Neuroscientists, living

<p>Note: &nbsp;I gave up on these big lists: &nbsp;too many potential nodes to be useful (thousands):

subfield lists are somewhat more useful.

Ignore "importance" measure; (usu salience or propinquity, etc)</p>

<p>

also see the list of historic Neurosci &nbsp;(ie dead or, if alive, old (>75-80) and celebrated)</p>

<p>

Note: &nbsp;many other relevent lists (<b>this list got to be too long</b>): <b>see individual subfields</b>:

eg. &nbsp;theoretician/ neural networker or retina researcher</p>

<p>

Note: &nbsp;<b>ignore "importance</b>"; &nbsp;this used to be a crude <b>SALIENCE</b> measure for

projects I was working on:&nbsp;(could refer to relevance, influence, personal contact, etc.)</p>