Redress
redress v. 1. To set right, remedy or rectify. 2. To make amends for.n. 1. Satisfaction for wrong done; reparation. 2. Correction.
E Clause LLC was created by Chris Hallett to provide Loss Prevention Services to the governments of the United State and the several States. Over the years, many of us have found much great info about Natural Law, Due Process and The Rule of Law only to be left in the dark as to how to use that info to effect any meaningful redress.
Christopher Edward Hallett (DBA E-Clause LLC) with full authority in Standing pursuant to the attached Judicial Mandate, establishment of Loss Prevention Practice,and through the attached Lawfully created corporation by and through the Florida Department of State to provide Loss Prevention Services to the United States of America Corporation. (see E-Clause on tab above) Duties include but are not limited to:
Job Description of E-Clause:
- Malitiis hominum est obviandum. The malicious designs of men must be thwarted.
- Integrity of Legal / Lawful Process Issues as unlawful Emoluments, Pyramid Schemes, Sham Prosecutions, Defective Business Practices, etc.
- Lawful and Equal Enforcement under the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitutions of the Several States pursuant to Article 4.
- Advising the Court’s through this Process in accordance with the established Due Process of Law as I redress my grievances with my Legislatureas written in the Constitution; and paying due Respect to Lady Justice in accordance with the Judiciary Act of 1789.
The questions to be answered in this case by the court are pursuant to these fundamental principles (Maxims) of Lawful Process as follows: (for parliamentary inquiries)
- Justitia est libertate prior.Justice comes before Liberty
- Justitia nemini neganda est. Justice is to be denied to no one.
- Jus et fraus nunquam cohabitant. Right and fraud never abide together.
How is it anything less than Treason to continue to deny the People true Justice under the Law by not enforcing perjury statutes against Government Actors, in positions of Emoluments, knowing these three (3) most fundamental Principles and Practices of Law?
How does the court reconcile (hold accountable) the BAR Association in using the Declaration of Independence’s declared acts of tyranny like a “Check List” of “To Do” in these cases to perpetuate litigation, and those actions not constitute Treason on the Court?
How is Title 4 et al of the Social Security Act (unlawful Emoluments) anything but practicing Barratry and Extortion under the color of Law; knowing unlawful incarceration is the end result as clearly established in this case pursuant to the cited “Unjust Conviction Law”, and the cited Treatises?
A) Treatise on-Law Malicious Prosecutions
B) Treatise on False Arrest & Imprisonments
How is The Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 (ASFA) anything less than State Sponsored “Human Trafficking”? (A Death Penalty Offense as articulated by the World Court)