horowitz bak

=<div>Horowitz talk
22 Jun 2018 by DHTV in Colleges David Horowitz at UC Santa Cruz =<a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/david-horowitz-u-s-history-with-slavery-not-our-original-sin-but-original-virtue/" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none;">http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/david-horowitz-u-s-history-with-slavery-not-our-original-sin-but-original-virtue/</a><div class="mce-content-body" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: small; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear;"><div class="layout-constrain--narrow" style="box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; max-width: 47.2222em; padding-left: 1em; padding-right: 1em; line-height: 1.5;"><p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; line-height: 1.5;">Right-wing author David Horowitz appeared on Glenn Beck’s show on Tuesday to talk about his most recent book, “Dark Agenda: The War to Destroy Christian America.” Beck read from the book’s closing lines declaring that a nation divided over fundamental principles like individual freedom versus group identity “cannot long endure” and concluding, “The urgency that drew the Religious Right into politics 50 years ago is now an urgency of the nation itself.”<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; line-height: 1.5;">A <a href="https://www.theblaze.com/glenn-tv/david-horowitz-uncovers-the-lefts-dark-agenda-to-destroy-christianity-in-america?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily-NewsletterAM-Final%202019-06-06&utm_term=TheBlaze%20Daily%20AM%20-%20last%20270%20days" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; background-color: transparent; outline-offset: 0.111111em;">clip highlighted by the Beck’s The Blaze</a> focuses on Horowitz’s take on slavery. It’s a stunning rewrite of America’s racial history, and one that, like many right-wing attempts at historical revisionism, ignores the long and violent imposition of Jim Crow apartheid in the former Confederate states after the Civil War—not to mention official and unofficial policies that have continued to perpetuate glaring racial disparities in opportunity, income, wealth and well-being.<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; line-height: 1.5;">In the clip, Horowitz starts with a slam at Cory Booker, U.S. senator and presidential candidate, for saying, in Horowitz’s telling, “we have to get rid of the bigotries in the Constitution.” Here’s how Horowitz responded:<blockquote style="background: rgb(239, 243, 243); box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; hyphens: none; padding: 1.5em; margin: 0px 0.75em 2em;"><p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; line-height: 1.5;">There are no bigotries in the Constitution. It doesn’t deal with race. It doesn’t use the words white or black because the founders actually believed that all human beings are created equal, and that even though given what those times were like it would take a bloody civil war, which they wanted to avoid, that was their goal. And we’ve achieved it.<p style="margin: 0px; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; line-height: 1.5;">There’s never been in the history of the world a more integrated, inclusive, tolerant nation than our nation, and yet they’re talking about slavery as the original sin of our country. No. What we did with slavery is our original virtue. Slavery existed for 3,000 years in all countries. No one ever said it was immoral until white Christian males led by Wilberforce in England and Jefferson in the United States said it was immoral and that all men are created equal—this is our own birth certificate—and have an inalienable right to liberty. That included black slaves, and that’s why we had a civil war, and that’s why we led the world in ending slavery. It’s so repulsive what Democrats are doing today in destroying our heritage and pretending we have to be ashamed of our country instead of proud of it.</blockquote><div class="at-below-post addthis_tool" data-url="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/david-horowitz-u-s-history-with-slavery-not-our-original-sin-but-original-virtue/" style="box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; line-height: 1.5;"><div class="layout-constrain--narrow" style="box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; max-width: 47.2222em; padding-left: 1em; padding-right: 1em;"><div class="tags" style="box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; border-top: 5px solid rgb(239, 243, 243); margin-bottom: 2em; padding-top: 1em;"><p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear;"><strong style="box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear;">Tags: <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/people/david-horowitz/" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; background-color: transparent; outline-offset: 0.111111em;">David Horowitz</a><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/people/glenn-beck/" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; background-color: transparent; outline-offset: 0.111111em;">Glenn Beck</a><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/topics/racism/" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; background-color: transparent; outline-offset: 0.111111em;">Racism</a><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/topics/revisionist-history/" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; background-color: transparent; outline-offset: 0.111111em;">revisionist history</a><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/organizations/theblaze/" style="text-decoration-line: none; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(0, 51, 153); outline: none; box-sizing: border-box; transition-duration: 0.2s; transition-property: background-color, border-color, box-shadow, color, opacity, text-shadow, transform, -webkit-transform; transition-timing-function: linear; background-color: transparent; outline-offset: 0.111111em;">TheBlaze</a></div></div></div></div></div><a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/may/24/donald-trump/donald-trumps-false-claim-nancy-pelosi-came-out-fa/">http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/may/24/donald-trump/donald-trumps-false-claim-nancy-pelosi-came-out-fa/</a>
<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"> Trump cast Democrats as supporters of MS-13 gang members and uninterested in fighting crime.<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Trump routinely brings up brutal crimes committed by MS-13 members while highlighting his administration’s goal to incarcerate or deport them from the United States.<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">At the May 22 Susan B. Anthony List’s Campaign for Life Gala, Trump claimed Democrats want open borders and don’t want to stop illegal immigration."And the other day — just the other day — Nancy Pelosi came out in favor of MS-13," <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-susan-b-anthony-list-11th-annual-campaign-life-gala/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">Trump said</a>. "That’s the first time I’ve heard that. She wants them to be treated with respect, as do other Democrats."<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Trump repeated the charge against House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on May 23 during a roundtable discussion on MS-13, saying: "I noticed recently where Democrats, Nancy Pelosi as an example, are trying to defend MS-13 gang members. I called them animals the other day and I was met with rebuke. They said, ‘they are people.’ They are not people. These are animals."<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">We wondered about Trump’s claim that Pelosi "came out in favor of MS-13" and that she has defended gang members. Trump distorted the facts.Pelosi said "calling people animals is not a good thing," but did not focus her comments on MS-13 gang members.<div class="pf_subheadline" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1em; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-weight: bold; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Trump’s ‘animals’ remark</div>Trump made headlines earlier this month after labeling some people who come to the United States as "animals." His comment came during an immigration meeting with California officials.While Trump did not specifically mention MS-13 gang members in the "animals" sentence, his statement came after a sheriff spoke about "bad guys" and MS-13 gang members. (<a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2018/may/17/context-donald-trumps-comments-about-immigrants-an/" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">Here’s the full context</a>.)<a href="http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/17/media/media-trump-animals-immigrants/index.html?utm_source=CNN+Media%3A+Reliable+Sources&utm_campaign=dd34d0ce5f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_06_06&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e95cdc16a9-dd34d0ce5f-85679693" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">Some interpreted Trump</a> as saying all immigrants are "animals."Trump went on Twitter May 18 to fight back that assessment: "Fake News Media had me calling Immigrants, or Illegal Immigrants, ‘Animals.’ Wrong! They were begrudgingly forced to withdraw their stories. I referred to MS 13 Gang Members as ‘Animals,’ a big difference - and so true. Fake News got it purposely wrong, as usual!" <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/997429518867591170" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">Trump tweeted</a>.<div class="pf_subheadline" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1em; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-weight: bold; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">What Pelosi said</div>Pelosi clearly chose the interpretation of Trump’s words at the roundtable that was least favorable to Trump. But that doesn’t mean she was embracing violent gang members.At a May 17 press conference, the day after Trump’s "animals" comment, <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/05/17/nancy_pelosi_ms-13_gang_members_are_not_animals.html" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">Pelosi said</a>"calling people animals is not a good thing" and defended "undocumented immigrants." She did not mention MS-13 gang members.Pelosi said "we're all God's children" and spoke about "a spark of divinity in every person on Earth.""And so when the president of the United States says about undocumented immigrants, ‘These aren't people. These are animals,’ you have to wonder, does he not believe in the spark of divinity, the dignity and worth of every person? ‘These are not people. These are animals.’ The president of the United States," Pelosi said.White House spokesman Steven Cheung said in an emailed statement, "Pelosi either is peddling an out-of-context quote that mainstream media outlets have corrected or retracted (<a href="https://twitter.com/ap/statuses/997138543817449472" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">AP</a> and <a href="https://twitter.com/CNN/status/997170505609302016" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">CNN</a>), or defending MS-13 gang members whose motto is rape, control, and kill."<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">The White House said the "animals" term is language <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/07/28/in-long-island-trump-to-highlight-violence-from-ms-13-gang-to-push-congress-on-immigration/?utm_term=.ad218677f6b3" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px 0px 1px; border-top-style: initial; border-right-style: initial; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: initial; border-top-color: initial; border-right-color: initial; border-bottom-color: transparent; border-left-color: initial; border-image: initial; font-style: inherit; font-variant: inherit; font-weight: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; transition: color 0.15s ease-in-out, border 0.15s ease-in-out; text-decoration-line: none;">Trump has used before</a> when talking about MS-13 gang members.<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Still, Pelosi did not defend MS-13 gang members or come out in their favor, as Trump claimed. She centered her comments on "undocumented immigrants" and rebuked using the word "animals" to refer to people.<div class="pf_subheadline" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px 0px 1em; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-weight: bold; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Our ruling</div><p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Trump said Pelosi "came out in favor of MS-13."<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Trump’s claim is based on Pelosi’s criticism of Trump for using the word "animals" during an immigration meeting with California officials. Trump used that term after a sheriff spoke about MS-13 gang members.<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">A day after Trump’s comment, Pelosi said "calling people animals is not a good thing" and defended "undocumented immigrants." Pelosi did not mention MS-13 gang members in her comments.<p style="margin: 0px 0px 1.5em; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-variant-numeric: inherit; font-variant-east-asian: inherit; font-stretch: inherit; line-height: inherit; vertical-align: baseline; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">While Trump blasted media reports and others for missing the context of his remarks, he did just that with Pelosi’s comment. We rate it False. <p name="23ff" id="23ff" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">“All of us cherish our ideals. We do have our differences — and they are real. But I hope that we will each be humble enough to accept the good faith of others.<p name="635f" id="635f" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em;">“I hope too that we will find wisdom from the Scriptures where it says, ‘To minister to the needs of God’s creation — humanity and nature — is an act of worship. To ignore those needs is to dishonor the God who made us.’<p name="846c" id="846c" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">“In that spirit, in order to meet the needs of the American people, House Democrats pledge to seek common ground wherever we can: To forge a bipartisan path forward on job-creating infrastructure, to make taxes and foreign trade fair to American workers, to help Americans balance work and family life, and to ‘drain the swamp’ of big money from our campaigns, all of these provisions, President-elect Trump has pledged.<p name="335b" id="335b" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">“We will seek common ground. But we will stand our ground wherever in good conscience we must.<p name="eda9" id="eda9" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em;">“If there is an attempt to destroy the guarantee of Medicare, harm [Medicaid], Social Security, or the Affordable Care Act, Democrats will stand our ground.<p name="39dc" id="39dc" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em;">“If there is an assault on clean air and clean water; on civil rights, women’s rights, or LGBT rights; if DREAMers and their immigrant families face the nightmare of deportation, Democrats will stand our ground.<p name="bc80" id="bc80" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em;">“And if there is an attempt to silence our voices for common sense gun violence prevention, with Gabby Giffords here in the chamber as our witness — Democrats will stand our ground.<p name="7888" id="7888" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em;">“Many of us just celebrated Christmas, the birth of Christ. In sharing in our humanity, God enabled us to participate in His divinity. This spark of divinity is acknowledged in every faith tradition. In recognizing the spark in others, we reaffirm it in ourselves.<p name="d2a9" id="d2a9" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em;">“Honoring it, honoring that spark of divinity — we are commanded to respect the dignity and worth of all of God’s children, and to work together for the common good.<p name="6152" id="6152" class="graf graf--p graf--startsWithDoubleQuote graf-after--p" style="margin: 29px 0px 0px; --baseline-multiplier:0.17; line-height: 1.58; letter-spacing: -0.003em; text-indent: -0.4em; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">“In that spirit, I offer my congratulations to the Speaker of this new Congress, a proud son of Wisconsin, Paul Ryan. He is a leader of principle, immersed in ideas, and gifted with experience. putin hackerman, frog guy, woodside high https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8yjVFZXJxo 66 min qa 54? brandon: 10 years ago? friendly crowd here; coll rep invite [see intro in other low res version] cowards that run this inst, know who violent ppl are; for 60 yrs at ucb [i did not occupy bldgs]how did we get away; one black guy thx rep comm? security vol? muslim brohood gather outside waiver from personal injury[; everyone who spks here must signcf 10 yrs ago, demand security]; all know that all the violence comes from left student who took bld 3 days, admin caved to demands;, prosecuted for extortion and expelled, arrest trespass; if in real field eg marine bio prolly great ed, but if lib art mjr, drop out buy house, avoid indoc by braindead leftist... dept of fem study, imaging if...radicals here so extreme, put agendas out there; usually women's studies; all about indoct; fems are racists; 4 min every lib arts issue is radical? controversial; gop as rare as unicorns; 4 yrs no conserv adult, that's why att nuts; to stand out students take more and more extreme positions; leftist learned to leran cty; white suprem use term deserve to be in mental inast; in a nutshell; BO sez racism in DNA of Am actually it's liberty] full speech of David Horowitz, 6/7/18, hosted by College Republicans at UCSC. UCSC is retrograde, reactionary and for me, dangerous ta nehisi coates[ nice guy] is biggest racist? fad of am democ, never eradicated; here's reaLITY: 3K till white xian Wilberforce; TJ all men =; slave in africa 1k yrs before whites; (ref net over head by blacks kunta kinte? many white men died in civil war to free; 1807 abol slavery; if before, south wd have gone to war, UK join and crush usa; tamika mallory idiot women, calls us racist; al gore says 3/5th [i can find no ref, tho he did win pop vote, as did hallary]
The population of slaves would be counted as three-fifths in total when apportioning Representatives, as well as Presidential electors and taxes. The Three-Fifths Compromise was proposed by James Wilson and Roger Sherman, who were both delegates for the Constitutional Convention of 1787. [many bald a n d grey heads] 10 min pro slav wanted blk ppl to have 3/5 rep,[date?] anti slave wanted them to have none?! genius of am fdrs, writing book, all prots, rival denominations Priesthood of all believers; catholic peter, indulgences; prot reform made all ppl = in the eyes of God; vs judge by skin, gender [title about identity politics, supposed to be talking about, OPPOSITE, racist, dem party is racist; hoodlums occupy bldg, extort concessions, get away w it b/c black, incred disservice to blk to cut them a pass, black skin privilege; 200 IQ pts lower?! [ // jared taylor of AA IQ but coy?]14 min; NBA millionaires conspiracy to keep out asian power fwd ? no]most tolerant and inclusive cty on god's green earth w/o question
[<a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263478/progressive-racism-barbara-kay">https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263478/progressive-racism-barbara-kay</a> 1958 only 4% approve interracial marriage, now _; 13% think elvis on moon; look on TV, total integrate, blk ppl dominate entertainment media; "Ppl of color" term is used to beat up, not english, ideological , stick to hit ppl with ; ppl with no color [box of crayons?] , evil, ID of interest? tell that to rwandans, massacre tutsi; indians and pakis fight tho same color [actually hindu muslim fight] left is brain dead can't win arg, so use term to beat up also spoze to say why totalitarian: erase particular of situation, of person? starbucks, loitering big guys want to use restroom, smaller white woman [is the victim]; no evidence of what actually happened; frightened, called cops, nothing to do with race[ head of SB wants to run for prez [true] ; give 175K ppl day off to learn they have uncons bias [hired ADL?] ; can't find racists, a few like duke completely isolated and charlotte, so invent; kkk at ht had x # 11 senate 87m congress congress seats; have to be a racist to be dem; 12 mill $
<a href="https://whyy.org/articles/the-woman-behind-the-viral-video-of-philly-starbucks-arrests/">https://whyy.org/articles/the-woman-behind-the-viral-video-of-philly-starbucks-arrests/</a>
don't look very scary:
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/05/02/african-american-men-arrested-at-starbucks-reach-1-settlement-with-the-city-secure-promise-for-200000-grant-program-for-young-entrepreneurs/?utm_term=.6fa23f010813">https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/05/02/african-american-men-arrested-at-starbucks-reach-1-settlement-with-the-city-secure-promise-for-200000-grant-program-for-young-entrepreneurs/?utm_term=.6fa23f010813</a> whoo'i'm scared candace owens great video; 20 min <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S2TZOdXAtQ"> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4S2TZOdXAtQ</a>
93% blk ppl killed by blk-----84% wht ppl killed by why ppl; 6k klans left; rant... dem platform systemic and inst racism; hello 1964 civil rights act outlawed; thus can't be bias b/c lib lawyers and , no cases b/c does not exist; my fav, watch their words; look at Mex, 2 ethnic groups, conqueror who slaughtered; oppressor and -ed, when cross border, both are oppressed, totalitarians erase distinction; proto kgb, KGB cow made them capitalists; [in new bk?] don't ask how go cow, just ask ID, we will eliminate you [= cap class] better case; poor colo baker, sweet guy, gays come to attack, want to make case; i will make any cake but not wed; gay guys have hate bone; fire 6 of 10 empl; see interrac ads couples; do not need scotus to force people to not discrim; [xian lawter army ted cruz alliance defending freedom , won scotus, broaden ability to discriminate] "sexism" related term invented by leftist, look on wiki; a n attempt to appropriate the moral auth of civil rights move for woman; but women never treated like black ppl as a gp, QE 1, vict 2 queens of engl; 25 min] ; cannot go into why uk women did not have =, die childbirth, 21 kids; inapprop behavior, boorish, offensive behave, criminal if rape, now all sexism; take a jerk like al franken, did a joke; we don't know about his behav w/ women; one woman said she offended, but asleep, waited for metoo and be hero too; guy lost sen seat, 1 mil votes, some crooked votes; that's what hap in totalitarian soc: guilt by association [? nb no ethic invest by sen b/c he quit] ; garrison keillor 30 yrs pbs, erased him b/c accused of touching back inapprop; indiv freedom, acctability, get details. 30 min; all women who led metoo made deals, sex for gig; who goes top hotel rm for biz?: not to defend that behav, but [wrog?] to crim[inalize?] w/o details; you do not want to live in dems state ; 2x income, move to another state, i buy CA fruit cheaper b/c no tax; am idea incd inspire, unique in world; want to take down [civil war] monument, yes TJ owned slaves. but he gave us all freedom; left tells young blk ppl that this is racist country and rigged against them, such obvious lie Left is losing gp; every family has relative or gay ppl color; whole other am, but you are in hothouse leftwing idiots, not CS; angela davis lounge honors, terrible pol hack [odd term, not like she was Tammany HaLL], won lenin prize from germany, commie tool; PIC claim to fame; every person of color in jail is polit crim, if release they will attack other bkl ppl' pelosi find spark of divine in__ in MS 13; prey on weak [see above; quite a xian reading when she handed gavel to ryan; reused term after djt called them animals, but no specif details, omg infowars; palin] spox hurt people they pretend to champions dems control all inner city, killing field, schools where kids are funct illiterate, 100% chic, detroit, baltl, st louis, monop control 50-100 yrs, too polite and tongue-tied to mention gop; catch and release pol; pal wayne lost cousin , 4 kids, 2 crims released by lib judges; 34 min [willie horton ] hold dems acct for racism, very grave danger ideol of dems, melodrama, oppressed, hierarchy, all crap, denigrates indiv; explain whole life by oppression, you have no agency, takes power, makes you an object; if women engaged morgan freeman bill cosby drugged, takes 2 to tango, if i can be mjr star i'm willing to sacrifice ----, but don't act victim; i know all is pol corr; take it from me, i was raised by commies, invent by Mao, greatest murdered; my parent say do not deviate from party line, not cute; waited 30 years, bootheels on necks of inner city blks; it wd take blk leader to break, and candace and kanye west, very courageous and accomplished; left are bullies, went after his adidas contract; if you do, i will take my fans of adidas and they backed down; his new album top 7 on spotify, so greAT WAR going on, earthshaking conseq if blk ppl take back mccarthyism call race traitor, it cd be great change; let me finish with djt game hanger, ramif felt for decades, won over with 1st answer to 1st q of kelly that was rosie o'donnell, what other gop wd answer that back,; in debate w/ hillary (you are liar and a crook, and 's both?!; all things dem ppl hate i love you are in iron curtain, can't now but after grad, fight fire / f , when they are racists call them. qa:42 min give ben a card; maga hats, allow rebuttals w/ mic, no speeches; 1: why no conserv wiki? left gets away from everything:  conserve left media 30 yrs ago; left is stupid, crypto-religion, do not see real world, but good in media, pol tactics; they re vindictive, evil, but talented; unprincipled; why does conservatives call it liberaL? BIG PROBLEM [HUH?] 2: how did lbj bing blks into dems? it was jfk? welfare sys diabolical, evil, drive dad out, give $ for extra kids; left likes to kill babies, but norplant sensible for inner city welfare mo's; not racist to kill black babies; more blk babies killed in NY than born by PP; 3: chance to de-escalate: no , crypto religion of their god history to create social justice which is communist; look at corrupt govt is FBI cointelpro a tool of ruissians; can't have a world of social justice ; they are at war and they hate you; anti trump are haters, will not listen; beat them back, when on their knees you can be nice thank you (tried to ask f/u several times] card vinzente hungarian commies took control 1st gig when he came out; holed up in US embassy; former civ rights activists and peace activist, into actually marxist revo 4: SF/berk any hope?  no, gop almost gone in CA gave up on ca gop 20 yrs ago; very active oak naacp; blk hustler in gop b/c desp to show blk pal; hakes, jesse j mentor; endorsed Bush; pal ran for party chair in ca, put blk guy on tiket, sec of party, chair spent 100K for chair; newsletter better if so won civil war; f/u fight you love in djt, finding its way to young ppl:, candace? crowdr, --witz, ; o'keefe, pal kirk, 5:  global elite... : jesuits a problem since c16; evangelicals and relig rights came into fight b/c bad scotus; shd not be judicial rev; pol appt lawyers, no have schools overrun by commie left stop k12 indic] historial at ucsc: sexism incorrect, hen 8 beheaded?  study TJ , owned 600, impregnated, extended slavery into 1/3 of US w/ La purchase; these are facts for 3k years not jesus, not moses; in love w/ hemmings; let slavery into west, 1804 to counter... roger wilkin (hated on TV, leftist, ) jeff's pillow, vet served on Korea, these are complex issues...TJ woot words that led to slavery end in civil war; 3k black slave owners, bot in benin and ghana; 26 mil slaves still in world, show how hard to change anything ctr-factuals, he was a pioneer a fact used to try to depreciate what he tried to do, change 3k years, wrote all equal into const; only idiots and ignoramuses thot ff wanted 3/5 [yelling] 6: symbiotic left and _islam; left in bed w/ enemy since wwii no anti-war movement in US, only anti US; VN guy on posters in dorm; commies killed slaughter 2.5 million, madame boom? no protest, 5th col for our enemies head on women's march sarsour jew hating jihadists headed by racists, that's why you can't sit down w/ them and be nice thank you = rants about student take over blg, extort concession from regents? ---racism in US impossible b/c___ later pts ut that interracial couples common now, thus no gov't action necessary, slides over into lgbt QE and QV exist, thus no gender problems ever? no notes rant? kulaks peasants with a cow QA: how will trump ideas infuse GOP? b/c young ppl will, charlie kirk, o'keefe? Q...evangelicals fight Left b/c of bad scotus decisions [we shd not have jud review, appt [pol judge] stopk12indictrination.org ~ commie Q about 600 slaves; 3k JC ari no one said slavery immoral; [one black woman in aud]; cites roger wilkin on TJ sally hemings? complex issues, ppl complex; everyone had slaves, 3k AA in US owned slaves; calls fact ctr-factual: TJ write great doc so his ownership irrelevant; yells england burned white house in 2002, get perspective! left in bed w/ ussr, changed when hitler invades; 5th col; head of women march raBID JEW HATING; http://www.horowitzfreedomcenter.tv/2018/06/22/david-horowitz-at-uc-santa-cruz/ much better audio<div style="">
</div></div><div>=</div><div>
</div><div>kay cda nat'l post:</div><div>reprinted from <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word;">Breitbart.com.</a></div><div>
</div><div class="field-body" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Below is Barbara Kay's review of David Horowitz’s new book, “Progressive Racism," which is <a href="http://www.blackbookoftheamericanleft.com/volume-vi/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word;">volume 6</a> of <a href="http://www.blackbookoftheamericanleft.com/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word;">The Black Book of the American Left</a>, a multi-volume collection of David Horowitz's conservative writings that will, when completed, be the most ambitious effort ever undertaken to define the Left and its agenda. (Order <a href="http://horowitzfreedomcenterstore.org/products/the-black-book-of-the-american-left-volume-vi-progressive-racism" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word;">HERE</a>.) We encourage our readers to visit <a href="http://www.blackbookoftheamericanleft.com/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word;">BlackBookOfTheAmericanLeft.com</a> – which features Horowitz’s introductions to Volumes 1-6 of this 10-volume series, along with their tables of contents, reviews and interviews with the author.The timing for the recent release of “Progressive Racism,” Book VI in David Horowitz’s series, The Black Book of the American Left, could not be more propitious. This volume, which explores the politicized betrayal of MLK’s vision in detail, is arguably the most important of the series because, as Horowitz writes in his preface, the subject “goes to the heart of the most problematic assault on the American social contract.” The book is a compilation of Horowitz’s columns on race published (mostly, with a few recent exceptions) in the late 1990s and early 2000s.Horowitz writes that he structured the chronologically arranged articles to,“form a running journal of the conflicts that accompanied the transformation of the civil rights cause. Until this transformation it had been a movement to integrate African-Americans into America’s multi-ethnic democracy. In less than a decade it had become a movement led by demagogues to refashion racial grievances into a general assault on white people and on the country they were said to ‘dominate.’ In its core agendas, the new civil rights movement was an assault on the basic American social contract, and in particular the 14th Amendment’s commitment to equal rights under the law and thus to race-neutral standards and race-neutral government practices. Post-King civil rights became a movement to institutionalize racial preferences – the same kind of discriminatory practices that characterized segregation – and to recreate a race-conscious political culture in which blacks and a handful of designated minorities were singled out as the groups to be racially privileged. On the other side of the coin, whites were made targets of exclusion, suspicion and disapprobation.”The book’s first section, “Decline and Fall of the Civil Rights Movement,” begins with “Memories in Memphis” (1999) in which Horowitz challenges both the creation myth and the illusory achievements of affirmative action head-on:“[A]ffirmative action was not created because of white racism. It was created because of widespread black failure to take advantage of the opportunities made available when legal segregation was ended. Since the politics of the left are premised on the idea that social institutions determine individual outcomes, this failure had to be the result of institutional rather than individual factors”;and the alleged achievement:“[Affirmative Action’s] primary achievement is to have convinced black Americans that whites are so racist that some external force must compel their respect and, secondarily, that blacks need affirmative action in order to gain access to the American dream. The further consequence of this misguided remedy has been to sow a racial paranoia in the black community so pervasive and profound that even blacks who have benefited from America’s racial opportunities have been significantly affected in the way they think.”One of the more vexing tropes that pervades black activist discourse is “institutional racism.” This Soviet-like abstraction, unverifiable and collectively inculpatory is, Horowitz argues, the last refuge for desperate militants running short of individual racist acts to condemn. It is on the one hand meaningless, but on the other impossible to rebut, rendering ineffectual all attempts to counter it. As Horowitz writes:“The belief in the power of institutional racism allows black civil rights to denounce America as a racist society, when it is actually the only society on earth – black, white, brown or yellow – whose defining creed is anti-racist; a society to which blacks from black-ruled nations regularly flee in search of opportunity and refuge. But the real bottom line is that the phantom of institutional racism allows black leaders to avoid the encounter with real problems in their own communities which are neither caused by whites nor solvable by the actions of whites.”The main effect of affirmative action seems to have been to heighten awareness of and sensitivity to black self-esteem in order to make life easier for students only too conscious of the disparity in educational preparedness between them and their white peers. Blacks attending university on affirmative action tend to drop out at far greater rates than whites - at Berkeley it is nearly three times the white dropout rate - or take far longer to get their degrees. But any allusion to this reality became a forbidden subject.In the following section, “Racial Correctness,” Horowitz offers examples of the many ways in which the “race card” dominates the discourse in American society on every level. When Horowitz wrote an article for Salon, “Guns Don’t Kill Black People – other Black People Do,” which put the bald facts and statistics of black crime on the table, he was told by a reader he had no business opinionating on black issues because he wasn’t black. The unspoken assumption was that facts and statistics need not be taken seriously by blacks, because their situation is unique, and they therefore aren’t bound by the same rules of logic or justice as whites.In “An Academic Lynching (1997)” Horowitz tells the story of Lino Graglia, a Sicilian-born American, an attorney in the Eisenhower Justice Department, who taught constitutional law at the University of Texas in Austin for 33 years. His martyrdom is worth recounting in full because what happened to him is a template for all the ruined lives in academia that can be traced to political correctness around race.The syndrome is called a “mobbing.” In a classic mobbing episode, the underlying "crime" is typically a statement that is benign or objectively unassailable. But someone or some group takes offence. The accused at first assumes his friends and colleagues will rush to defend him. But if the critics are able to cast their case in politically fashionable terms -- the fight against racism or sexism, most commonly -- then personal loyalties go out the window. People rush to join the torch-bearing crowd, lest the accused's crimes tarnish them as well. Graglia was mobbed by his chancellor, 51 colleagues in the law school and state legislators. He was called a KKK supporter, a racist and “academic riff raff.” Graglia was charged by the local NAACP chapter and student groups for “racial harassment.”His crime? To state his opinion in a speech to the Students for Equal Opportunity (SEO), where he was faculty advisor. The subject under discussion was the Hopwood case, which had recently ended affirmative action at the university. Twenty years before, Graglia had written a book, Disaster by Decree: the Supreme Court Decisions on Race and the Schools, which was highly critical of affirmative action programs. So it wasn’t as if Graglia had been hiding his light under a bushel. The opinion he expressed was that affirmative action cannot obscure the fact that blacks and Mexican-Americans are not academically competitive with whites and Asians.He said:“Racial preferences are the root cause of virtually all the major problems plaguing American campuses today. They result in a student body with two groups, identifiable by race, essentially in different academic ballparks. An inability to compete successfully in the game being played necessarily results in demands that the game be changed, and thus are born demands for black and Hispanic studies and ‘multiculturalism’....Concealment and deception are therefore always essential elements of racial preference programs and thus is born insistence on political correctness and the need to suppress ‘hate speech’.”One does not hear this sort of thing anymore – or at least one does not hear it emanating from the lips of academics, even those with tenure. Not because there is no truth in what Lino Graglia said, but because of what happened to him for saying it. Bad things still happen to racially incorrect academics; it is just that the triggering “<a href="https://www.thefire.org/cases/protesters-at-yale-threaten-free-speech-demand-apologies-and-resignations-from-faculty-members-over-halloween-email/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">offences</a>” have been dumbed down considerably since the Graglia affair. Since those in authority at universities have given no indication so far that they will stand up for their wrongfully tarred and feathered scapegoats, we can expect the show trials of insufficiently racially correct professors and administrators to continue, and the population to swell in those gulags where mugged classic liberals with a nostalgia for freedom of speech gather to express their astonishment and lick their wounds.Racial correctness is at its core an endorsement of black separatism.  Horowitz summarizes:“This cold-hearted calculus is a central thesis of what is now generously described as ‘black separatism’.” If blacks want to march behind a racist kook, fine, or want racially segregated dorms and racially segregated graduation ceremonies and racially separated curricula, fine. Basically we are back to “separate but equal”.Playing the race card has done nothing to help the blacks who need help most and a great deal to harm them. One of the great paradoxes of progressive indulgence for the myth that racism is at the root of all black problems is that the elephant in the room, black crime, cannot be discussed with candor – or at all, except when the thrust is black victimization of white policemen. There are racist cops, and some of them do kill blacks under (filmed) <a href="http://nypost.com/2016/07/07/woman-live-streams-bloody-aftermath-of-police-involved-shooting/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">circumstances</a> in which they would be very unlikely to kill whites. Nevertheless, such individual tragedies, increasingly explosive in their collective emotional and political impact, often serve to obscure the more pervasive and intractable cultural problem it is racially incorrect to mention (my own <a href="http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/barbara-kay-in-blms-view-to-be-white-is-to-be-racist-and-to-be-black-is-to-be-a-victim" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">recent foray</a> into such a discussion attracted a slew of angry emails and Twitter accusations accusing me of racism).Horowitz wades boldly in on this subject where progressives fear to tread. In “Guns Don’t Kill People, Other Black People Do” (1999), he adduces troubling but incontestable statistics, such as the fact that black men are eight times more likely to commit murder than white men, a reality that spikes fear in police officers tasked with keeping order in high-crime areas. In another article, “Death of the Civil Rights Movement” (2000), we learn that in 2000, there were an estimated 31,000 gangs in the U.S. with a combined membership approaching one million, 80% of which were black or Hispanic. According to a 1993 Justice report, 70% of violent juvenile defendants in criminal court were black males, as well as 72% of rape defendants, 78% of robbery defendants and 61% of assault defendants (similar statistics for today can be found <a href="https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Imprimis_April16.pdf" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">here</a>). Horowitz’s refusal to play the game of racial correctness, whose first rule is to ignore inner-city cultural epidemiology, earned him vicious blowback and contributed to his professional marginalization. The fact that he is himself the grandfather of black children earns him no points with progressives.<div class="entity entity-bean bean-advertisment clearfix" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 1.5em; text-align: center;"><div class="content" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><div class="field-code" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><ins class="adsbygoogle" data-ad-client="ca-pub-4524408241564223" data-ad-slot="2298115439" data-ad-format="auto" data-adsbygoogle-status="done" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: block; height: 0px;"><ins id="aswift_0_expand" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: inline-table; border: none; height: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 812px;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="box-sizing: border-box; display: block; border: none; height: 0px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; position: relative; visibility: visible; width: 812px; overflow: hidden; opacity: 0;"></ins></ins></ins></div></div></div>In the next section, “Reparations for Slavery,” Horowitz takes aim against the most hyper-alienated of black leaders, those for whom equal rights and opportunities, even if fully realized, would never be enough. They want America to “show me the money.” Reparations is the hottest of controversial subjects on the race file, and Horowitz met the challenge with customary resolution. In response to reparations movement founder Randall Robinson’s treatise, The Debt: What America Owes to Blacks (namely more than $4 trillion), Horowitz mounted a highly-publicized <a href="http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=24317" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">rebuttal</a>, “Ten Reasons Why Reparations are a Bad Idea,” which in turn set off a firestorm of rage and counter-rebuttal on campuses across the country.Some of Horowitz’s stated figures and claims in his “ten reasons” – for example, that if American blacks were a nation, they would be the tenth richest in the world – are hotly contested, but on one critical point Horowitz is, I think, unassailably right: the reparations movement is virulently anti-American.To reduce the relationship of blacks and whites to a cash nexus – all blacks are “owed” and all whites must therefore “pay” – would, Horowitz argues, pit blacks against whites, but also against other ethnic groups, who have had their own struggles in making it as full Americans. It would furthermore be to deny that “[f]or all their country’s faults, African-Americans have an enormous stake in America and above all in the heritage that men like Jefferson helped to shape...The American idea needs the support of its African-American citizens. But African-Americans also need the support of the American idea.”Reparations has never taken hold outside of a militant core. A 2002 “Millions for Reparations March” was a flop, attracting only hundreds of participants. Just as well, since the rhetoric was quite incendiary. New York City Councilman Charles Barron confessed himself so angry he felt like going up to “any white person” and “slap[ping] them.” One rapped shouted, “Show me the money, or I’ll show you my Glock.” Virulent anti-Semite and New Black Panthers “Minister of Defence” <a href="http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2044" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">Malik Zulu Shabazz</a> ranted: “The president wants to talk about a terrorist named bin Laden. I don’t want to talk about bin Laden. I want to talk about a terrorist called Christopher Columbus. I want to talk about a terrorist called George Washington. I want to talk about a terrorist called Rudy Giuliani. The real terrorists have always been the United States of America.”The final section, “Progressive Racism,” examines the double standards black ideologues endorse for anti-social or even criminal behavior in the name of combatting an alleged systemic attitude of “white supremacy.” What would not be tolerated in whites is well tolerated in blacks. Victimization of blacks by whites is highly publicized, but not the reverse.When, in December 2000, five professional young men and women were tortured and shot in the head by sadistic black brothers, with only one survivor – the shocking incident is known as the <a href="http://library.flawlesslogic.com/wichita.htm" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">Wichita massacre</a> - not a single national news outlet reported the case contemporaneously (“Racial Witch Hunt,” 2001). In 2002, a white man, Ken Tillery, was lynched by four black men in Jasper, Texas, the same town where James Byrd was lynched by white men in 1998. Byrd’s name became a household word. Tillery’s not so much.The book ends with a 2012 article co-authored with <a href="http://archive.frontpagemag.com/bioAuthor.aspx?AUTHID=8" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">John Perazzo</a>, “Black Skin Privilege and the American Dream.” Here the concepts of “white skin privilege” and “institutional racism” are unpacked as “sophistries [that] made possible new battles and continued campaigns that annually lured millions of dollars into the deep pockets of ‘anti-racist’ organizations and movements, even as racists were no longer detectable in the institutions themselves.”“Black privilege” rests on three main pillars.First is the progressive assumption that in any incident involving blacks and whites with abuse as the central motif, allegations of racism-motivated guilt against whites will be received as truth without – or before – substantiation to reinforce the claim, while reverse claims are meticulously interrogated or even ignored.A case in point is the infamous 2006 “rape” of a black stripper by three white male members of the Duke University lacrosse team, which turned out, to the utter dismay of progressives, to be a complete <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/03/12/the-stripper-who-cried-rape-revisiting-the-duke-lacrosse-case-ten-years-later.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">fabrication</a> on the part of the accuser, Crystal Mangum, who later went to prison convicted of second-degree murder in an unrelated incident.  On her word alone, a posse of 88 Duke academics charged in a notorious <a href="http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/12/025283.php" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">ad</a> that “white male privilege” had permitted the perpetrators of “this horrific racist incident” to remain “safe under the cover of silent whiteness” and given them “license to rape, maraud, deploy hate speech and feel proud of themselves in the bargain.” Even after the accused were exonerated, none of the 88 ever apologized nor did they suffer professionally for their rush to judgment. Quite the <a href="http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/17222/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">contrary</a>, in fact.The second pillar of black privilege is the reflexive impulse in the liberal media to ignore, downplay or “explain” instances of hate crimes or hate speech by blacks against whites.Regarding hate crimes: In the two months following the death of Trayvon Martin in Florida, black assailants perpetrated more than a <a href="https://pjmedia.com/blog/justice-for-trayvon-15-whites-beaten-by-gangs-of-black-thugs-so-far/" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">dozen brutal attacks</a> on white victims motivated by vengeance for Martin. In Mobile, a white man was assaulted by a mob of black men armed with brass knuckles, bricks, bats and steel pipes after he asked them to stop playing basketball in front of his house. According to his sister, who witnessed the incident, as the victim lay bleeding, one of the assailants told her, “<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4Oy5zEVJes" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">Now that’s justice for Trayvon.”</a>In Phoenix, weeks after the Martin killing, a 22-year old black motorist shot and killed mentally disabled “white Hispanic” Daniel Adkins outside a Taco Bell restaurant. The shooter claimed a <a href="http://www.chicagonewsreport.com/2012/04/daniel-adkins-killer-claims-self.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">“stand your ground” defence</a>, though no weapons were found on Radkins, who may or may not have attempted to punch the shooter after an altercation. In many respects this was a mirror image of the Trayvon Martin affair, but it is doubtful that many people will recognize the name of Daniel Radkins. The shooter was not charged.Horowitz and Perazzo cite the book, <a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/138440/white-girl-bleed-lot-jamie-glazov" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">White Girl Bleed a Lot: The return of racial violence and how the media ignore it</a>, by Colin Flaherty, which documents a plethora of black race riots, shootings, stabbings and sexual crimes that have gone unreported by the media under the rubric of black privilege.As I write in early July, Micah Johnson, a heavily armed black sniper, “upset about Black Lives Matter,” has just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/us/dallas-police-shooting.html?_r=0" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">killed five white police officers</a> at a peaceful Dallas march protesting police abuse (He himself was killed after a gun battle with police). His Facebook page revealed he is a supporter of the <a href="http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7556" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">New Black Panther Party</a>, a group that advocates violence against whites (and Jews in particular). It will be interesting to see the spin black militants and white progressives put on this affair. (One of my detractors almost instantly tweeted to me that Johnson was goaded to action by America’s systemic racism; I tweeted back asking if Lee Harvey Oswald was goaded to murder JFK by America’s “systemic communism.” I didn’t hear back.)As for hate speech, a cursory perusal of some of the content in comments by anti-American and anti-Semitic black cleric <a href="http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2416" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">Bishop Desmond Tutu</a> or anti-white black actor <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2100210/Samuel-L-Jackson-I-Voted-Obama-hes-black.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">Samuel L. Jackson</a> will convince any fair-minded observer that there are consequences for white celebrity racists or anti-Semites like Mel Gibson that don’t apply to blacks in the public eye. Gibson will never be offered the 40 honorary doctorates Jackson boasts, or receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom Jackson received from Bill Clinton. Not that Gibson should have been so honored! But then neither should Jackson.The third pillar is an activist judiciary that, in the spirit of “leveling the playing field,” complacently rigs the law to favor collective institutional entitlements rather than individual justice, particularly, but not only, in the area of education. As Columbia University law professor Patricia Williams (who is black) explains: “If the modern white man, innocently or not, is the inheritor of another’s due, then it must be returned.” Or, as Chief Justice Thurgood Marshall bluntly told fellow justice William O. Douglas, “You [white] guys have been practicing discrimination for years. Now it’s our turn.”Consequently, this past June, in <a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/justice-kennedy-overturns-himself-1466723607" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">a “tortured 4-3 opinion,” </a>regarding the case of Abigail Fisher, a white student who claimed she had been rejected by the University of Texas on unconstitutional grounds, the Supreme Court voted to uphold racial preferences in U of Texas admissions. Dissenting Justices Alito, Roberts and Thomas described as <a href="http://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-upholds-affirmative-action-in-university-admissions-1466691615" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">“remarkably wrong”</a> Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion that “[c]onsiderable deference is owed to a university in defining those intangible characteristics, like student body diversity, that are central to its identity and educational mission.” Nevertheless, the ruling finds favour with other elite universities and, of course, the Obama administration.The message bruited by progressive elites that affirmative action is both ethical and legally normative has trickled down to permeate the institutional culture everywhere in the U.S. Universities, major corporations and franchises actively recruit minorities and sponsor scholarships for them, and even give bonuses to managers who successfully recruit and promote black hires. Even public services in which high standards for competence can make all the difference in public safety, as in fire departments, have signed on to aggressive affirmative action programs, sometimes with what would be <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1988/10/09/us/boston-case-raises-questions-on-misuse-of-affirmative-action.html" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; font-weight: 700;">entertaining results</a>, if they were not so disquieting.The left’s most beguiling argument for affirmative action is its necessity to redress past injustices: that even though the practice may cause a certain collateral damage, the benefits conferred on the formerly disadvantaged group are worth the cost to others. Horowitz and Perrazo respond that the artificial leveling of the playing field is a “totalitarian” impulse and a threat to freedom. “One standard and one justice for all...is the only equality that is not at odds with individual freedom.” Affirmative action, they say, harms more than the individuals it displaces.“When enforced by government and backed by law, it tears at the very fabric of the social order, regardless of whom it benefits. The wounds that the principle of separate and unequal inflicts on the community are incomparably greater than the damages incurred by individuals or the benefits that accrue to them. Building racial bias into the framework of the nation compromises the neutrality of the law that governs us all. It corrupts the standards that make a diverse community possible, and creates a racial spoils system that is the antithesis of the American dream, which was Martin Luther King’s dream as well. By corrupting the principle of neutrality, racial privilege breaks the common bond between America’s diverse communities and undermines the trust that makes the nation whole.”Just so. The erosion of common bonds and the undermining of trust between our communities is proceeding apace before our eyes in daily reports of encouraged or actual violence - not in spite of, but because of the erroneous progressive belief that separate and unequal treatment of citizens based on history and color is the way to bring about an equal and united citizenry.David Horowitz is once again to be commended for his unwavering resistance to reprehensible good intentions on the left and exposure of the hell to which they are the paving stones, as well as for his eloquent commitment to the fundamental conservative belief that the principle of individualism as America’s Founders conceived it is the only path to the true equality all right-thinking Americans aspire to.</div><div class="field-tags" style="box-sizing: border-box; margin-bottom: 20px;"> Tags: <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/tag/david-horowitz" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; text-decoration-line: none;">David Horowitz</a>, <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/tag/loretta-lynch" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; text-decoration-line: none;">Loretta Lynch</a>, <a href="https://www.frontpagemag.com/tag/racism" style="box-sizing: border-box; word-break: break-word; text-decoration-line: none;">Racism</a></div><div>=</div><div>tim wise (2nd art']</div><div>ZNet Commentary, www.zmag.org, December 16, 2002I’m not sure who said it first, but whatever the case, it bears repeating: there are plenty of assholes on both the right and left of the political spectrum, and David Horowitz has the distinction of having been both in the course of one lifetime. Pretty good work if you can get it.Since his conversion, Horowitz — the Marxist-turned-right-wing culture critic — has demonstrated a special hostility towards civil rights activists and liberal/left commentators on issues of race, calling us racists for supporting things like affirmative action. According to Horowitz, such policies are racist because they presume that blacks are incapable of succeeding in America on their own, and need what he views as paternalistic government assistance to get ahead. By “lowering” standards for African Americans, such efforts patronize blacks as inferiors, according to Horowitz.In truth, affirmative action was never predicated on the notion of black inferiority, and to the extent the concept has long enjoyed black support, to suggest otherwise is especially putrid: as if blacks think themselves inferior; as if blacks are masochists, incapable of intuiting their interests, or so gullible as to be led down the primrose path by scheming white leftists seeking to use them for political gain. Fact is, no one on the left says blacks can’t “make it” without such initiatives. We insist only that racism really has skewed the distribution of resources, opportunity and accumulated “credentials.” As such, people of color are likely to be overlooked for job and contract opportunities even when fully qualified, in the absence of deliberate efforts at inclusion. Common sense dictates that when a society has oppressed a group of people, that group will find itself in an inferior social position relative to those in favored groups.Indeed, to expect subordinated groups not to lag behind the dominant one in terms of income, wealth, and occupational status would require holding blacks to a higher standard than others, since it would mean expecting those who started out five laps behind in an eight leg race to not only run as fast as everyone else (a reasonable expectation that would still leave them behind), but much faster than others so as to catch up. That such a burden is the height of injustice — what with the five-lap deficit not a function of black shortcomings but rather white racism — should be obvious.Of course what is most telling about Horowitz’s charge of racism against the left is that while he ridicules us for supposedly implying that blacks are inferior, he remains silent about those in his own camp who do far more than imply black inferiority, but indeed scream it from the rooftops. After all, I don’t recall any indignant criticisms by Horowitz in response to Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein’s book, The Bell Curve–a collection of sociobiological nonsense, whose authors say blacks are genetically less intelligent than whites, and who praise and include the research of Richard Lynn: a racist scholar who has called for the “phasing out” of “inferior” peoples. Among other things, Murray and Herrnstein conclude that for most blacks there is little benefit that can be gained from education since the cost of educational enrichment will not likely be “repaid” by greater black cognitive development.Yet far from condemning The Bell Curve or the conservative movement that greeted the volume in the mid-1990s, Horowitz’s group — the Center for the Study of Popular Culture — has received roughly $4 million from the same Bradley Foundation that subsidized Murray’s research for the book and continued supporting him after publication. Not only has David never flinched at the thought of taking money from the group that paid for the distribution of such racist scholarship, but indeed when pressed on his own views about the link between race and IQ, Horowitz merely offers that he “isn’t convinced.” How terribly ecumenical.That the GOP delegation invited Murray to speak to them after taking control of Congress in 1994 (just months after the release of The Bell Curve) apparently caused David no concern. To Horowitz, people who claim that blacks are genetically predisposed to crime, out-of-wedlock childbirth and poverty apparently aren’t racists, but people who support programs to ensure racial equity are: by which logic, Klansmen would be less racist than Martin Luther King Jr., who did in fact support affirmative action and even reparations programs, as I have pointed out in a previous column.Furthermore, a glance at Horowitz’s website (FrontpageMag.com) reveals articles that actually endorse racism openly. One piece by John J. Ray includes praise for the “very scholarly” book on IQ by Christopher Brand, an admirer of eugenics (policies to promote selective breeding of “superior people”) and an adherent to the belief that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites. In a more recent essay by Ray, on the opening page of David’s site for October 8th, 2002, the author concludes that racism is not always bad, and is a rather natural human instinct, suggesting, “Feelings of racial, national or group superiority are natural, normal and healthy and can as easily lead to benevolent outcomes as evil ones.”But for the best evidence that Horowitz is a rank hypocrite when it comes to criticizing supposed leftist racism, consider his recent comments about Jared Taylor: a self-proclaimed white nationalist who advocates an all-white U.S. Recently, Horowitz reproduced an article from Taylor’s American Renaissance website concerning the brutal murders of four white youth by a pair of black assailants. While there is no apparent evidence that the murders of the four, and attempted murder of another who survived, were racially-motivated, Taylor’s group pounced on the incidents as proof of how dangerous blacks are to whites–a consistent theme on the AR website.In fairness, it must be said that Horowitz’s motivation for running the piece was apparently different from Taylor’s. First, he excised some of the more overtly racist aspects of the original article, and secondly, his own comments suggest that his primary interest was pointing out how little media attention was given to the crimes, as opposed to what he assumes would have been the deluge of coverage had the racial roles been reversed. That most crimes — including most white-on-black crimes — are never discussed in the news fails to register with Horowitz; so too studies suggesting that crimes with black perps and white victims are actually more likely to garner media attention than other combinations.But that said, it was David’s side comments about Taylor that demonstrate how comfortable he’s become with the racist right even as he blisters the left for supposed racist condescension to people of color. For example, about Taylor, Horowitz says he is “author of a pioneer book of political incorrectness on race…a very smart and gutsy individualist…a very intelligent and principled man.”Although Horowitz criticizes Taylor’s white nationalism as a capitulation to destructive “identity politics,” he cannot bring himself to call Taylor a racist. Indeed he defends him against the charge, saying it is more accurate to call him a “racialist.” That this is a distinction without a difference, and the same term David Duke uses to describe himself — all the while adhering to the beliefs in white superiority shared by Taylor — apparently matters not to Horowitz, who goes on to say that Taylor and AR are no more racist than Jesse Jackson or the NAACP.Yet when has Jackson or any representative of the NAACP said anything resembling the following from Taylor:“…In some important traits — intelligence, law-abidingness, sexual restraint, academic performance, resistance to disease — whites can be considered ‘superior’ to blacks.”“Without constant urging from liberal whites, virtually all Africans would be content to put their fate in the hands of a (white) race that they recognize as smarter and more fair-minded than their own.”“The possibility of black inferiority is the goblin that lurks in the background of every attempt to explain Black failure.”Furthermore, since 1994, Taylor has hosted an annual conference attended by lifelong neo-Nazis like David Duke and Don Black, and featuring speeches by “scholars” like Philippe Rushton, who says blacks have smaller brains because they have larger penises and “you can’t have everything.” Other speakers invited by Taylor have included:— Recently deceased professor Glade Whitney, whose comments to the conference in 1998 included referring to black marathon runners as “biologically adapted cattle thieves,” and American blacks as “primitives.” Whitney wrote the fawning introduction to David Duke’s 1998 racial manifesto, in which Duke called for whites to become “Aryan warriors;”— Philosophy professor Michael Levin, who proclaims that blacks are biologically less intelligent than whites and says “some forms of racism are justified.” Levin has also claimed that “there is nothing wrong with eugenics. It’s a perfectly respectable idea;”— Steven Barry, a retired military officer who promotes white nationalism to soldiers and is a member of the openly neo-Nazi National Alliance;— Samuel Francis, a close friend of Taylor’s and a former columnist for the Washington Times, who has said, “The civilization we as whites created in Europe and America could not have developed apart from the genetic endowments of the creating people;” and finally,— Gordon Baum, of the Council of Conservative Citizens, who in 1995 attempted to recruit the chief of security for the Aryan Nations to the CCC’s national board of directors. Among the things published in the CCC’s newsletter, have been columns calling for the repeal of all existing civil rights laws, and articles claiming that immigration will cause America to become “just a slimy brown mass of glop.” The CCC has also published columns proclaiming, “Any effort to destroy the (white) race by a mixture of black blood is an effort to destroy Western civilization itself,” and arguing that the only good idea Abraham Lincoln ever had was to deport blacks to Africa. It should be noted that Taylor serves on the Board of the CCC, has spoken at CCC events and has written papers for the group to distribute.In the end, it is inconceivable that Horowitz does not know of Taylor’s true views or affiliations. He knew enough, after all, to issue a disclaimer when reprinting an article from Taylor’s website, knowing some might find the decision troubling. Perhaps he thought no one would check to see if his assurances that Taylor was not a racist could hold up. Or perhaps he doesn’t care, having spent the better part of his life willing to cozy up to dubious characters and ideologies, making excuses along the way. At long last, however, Horowitz has played himself out: a Jew who makes nice with Nazis. Imagine that, from a guy who accuses other Jews (like me) who support Palestinian statehood of being self-hating.As the saying goes, “When you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas”–an apt witticism in this instance when discussing Horowitz, whose willingness to traffic in racially-inflammatory rhetoric as well as to write articles justifying racial profiling have made it difficult for him to now draw the line between respectable commentary and that which is more fascistic: this is, after all, where right-wing race thinking leads. To the extent Horowitz lends even the faintest credibility to a character like Jared Taylor, he should be viewed as ultimately no better than the latter, and afforded just as much legitimacy<div class="wp_rp_wrap wp_rp_plain" id="wp_rp_first" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-align: justify; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><div class="wp_rp_content" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px;"><h3 class="related_post_title" style="margin: 15px 0px 0px !important; padding: 0px !important; font-variant-numeric: normal !important; font-variant-east-asian: normal !important; font-stretch: normal !important; line-height: normal !important;">Related Posts</h3><ul class="related_post wp_rp" style="margin: 0px 0px 6px 35px; padding: 0px;"><li data-position="0" data-poid="in-2978" data-post-type="none" style="margin: 0px; padding: 8px 25px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.timwise.org/2013/06/sadism-with-a-smirk-conservatism-ex-offenders-and-the-lust-for-vengeance/" class="wp_rp_title" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none;">Sadism With a Smirk: Conservatism, Ex-Offenders, and the Lust for Vengeance</a></li><li data-position="1" data-poid="in-2879" data-post-type="none" style="margin: 0px; padding: 8px 25px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.timwise.org/2013/05/whine-merchants-privilege-inequality-and-the-persistent-myth-of-white-victimhood/" class="wp_rp_title" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none;">Whine Merchants: Privilege, Inequality and the Persistent Myth of White Victimhood</a></li><li data-position="2" data-poid="in-2650" data-post-type="none" style="margin: 0px; padding: 8px 25px 0px 0px;"><a href="http://www.timwise.org/2013/03/culture-of-cruelty-an-interview-with-tim-wise-about-his-forthcoming-book/" class="wp_rp_title" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; text-decoration-line: none;">Culture of Cruelty: An Interview With Tim Wise About His Forthcoming Book</a></li></ul></div></div></div><div></div><div>screen grab weds am page 6/18</div><div>
</div><div><div>SUBSCRIBE TO DHTV</div><div>Email Facebook Twitter RSS Feed</div><div> David Horowitz TV</div><div>Home</div><div>Jew Hatred on Campus</div><div>Television</div><div>Wednesday Morning Club</div><div>The Retreat</div><div>Restoration Weekend</div><div>Texas Weekend</div><div>Colleges</div><div>Other Media</div><div>Links</div><div>Donate</div><div>Contact</div><div>FrontPage Mag</div><div>
</div><div>Katie Hopkins</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>David Horowitz</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Robert Spencer</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Heather MacDonald</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Daniel Greenfield</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Robert Spencer- September 2015</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Sharyl Attkisson</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Robert Spencer- April 14, 2015</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Bruce Thornton</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Ken Timmerman</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Joshua Muravchik – “Making David into Goliath”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Edwin Black</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Caroline Glick</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>David Horowitz Introducing Caroline Glick</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Larry Elder – “Dear Father, Dear Son”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Pat Caddell – The Election</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>David Horowitz – “Radicals”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Peter Collier “Political Woman: The Big Little Life of Jeane Kirkpatrick”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Monica Crowley “What The (Bleep) Just Happened?”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Harry Stein – “No Matter What… They’ll Call This Book Racist”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Robert Spencer – “Did Muhammad Exist?”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Charles Murray – “Coming Apart”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>John Stossel – “No They Can’t”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Peter Schweizer – “Throw Them All Out”</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Stephen Moore – Regaining Prosperity</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>Page 1 of 212»</div><div>
</div><div>
</div><div>Advertisement</div><div>
</div><div> </div><div>Categories</div><div>What’s New</div><div>Book speeches</div><div>Restoration Weekend</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2008</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2009</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2010</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2011</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2012</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2013</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2014</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2015</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2016</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2017</div><div>Restoration Weekend 2018</div><div>Colleges</div><div>The Retreat</div><div>The Retreat 2008</div><div>The Retreat 2010</div><div>The Retreat 2011</div><div>The Retreat 2012</div><div>The Retreat 2013</div><div>The Retreat 2014</div><div>The Retreat 2015</div><div>Television</div><div>Wednesday Morning Club</div><div>Jew Hatred on Campus</div><div>Texas Weekend</div><div>Texas Weekend 2013</div><div>Texas Weekend 2014</div><div>Black Book of the American Left</div><div>Bill Whittle</div><div>Other Media</div><div>Featured Videos</div><div>Uncategorized</div><div>David Horowitz' 75th Birthday Celebration</div><div>Want More?</div><div>Watch more of David on PopScreen</div><div>
</div><div>Subscribe to David's VIDEO podcasts for your iPhone or iPod </div><div>
</div><div>Subscribe to our mailing list</div><div>Email Address</div><div>
</div><div>First Name</div><div>
</div><div>Last Name</div><div>
</div><div>Recent Videos</div><div>  Katie HopkinsPrevNext</div><div>Home</div><div>Jew Hatred on Campus</div><div>Television</div><div>Wednesday Morning Club</div><div>The Retreat</div><div>Restoration Weekend</div><div>Texas Weekend</div><div>Colleges</div><div>Other Media</div><div>Links</div><div>Donate</div><div>Contact</div><div>FrontPage Mag</div><div>Popular Videos</div><div>Bill Whittle</div><div>16 Nov 2012</div><div>Monica Crowley "What The (Bleep) Just Happened?"</div><div>16 Jul 2012</div><div>Robert Spencer - "Did Muhammad Exist?"</div><div>17 May 2012</div><div>Recent Videos</div><div>Katie Hopkins</div><div>David Horowitz – YAF Roundtable Luncheon</div><div>Whiskey Politics with Dave Sussman</div><div>David Horowitz at Beverly Hills High School</div><div>Charlie Kirk</div><div>Our Mission</div><div>The DHFC is dedicated to the defense of free societies whose moral, cultural and economic foundations are under attack by enemies both secular and religious, at home and abroad.</div><div>David Horowitz TV - Copyright 2016.</div></div><div>==</div>