Open in TheBrain

care ctr affordable reliable energy

<font size="4" face="Times New Roman">several w/ this acronym</font><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div><a href="http://www.climatedevlab.brown.edu/uploads/2/8/4/0/28401609/covercountermovementcoalitions.2.2019.pdf"><font size="4" face="Times New Roman" color="#000000">http://www.climatedevlab.brown.edu/uploads/2/8/4/0/28401609/covercountermovementcoalitions.2.2019.pdf</font></a></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">The Center for Affordable and Reliable Energy (CARE) operated as a cover group for fossil fuel interests, where

it sustained a short-lived but impactful lobbying effort from 2001-2008. CARE self described as “a broad

coalition of organizations representing thousands of businesses and individuals that support the development of a

sound energy policy for America.” CARE’s primary purpose was lobbying for pro-coal energy policy, mostly at

the federal level, though it also participated in advertising campaigns. Members of CARE included some of the

largest and most powerful lobbyists in the country, including the free-market, tax reduction lobbying groups of

<b>U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the 60 Plus Association.&nbsp;</b></font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">There is notably little published information on CARE

in comparison to other denial groups, though an investigation from the Annenburg Public Policy Center revealed

that CARE spent approximately $533,000 in 2004 alone on at least 50 print legislative issue advertisements.

Membership

Membership included ultra-conservative groups (i.e. Americans for Tax Reform, Frontiers of Freedom Institute),

focused on issues like tax reform, promoting free trade, and market deregulation. Many of the members are some

of the most influential lobbyists in Washington, such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, an enormous lobbying

group with total donations topping $140 million in the 2008 elections alone...</font></div></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">
</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">CARE’s lobbying efforts centered on emphasizing the competitive cost and economic benefits of increased coal

mining. In 2001, pro-coal posters funded by CARE were plastered around the Washington, D.C. subway system

to target policymakers. When President Bush emphasized the need for a comprehensive energy strategy in his

2005 State of the Union address, he specifically endorsed the “<b>Clear Skies” legislation</b>, which -- among other

things -- promoted greater domestic reliance on energy sources like clean coal. CARE’s press release highlighted

their support of the legislation, reading, “Coalition Lauds President’s Commitment to Pass Energy Legislation.”&nbsp;</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>
</b></font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"><b>The legislation was introduced by staunch climate denier Senator Inhofe (R-OK).</b>

The advertising and pro-coal propaganda CARE distributed, distorted by not presenting the negative

implications, are well-documented in the information available on their website.

Their webpage on “Benefits of Mining” lists the following points, emphasizing the individual benefits that

Americans receive from domestic coal production, particularly in comparison to citizens of other nations, which

they argue pay more for their electricity:

● “The value of coal produced in the

United State each year is nearly $18

million.”</font></div><div><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">...</font></div>