kwebtransPreview
Open in TheBrain

Sismondi

SISMONDI & MALTHUS

J.C.L. Simonde de Simondi (1773-1842) originated more fundamental economic

concepts and theories than many economists of wider and more enduring fame -

was Sismondi who first developed the theory of equilibrium aggregate income,

an algebraic growth model, and who anticipated more celebrated economists on

a number of points: e.g. although Keynes lauded Malthus' 'Principles of

Political Economy' as a forerunner of his own 'General Theory', Marx was

perhaps closer to truth when he cynically characterized Malthus'

'Principles' as merely the "English translation" of Sismondi. (In his

'Theorien über den Mehrwert', 18?). Whatever, Sismondi generally considered

the ally of Malthus in his battle with economic ideas of Ricardo, despite

their hugely differing positions on number of important issues.

Sismondi was one of the first critics of capitalist, liberal economic

system, along with Ricardo and Malthus - however, he differed from them by

(from 1815) advocating state intervention in the economic process, while 2

English economists - despite knowledge of social evils caused by economic

laisser faire - stood by principles of their master Adam Smith who rejected

every kind of state intervention. His famous "conversion" from classical

economics to support for state controls and intervention to combat results

of overhasty mechanization and ruthless selfishness of the entrepreneurial

class was brought about by profound shock over conditions in England, plus

influence of Robert Owen - latter's 'Observations on the Effect of the

Manufacturing System' appeared in 1815, and Sismondi met him personally in

Paris in 1818. Sismondi refused to admit himself a socialist however:

considered idea of social equality and equal distribution of wealth as a

utopian dream, and opposed revolution - reason why Marx and Engels in

'Communist Manifesto' disdainfully classed him with "petty-bourgeois

Socialism". Although Sismondi's proposals do not add up to a rational and

logical system, they do contain germs of future social policy and labour

legislation - was one of first to point to terrible position of workers,

esp. women and children - and for need for protection for them and their

wages. Basically was a republican ("never a democrat") - believed in equal

protection and equal opportunity, but not equal conditions.

Sismondi's break with classical tradition came in 1815, when he wrote an

article, "Political Economy", for the 'Edinburgh Encyclopedia' in which he

presented the skeleton of the argument that was later fleshed out in his

'Nouveaux Principes' (1819), and repeated later in his 'Etudes sur

l'économie politique'. In particular, Sismondi attacked the dominant

Malthusian population theory of his time, questionning the famous "ratios"

of food and population growth, not simply on empirical grounds but because

he had detected fatal ambiguity in M.'s shifting use of the word

"tendencies" - worked out that in fact there wasno tendency for man to

increase faster than his food supply

Although from 1815 on different sides of the economic fence, Malthus and

Sismondi frequently corresponded - and met in April 1819 when Sismondi in

England, having recently married English woman Jessie Allen (1777-1853).

Along with George Ticknor and Lord John Russell, Malthus and Sismondi paid

visit to Sir James Mackintosh (he married to Sismondi's wife's sister,

Catherine Allen) at Mardocks, near Ware - colleague of Malthus at East India

College, Haileybury, where Malthus prof of political economy; hence, Malthus

and Sismondi linked by economics, and by friendship/family connections with

Allens/Mackenzie.

Malthus and Sis. got on very well - both originally great admirers of Adam

Smith (Sis. still regarded himself as a disciple, even after developing his

heretical views, which he saw as "modifications" or "complements" to Smith's

system - Sis. greatly admiring Smith's use of a combination of both facts

and theory), and kept up friendship - Sismondi in particular continued

always to honour his adversaries and reserved special affection for his

greatest adversary, Ricardo.

Almost total neglect of Sismondi's ideas remains a mystery: in S.'s own

view, it was due to his attacking a dominant system which had an attractive

symmetry, determinacy, and comprehensiveness. Was right to some extent - it

needed a system to beat a system, and his rambling examples and shifting

terms make it difficult to see the system underlying it all. Another major

factor was Sismondi's intellectual isolation - he belonged to no school in

economics and his policy positions put him at opposite end of political

spectrum from the "general glut" economists such as Malthus, Lauderdale and

Chalmers, whose proposals involved favouring landlords, government

sinecurists, and fundholders in the national debt, rather than Sismondi's

"proletarians". Moreover, although the basic Sismondian analysis and that of

Malthus are practically identical as theory, Malthus was never as much a

promoter of Sismondi as Sismondi was of him, possibly because Sismondi

preceded him into print with ideas which Malthus already held. . . .

Sismondi received equally shabby treatment from Karl Marx and his followers,

who owed several ideas to Sismondi. Marx's voluminous 'Theorien über den

Mehrwert', the first great history of economic thought, deliberately omitted

Sismondi [on grounds that a study of Sis. would have to come after a

discussion of competition and credit], although covering other economists

who were even less well known, and he was dismissed with patronizing

references elsewhere in Marx . . . Sismondi's independence and distrust of

rigid systems - perhaps born of his experiences with French Revolution and

the later reactions - made him unwilling to raise a banner or to fall in

behind anyone else's banner. He was simply a man who sought truth and tried

to deal with the sufferings he saw around him. This made his name and his

doctrines of little use to leaders of contemporary crusades or founders of

dogmatic movements." (Sowell, p. 88)

Bit on Mackenzie's - where Malthus and Sismondi were introduced:

In 1798 James Mackenzie (long article in DNB), aged 33, made 2nd marriage,

to Catherine Allen, who was known in some circles as the bluest of

blue-stockings; was one of nine daughters whose father, John Allen snr, is

alleged to have thrashed them (afterwards) if they did not talk sufficiently

brilliantly at dinner to amuse the guests. Sister Jessie married Sismondi,

while 2 other sisters married Josiah and John Wedgwood.

In 1798, with his brother-in-law John Allen jr, best friend Richard Sharp,

Samuel Rogers, Bobus Smith, and fellow-barrister James Scarlett (later Lord

Abinger), Mackintosh founded a dinner-club known as "The King of Clubs" and

which became famous for good talk. Then, in 1799, Mackintosh became more

widely known for his 39 lectures on 'The Law of Nature and Nations', which

delivered February-June in the Hall of Lincoln's Inn, attended by full house

of 150. "King of Clubs" flourished, and was afterwards joined by such men as

Lord Holland, Brougham, Romilly, Sydney Smith, and Ricardo - Malthus himself

did not become a member until 1812, but was not known as a shining

conversationalist, whereas Mackenzie was renowned for his great conversation

and locquacity.

Sir James' notable art of conversation was not, however, appreciated by

everyone, esp. his wife - according to her sister, Jessie Sismondi,

Catherine Mackenzie "could neither make herself nor others happy"; plus JS

also wrote of Sir James's wasted life, and how "he loved passionately and

fondly only one person in the world [his wife] and she never could love him,

though he was the only person in the world that truly loved her". Instead,

CM immersed herself in helping poor - shared some of concerns of

brother-in-law Sismondi, and got on well with him: campaigned against

slavery, child labour, and animal cruelty among other things. In 1829, Lady

Mackintosh "much out of health" and, according to her sisters, suffering

greatly from Sir James's "increasing loquacity" with old age, set out in

autumn 1829 to visit the Sismondis at Chene, Geneva with "some vague notion

of never returning". She died at Sismondis' house at Chene on 6 May 1830.

In 1817, Mackenzie made professor of law at East India College in 1817 and

moved to Mardocks, and was here in 1819 that Sismondi and Malthus met (among

other places).