Gillibrand, Sen
2020 CAND
7 26 SON GOT 30M$ VC? SEDER MAJ REPT CRYPTOCURRENCY? DSCC
genius clarity eleanor davis-diver
:{Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Announces $10 Trillion Plan to Flight Climate Crisis:
-=-=
-=-=
-=-=
AN 9 26 CRYPTO KRIGMAN
On Tuesday, a Nobel Prize-winning economist warned that a “scheme” is in the works to influence the midterm results and buy the favor of the winning candidates, having already bought favor with President Donald Trump and his sons. This is according to Paul Krugman, who warns that while cryptocurrency “has not succeeded in creating a viable business in the normal sense, it has been extraordinarily successful at buying political influence – and they’re set to do it again.”
“The midterm elections look – based upon polling, based upon just impressions – look like a big blue wave,” says Krugman. “Elliot Morris gives the Democrats a 97 percent chance of taking the House and two-to-one odds of taking the Senate. But there’s still a few weeks to go and it looks like there’s a big wave of right-wing money that’s going to come crashing in. We don’t know how effective that will be. The role of money in politics, particularly of last-minute advertising blitzes, is somewhat unclear. But it is coming and crypto is going to be a pretty big part of it.” He notes that the crypto industry spent big in 2024 and is poised to spend even more in 2026 – an unusual move for a midterm cycle.
“But this industry is going to go all in,” asserts Krugman. “The crypto political strategy has been to knock out candidates that it considers hostile, and that is a strategy that was very effective in the last election cycle.” He explains that the crypto industry spent big to defeat crypto-skeptical Democrats in favor of potential allies, whether Republican or Democrat. In Ohio, for example, the crypto industry spent $38 million to flip a blue Senate seat red, and this year they’ve spent another $30 million to prevent Democrat Sherrod Brown from winning the seat back.
“Crypto became seen in Washington as a force to be afraid of” after victories like Ohio, but according to Krugman, it is “still barely used for legitimate transactions.” Instead, he explains, it is “pretty much only for criminal activities, including, by the way, Iranian efforts to bypass U.S. sanctions.” According to the Federal Reserve, notes Krugman, only 2 percent of Americans have actually used crypto to buy something other than assets, “but the political effectiveness has been huge, and it has intimidated a lot of politicians.
Back in February, Chuck Schumer warned his colleagues not to do too much to offend Fairshake, the big crypto lobbying group. Crypto has also, in addition to campaign contributions, done a lot of what in the old days we would call bribery. There’s a lot of money that flows from the crypto industry to politicians and their relatives, and not just Trump… it’s an industry that has developed a really effective political strategy. They couldn’t actually produce stuff, but if we count the $1.4 billion or so that Trump personally has made from crypto as part of its campaign contributions, then crypto may be the biggest single political financial force out there.”
If the blue wave does come, warns Krugman, the crypto industry will not stop peddling its influence just because a particular seat has turned Democrat, and it may even resort to outright “bribery.” But, he asserts, buying Democratic influence is “a completely different universe from the Trumpian Republican Party, and so the crypto industry knows that if Democrats really do sweep, if this is a blue wave which brings them not just the House but the Senate, it will be a less favorable environment, so their scam will be greatly endangered.”
So as crypto seeks to exert its influence after the election, concludes Krugman, “I guess we’re going to learn something about how much of a democracy we remain. I mean, yes, a vote is a vote, even if it’s a vote that was influenced by money, but we’re going to find out: can a wave of largely corrupt money – clearly totally corrupt in the case of crypto, but largely corrupt in other cases – can a wave of corrupt money stop a popular electoral uprising against a really disastrous administration and its allies in Congress?”
-=-=
-=-=
MAJ REPT 9 26
GILLEBRAND SON STANFORD SR 30M$ TO DO DERIVATIVES IN rw
16:08
16 minutes, 8 seconds
Um to be fair, Schumer's daughter, um she's worked in this area. Like, wasn't she
16:15
16 minutes, 15 seconds
also the top lobbyist for Amazon at one point? I mean, does he have multiple daughters or is she literally been the
16:23
16 minutes, 23 seconds
top lobbyist for Amazon and for like Facebook? Yeah. So, he has two daughters.
16:30
16 minutes, 30 seconds
Oh, okay. I'm sorry. I'm getting confused. I'm getting confused. Jessica, who now works for OpenAI, was a leading
16:37
16 minutes, 37 seconds
figure in or arguably the leading uh figure in New York State for Amazon.
16:43
16 minutes, 43 seconds
This was they got their butt kicked on Amazon HQ2 uh the where AOC and uh Mike
16:50
16 minutes, 50 seconds
Janerys and others pushed back on the subsidies that New York State was prepared to give to Amazon to build a headquarters in Queens. Uh turns out
16:59
16 minutes, 59 seconds
also Amazon's not finishing the efforts they started in uh uh Virginia, Northern Virginia that the ones who supposedly
17:07
17 minutes, 7 seconds
won the Amazon contract that turned out to be uh worthless. Um but uh so she did
17:14
17 minutes, 14 seconds
six years there. Uh her sister works at Meta. So yeah, so now we've got you have
17:21
17 minutes, 21 seconds
a Meta official and a former Amazon who's now open AI. And I think that that reflects the fact that OpenA's eyes
...
-=-=
-=-=
The American Prospect
https://prospect.org › 2026 › 07 › 24 › crypto-clarity-act-genius-trump-republicans-senate-fairshake
Crypto Boosters See a Lack of CLARITY - The American Prospect
Jul 24, 2026After spending hundreds of millions on Congress to advance their market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, the crypto industry faces one giant obstacle: Donald Trump's corruption.
The American Prospect
https://prospect.org › 2026 › 08 › 10 › crypto-democrats-ghosting-industry-clarity-act
Crypto Democrats Are Ghosting the Industry - The American Prospect
7 days agoThe crypto industry was hoping the threat posed by their $136 million war chest would scare enough Democrats to win the 60 votes necessary to overcome a filibuster before the August recess began, and the future of the legislation would become all that much more uncertain ahead of the November midterms. More from Eleanor Davis-Diver
Democratic Underground
https://www.democraticunderground.com › 100221397983
Crypto Boosters See a Lack of CLARITY by Eleanor Davis-Diver ...
Jul 24, 2026Crypto Boosters See a Lack of CLARITY by Eleanor Davis-Diver At the end of June, crypto super PAC Fairshake had almost $127 million cash on hand, second among outside campaign groups only to the primary Republican PAC, the Senate Leadership Fund.
Scoop.it
Crypto Industry Gets Its Way on GENIUS Act Rule... - Scoop.it
Jun 24, 2026Crypto Industry Gets Its Way on GENIUS Act Rulemaking | by Eleanor Davis-Diver | The American Prospect | Prospect.org From prospect.org - June 24, 2:00 AM
Democratic Underground
https://www.democraticunderground.com › 100221353052
The Project Crypto Scheme by Eleanor Davis-Diver - Democratic ...
Jul 6, 2026The Project Crypto Scheme by Eleanor Davis-Diver In a bombshell financial disclosure report released last week, Donald Trump revealed he brought in $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency ventures in the first year of his second term.
-=-=
mma
At her March 19 presidential campaign event in Davenport, IA, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) fielded a series of questions from potential voters on a wide range of topics. However, it was a very specific part of her answer to a broadly worded question about immigration that made news.
That night, the Republican National Committee’s “GOP War Room” YouTube channel posted a link to
in which Gillibrand says, “We need comprehensive immigration reform. If you are in this country now, you must have the right to pay into Social Security, to pay your taxes, to pay into the local school system, and to have a pathway to citizenship.”
Gillibrand was pretty clearly saying that she supports a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, noting that these are people who in many cases already make contributions into Social Security and local school districts via taxes. The YouTube clip was deceptively titled “Sen. Gillibrand: Expand Social Security To All Illegal Immigrants,” a distortion of what she said.
The clip was posted to YouTube at 9:33 p.m. EDT. Less than 90 minutes later, Fox News’ Laura Ingraham played the clip for her audience, adopting the RNC’s misleading interpretation.
“A 2020 Dem wants to give illegals, you kidding me, another benefit?” said Ingraham before throwing to a commercial. Upon returning, she played the clip and added, “Anything else, Kirsten? Well, there you have it. She wants to expand Social Security benefits to illegal immigrants.”
That, of course, is untrue and gives the impression that Gillibrand wants to start cutting checks to undocumented immigrants. In reality, what she’s proposing would result in more money being paid in to Social Security, with more people who are currently undocumented being able to do things aboveboard.
On March 20, Hannity covered the story, inviting Trump supporters Mike Huckabee and Larry Elder on to thrash the nonexistent radical policy proposal. Huckabee took things even further when he said that this would be the equivalent of giving undocumented immigrants “grandma’s Social Security,” telling the audience that this policy would result in people currently on Social Security losing out on benefits because “we’re going to be giving it to people who broke into this country illegally.”
...
Media outlets tried to downplay Trump's sexist tweet towards New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand as merely Trump attacking her. They should call it what it was: textbook sexual harassment.
==
GILLIBRAND, Kirsten, a Senator and a Representative from New York; born in Albany, Albany County, N.Y., December 9, 1966; A.B., Dartmouth College, Hanover, N.H., 1988; J.D., University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif., 1991; lawyer, private practice; special council, United States Housing and Urban Development; elected as a Democrat to the One Hundred Tenth Congress and to the succeeding Congress, and served from January 3, 2007, to January 26, 2009, when she resigned to become a U.S. Senator; appointed January 23, 2009, to fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Hillary Clinton; appointment took effect upon her resignation from the House of Representatives on January 26, 2009; took the oath of office on January 27, 2009; elected in 2010 in a special election for the term ending January 3, 2013; reelected in 2012 for the term ending January 3, 2019.
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/summary.php?cid=N00027658&cycle=Career
| Contributor | Total | Indivs | PACs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boies, Schiller & Flexner | $651,648 | $651,648 | $0 |
| Davis, Polk & Wardwell | $467,650 | $467,650 | $0 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | $161,700 | $151,700 | $10,000 |
| Morgan Stanley | $155,525 | $132,025 | $23,500 |
| Corning Inc | $152,150 | $139,650 | $12,500 |




