Piety, Tamara law prof
see free sp for ppl
---
---
y mail 5 23
scotus ~ appeal
Here is a look into the letter to the UN signed by16 prominent lawyers, including Natali Segovia, Marty Garbus, Michael Tigar, Professor Charles Nesson of Harvard, Ron Kuby, Nadine Strossen:
“To this day, Mr. Donziger and his family, including his wife Laura Miller and 16-year-old son Matthew, live under the constant threat of further contempt charges that could be levied by Judge Kaplan, the conflicted presiding judge who continues to maintain he has the legal authority to appoint Chevron to prosecute Mr. Donziger directly. Mr. Donziger and his family live with the knowledge that the same forces that have worked for years to destroy them could decide to launch even further attacks to try to silence Mr. Donziger for good. To combat such an injustice and to comply with the Opinion, the United States government (through President Biden) should exercise its pardon power to void Mr. Donziger’s conviction.”
---
am prom adv cncl
Professor of Law; Tulsa, OK
“The Supreme Court’s creation of First Amendment speech rights for commercial entities imperils public health, safety, and welfare; the reliability of commercial and consumer information; the stability of financial markets; and environmental stability. The 28th Amendment will help shift the balance of power between capital and the people and the people’s ability to legislate for the common good.”
---
June 10, 2015
Why Personhood Matters: Professor Tamara Piety to Truthout
Professor Tamara Piety, whom we are honored to have on our Legal Advisory Committee at Free Speech For People, tells it like it is in this must-read Truthout piece on why corporate personhood matters. Read the full piece, here.
Some excerpts below:
“Yes, corporations are made up of people, but that doesn’t tell us which of these people count for purposes of constitutional rights when, as in Hobby Lobby, the rights of the various people in the corporation are in conflict. And describing corporate speech as a public “benefit” is a stretch when the speech in question (for example, tobacco advertising) may harm the public.”
“We condemn discrimination against people because it offends human dignity. By contrast, concern for human dignity does not require us to treat all businesses alike: to the contrary, hard experience teaches us that some businesses – drugs, banks, securities, common carriers – require more regulation than others. The tax code “discriminates” between for-profit and charitable organizations without offending anyone’s dignity. Yet the Supreme Court’s new “corporate civil rights movement” obscures that fact.”
“Voters do not need to be legal sophisticates to know that something is wrong when corporations have more rights than people do.”
---
fs4ppl
8 22
LEGAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ALBERT ALSCHULER
Professor Emeritus Of Law And Criminology, University Of Chicago Law School
LAWRENCE ANDERSON
Montana Trial Attorney And Member Of The Board Of Governors Of The American Association Of Justice
DAVID CIEPLEY
Laurance S. Rockefeller Visiting Faculty Fellow, Princeton University, Associate Professor Of Political Science, University Of Denver
JOHN COATES
Professor Of Law, Harvard Law School
JAMES EXUM, JR.
Former Chief Justice Of The North Carolina Supreme Court
CAROLINE FREDERICKSON
President, American Constitution Society
ELLEN P. GOODMAN
Professor Of Law, Rutgers School Of Law
LISA GRAVES
Co-Director, Documented
DANIEL GREENWOOD
Professor Of Law, Hofstra Law School
THOMAS JOO
Professor Of Law, University Of California, Davis, School Of Law
LIZ KENNEDY
Director Of Democracy And Government Reform At The Center For American Progress
ROBERT KERR
Edith Kinney Gaylord Presidential Professor, University Of Oklahoma
CYRUS MEHRI
Founding Partner, Mehri & Skalet, PLLC.
ROBERT A.G. MONKS
Author, Founder, Lens Governance Advisors
JAMES NELSON
Former Justice Of The Montana Supreme Court
EVA PATERSON
Co-Founder And President, Equal Justice Society
PETER PEASE
Founder, Law Offices Of Peter Pease
KATIE REDFORD
Executive Director, The Equation Campaign
BERTRALL ROSS
Assistant Professor Of Law, University Of California At Berkeley School Of Law
CATHERINE ROSS
Professor Of Law, George Washington University Law School
DALE RUBIN
Professor Of Law, Appalachian School Of Law
STEVEN SHIFFRIN
Professor Of Law, Cornell University Law School
JAMES GUSTAVE SPETH
Senior Fellow, Vermont Law School
JENNIFER TAUB
Professor Of Law, Western New England Law School
GERALD TORRES
Professor Of Environmental Justice And Professor Of Law, Yale Law School
---
---
Tamara Piety
Professor of Law; Tulsa, OK
“The Supreme Court’s creation of First Amendment speech rights for commercial entities imperils public health, safety, and welfare; the reliability of commercial and consumer information; the stability of financial markets; and environmental stability. The 28th Amendment will help shift the balance of power between capital and the people and the people’s ability to legislate for the common good.”
---
https://faculty.utulsa.edu/faculty/tamara-piety/
Tamara Piety, LL.M, JD
Professor Emerita of Law
College of Law
professor Piety is an internationally known expert on the issue of corporate and commercial speech and is the author of “Brandishing the First Amendment.” She writes about corporate and commercial speech and the First Amendment, the regulation of advertising, and the influence of advertising, as well as corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, political speech and related topics.
tamara-piety@utulsa.edu
918-631-2490
College of Law
Room 2406
Curriculum Vitae
EDUCATION
LLM – Harvard University
JD – University of Miami
BA – Florida International University
---
Tamara Piety, LL.M, JD
Professor Emerita of Law
College of Law
tamara-piety@utulsa.edu
918-631-2490
College of Law
Room 2406
Curriculum Vitae
EDUCATION
LLM – Harvard University
JD – University of Miami
BA – Florida International University
Bio Research Interests Teaching Interests Publications Courses Taught Professional Affiliations
Law Reviews
In Praise of Legal Scholarship, 25 Wm. & Mary Bill of Rights L. J. 801 (2017).
Tamara Piety, Why Personhood Matters, 30 Const. Comment. 361 (2015).
download: https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/fac_pub/476/
abstract
One of the most controversial aspect of the Supreme Court's decisions in Citizens United and Hobby Lobby is its treatment of corporate personhood. Many members of the public object to the notion that corporations should have the same rights as human beings. Yet many scholars claim that this concern is misplaced. In this article I argue that concern about corporate personhood is not misplaced because the personhood metaphor conceals the degree to which there has not been an adequate justification given for extending fundamental rights to corporations. Focusing on personhood allows us to push on the metaphor to ask whether it is appropriate to extend the analogy to antidiscrimination. I argue that it is not because treating distinctions between human beings and corporations or between different types of corporations, as if it entailed invidious discrimination casts a constitutional shadow on a great deal of law previously thought well settled
Tamara Piety, The Heroic Corporation and First Amendment Romanticism: A Response to Professors Redish & Neuborne, 92 Tex. L. Rev. See Also 181 (2014).
Tamara Piety, “A Necessary Cost of Freedom”? The Incoherence of Sorrell v. IMS, 64 Ala. L. Rev. 54 (2012).
Tamara Piety, Citizens United and the Threat to the Regulatory State, 109 Mich. L. Rev. First Impressions 16(2010).
Tamara Piety, Onslaught: Commercial Speech and Gender Inequality, 60 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 47 (2009).
Tamara Piety, Against Freedom of Commercial Expression, 29 Cardozo L. Rev. 2583 (2008).
Tamara Piety et al., Corporations and Commercial Speech, 30 Seattle U. L. Rev. 895 (2007).
Tamara Piety, Market Failure in the Marketplace of Ideas: Commercial Speech and the Problem That Won’t Go Away, 41 Loy. L. Rev. 181 (2007).
Tamara Piety, Free Advertising: The Case for Public Relations as Commercial Speech, 10 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 367 (2006).
Tamara Piety, Grounding Nike: Exposing Nike’s Quest for a Constitutional Right to Lie, 78 Temp. L. Rev. 151 (2005).
Tamara Piety, Why the ACLU Was Wrong About Nike, Inc. v. Kasky, 41 Tulsa L. Rev. 715 (2005).
Tamara Piety, Something Fishy: Or Why I Make My Students Read Fast-Fish and Loose-Fish, 29 Vt. L. Rev. 33 (2004).
Tamara Piety, Tribute to the Scholarship of Frank Michelman: Meditations on Mentoring and the Scholar as Mentor, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 583 (2004).
Tamara Piety, Smoking in Bed, 57 U. Miami L. Rev. 827 (2003).
Tamara Piety, The War on the Poor -News From the Front: Department of Housing and Urban Development v. Rucker, 38 Tulsa L. Rev. 385 (2002).
Tamara Piety, “Merchants of Discontent”: An Exploration of the Psychology of Advertising, Addiction, and the Implications for Commercial Speech, 25 Seattle U. L. Rev. 377 (2001).
Tamara Piety, A Critique of Adjudication: Fin De Siecle: Confession Without Avoidance, 22 Cardozo L. Rev. 947 (2001).
Tamara Piety, Comment, Scorched Earth: How the Doctrine of Civil Forfeiture Has Laid Waste to Due Process, 45 U. Miami L. Rev. 911 (1991).
Books
Tamara Piety, Brandishing the First Amendment: Commercial Speech in America 342 (2012).
description
Over the past two decades, corporations and other commercial entities have used strategic litigation to win more expansive First Amendment protections for commercial speech—from the regulation of advertising to the role corporate interests play in the political process, most recently debated in the Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Tamara R. Piety, a nationally known critic of commercial and corporate speech, argues that such an expansion of First Amendment speech rights imperils public health, safety, and welfare; the reliability of commercial and consumer information; the stability of financial markets; and the global environment.
Prof. Piety appeared on TU Public Radio's Studio Tulsa recently to discuss her book.
Publication Date
2012
Publisher
University of Michigan Press
Book Chapters
Tamara Piety & Samantha Graff, The New First Amendment and Its Implications for Combating Obesity Through Regulation of Advertising, in Advances in Communication Research to Reduce Childhood Obesity (2013).
Conference Proceedings
Killing the Golden Goose: Will Blended Advertising and Editorial Content Diminish the Value of Both?,
Other
Tamara Piety, Symposium, Voters and Contributors (Online symposium on McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, SCOTUSblog.com) (2013).
Contributor, Amicus Brief for Sierra Club in Nike v. Kasky (Spring 2003
---
fed soc
The Future of Masterpiece Cakeshop
Tulsa Student Chapter
Speakers:
Jordan Lorence • Tamara Piety
Topics:
Civil Rights • First Amendment • Religious Liberty
Sponsors:
Tulsa Student Chapter
Should Health Insurers or Employers Be Mandated to Pay for Contraceptives Despite Religious Objections?
2013
Should Health Insurers or Employers Be Mandated to Pay for Contraceptives Despite Religious Objections?
John Rogers Hall
Speakers:
Tamara Piety • Robin Fretwell Wilson
Topics:
Religious Liberties • Free Speech & Election Law
Sponsors:
Tulsa Student Chapter
The Protection of Free Speech
The Protection of Free Speech
Courtroom
Speakers:
Tamara Piety
Topics:
Free Speech & Election Law
Sponsors:
Tulsa Student Chapter
Citizens United v. FEC
This event has concluded.
Apr
19
2010
Citizens United v. FEC
Speakers:
Tamara Piety
Topics:
Free Speech & Election Law • Corporations, Securities & Antitrust
Sponsors:
Tulsa Student Chapter
---
Tamara Piety - Faculty & Adjuncts https://faculty.utulsa.edu › faculty › tamara-piety
Tamara R. Piety is the author of BRANDISHING THE FIRST AMENDMENT, as well as numerous articles and essays about commercial and corporate speech.
Faculty & Alumni Showcase Series Lecture Featuring ...https://www.tualumni.com › tamara-piety
Faculty & Alumni Showcase Series Lecture Featuring Professor Tamara Piety ; Date: 9/10/2010 ; Time: 12:00 PM to 1:00 PM ; Location: John Rogers Hall, Price & ...
Tamara Piety - Academia.edu http://utulsa.academia.edu › CurriculumVitae
Curriculum Vitae Tamara R. Piety Professor of Law University of Tulsa College of Law Email: tamara-piety@utulsa.edu 3120 E. 4th Pl. * Tulsa, OK 74104 Phone: ...
Prof. Tamara Piety - | The Federalist Societyhttps://fedsoc.org › contributors › tamara-piety
Tamara Piety. Prof. Tamara Piety. University of Tulsa College of Law ... The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy ...
Tamara R. Pietyhttps://works.bepress.com › tamara_piety › downloadDOC
Tamara R. Piety. Professor of Law. University of Tulsa College of Law Email: tamara-piety@utulsa.edu. 3120 E. 4th Pl. * Tulsa, OK 74104 Phone: 918-631-2490.
Tamara R. Piety, a professor at... - The University of Tulsahttps://www.facebook.com › utulsa.edu › posts › tamar...
Tamara R. Piety, a professor at The University of Tulsa College of Law is mentioned in the New York Times for an amicus brief filed in a case involving...
Tamara R. Piety - Amazon.comhttps://www.amazon.com › Tamara-R.-Piety
I am a Professor of Law at the University of Tulsa College of Law. I came to law teaching through an early career in banking. After graduating from the ...
Tamara Piety University of Tulsa · College of Lawhttps://www.researchgate.net › University of Tulsa
Tamara Piety currently works at the College of Law, University of Tulsa. Tamara does research in Commercial Speech, First Amendment, Freedom of Expression, ...
Tamara Piety – LPE Projecthttps://lpeproject.org › authors › tamara-piety
Tamara Piety (@tpiety) is a Professor of Law, University of Tulsa College of Law in Tulsa, Oklahoma. LPE Originals. Radical Skepticism About Information ...
Tamara R. Piety - USNews.comhttps://www.usnews.com › topics › author › tamara-r-pi...
Tamara R. Piety is the Phyllis Hurley Frey Professor of Law at the University of Tulsa College of Law, a senior research scholar at Yale Law School and a ...
---