs and family income, but Boxer–Sanders does even more to try to slow, stop, and reverse America’s conventional fuel renaissance. Title III, for example, would begin federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing. It would change the Safe Drinking Water Act’s deference to state law<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn24" name="ftnref24" id="ftnref24" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[24]</a> by requiring disclosure of the fluids used in the fracturing process now and opening the door for more regulation by federal agencies.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Fracturing is safe; it is regulated by states, and fluids are already disclosed. As The Heritage Foundation has pointed out before, studies by the EPA, the Groundwater Protection Council, and independent agencies have found no evidence of groundwater contamination.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn25" name="ftnref25" id="ftnref25" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[25]</a> Then-EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson also acknowledged that there are no proven cases to confirm the fracturing process’s alleged effect on water.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn26" name="ftnref26" id="ftnref26" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[26]</a> Currently, this long-standing process is regulated by the 35 oil- and gas-producing states.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn27" name="ftnref27" id="ftnref27" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[27]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">The Safe Drinking Water Act recognizes that states can properly regulate hydraulic fracturing—a process that uses 99.5 percent water and 0.5 percent additives and chemicals (all of which have common applications like swimming pool cleaners, cosmetics, and ice cream).<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn28" name="ftnref28" id="ftnref28" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[28]</a><b> Moreover, the industry, in collaboration with the Department of Energy, lists the chemicals being used on the website FracFocus.org.</b></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Repealing </b>the Safe Drinking Water Act’s wise determination concerning state and local governments—the entities that are the most familiar with the environment in their areas and that have regulated the practice successfully thus far—would encourage unnecessary federal regulation.</font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Destroys Manufacturing Jobs</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The abundance of natural gas production because of hydraulic fracturing is leading a manufacturing rebound in the United States. As Heritage’s Nicolas Loris points out, “North America has approximately 4.2 quadrillion (4,244 trillion) cubic feet of recoverable natural gas that would supply 175 years worth of natural gas at current consumption rates.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn29" name="ftnref29 " id="ftnref29 " style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[29]</a>The accounting and consulting firm KPMG says that the U.S. is “one of the most advantageous markets for chemical production in the world”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn30" name="ftnref30" id="ftnref30" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[30]</a> thanks to abundant natural gas, a feedstock for many chemical companies. Inexpensive and plentiful energy, a major input for many other manufacturers, is another factor that manufacturers consider when deciding where to invest. Instead of consolidating and securing these advantages, Boxer–Sanders imposes a new tax and opens the door to meddlesome federal regulation of hydraulic fracturing, a process that is providing abundant fuel supplies for the nation.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Boxer–Sanders seems to recognize that a carbon tax will be harmful to manufacturing. In Section 103, the bill provides $7.5 billion (without further appropriation by Congress) “to mitigate the economic impacts…on energy-intensive and trade-exposed industries.” Once again, it is the unelected EPA Administrator who decides which companies qualify and at what level, the only statutory guidance being that at least 25 percent must be used for energy-efficiency measures in those industries.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">When Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis ran Boxer–Sanders in its Heritage Energy Model, a derivative of the National Energy Model System created by the Department of Energy, it found 447,000 fewer jobs in 2016..<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn31" name="ftnref31" id="ftnref31" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[31]</a> While the analysis did not describe the job loss by sector, it is a reasonable to conclude that many of those jobs will be manufacturing jobs, where energy is a major input. This intuition is also supported by a National Association of Manufacturers study, which indicated that a carbon tax would lead to lower manufacturing output for energy-intensive and non–energy-intensive manufacturing.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn32" name="ftnref32" id="ftnref32" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[32]</a></font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Risks Triggering a<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"> Trade War</span></font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The Boxer–Sanders bill also tacitly recognizes its potential harm to manufacturing competitiveness by levying a “carbon equivalency fee”—effectively a tariff—on imported “carbon pollution-intensive goods,” including the amount of carbon used to transport the goods.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn33" name="ftnref33" id="ftnref33" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[33]</a> Once again, the unelected EPA Administrator is given authority to implement the measure, determining both the fee<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn34" name="ftnref34" id="ftnref34" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[34]</a> and when such a fee is no longer appropriate.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn35" name="ftnref35" id="ftnref35" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[35]</a> (The President could also determine that the country of export has implemented substantially equivalent measures, or the bill would cease to have effect if the countries of export ratify an international agreement with equivalent measures in effect.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn36" name="ftnref36" id="ftnref36" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[36]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Setting aside any problems under existing trade treaties, giving the EPA Administrator wide discretion in setting the trade policies of the United States is unwise and risks retaliation from countries that have indicated that they do not plan to impose significant limitations on their greenhouse gas emissions.</font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Wastes Money</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The Climate Protection Act wastes significant amounts of money. First, in addition to determining trade policy, industrial policy, and welfare policy, the EPA Administrator is given $5 billion a year (without further appropriation) from the Treasury (not directly from the tax or tariff proceeds) for the costs “of grants, loans and loan guarantees.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn37" name="ftnref37" id="ftnref37" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[37]</a> This Sustainable Technologies Finance Program also is under the authority of the Administrator. Eligible projects include energy efficiency; combined heat and power; solar energy; biomass; non-food-crop biofuels; ocean, tidal, and hydropower; electric vehicle infrastructure; advanced battery or energy storage; rail, transit, or public transportation; or any other transportation technology that offers a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, as determined by the Administrator.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Green energy subsidy programs create dependence on government and<b> distort markets</b> by ensuring funding of otherwise non-competitive projects. The Department of Energy has a horrible record of selecting commercially viable technologies.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn38" name="ftnref38" id="ftnref38" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[38]</a> and there is little reason to expect that the EPA would do much better. That suspicion is further compounded by the criteria the bill directs the Administrator to follow when granting, loaning, or guaranteeing loans, with priority financial assistance given “to projects that provide the largest greenhouse gas emissions reductions per Federal dollar invested” rather than any commercial viability. At least DOE is supposed to consider commercial viability. Of course, in theory, no subsidies are necessary if a technology is actually commercially viable.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn39" name="ftnref39" id="ftnref39" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[39]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>In addition to the green venture capitalism waste, the bill provides for $5 billion more for weatherization projects.</b> The Weatherization Assistance Program for Low-Income Persons is meant to make the homes of the poor more energy-efficient in order to lower their utility bills. Created by the Energy Conservation and Production Act, it is typically funded in the hundreds of millions of dollars per year. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the “stimulus” bill) allocated $5 billion for weatherization, and such a huge influx of money was difficult to spend efficiently: The DOE Inspector General said it was like hooking up a garden hose to a fire hydrant.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn40" name="ftnref40" id="ftnref40" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[40]</a> The program was notorious for waste and abuse, especially in the early years.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn41" name="ftnref41" id="ftnref41" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[41]</a> Recently, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform issued a staff report detailing the inefficiencies in the weatherization program.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn42" name="ftnref42" id="ftnref42" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[42]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>No matter the efficiencies, it seems odd to raise utilities prices for the poor and everyone else and then use some of the money to pay for expensive efficiency programs for the poor to save on utility bills</b>. Micromanaging the affairs of working families in this way is bound to misallocate the scarce resources of the poor. They might prefer to spend money on education, transportation, food, or any number of other items.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Without private market incentives to deliver a desirable product at a good price, the weatherization program was perhaps doomed from the start. The Oversight Committee staff report noted that:</font></p><blockquote style="box-sizing: inherit; padding-left: 2.5rem; border-left: 1px solid rgb(217, 227, 233); margin: 1.875rem 19.3438px 3.125rem 101.552px; line-height: 1.875rem; display: flex; clear: none; width: auto; float: none;" gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b"><font size="4"><font face="Times New Roman">It appears that DOE’s failure to put in place effective oversight mechanisms in the Weatherization Program created a situation where no one was checking the quality of the work performed, allowing poor workmanship to go undetected and undeterred. As a result, many DOE contractors did not do the quality work that DOE promised, and many DOE contractors actually damaged houses, created new hazards, or made houses less energy efficient.</font></font><a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn43" name="ftnref43" id="ftnref43" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" color="#000000">[43]</font></a></blockquote><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">“For many of the recipients,” the report noted, “the DOE contractor who showed up at their door did not ‘make their lives and homes better,’ and in most cases even left the homeowner worse off.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn44" name="ftnref44" id="ftnref44" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[44]</a> A Department of Energy Inspector General’s report found failure rates of up to 80 percent.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn45" name="ftnref45" id="ftnref45" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[45]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">In addition to weatherization, Boxer–Sanders appropriates $1 billion per year for 10 years to the Secretary of Labor “for job training, education, and transition assistance for individuals employed by the fossil fuel industry seeking transition to clean energy jobs.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn46" name="ftnref46" id="ftnref46" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[46]</a> Job training programs are notoriously ineffective.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn47" name="ftnref47" id="ftnref47" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[47]</a> It appears from this provision that the drafters of the bill are also preparing for layoffs in the large conventional fuels industry.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Without Boxer–Sanders, jobs in the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ “Oil and Gas Extraction” category have increased by 26 percent in the past five years.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn48" name="ftnref48" id="ftnref48" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[48]</a> Looking at a recent jobs report, American Enterprise Institute analyst Mark Perry wrote, “[i]n just the last three months, energy companies have hired 5,500 new employees for oil and gas extraction activities, which is a hiring rate of almost 100 new workers every business day.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn49" name="ftnref49" id="ftnref49" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[49]</a> Jobs in oil and natural gas often have high average salaries (for example, on average, rotary drill operators make $58,540, and derrick operators make $47,120,<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn50" name="ftnref50" id="ftnref50" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[50]</a> and help create other jobs. One study put the “multiplier effect”—how many other jobs these jobs help to create—at more than three.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn51" name="ftnref51" id="ftnref51" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[51]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Discouraging jobs that pay well and spending tax money on retraining displaced workers in a field that is otherwise growing makes little economic sense and is morally questionable, to say the least.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn52" name="ftnref52" id="ftnref52" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[52]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Not content to waste funds derived directly from the carbon tax, Boxer–Sanders also poorly directs funding (without additional appropriation from Congress) from the climate tariff. One-half of the funds would go to the EPA Administrator for two purposes, primarily for state and local programs to adapt to climate change, improve infrastructure, and protect environmental quality and wildlife.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn53" name="ftnref53" id="ftnref53" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[53]</a> Secondarily, the funds would be used “to meet international commitments made by the United States to assist with climate change adaptation.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn54" name="ftnref54" id="ftnref54" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[54]</a> The other half of the funds would go to the Secretary of Transportation to “improve the resiliency of critical infrastructure” and “for projects that provide preferential parking for carpools, including the addition of electric vehicle charging stations….”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn55" name="ftnref55" id="ftnref55" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[55]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Risking a trade war is irresponsible for any reason, and using a tariff to fund carpools and charging stations is also poor policy.</font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Does Practically Nothing for the Environment</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 153, 0);">Even if one assumes that rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere lead to higher global temperatures, </span>a carbon tax in the United States that reduces emissions domestically would have zero direct effect on foreign emissions if we acted alone. In fact, unilateral action by the U.S. would have very little effect on total global emissions, as then-EPA Administrator Jackson testified,<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn56" name="ftnref56" id="ftnref56" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[56]</a> and with little effect on emissions, there would be an almost imperceptible impact on global temperatures.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Boxer–Sanders, therefore, would impose a tax of $1.2 trillion without achieving its stated goal of “address[ing] climate disruptions.” If drafters of the bill thought that it would actually achieve their environmental goals of sufficiently reducing greenhouse gas emissions, then they would not continue to allow EPA and other agencies to impose strict regulations in addition to the carbon tax.</font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Spawns a New Tax and Burdensome Regulation</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>The Climate Protection Act does nothing to stop the EPA and other federal agencies from regulating greenhouse gas emissions. I</b>f proponents had confidence in the environmental aims of the bill—that a carbon tax will place an appropriate “price” on carbon to capture the cost of externalities—then other regulations would be unnecessary.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The bill’s primary objective, therefore, seems to be to raise taxes and increase government spending—but not so much that the environmental goals are reached. Boxer–Sanders instead provides revenue to pay for green venture capitalism and other objectives while simultaneously shifting income among states and citizens. Not having to increase the tax to the level they believe is necessary has the added benefit for lawmakers of making the true cost of their environmental goals less transparent for citizens.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">In short, Boxer–Sanders makes no pretense that it is trying to regulate greenhouse gases more efficiently; instead, it seems to be designed to raise and spend revenue on favored green energy projects while amassing massive powers in the EPA. While a carbon tax that preempted regulation would still be poor policy, creating a carbon tax on top of federal regulation is terrible policy.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Taxes should raise the revenue to fund necessary government operations in ways that cause the least possible economic damage and not “pick winners and losers with preferential or punitive policies.”<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn57" name="ftnref57" id="ftnref57" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[57]</a> In a way, while simultaneously shifting income among states and citizens, the carbon tax would treat using air conditioning, turning on lights, driving a car, and charging a cellular phone—all of which use primarily conventional fuel resources—much as using disfavored goods such as alcohol and cigarettes is treated. This is exactly backwards because conventional fuels have led to great human flourishing.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn58" name="ftnref58" id="ftnref58" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[58]</a></font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Using the tax code to discourage behavior may be seen more frequently post–NFIB v. Sebelius, the health care case in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government has broad authority to tax behavior.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn59" name="ftnref59" id="ftnref59" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[59]</a> We have already seen taxes on plastic bags and soft drinks in some localities.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn60" name="ftnref60" id="ftnref60" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[60]</a> Conservatives in particular should reject a carbon tax and would be on a more solid foundation advocating for a simplified tax code whose purpose is to raise revenue, not influence behavior.<a href="https://www.heritage.org/environment/report/boxer-sanders-carbon-tax-would-empower-epa-crush-booming-energy-economy#ftn61" name="ftnref61" id="ftnref61" style="box-sizing: inherit; text-decoration-line: none; transition: color 0.3s ease 0s;">[61]</a></font></p><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">What Needs to Be Done</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Instead of instituting a new tax and stopping the hydraulic fracturing–driven energy boom, Congress should:</b></font></p><ul style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><li style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; list-style: outside disc;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Stop command-and-control climate regulation under the Clean Air Act and other federal statutes through the Congressional Review Act and, if necessary, through prohibitions on funding in appropriations measures.</b></font></li><li style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; list-style: outside disc;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Protect the Safe Drinking Water Act from politically motivated changes that could slow or stop the practice of hydraulic fracturing, currently regulated appropriately and safely at the state level. Prevent any federal agency from adding new regulations on hydraulic fracturing.</b></font></li><li style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; list-style: outside disc;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>Allow more energy production on federal lands and off the coast of the United States.</b></font></li><li style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 0px 1.25rem; padding: 0px; list-style: outside disc;"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);"><b>Ensure that conventional fuels can be exported without impediment from federal agencies.</b></font></li></ul><h3 style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-weight="font-weight" font-size="font-size" rem="rem" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Conclusion</font></h3><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Boxer–Sanders has many flaws. It would inflict high costs on families, especially those in carbon-intensive states; thwart promising energy investment and development; destroy manufacturing jobs; risk triggering a trade war; waste money; fail to provide environmental benefits; and impose a massive tax and leave a command-and-control regulatory regime in place for greenhouse gas emissions.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">While some apologists for a carbon tax may argue that these problems can be fixed, proponents should realize that flirtation with the carbon tax is unwise policy, whatever its form. It would be politically impossible to offset a carbon tax completely with reductions in economically harmful taxes on capital or corporate income because such a scheme would be very regressive. Moreover, liberals are very unlikely to preclude regulation of GHG emissions by federal agencies.</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Even if it were possible to get a regulatory and corporate tax swap, the carbon tax would inevitably harm American families, particularly those who reside in areas outside of the Northeast and the West Coast. Such a tax would also invite more government intervention in the economy in the form of tariffs for imports from countries without a price on carbon. (Or, if a carbon tax did not have a tariff, it would lead to an even more massive loss of manufacturing jobs due to American uncompetitiveness and perhaps increased environmental impacts, since enterprises that relocated to foreign countries would likely face more lax emissions and toxic pollution controls.)</font></p><p style="box-sizing: inherit; margin: 0px 0px 1.25rem; font-family: " gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px" line-height="line-height" color="color" rgb="rgb"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Additionally, a carbon tax would make it more difficult for the American people to make use of plentiful natural resources to improve human flourishing. Finally, such a tax would be a step away from tax reform that moves America toward the simplest system possible: one that is designed only to raise requisite revenue, not to promote social engineering.</font></p><span style="box-sizing: inherit;" gotham="gotham" a="a" b="b" font-size="font-size" px="px"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><strong style="box-sizing: inherit;">—Derrick Morgan </strong>is Vice President for Domestic and Economic Policy at The Heritage Foundation.</font></span></div></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">the nation</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" /><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">no lnx</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">In the midst of a heightened conversation on combating climate change—as thousands of protestors are headed to DC this weekend to protest against the Keystone XL pipeline project, and as President Obama increasingly uses his bully pulpit to talk about the issue—the Senate is now jumping into the fray.</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><b>Senators Bernie Sanders and Barbara Boxer announced comprehensive climate change legislation Thursday morning at a news conference on Capitol Hill that aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050. It’s an ambitious bill that doesn’t settle for half-measures, but rather lays out an actual solution to the climate crisis. “This is a gold-standard bill,” Boxer said. “Every once in a while we have them.”</b></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">The lawmakers are putting the finishing touches on the initial version of the bill, but here are some features of the imminent legislation:</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">A price on carbon or methane equivalent of $20 per ton. That amount rises 5.6 percent annually for ten years.</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">The carbon price applies only to “upstream” producers, that is, the points of origin for fossil fuels—coal mines, oil refineries, natural gas processing points and so on. It would also apply to any imported fossil fuels, at the point of importation.</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">The price also applies to only 2,869 of the largest fossil fuel polluters, which covers 85 percent of US greenhouse gas emissions.</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">The carbon price would raise $1.2 trillion in revenue, according to the CBO. A large portion of that revenue would go towards investments in clean energy and energy efficiency: weatherizing 1 million homes per year, tripling the federal budget for energy research and development via ARPA-E, and creating a $500 billion sustainable technologies finance program, and providing worker training for clean energy technologies, among other initiatives. Using revenue from the carbon price and from ending subsidies to oil and gas companies, the <b>Sanders-Boxer legislation would also pay $300 billion towards deficit reduction.</b></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><b>Since this would likely boost natural gas production, the bill contains several fracking safeguards: it ends current fracking exemptions from the Safe Drinking Water Act, and heightens disclosure requirements for fracking chemicals.</b></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">Many people’s immediate response to this bill is: it will never pass. Never mind the Republicans filibustering it in the Senate and never even taking it up in the House; President Obama hasn’t endorsed it and called for a different approach based on cap-and-trade during his State of the Union speech, and Harry Reid might not even put it on the Senate floor for fear of making vulnerable senators take a tough vote</span>. (Asked Thursday morning if he received any promises from Reid that the legislation would receive a floor vote, Sanders implied he hadn’t: “I have over the years talked to Senator Reid on this issue. In general, he is sympathetic, but we’ll see how he and other leaders come down on this in the months to come.”)</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><b>But both Sanders and Boxer think the bill can create a serious public discussion on climate change that could lead to its passage. </b>They’ve mobilized several mainstream environmental groups to fan out across the country and whip up support<span style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">: Bill McKibben, president of 350.org, spoke at Thursday morning’s announcement, as did representatives from the Center for American Progress, the Sierra Club, Public Citizen, and the National Community Action Foundation. In other words, this isn’t a one-off messaging bill: they want to try to get it passed. </span></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><b>The Senators repeatedly stressed it was up to the movement, and the people, to make this bill law</b>. “The United States Congress is way behind where the American people are on this issue,” said Sanders. “And we’re going to win this fight when millions of people stand up and say ‘you have got to do something for my kids, and grandchildren, and for my business—you cannot ignore this planetary crisis.’”</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">Boxer added: “The people are the ones who are in control of what happens. And that’s a great thing. Because they are so far ahead of us. They know what they are seeing. No big oil company can sit down in their living room and tell them Superstorm Sandy didn’t happen, or droughts didn’t happen, or fires, or this bark beetle, or all these other things they see happening in front of their eyes,” she said. “We think the community is the key.”</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><b>The one thing Boxer can control, as chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, is hearings and mark-ups on this bill, which she anticipates will happen this spring. The first step for the bill’s defenders will be focusing national attention on these hearings.</b></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">Already, protestors have been marching in Washington against the Keystone pipeline, George Zornick reports.</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">
</div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted">George Zornick is The Nation's former Washington editor.</div></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"></font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">=</font></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CAUQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIBRAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_12032764647419699936" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://grist.org/climate-energy/sanders-and-boxer-introduce-fee-and-dividend-climate-bill-greens-tickled-pink/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAMQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://grist.org/climate-energy/sanders-and-boxer-introduce-fee-and-dividend-climate-bill-greens-tickled-pink/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAMQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;" /><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://grist.org/climate-energy/sanders-and-boxer-introduce-fee-and-dividend-climate-bill-greens-tickled-pink/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAMQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://grist.org/climate-energy/sanders-and-boxer-introduce-fee-and-dividend-climate-bill-greens-tickled-pink/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAMQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Sanders and Boxer introduce 'fee and dividend' climate bill</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://grist.org<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › climate-energy › sanders-and-boxer-i...</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsw8" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIAxAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 15, 2013 — </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> and <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Sanders</span> unveil the <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Climate Protection Act</span> of <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">2013</span>. ... The <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Sanders</span>-<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> bill would impose a $20 per ton tax on carbon or methane ...</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_1" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xsw4" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQIAhAA" /></div></div></div><span id="z9PoV" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" /><div data-hveid="CA0QAA" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="g" style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px;"><div><div data-hveid="CAsQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQICxAA" style="width: 600px;"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_18423067748551626106" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-propose-climate-change-bills-2/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAcQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-propose-climate-change-bills-2/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAcQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-propose-climate-change-bills-2/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAcQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-propose-climate-change-bills-2/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAcQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Sanders, Boxer Propose Climate Change Bills</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.sanders.senate.gov<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › press-releases › sander...</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsxQ" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIBxAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;">WASHINGTON, Feb. 14 – Sens. <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Bernie Sanders</span> (I-Vt.) and Barbara <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> (D-Calif.) today introduced comprehensive <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">legislation</span> on <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">climate change</span>.</div></div></div></div></div><div class="d4rhi"><ul class="FxLDp" style="margin: 0px; padding: 18px 0px 0px 16px; box-sizing: border-box; display: flex; flex-direction: column; list-style-type: none; width: 600px;"><li class="MYVUIe" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: flex;"><div class="XN9cAe" style="flex: 1 1 0%; box-sizing: border-box;"><div data-hveid="CAwQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQtJkDKAB6BAgMEAA" style="width: 600px;"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_9061639297680521272" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-to-introduce-major-climate-change-legislation-2/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAgQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-to-introduce-major-climate-change-legislation-2/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAgQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-to-introduce-major-climate-change-legislation-2/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAgQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.sanders.senate.gov/press-releases/sanders-boxer-to-introduce-major-climate-change-legislation-2/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECAgQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Sanders, Boxer to Introduce Major Climate Change Legislation</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.sanders.senate.gov<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › press-releases › sander...</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsxU" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQICBAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Bernie Sanders</span> (I-Vt.) and Barbara <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> (D-Calif.) will hold a news conference on Thursday, Feb. 14 to announce comprehensive <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">legislation</span> on <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">climate change</span>.</div></div></div></div></div></li></ul></div></div></div><span class="oUAcPd" id="fld_1" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" /><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CCAQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIIBAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_15146300472148750715" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.foreffectivegov.org/blog/sanders-and-boxer-take-lead-climate-change" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBYQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.foreffectivegov.org/blog/sanders-and-boxer-take-lead-climate-change&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBYQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.foreffectivegov.org/blog/sanders-and-boxer-take-lead-climate-change" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBYQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.foreffectivegov.org/blog/sanders-and-boxer-take-lead-climate-change&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBYQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Sanders and Boxer Take Lead on Climate Change - Center ...</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.foreffectivegov.org<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › blog › sanders-and-box...</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsyU" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIFhAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 15, 2013 — </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Bernie Sanders</span> (I-VT) and Barbara <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> (D-CA) revealed new <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">legislation</span> to address <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">climate change</span> by reducing carbon emissions from the ...</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_4" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xsyE" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQIDxAA" /></div></div></div><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CDAQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIMBAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_15682166778484924178" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/sanders-boxer-outline-gold-standard-climate-bill/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECC8QAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/sanders-boxer-outline-gold-standard-climate-bill/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECC8QAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/sanders-boxer-outline-gold-standard-climate-bill/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECC8QAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/sanders-boxer-outline-gold-standard-climate-bill/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECC8QAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Sanders, Boxer Outline 'Gold Standard' Climate Bill | The Nation</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.thenation.com<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › Article</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xszg" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQILxAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 14, 2013 — </span>Senators <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Bernie Sanders</span> and Barbara <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> announced comprehensive <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">climate change legislation</span> Thursday morning at a news conference on ...</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_8" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xszc" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQILhAA" /></div></div></div><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CCgQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIKBAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_17422838839212430797" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://mronline.org/2013/03/12/rm120313-html/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBoQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://mronline.org/2013/03/12/rm120313-html/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBoQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://mronline.org/2013/03/12/rm120313-html/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBoQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://mronline.org/2013/03/12/rm120313-html/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBoQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">What's in the Boxer-Sanders Climate Change Bill? | MR Online</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://mronline.org<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › 2013 › March › 12</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsy4" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIGhAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Mar 12, 2013 — </span>Days before last month's <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">climate change</span> demonstration on the doorstep of the White House, two Senate Democrats introduced <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">legislation</span> that ...</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_5" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xsyI" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQIEhAA" /></div></div></div><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CB8QAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIHxAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_10504406412969994492" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/14/global-warming-carbon-tax-barbara-boxer/1920963/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBQQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/14/global-warming-carbon-tax-barbara-boxer/1920963/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBQQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/14/global-warming-carbon-tax-barbara-boxer/1920963/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBQQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/02/14/global-warming-carbon-tax-barbara-boxer/1920963/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBQQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Boxer pushes carbon tax to ease global warming - USA Today</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.usatoday.com<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › news › politics › 2013/02/14</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsyc" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIFBAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 14, 2013 — </span><span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Climate change</span> proposal introduced by Sen. ... <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> proposes carbon tax as way to reduce emissions linked to ... <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Bernie Sanders</span>, I-Vt.</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_3" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xsx8" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQIEBAA" /></div></div></div><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CCcQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIJxAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_4919224856926159315" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9e96290a-0df1-40f5-883e-8f5aabb22d19" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBkQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx%3Fg%3D9e96290a-0df1-40f5-883e-8f5aabb22d19&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBkQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=9e96290a-0df1-40f5-883e-8f5aabb22d19" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBkQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx%3Fg%3D9e96290a-0df1-40f5-883e-8f5aabb22d19&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBkQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Senators introduce Climate Protection Act of 2013 - Lexology</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.lexology.com<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › library › detail</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsy8" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIGRAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 20, 2013 — </span>On February 14, <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">2013</span>, Senators <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Bernie Sanders</span> (I-VT) and Barbara <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Boxer</span> (D-CA) introduced a new carbon tax bill (S. 332) called the <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Climate</span> ...</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_6" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xsyM" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQIExAA" /></div></div></div><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CCwQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQILBAA" style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_14481675003216080908" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/02/sandersboxer-20130215.html" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBsQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/02/sandersboxer-20130215.html&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBsQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/02/sandersboxer-20130215.html" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBsQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.greencarcongress.com/2013/02/sandersboxer-20130215.html&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBsQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Senators Sanders, Boxer propose legislation to institute GHG ...</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://www.greencarcongress.com<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › 2013/02 › sanders...</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xszA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIGxAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 15, 2013 — </span>The proposal was drafted as two measures, the <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Climate Protection Act</span>—which sets the carbon price and finance programs for sustainable ...</div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div jscontroller="K6HGfd" id="eob_7" jsdata="fxg5tf;;B+xsyQ" jsaction="rcuQ6b:npT2md" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2Z0BegQIGBAA" /></div></div></div><div class="hlcw0c" style="margin-bottom: 44px; color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="g tF2Cxc" data-hveid="CCEQAA" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFSgAegQIIRAA" style="font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.58; width: 600px; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 30px; position: relative;"><div class="jtfYYd" data-sokoban-container="SOKOBAN_2373246717491398023" style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; position: relative; overflow: hidden; contain: layout paint; flex-shrink: 0;"><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c jGGQ5e" data-header-feature="0" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 0 0 auto;"><div class="yuRUbf" style="font-size: small; line-height: 1.58;"><a href="https://legal-planet.org/2013/02/14/sandersboxers-carbon-tax/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBUQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://legal-planet.org/2013/02/14/sandersboxers-carbon-tax/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBUQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">
</a><h3 class="LC20lb MBeuO DKV0Md" style="font-weight: normal; margin: 0px 0px 3px; padding: 5px 0px 0px; font-size: 20px; line-height: 1.3; display: inline-block;"><a href="https://legal-planet.org/2013/02/14/sandersboxers-carbon-tax/" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBUQAQ" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://legal-planet.org/2013/02/14/sandersboxers-carbon-tax/&ved=2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQFnoECBUQAQ" style="color: rgb(26, 13, 171); text-decoration-line: none; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); outline: 0px;">Sanders/Boxer carbon tax - Legal Planet</a></h3><div class="TbwUpd NJjxre" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none; position: absolute; left: 0px; top: 0px;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="color: rgb(32, 33, 36); font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;">https://legal-planet.org<span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);"> › 2013/02/14 › sandersboxers-c...</span></cite></div><div class="B6fmyf" style="position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 0px; visibility: hidden; white-space: nowrap;"><div class="TbwUpd" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; text-size-adjust: none;"><cite class="iUh30 qLRx3b tjvcx" role="text" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; padding-top: 1px;"><span class="dyjrff qzEoUe" role="text" style="color: rgb(95, 99, 104);" /></cite></div><div class="eFM0qc" style="display: inline-block; padding-bottom: 2px; padding-top: 1px; padding-left: 2px; visibility: visible;" /><div class="csDOgf" style="display: inline; visibility: visible; position: absolute;"><div jscontroller="exgaYe" data-acc="n" data-enjspb="true" jsdata="l7Bhpb;;B+xsyY" data-ved="2ahUKEwiTs5fBooD2AhXKkmoFHc4TAnQQ2esEegQIFRAE"><div jsaction="KyPa0e:WZTn;wjOG7e:edHC5b;al5F3e:edHC5b;"><g-popup jsname="Y3ZMZd" jsshadow="" jscontroller="DPreE" jsaction="A05xBd:IYtByb;EOZ57e:WFrRFb;" jsdata="mVjAjf;;B+xsxA"><div jsname="oYxtQd"><div jsslot=""><div aria-expanded="false" aria-haspopup="true" role="button" tabindex="0" jsaction="Ndrj7;keydown:tXc2mb" jsname="I3kE2c" class="iTPLzd GUHazd lUn2nc eY4mx" aria-label="About this Result" style="cursor: pointer; top: 0px; left: 0px; width: 28px; z-index: 1; line-height: 16px; padding-bottom: 20px; padding-left: 12px; padding-right: 5px; outline: 0px; position: absolute;"><span jsname="czHhOd" class="D6lY4c" style="height: 22px; width: 22px; position: absolute; border-radius: 11px; top: -1px;"><span jsname="Bil8Ae" class="xTFaxe IjabWd z1asCe SaPW2b" style="display: inline-block; fill: rgb(112, 117, 122); height: 18px; line-height: 18px; position: relative; width: 18px; margin-left: 2px; top: 2px;"><svg focusable="false" viewbox="0 0 24 24" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M12 8c1.1 0 2-.9 2-2s-.9-2-2-2-2 .9-2 2 .9 2 2 2zm0 2c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2zm0 6c-1.1 0-2 .9-2 2s.9 2 2 2 2-.9 2-2-.9-2-2-2z" /></svg></span></span></div></div></div></g-popup></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="NJo7tc Z26q7c uUuwM" data-content-feature="1" style="flex-direction: row; flex: 1 1 auto;"><div class="VwiC3b yXK7lf MUxGbd yDYNvb lyLwlc lEBKkf" style="overflow-wrap: break-word; padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(77, 81, 86); display: -webkit-box; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; -webkit-line-clamp: 2;"><span class="MUxGbd wuQ4Ob WZ8Tjf" style="padding-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; color: rgb(112, 117, 122);">Feb 14, 2013 — </span>The “<span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">Climate Protection Act</span> of <span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(95, 99, 104);">2013</span>” would impose a fee of $20 per ton (carbon or methane equivalent) on coal, petroleum, natural gas and ...</div></div></div></div></div></div><div id="post-topics" class="span-24 topics border-bottom-dotted"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">===</font></div></div>