Language
Language is very important. The language of things becomes a binding contract. When you use a word correctly, you “spell”. Language is a binding spell used to keep us in the contractual agreement. By using the language we are acquiescing to the laws without knowing it.
Aristotle said, “Animals use their voices to indicate pleasure and pain. People speak to distinguish the just from the unjust.”
Ad recte docendum oportet primum inquirere nomina quia rerum cognition a nominibus rerum dependet: In order rightly to comprehend a thing, it is necessary first to inquire into the names, for a right knowledge of things depends on their names.
It has been said that without reference to the common law, the language of the Federal Constitution could not be understood.” 16Am Jur 2d. Sec. 114
“Political language…is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”
A single word can be all it takes to win or lose. When dealing with the law you are dealing with very explicit things and if you can use the correct definition and the source, you’ll find the answers to so many things are right there in the definitions. We can say we are relying on this definition, Blacks Law. If they say that’s not the definition they’re using say “Ok, show me which definition you’re using”. That’s law, its word play. We have to be clear what words we’re using, we don’t go in and say “I’ve got a right to this, I’ve got a right to that, I’m a sovereign citizen….” Because somewhere on the internet I read that I’m a man. Can you explain it to a six-year-old using definitions so there’s no doubt about what you’re saying? Quite often people jump to an assumption rather than a definition.
We are very precise, we don’t use an extra word here and there. We don’t use more than we need.
Video Resurfaced Rockefeller Document Using Meetings To Force Agendas & Language Manipulation
Why You Must Learn About Context
- “The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttle fish spurting out ink.” – George Orwell “Politics and the English Language”, 1946
- Using proper language
In the 1st Amendment:
The Overbreadth Doctrine, Statutory Language, and Free Speech
Video Maritime Admiralty Law, Language Deception & The Importance of Words
Article VI and What it Requires of Government
- All that matters, according to the language of the Constitution, is what the Federal Government says, or how the Federal Government interprets a Clause; and that final decision is left to the Judiciary of the Federal Government.
1990 Court Decides Opinion Not Always Protected
- In Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., the U.S. Supreme Court decides that the First Amendment does not absolutely protect expressions of opinion from being found libelous. The Court makes a distinction between pure opinion and opinion that implies “an assertion of objective fact” that a plaintiff can prove is false. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist writes that “loose, figurative or hyperbolic language” is protected because it would “negate the impression” that the writer is making serious accusations based on fact.
Statutory Language
- Plain Language
- The court is bound to apply the plain language of a statute to accomplish the intent of the General Assembly. If the language is clear and unambiguous, the court will not look to rules of construction or to legislative history; it will simply apply the language. But, if applying the plain language leads to an absurd result or a result that is contrary to the obvious intent of the General Assembly, or if the language is ambiguous, then the court will apply rules of statutory interpretation to construe the statute.
Judges, in interpreting the language of statutes, have wide latitude in determining which actions qualify as legally cognizable wrongs, which defenses may override any given claim, and the appropriate measure of damages.
Improper Language Used in Debate
It is usual, when it is simply a case of improper language used in debate, for the chair to call the speaker to order, or for a member to say, "I call the gentleman to order." The chairman decides whether the speaker is in or out of order, and proceeds as before.
Legal fiction is an abstract term. to explain a concept. Dog latin is everything in CAPs, the language of the illiterate. Take a black marker and block out everything that's in all caps. Everything in the document is legal fiction if its in all caps. Imitates Latin as a sign language.
Lawyers always parse language to favor their side.
Always question authority
- Remember: the BIG print GIVETH and the SMALL print TAKETH AWAY. Read the SMALL print first. In statutory language, the SMALL print is the definitions.