msn news
the hill AFP, newsweek, bbc, msnbc joy reid pops up
NEWS AGGREGATOR?
SOLOMON JUST THE NEWS BS
Associated Press
---
MSN --> NO LNX
House makes bipartisan effort to renew Trump's Great American Outdoors Act, restore national parks
Members of Congress are engaged in a bipartisan effort to renew President Donald Trump's legacy "Great American Outdoors Act" to help restore national parks and historic sites, with funding having expired roughly a year ago.
The initial bill, passed and signed into law in 2020, is considered one of the most significant conservation laws in decades and permanently mandated $900 million in annual funding for the Land and Water Conservation Fund and created the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund.
Jet Ski Ports For Sale
Jet Ski Ports For Sale
EZ Dock
EZ Dock
·
Sponsored
call to action icon
In total, the law allocated up to $1.9 billion a year through fiscal 2025 to tackle a multi-billion-dollar backlog in deferred maintenance by repairing crumbling roads, outdated water systems, trails, and facilities managed by the National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Indian Education, and other American land agencies.
Great American Outdoors Act 250:
The new legislation, introduced by Arkansas GOP Rep. Bruce Westerman, seeks to build on the 2020 legislation by extending the $1.9 billion order for another five years, but it also has new funding mechanisms, such as a foreign visitor fee and lease sales that have already taken place under the "One Big Beautiful Bill."
Westerman recently on the "Just The News, No Noise" TV show pointed out the large bipartisan support for the legislation and said it's now a matter of putting the legislation up for a vote when the House returns after the midterms.
Related video: 3 big changes coming to national parks in 2026 (The Weather Channel Video)
The Weather Channel Video
3 big changes coming to national parks in 2026
2026 brings big changes to America's national parks.
The legislation advanced in June when it was approved by the House Committee on Natural Resources, of which Westerman is the chairman.
"In our country, where we have a hard time agreeing on a lot of things, most people support our national parks," Westerman also said last week. "This is a very popular piece of legislation, something President Trump supports. ... It's something we really need to come together on and do something good for our country here in the 250th year anniversary.
"We're seeing people that are anxious to invest in our parks," he continued. "Not necessarily to make a big return, but to keep these parks in good shape for the future because they're so beloved by so many Americans. It's a great thing to be associated with if you're helping to create more access and to make these experiences better."
The lawmaker said the legislation has over 250 cosponsors and is supported by more than 180 organizations nationwide.
2-1/2 in. FNPT SS Threaded Flange
Zoro.com
·
Sponsored
call to action icon
The website Govtrack.us shows a total 260 cosponsors – 130 Republicans and 131 Democrats including Debbie Dingell, of Michigan; Jared Golden, of Maine, and Jim Costa, of California.
Westerman also emphasized that the legislation stretches beyond the national park system to include 15% of the budget to the United States Forest Service, 5% to U.S. Fish and Wildlife and 5% to the Bureau of Indian Education.
"If you like to hunt on National Wildlife Refuges, these funds help make those experiences better," he said. "They help make hiking and camping experiences in the national forest better ... We know that when people have a positive experience ... you develop these expectations of what your trip's going to be, and you want reality to exceed the expectation.
"Unfortunately, now some of these areas are in such maintenance disarray that the expectation exceeds the actual experience," he continued. "So we want to make sure that going forward, that the expectations that Americans have when they visit their public lands are met by reality that's even greater than the expectation."
Mens Supportive Walking And Running Shoes, Blue / 7
My Game Tables
·
Sponsored
call to action icon
Fixing the infrastructure:
Colorado GOP Rep. Gabe Evans emphasized the legislation's role in addressing the maintenance backlog at national parks and highlighted the parks' role in the American economy and the economy of the local communities surrounding and supporting the parks.
"These are things like visitor centers, or the trailheads, or the restrooms, or something just as simple as making sure that the water fountain works," he said on last week's "Just The News, No Noise. "This piece of legislation that I helped to introduce, what this does is it invests $1.9 billion every year for the next five years, to be able to go and fix that infrastructure, and we know that fixing that infrastructure is incredibly important."
Evans also said the legislation through the infrastructure repairs is expected to bring in $26 billion in revenue for the parks, the majority of which will come from the foreign tourists who visit national parks.
Montana Republican Rep. Troy Downing said one of the top priorities for infrastructure repairs is Yellowstone National Park, where crews are working to construct a bridge over the Yellowstone River.
"I brought my staff very recently, within the last month, down to Yellowstone Park, and we met with the superintendent, and we looked at some of the projects going on," he said. "The bridge they're building over the Yellowstone River right now is an incredible upgrade to what was there before, and is something that's going to be there for you know generations in the future."
Downing said Yellowstone has done roughly 400 projects through the Legacy Restoration Fund and that about $115 million of the $8.7 billion in federal funding through the legislation has gone to Montana.
Yellowstone itself needs $523 million for paved roads, $218 million for housing, $211 million for water systems and $74 million for sewerage, a 2025 federal inventory shows, according to the Daily Montanan.
"The numbers are big, but this investment is going to return dividends from more usage, more people spending money, not just in the parks but in the gateway communities, the states around, and coming to this country to see these jewels that we have," Downing said. "So we need to make sure that they're safe, presentable, and we're dealing with all that deferred maintenance."
Misty Severi is a news reporter for Just The News. You can follow her on X for more coverage.
-=-=
-=-=
MSN = FOX?!
NO LNX
A Trump-appointed federal judge on Friday reluctantly dismissed the Jan. 6 prosecution of four Proud Boys members, saying the law left him no authority to block the Justice Department's request.
U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted the Justice Department's motion to dismiss the case with prejudice against Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl and Dominic Pezzola after a federal appeals court had already vacated their convictions.
·
Sponsored
call to action icon
In a seven-page opinion, Kelly said longstanding separation-of-powers principles leave charging decisions to the executive branch, meaning he could not require the Justice Department to maintain a prosecution it had decided to drop.
"Because the decisions to issue the Executive Order and to abandon this prosecution—even after the Government secured convictions for serious crimes relating to the attack on the Capitol on January 6—are solely the Executive's, no one should mistake the Court's granting of the Government's motion for its agreement with those decisions," Kelly wrote.
Pezzola, who was convicted of assaulting police, robbery and destroying government property, was found guilty of stealing a Capitol Police riot shield before using it to smash a Capitol window, creating what prosecutors said was the first breach point through which hundreds of rioters entered the building. He was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but convicted on multiple other felony counts.
READ ON THE FOX NEWS APP
Meanwhile, Nordean, Biggs and Rehl were convicted of seditious conspiracy and several other felonies related to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, including conspiracy to obstruct Congress' certification of the 2020 presidential election, obstruction of law enforcement during a civil disorder and destruction of government property.
The Justice Department first moved in April to vacate the convictions and dismiss the case against the four men, arguing that doing so was "in the interests of justice" in light of President Donald Trump's Jan. 20, 2025, executive order commuting their sentences and issuing full pardons to former Proud Boys Chairman Enrique Tarrio and hundreds of other Jan. 6 defendants. The D.C. Circuit had already erased the men's convictions before returning the case to Kelly's courtroom to consider the Justice Department's request to dismiss the indictment. HUH?
call to action icon
"There is little mystery about why the Government is moving to dismiss this case, or whether dismissal is in fact what the Executive seeks," Kelly wrote. "President Trump's views about the prosecution of those who attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6—whether those views are based on fact or fiction—are well known, as is his intention to extend clemency to them."
Kelly cited longstanding precedent holding that charging decisions belong to the executive branch and that judges cannot reject a dismissal simply because they disagree with the government's reasoning.
And because the convictions had already been vacated and prosecutors have broad authority to decide whether to pursue criminal charges, Kelly said he lacked the power to force the Justice Department to continue the prosecution.
"Indeed, it is hard to see how any course other than granting the motion in full could make practical sense. Denying the motion would not somehow revive the convictions that the Court of Appeals vacated," Kelly wrote. "Nor would denying it mean a retrial would follow, because the Court lacks the authority to compel the Executive to pursue a prosecution, full stop—but especially when an executive order explicitly requires that the Government seek dismissal with prejudice."
But Kelly sharply rebuked the actions of the Jan. 6 rioters, calling it an attack on the people, Congress, and the "Constitution's mechanism to facilitate the peaceful transfer of power."
"Moving forward, if this Nation's experiment in self-government is to last another 250 years, the American people—no matter their partisan preferences—will have to act together to preserve, protect and defend that miracle through our constitutional framework," Kelly wrote.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Tarrio, who was also pardoned for criminal charges stemming from his role in the Jan. 6 riots, celebrated Kelly's dismissal on X.
"We took the worst they threw at us the raids, the solitary, the lies and we stood tall," Tarrio wrote. "Trump dropped the pardons and now the rest is crumbling. Justice is SERVED! Proud Boys don't lose. We WIN. This is OUR victory. THANK YOU PRESIDENT DONALD J TRUMP and all of you that fought for us!"
Original article source: Trump-appointed judge permanently ends Proud Boys Jan. 6 case, says Constitution left him no choice
Related Links:
DOJ SEEKS TO VACATE JAN 6 CONVICTIONS IN SWEEPING MOVE TIED TO TRUMP ORDER
FORMER INDIANA REP STEPHEN BUYER RECEIVES FULL PARDON FROM TRUMP FOR 2023 INSIDER TRADING CONVICTION
LEGAL WAR ON TRUMP’S AGENDA GAINS FIREPOWER AS FEDERAL LAWYERS DEFECT TO DEMOCRATS
===
7 26 ti
SIMON CLARK
CLIMATE COSMOS BS
0:00
This is a website called climatecossmos.com. At first glance, it appears to be a relatively normal website writing
0:06
articles about climate change. But spend more than about 10 seconds on it and you notice that things are a bit odd. Their
0:13
articles are very generic. They don't interview any experts. Their topics of articles are sometimes completely
0:19
bizarre, sandwiching articles with information about climate change between those that push an anti-science agenda.
0:26
And then they published a piece called um what the climate movement isn't
0:31
telling you. And the piece read, "I'll help you write an article about what the climate movement isn't telling you with
0:36
current facts and data. Let me search for the latest information." This website is AI slop. And this is Joey
0:43
Gsturn, a journalist at DMOG, the investigative reporting site specializing in climate misinformation.
0:50
A few months ago, I learned of Climate Cosmos and passed it over to Joey to do some digging. And what he uncovered was
0:57
a bizarre new form of climate misinformation. One that shows how the
1:03
information landscape around climate change is in danger and raises questions
1:08
about what we can and should do to safeguard that landscape.
1:18
To begin with, let's look at Climate Cosmos in a bit more detail. So, you'll have one piece that's like a
1:23
listical saying something like the top 10 snowiest cities in Hawaii or something nonsensey that's very
1:28
obviously like there to draw clickbait and then like sort of every third or fourth article would be like the secret
1:33
hidden costs of the green transition and then quote Bjorn Lomborg who is a kind of very prominent like anti-net zero
1:39
voice. So, we did more of a deep dive into the site, trying to look at who owns the site, who's behind it, you
1:45
know, all these kinds of things. On the about page, they listed staff members, and we found this site maybe 4 months
1:50
ago. Back then, the staff members had AI generated pictures and untraceable
1:55
social media footprints. So, at that point, it was kind of clear, okay, maybe these aren't even real people. Things have changed. They seem to have aligned,
2:02
swapped out these AI generated profiles for real people or what what we think of real people online. We did some digging
2:07
into who owns the companies. It turns out Climate Cosmos is part of a group called NextVision Media. This is a German startup media business. Next
2:15
Vision Media don't just do climate content. They have a few AI generated sites. There were like home decoration sites. There was all kind of like really
2:21
random seeming topics um where you'd think, okay, if this is a a media business dedicated to climate content,
2:27
why do they have a site called Home Harmony that's about how to like decorate your living room? And all of these websites feature AI generated
...
this story gets more interesting. MSN is one of the world's largest news aggregators. That means that it's a web
4:30
violated its policies on misinformation. And so when Microsoft was made aware of
4:35
the content, it was all pulled. But via the massive reach of MSN, Climate Cosmos's content had escaped into the
4:43
wild, where it was seized upon by an entirely different kind of actor in the
4:49
climate information landscape. From the 1960s, it was very clear to
4:57
scientists working in the fossil fuel industry that the fuels they were selling were leading to carbon building
5:02
up in the atmosphere. In fact, in 1959, physicist Edward Teller warned them that
5:09
this would lead to global warming and sea level rise. In 1965, President Johnson's science advisory committee
5:15
published the Restoring the Quality of Our Environment Report. President of the American Petroleum Institute, Frank
5:21
Ikard, said of the report, "One of the most important predictions of the report is that carbon dioxide is being added to
5:27
the Earth's atmosphere by the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas at such a rate that by the year 2000, the heat
5:33
balance will be so modified as possibly to cause marked changes in the climate beyond local or even national efforts."
5:40
And he did not dispute the links between fossil fuels, CO2, and global warming. In retrospect, it's kind of surprising
5:47
that the fossil fuel industry didn't immediately start disputing those links and climate science as a whole. Because
5:54
after all, if it became public knowledge that their products were threatening the
5:59
climate stability that we all depend on, their industry could just cease to
6:04
exist. Perhaps it was because no government was seriously considering actual climate policy until the 1980s.
6:11
And it was at this time when the existential threat to the industry became clear that the fossil fuel
6:17
companies started fighting back with all the resources of the richest, most
6:24
powerful industry the world has ever seen. They financed think tanks and
6:29
individual scientists who disputed the scientific consensus, saying variously that climate change wasn't real. real
6:36
but not caused by the fossil fuel industry or real but actually beneficial to humanity. Their techniques included
6:42
use of experts outside their fields of study, lobbying policy makers, portraying environmental campaigners as
6:48
outofouch liberal elites, harassment and legal action against individual scientists, and accusing scientists of
6:54
accepting money from industry while paying other scientists to produce studies that supported the industry's
6:59
continued survival. The fossil fuel industry was using a playbook to dispute the science that had been honed by
7:05
previous industrial misinformation campaigns, notably by the tobacco industry when they disputed the science
7:12
linking tobacco smoke and lung cancer. In fact, the fossil fuel industry used some of the same experts from that
7:19
tobacco industry campaign. I would highly encourage you to read Merchants of Doubt by Areskis and Conway, which is
7:26
the authoritative account of how this playbook came to be. Though for more recent reporting, you can also read the
7:32
Union of Concerned Scientists climate deception dossier or most recently
7:37
Barbara Fries's Industrial Strength Denial. The result was that from the 1980s, the climate information landscape
7:44
became a battleground. On the one side, you had climate scientists and institutions taking observations, doing
7:51
analysis, and projecting what kind of damage would occur to the environment if we continued burning fossil fuels.
7:57
Victory for this side meant getting accurate information about climate change to the public and ultimately to
8:03
politicians. The end goal being government policy to
UN climate slush fund': COP conferences all about money - MSN
MSN
'Climate Depot' Executive Director Marc Morano claims COP29 was all about money and labelled the conference a “UN climate slush fund”.
===
ggl alert
Marc Morano
Weekly update ⋅ July 12, 2024
artif intell no al gore]
AI's Energy Demand Sparks U.S. Electricity Crisis | Watch - MSN
MSN
placeholder
Climate Crisis 247
6d
AI’s Energy Demand Sparks U.S. Electricity Crisis
Doug McIntyre, editor-in-chief of Climate Crisis 247, highlights the looming energy crisis driven by AI’s massive electricity consumption. This surge will strain the U.S. grid, which cannot support such demand. Renewables like solar and wind won’t be sufficient to fill the gap, necessitating a nuclear resurgence despite public fears stemming from the 1979 Three Mile...
share
more
placeholder
the green energy transition that wasn't Mark Murano is actually
Current Time 0:06
/
Duration 3:12
twit?
Fox Business
2w
Idea of transitioning energy to solar and wind is a ‘nonstarter’: Marc Morano
ClimateDepot.com executive editor Marc Morano weighs in on the Biden administration’s ongoing push for green energy policies during an appearance on ‘Varney & Co.’
Idea of transitioning energy to solar and wind is a 'nonstarter': Marc Morano. ClimateDepot.com executive editor Marc Morano weighs in on the Biden ...
Plans for windfarm rejected for a third time - MSN
MSN
... a 'nonstarter': Marc Morano. 03:12. Idea of transitioning energy to solar and wind is a 'nonstarter': Marc Morano. Fox Business. 155.
===}:
gmail 7 24 not sure how morano fits here
speed of human-induced global warming has never been higher - MSN
MSN
... a 'nonstarter': Marc Morano. 03:12. Idea of transitioning energy to solar and wind is a 'nonstarter': Marc Morano. Fox Business. 53.
for or the second consecutive year, an international consortium of fifty researchers, mainly involving scientists from CEA, CNRS, Mercator Océan international, and Météo-France in France, has updated the key indicators of global climate change. Their findings are alarming: the results show that global warming due to human activities is advancing at a rate of 0.26°C per decade, the highest pace since records began.
As 2023 ranks as the hottest year on record, a group of 50 international scientists including Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Sophie Szopa, Aurélien Ribes, Karina von Schuckmann, and Pierre Friedlingstein, from several French organizations (CEA, CNRS, Mercator Océan international, Météo-France, IPSL-ENS, Paris Saclay) have published their second annual report on global climate change indicators in the scientific journal Earth System Science Data.
Once again this year, the study's conclusions reveal that warming due to human activities continues to increase, reaching 1.19°C over the last decade (2014-2023) compared to the pre-industrial period, surpassing the 1.14°C estimated between 2013 and 2022 (as indicated in last year's report).
The analysis also shows that the residual carbon budget, i.e., the amount of carbon dioxide that can be emitted before causing global warming of 1.5°C, is now only about 200 billion tonnes (approximately 220 billion tons), equivalent to five years of current emissions. In 2023 alone, human-induced warming reached 1.3°C.
This figure is lower than the overall warming observed during the same year (1.43°C), demonstrating that natural climate variability, particularly the El Niño phenomenon, also played a role in the record temperature of 2023.
gfx]
Key planetary climate indicators 2023 © CEA, CNRM, Météo France, CNRS.
This report also presents new information on the effects of reducing sulfur emissions, particularly those from the global maritime transport industry. These emissions have a cooling effect on the climate by directly reflecting sunlight back into space and promoting the formation of more reflective clouds. The continued decrease in these emissions has reduced this effect. Although this phenomenon was offset last year by particle emissions due to wildfires in Canada, the cooling induced by particle emissions will continue to decline in the long term, the report's authors highlight.
"A rapid reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, 70% of which are caused by fossil fuel combustion (oil, natural gas, and coal), will limit the level of global warming we will eventually experience. At the same time, we need to build more resilient societies. The devastation caused by wildfires, drought, floods, and heatwaves that the world experienced in 2023 must not become a new norm*," says Professor Piers Forster, director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at the University of Leeds (UK) and coordinator of the study.
Another key finding: high levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions also affect Earth's energy balance: ocean buoys and satellites are tracking unprecedented heat fluxes in the oceans, ice sheets, soils, and Earth's atmosphere. This heat flux is 50% higher than its long-term average.
"This second annual update after the 6th IPCC report highlights the intensification of human influence on the climate, with an even faster rate of heat accumulation due to human activities, and breaks down how temporary modulation by natural climate variability (particularly El Niño), in addition to human-induced warming, led to the record planetary temperature observed in 2023. The severity of the effects observed this year (which are not addressed in our article), related to extreme heat on land and at sea, extreme precipitation, drought, and wildfires, on ecosystems, populations, infrastructures, and the economy, sadly shows clearly why every increment of additional warming matters.*" declares Valérie Masson-Delmottte, climatologist at CEA.
The conclusions of this report should inform and guide the strengthening of climate action plans that all countries around the world have committed to present to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) by 2025, in order to reduce emissions and adapt to the effects of climate change.
---
Associated Press
Indiana Rep. Banks facing 'insurrection' ballot challenge
By TOM DAVIES, Associated Press - 5h ago
© Provided by Associated Press
INDIANAPOLIS (AP) — An Indiana congressman who was rejected by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the top Republican for the committee investigating last year’s U.S. Capitol insurrection is fending off an effort to remove his name from this year's election ballot.
The challenge to Rep. Jim Banks’ candidacy is at least the second across the country against a Republican House member citing a portion of a post-Civil War amendment to the U.S. Constitution pertaining to insurrections against the United States.
Banks, an outspoken supporter of former President Donald Trump and leader of the influential Republican Study Committee, has denounced the ballot challenge as frivolous.
It was filed by a long-shot Democratic candidate for Banks’ congressional seat and likely has little chance of success when it goes before the state election commission on Friday, a former longtime commission member said.
A similar challenge is pending against North Carolina Rep. Madison Cawthorn, who spoke at the rally supporting Trump before the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot that interrupted the certification of President Joe Biden’s victory.
The Indiana challenge petition filed by Democrat Aaron Calkins claims Banks is ineligible to be a candidate because of a “violation of the 14th Amendment supporting an insurrection.” The filing with the state election commission didn’t include additional information supporting the claim against Banks and Calkins didn’t return a telephone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.
The 14th Amendment says no one can serve in Congress “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress ... to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same.”
yikes
devin nunes he bailed to run trump media?
scaryMSN news no warninggives [but labelled when arrive on link/page]: FOX [then at end rolls to brian kileade asks us to click on something to join?]
6 min interview with fmr ca congressman" not 1st time; ran confid hu sources; infiltrate, FISA warrant; russia hoaxers, crickets in mainstream press; cites andrrew c mccarthy; mueller: trump framed; cognitive issues; clinton campaIGN OPERATIVES AND dirty cops [steel?]; doing it by the bk, zero leaks, complete opposite [bizzarroworld inversion?]; fmr intelligence chair; ratcliffe pushed russia colusion docs to durham, says docs kept from congress
Trump Media & Technology Group CEO Devin Nunes on the Durham probe into individuals connected to the Clinton campaign.
blonde host: devin confid hu sources paid w/ tax;
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/bidens-pipeline-gift-to-putin/ar-AAKbcXp
MSN news runs WT duck ny tabloid ~ biden
no lnx note no name
Biden’s pipeline gift to Putin
Washington Examiner - May 19
:{
}:
© Provided by Washington Examiner
President Joe Biden continues to be the best thing that ever happened to Vladimir Putin.
As a candidate, Biden pledged to get tough on Putin. Former President Donald Trump, Biden insisted, had appeased the former KGB lieutenant colonel to the great detriment of America’s closest allies and values. Now in office for five months, Biden’s former rhetoric bears stark contrast with his actual policies.
Biden this week gave the green light to a Russian pipeline across northern Europe with a huge strategic value to Putin every thinking person acknowledges.
The Nord Stream II natural gas pipeline is more than 90% completed, and Congress passed sanctions in early January designed to ensure it doesn’t get to 100%.
Putin needn’t have worried. Biden is unilaterally lifting those sanctions, giving Germany’s short-sightedness a thumbs-up and giving Putin a gift. In an absurd effort to disguise its appeasement, Biden’s State Department said it would sanction the ships involved in the concluding pipe laying process but not the actual operators of those ships. As you might assume, there is rather limited utility in sanctioning inanimate objects.
But for Putin, there is great utility in what Biden has just done. Biden has licensed Putin to complete this centerpiece of his long-term European strategy by making Europe dependent on Russia for energy.
With the completion of Nord Stream II, Putin will be able to extract European political appeasement of his global priorities as the price for his provision of winter heating. The new pipeline will also allow Russia to undercut Ukrainian energy supplies to Europe, thus denying Kyiv billions in dollars in much-needed revenue. Even if only at the margin, Nord Stream II will reduce the viability of expanded U.S. liquid natural gas exports to Europe.
And what might Putin want to get away with? Consider Russia’s sustained buildup of military forces on Ukraine’s borders. Or the recent Russian cyberattack on Annalena Baerbock, the Green Party leader and front-runner to replace Angela Merkel in Germany’s September federal elections. Or the identification of the Russian GRU intelligence service responsible for the 2014 detonation of two ammunition depots in the Czech Republic. That attack cost the lives of two innocent Czechs.
But we should stay for a moment with that name: Annalena Baerbock.
After all, Baerbock has said Nord Stream II is incompatible with European security. Seeing as Baerbock has outlined her position in clear public detail, we must assume the U.S. Embassy in Berlin made Washington aware of it. Why, then, did Biden not sustain the pipeline sanctions in recognition of Baerbock’s prospects?
The question deserves answering.
What we do know is Biden’s rhetoric on Russia is very different than his Russian policy. It’s not just Nord Stream II. In recent weeks, Biden has allowed Putin’s hackers to extort the Colonial Pipeline operators into a nearly $5 million ransom payment.The Kremlin knows the U.S. intelligence community is aware these hackers operate under the supervision of the Russian FSB intelligence service. Yet, for whatever reason, Biden decided it was easier to abandon the Colonial Pipeline and accept fuel disruption across the East Coast rather than threaten Putin with retaliation.
Equally pathetic is Biden’s begging Putin for a one-on-one summit. This Trump-style pageantry has seen national security adviser Jake Sullivan forced into numerous phone calls with his Moscow opposite, Nikolai Patrushev. The ringleader of Putin’s espionage, cyber, and assassination malevolence around the world, Patrushev must have reveled in Washington’s humiliation.
Humiliation certainly is the right word: Just a few weeks ago, Putin publicly questioned whether Biden is senile. Again, Biden doesn’t appear to care.
Where does this leave us?
Perhaps only with one sad but obvious truth. Biden’s "I’m-tough-on-Putin" shtick is simply preening to a press and a Democratic electorate invested in the fantasy of Trump as a Russian asset. Now that Biden is out of fantasy land, his tough talk has evaporated.
Tags: Editorials, Magazine - Editorial, Joe Biden, Vladimir Putin, Nord Stream II
Original Author: Washington Examiner
Original Location: Biden’s pipeline gift to Putin