webodec3ARCHIVEPreview
Open in TheBrain

dickstein shapiro

==

AG directory http://www.dicksteinshapiro.com/files/upload/StateAG_Guide.pdf

mark paoletta rev dr

pam bondi

RAGA

lipton nyt

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2016/02/11/once-mighty-dickstein-shapiro-closing-up-shop/

D.C. law firm Dickstein Shapiro LLP is shutting down after more than 60 years in business.

Philadelphia firm Blank Rome LLP is hiring roughly 100 lawyers from Dickstein Shapiro, a once-dominant legal and lobbying force on Capitol Hill whose fortunes took a hit after the last economic downturn.

The deal, which includes lawyers in New York and D.C., will create a law firm with more than 620 attorneys in 13 U.S. offices and an affiliate office in China. The combinationdoesn’t include Dickstein’s Los Angeles office.

==

--

trump mar 14 2014 mar a lago so beach

sugg min donation 3K = max?

lori kalani

tyler cathey repl muniz

Money sent to “Justice for All” or “And Justice for All” Groups Associated with Bondi

9/23/13 Republican State Leadership Committee Florida PAC $500,000

12/13/13 Republican State Leadership Committee Florida $50,000

1/28/14 Republican State Leadership Committee-Florida PAC $100,000

10/06/14 Republican Attorneys General Association $100,000

Until early 2014, RAGA was a part of the Republican State Leadership Committee

CONTRIBUTIONS IN 2013 FROM DICKSTEINAND ONE OF ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL CLIENTS

And Justice For All Lori Kalani 11/10/2013 $1,000

Justice for All Bernard Nash 11/22/13 $1,000

Justice for All Dickstein Shapiro, 11/30/13 $1,000

Florida Republican Party Dickstein Shapiro 2/28/2013 $2,500

Florida Republican Party Lori Kalani 2/28/2013 $2,000

Florida Republican Party Bernard Nash 2/28/2013 $2,000

Florida Republican Party Milton Marquis 2/28/2013 $500

Florida Republican Party Chris Tampio 2/28/2013 $250

And Justice for ALLETC Capital9/13/2013 $ 10,000.00

==

CONTRIBUTIONS TO PAM BONDI OR HER POLITICAL CAUSES BY RAGA

Money sent to “Justice for All” or “And Justice for All” Groups Associated with Bondi

9/23/13 Republican State Leadership Committee Florida PAC $500,000

12/13/13 Republican State Leadership Committee Florida $50,000

1/28/14 Republican State Leadership Committee-Florida PAC $100,000

10/06/14 Republican Attorneys General Association $100,000

Until early 2014, RAGA was a part of the Republican State Leadership Committee

CONTRIBUTIONS IN 2013 FROM DICKSTEIN AND ONE OF ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL CLIENTS

And Justice For All Lori Kalani 11/10/2013 $1,000

Justice for All Bernard Nash 11/22/13 $1,000

Justice for All Dickstein Shapiro, 11/30/13 $1,000

Florida Republican Party Dickstein Shapiro 2/28/2013 $2,500

Florida Republican Party Lori Kalani 2/28/2013 $2,000

Florida Republican Party Bernard Nash 2/28/2013 $2,000

Florida Republican Party Milton Marquis 2/28/2013 $500

Florida Republican Party Chris Tampio 2/28/2013 $250

And Justice for ALL ETC Capital 9/13/2013 $ 10,000.00

meeting in DC. We are again hosting this year's dinner at Citronelle, and expect about 25 AGs and

an equal number of Chief Deputies to attend.

I hope your schedule will permit you to join us. I guarantee that it will be an evening you will enjoy

and remember! Another copy of our invitation is attached.

Best,

Bernie

Bernard Nash

Partner

Dickstein Shapiro LLP

1825 Eye Street NW | Washington, DC 20006

Tel (202) 420.2209| Direct Fax (202) 379.9353

nashb@dicksteinshapiro.com

Confidentiality Statement

This email message and any attached files are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may contain

material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for delivering this confidential

114017249.txt

"Smoyer, Divonne"

3/11/2011 2:22:52 PM

To: "carlos.muniz@myfloridalegal.com"

cc:

Subject: Nice to see you again in DC this past week

Carlos --

I just wanted to drop you a quick like to let you know that it was great seeing

you again after so long; I was grateful for the chance to catch up?a little bit

at the Supreme Court reception.

I look forward to working with you in your new capacity!

Warm regards,

Divonne

Divonne Smoyer

Partner

Dickstein Shapiro LLP

1825 Eye Street NW | Washington, DC 20006

Tel (202) 420-2665 | Fax (202) 379-9256

smoyerd@dicksteinshapiro.com

Confidentiality Statement

This email message and any attached files are confidential and are intended

solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above. This communication may

contain material protected by attorney-client, work product, or other

privileges. If you are not the intended recipient or person responsible for

delivering this confidential communication to the intended recipient, you have

received this communication in error, and any review, use, dissemination,

forwarding, printing, copying, or other distribution of this email message and

any attached files is strictly prohibited. Dickstein Shapiro reserves the right

to monitor any communication that is created, received, or sent on its network.

If you have received this confidential communication in error, please notify

the sender immediately by reply email message and permanently delete the

original message.

To reply to our email administrator directly, send an email to

postmaster@dicksteinshapiro.com

Dickstein Shapiro LLP

www.dicksteinshapiro.com?

Page 1

Proprietary and Confidential

DSMDB-3216447v5

To: David Satz

John Maddox

Caesars Entertainment Corporation

From: Milton A. Marquis

Lori Kalani

J.B. Kelly

Chris Tampio

Date November 27, 2013

Date: Re: July 16, 2013 Attorney General Strategy

As requested, below is our proposal to assist Caesars Entertainment to combat Sheldon Adelson’s

campaign to generate State Attorneys General (“AG”) opposition to on-line gaming.

Why AGs Matter

AGs primarily serve as their State’s lawyer. While they are lawyers first, AGs are also policy advocates,

regulators, and enforcers. They are also influential on legislation. They interpret state laws by issuing

opinions. Many have original criminal prosecutorial authority. All of them are seen as the state’s top

cop. Simply put, AGs hold a unique position in that they have almost unfettered ability to use their

“bully pulpits” to advocate on behalf of the public interest.

The AG’s front office is generally comprised of lawyers and others who are charged with developing

and executing the AG’s priorities. The front office generally includes a Chief Deputy, Chief of Staff,

Policy Advisor, Public Information Officer and Legislative Liaison. These officials serve at the pleasure

of the AG and generally assist in advancing the AG’s interests. Front office interest or lack of interest in

an issue can come from an assessment of media reports and potential media scrutiny; advocacy group

requests; political benefit or detriment; legislative inquiries; and “pitches” made by law firms or other

professionals in whom the front office has confidence.

AG Strategy and Proposal

Our collective experience working with and within the AG community is that when there are public

campaigns (e.g, advocacy driven) about the business practices of a national company or industry, AG

offices have an awareness, and often a one-sided awareness, of the issues and the company and the

industry. When that occurs, we believe the better course is for the industry to proactively engage the

==

AG community at several levels. We recommend that Caesars engage the AG community with an initial

three-fold goal:

  1. Define the Adelson campaign for what it is: a self-interested attempt to protect his interests by

imposing ill-advised and unnecessary legal barriers to on-line gaming under the guise of

consumer protection;

  1. Educate AG offices on the need to protect the historic state prerogative to regulate gaming within

state borders;

1

and

  1. Promote the economic benefits of on-line gaming to any state that chooses to permit extensively

regulated on-line gaming within its borders.

To achieve these goals, and as discussed in more detail below, we propose the following AG strategy for

Caesars:

  1. Intelligence gathering: Dickstein will actively gather intelligence from the AG community to

assess the impact of Adelson’s campaign and the possibility of AG action.

  1. Educate ourselves: We will become fully versed in Caesars business model and its assessment

of the Adelson campaign.

  1. Develop talking points for the AG community: We will use our knowledge of the AG offices

and, working with the Caesars strategy team, develop legal and policy talking points promoting

our goals for use with the AG community.

  1. Educate the AG community: Using our knowledge of and relationships with the AG

community, we will identify the best means to educate AGs and their staff on defining Adelson

and promoting the benefits and consumer protections associated with on-line gaming. As

discussed below, there are several layers of education which will be honed as we continue to

gather intelligence regarding Adelson’s activities.

  1. Coordinate efforts: We will work with Caesars internal and external teams to coordinate

messages, share information and refine goals and strategies. We will identify members of the

Caesars team and its other consultants who may provide additional leverage within the AG

community, as needed.

  1. Become Caesars advocates at AG gatherings: We are in constant communication with AGs

and their staffs. We attend all AG meetings. We will use our knowledge of the Adelson

campaign to promote the company’s goals during those interactions. We will act as a resource

for the AG community if they have questions or need information.

  1. Continue Monitoring and Refining Strategy and Goals: From our experience, we know that

events can change, often rapidly. We do not believe that a strategy should be static. It must be

constantly assessed when there is new or different information available. We are adaptable, and

our working relationships within the AG community has allowed us to maintain credibility for

our clients even when new facts emerge that were previously not known

==

===

not sure why this is fatal:

Hastert has been in hiding since the indictment was issued. He is set to be arraigned next week on a federal indictment based on allegations that he sought to cover up a deal to pay $3.5 million to an acquaintance over “prior misconduct.” The Illinois Republican had already paid $1.7 million of that amount in small increments from various banks, and reports have said the payments were made as compensation to a former student for prior sexual misconduct.:{

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/dennis-hastert-lobbying-firm-118603#ixzz443NrmAlb}:

==

Dickstein Shapiro LLP (formerly Dickstein, Shapiro, Morin & Oshinsky[4]) was a large U.S. law firm and lobbying group based in Washington, D.C., with five offices across the United States. According to the National Law Journal's 2012 rankings, it was the 128th largest law firm in the United States. The firm also ranked 75th in profit per attorney on the 2012 AmLaw 200 survey.[2]

Contents

  [hide] 

Practice areas:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

The firm was divided into six practice groups, each of which handle various aspects of their respective specialties: Complex Dispute resolution, Corporate & Finance, Government Law & Strategy (includes lobbying, political law, regulatory law and government contracts), Insurance coverage, Intellectual property, and Litigation.

Pro Bono

Dickstein Shapiro was recognized by the DC Bar for its leadership in pro bono representation.[5] It is one of the law firms representing the detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

History:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

Dickstein Shapiro was founded by Sidney Dickstein and David I. Shapiro in New York City in 1953. By 1956, the firm moved its headquarters to Washington, DC.[6] The firm quickly established its reputation by winning several high-profile cases, including Silver v. New York Stock Exchangebefore the United States Supreme Court.

Over the following decades, the firm grew organically and through lateral hiring. In 2001, Dickstein Shapiro merged with Roberts, Sheridan & Kotel, a New York boutique firm that had spun off fromCravath, Swaine & Moore and which was primarily focused on corporate finance and tax law.[7]

In 2012, the firm entered into merger discussions with San Francisco-based international firmPillsbury Winthrop, but those talks ended by early 2013.[8]

Dickstein Shapiro hired former Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert as a lobbyist shortly after he resigned his seat in Congress. Hastert was later indicted in May 2015 on charges of illegally withdrawing money from banks to pay hush money to an individual that he committed misconduct against years ago. Hastert resigned his lobbyist position the day the indictment was unsealed. Hastert's biography was quickly removed from the firm's website, and the firm also purged all mentions of Hastert from its previously posted press releases.[9] Hastert's resignation from Dickstein Shapiro following the indictment against him left the law firm and lobbying firm "reeling," according to news reports.[9] The firm's lobbying business had already been struggling; it was reported that the firm had billed $130,000 on behalf of eight clients for the first quarter of 2015, "not close to being on track for its overall 2014 billings, when it brought in $3.7 million for the year."[9] In the few years preceding the indictment, Dickstein Shapiro had already "faced an exodus of ... talent" to rival firms Greenberg Traurig and Cozen O'Connor, as well as "the loss of major client contracts" including Lorillard Tobacco Co., Peabody Energy Corp., Bayer Corp., andCovanta Energy Corp.[9] Following the Hastert indictment, it was reported that Dickstein Shapiro's biggest domestic client, Fuels America, terminated its lobbying contract with the firm.[9]

In February 2016, it was announced that the firm would discontinue operation and that Blank Rome would hire approximately 100 of its lawyers.[10] Equity partners are expected to lose all of their firm capital.[11]

Offices:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

Notable lawyers and employees:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

Notable alumni:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

Notable Clients:{:(style="margin-right:0.25em"):}:[edit:{]}:

==

part 2 lipton

When the executives who distribute 5-Hour Energy, the popular caffeinated drinks, learned that attorneys general in more than 30 states were investigating allegations of deceptive advertising — a serious financial threat to the company — they moved quickly to shut the investigations down, one state at a time.

But success did not come in court or at a negotiating table.

Instead, it came at the opulent Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel in California, with its panoramic ocean views, where more than a dozen state attorneys general had gathered last year for cocktails, dinners and fund-raisers organized by the Democratic Attorneys General Association. A lawyer for 5-Hour Energy roamed the event, setting her sights on Attorney General Chris Koster of Missouri, whose office was one of those investigating the company.

“My client just received notification that Missouri is on this,” the lawyer, Lori Kalani, told him.

Ms. Kalani’s firm, Dickstein Shapiro,had courted the attorney general at dinners and conferences and with thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. Mr. Koster told Ms. Kalani that he was unaware of the investigation, and he reached for his phone and called his office. By the end of the weekend, he had ordered his staff to pull out of the inquiry, a clear victory for 5-Hour Energy.

The quick reversal, confirmed by Mr. Koster and Ms. Kalani, was part of a pattern of successful lobbying of Mr. Koster by the law firm on behalf of clients like Pfizer and AT&T — and evidence of a largely hidden dynamic at work in state attorneys general offices across the country.

Attorneys general are now the object of aggressive pursuit by lobbyists and lawyers who use campaign contributions, personal appeals at lavish corporate-sponsored conferences and other means to push them to drop investigations, change policies, negotiate favorable settlements or pressure federal regulators, an investigation by The New York Times has found.

A robust industry of lobbyists and lawyers has blossomed as attorneys general have joined to conduct multistate investigations and pushed into areas as diverse as securities fraud and Internet crimes.

But unlike the lobbying rules covering other elected officials, there are few revolving-door restrictions or disclosure requirements governing state attorneys general, who serve as “the people’s lawyers” by protecting consumers and individual citizens.

A result is that the routine lobbying and deal-making occur largely out of view. But the extent of the cause and effect is laid bare in The Times’s review of more than 6,000 emails obtained through open records laws in more than two dozen states, interviews with dozens of participants in cases and attendance at several conferences where corporate representatives had easy access to attorneys general.

Courting Favor

Articles in this series examine the explosion in lobbying of state attorneys general by corporate interests and the millions in campaign donations they now provide.

Often, the corporate representative is a former colleague. Four months after leaving office as chief deputy attorney general in Washington State, Brian T. Moran wrote to his replacement on behalf of a client, T-Mobile, which was pressing federal officials to prevent competitors from grabbing too much of the available wireless spectrum.

“As promised when we met the A.G. last week, I am attaching a draft letter for Bob to consider circulating to the other states,” he wrote late last year, referring to the attorney general, Bob Ferguson.

A short while later, Mr. Moran wrote again to his replacement, David Horn. “Dave: Anything you can tell me about that letter?” he said.

“Working on it sir,” came the answer. “Stay tuned.” By January, the letter was issued by the attorney general largely as drafted by the industry lawyers.

The exchange was not unusual. Emails obtained from more than 20 states reveal a level of lobbying by representatives of private interests that had been more typical with lawmakers than with attorneys general.

“The current and increasing level of the lobbying of attorneys general creates, at the minimum, the appearance of undue influence, and is therefore unseemly,” said James E. Tierney, a former attorney general of Maine, who now runs a program at Columbia University that studies state attorneys general. “It is undermining the credibility of the office of attorney general.”

Private lawyers also have written drafts of legal filings that attorneys general have used almost verbatim. In some cases, they have become an adjunct to the office by providing much of the legal work, including bearing the cost of litigation, in exchange for up to 20 percent of any settlement.

Money gathered through events like the one in February 2013 at the Loews hotel is flooding the political campaigns of attorneys general and flowing to party organizations that can take unlimited corporate contributions and then funnel money to individual candidates. The Republican Attorneys General Association alone has pulled in $11.7 million since January.

It is a self-perpetuating network that includes a group of former attorneys general called SAGE, or the Society of Attorneys General Emeritus, most of whom are now on retainer to corporate clients.

Graphic

Money Going to Attorneys General

Several of the largest donors to the Republican and Democratic Attorneys General Associations are companies or groups that have been targets of investigations or are seeking help from attorneys general in challenging federal regulations.

OPEN Graphic

Giant energy producers and service companies like Devon Energy of Oklahoma, the Southern Company of Georgia and TransCanada have retained their own teams of attorney general specialists, including Andrew P. Miller, a former attorney general of Virginia.

Continue reading the main story

Related Coverage

    interactive

    Courting Favor MARCH 15, 2015

    COURTING FAVOR: THE PITCH

    Lawyers Create Big Paydays by Coaxing Attorneys General to Sue DEC. 18, 2014

    COURTING FAVOR: A HIDDEN COALITION

    Energy Firms in Secretive Alliance With Attorneys General DEC. 6, 2014

    Rhode Island Investigating Former State Attorney General NOV. 21, 2014

    Missouri Attorney General Puts Limit on Contributions NOV. 19, 2014

Recent Comments

    See All Comments Write a comment

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

For some companies, the reward seems apparent, according to the documents obtained by The Times. In Georgia, the attorney general, after receiving a request from a former attorney general who had become a lobbyist, disregarded written advice from the state’s environmental regulators, the emails show. In Utah, the attorney general dismissed a case pending against Bank of America over the objections of his staff after secretly meeting with a former attorney general working as a Bank of America lobbyist.

That Bank of America case was cited in July when the two most recent former attorneys general in Utah were charged with granting official favors to donors in exchange for golf getaways, rides on private planes and a luxury houseboat.

While the Utah case is extreme, some participants say even the daily lobbying can corrode public trust.

“An attorney general is entrusted with the power to decide which lawsuits to file and how to settle them, and they have great discretion in their work,” said Anthony Johnstone, a former assistant attorney general in Montana. “It’s vitally important that people can trust that those judgments are not subject to undue influence because of outside forces. And from what I have seen in recent years, I am concerned and troubled that those forces have intensified.”

Several current and former attorneys general say that while they are disappointed by the increased lobbying, they reject the notion that the outside representatives are powerful enough to manipulate the system.

“There is no Mr. Fix-It out there you can hire and get the job done no matter what the merits are,” said Attorney General Tom Miller of Iowa, the longest-serving state attorney general in the country, at 19 years.

Mr. Koster said he regretted the prominence of groups like DAGA and RAGA — as the Democratic and Republican attorneys general associations are known — saying the partisanship and increased emphasis on money had been damaging.

“I wish those two organizations did not exist,” Mr. Koster said during an interview at his office in Kansas City, even though the Democratic group has contributed at least $1.4 million to his election campaigns, more than any other source.

Continue reading the main story

Continue reading the main story

Lobbying State Attorneys General

Here is a look at some of the organizations and players that are part of the fast-growing and largely secretive world of lobbying state attorneys general. All documents.

But he rejected any suggestion that his office had taken actions as a result of the lobbying, instead blaming mistakes made by his staff for moves that ended up benefiting Dickstein’s clients.

Some companies have come grudgingly to the influence game.

Executives from the company that distributes 5-Hour Energy, for example, have contributed more than $280,000 through related corporate entities in the last two years to political funds of attorneys general.

Company executives wrote those checks after the investigation into false claims and deceptive marketing, which initially involved 33 states, opened in January 2013. Requests started to come in for contributions, including a phone call this year directly from Mr. Ferguson of Washington State, whose staff was involved in the inquiry.

In a statement after the company was sued by three states in July, the company strongly denied the allegations and compared being solicited for contributions to being pressured to pay “ransom.” It asked, “Is it appropriate for an attorney general to ask for money from a company they plan to sue?”

A spokesman for Mr. Ferguson first called the allegation baseless. But after being shown a copy of an invitation to a fund-raising event that Mr. Ferguson held in May during a DAGA conference — where 5-Hour Energy was listed as a sponsor — his spokesman confirmed that Mr. Ferguson had made a personal appeal to the company.

Secluded Access

Breakfast was served on a patio overlooking the Pacific Ocean — a buffet of fresh baked goods, made-to-order eggs, lox and fruit — as the Republican attorneys general, in T-shirts and shorts, assembled at Beach Village at the Del, in Coronado, Calif.

These top law enforcement officials from Alabama, South Carolina, Nebraska, Wisconsin, Indiana and other states were joined by Ms. Kalani, of Dickstein Shapiro, and representatives from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Pfizer, Comcast and Altria, among other corporate giants.

The group had gathered at the exclusive Beach Village at the Del — where rooms go for as much as $4,500 a night and a special key card is required to enter the private compound — for the most elite event for Republican attorneys general, a gathering of the Edmund Randolph Club (named for the first United States attorney general).

The club, created by the Republican Attorneys General Association, has a $125,000 entry fee — money used to fund the campaigns of attorney general candidates with as much as $1 million, and to pay for the hotel bills, airfare and meals for the attorneys general who attend the events.

Photo

PAM BONDI Corporate sponsors or state taxpayers generally cover airfare, hotels and meals at conferences for the Florida attorney general and her counterparts. Credit Steve Cannon/Associated Press

As at the Democrats’ event, the agenda included panels to discuss emerging legal issues. But at least as important was the opportunity for the lobbyists, corporate executives and lawyers to nurture relationships with the attorneys general — and to lobby them in this casual and secluded setting. (A reporter from The Times attended this event uninvited and, once spotted, was asked to leave.)

The appeals began the moment the law enforcement officials arrived, as gift bags were handed out, including boxes of 5-Hour Energy, wine from a liquor wholesalers group and music CDs (Roy Orbison for the adults, the heartthrob Hunter Hayes for their children) from the recording industry.

Andy Abboud, a lobbyist for Las Vegas Sands, which donated $500,000 through its chief executive to the Republican group this year, has been urging attorneys general to join an effort to ban online poker. At breakfast, he approached Attorney General Pam Bondi of Florida.

“What are you going to be doing today?” he asked.

“Sailing,” Ms. Bondi replied.

“Great, I want to go sailing, too,” Mr. Abboud said, and they agreed to connect later that day.

The increased focus on state attorneys general by corporate interests has a simple explanation: to guard against legal exposure, potentially in the billions of dollars, for corporations that become targets of the state investigations.

It can be traced back two decades, when more than 40 state attorneys general joined to challenge the tobacco industry, an inquiry that resulted in a historic $206 billion settlement.

Microsoft became the target of a similar multistate attack, accused of engaging in an anticompetitive scheme by bundling its Internet Explorer with the Windows operating system. Then came the pharmaceutical industry, accused of improperly marketing drugs, and, more recently, the financial services industry, in a case that resulted in a $25 billion settlement in 2012 with the nation’s five largest mortgage servicing companies.

The trend accelerated as attorneys general — particularly Democrats — began hiring outside law firms to conduct investigations and sue corporations on a contingency basis.

The widening scope of their investigations led companies to significantly bolster efforts to influence their actions. John W. Suthers, who has served as Colorado’s attorney general for a decade, said he was not surprised by this campaign.

Photo

CHRIS KOSTER The office of the Missouri attorney general pulled out of an inquiry into 5-Hour Energy after he spoke with a lawyer from the law firm Dickstein Shapiro. Credit Whitney Curtis for The New York Times

“I don’t fault for one second that corporate America is pushing back on what has happened,” Mr. Suthers said. “Attorneys general can do more damage in a heartbeat than legislative bodies can. I think it is a matter of self-defense, and I understand it pretty well, although I have got to admit as an old-time prosecutor, it makes me a little queasy.”

Republican attorneys general were the first to create a party-based fund-raising group, 14 years ago. An initial appeal for contributions to corporate lobbyists and lawyers said that public policy was being shaped “via the courthouse rather than the statehouse.” It urged corporate lawyers “to round up your clients and come see what RAGA is all about.” The U.S. Chamber of Commerce alone has contributed $2.2 million this year to the group, making it the association’s biggest donor.

The Democrats at first fought the idea, but two years later formed a counterpart.

Dickstein, and a handful of other law firms, moved to capitalize by offering lobbying as well as legal assistance to deal with attorneys general, whom Dickstein called “the new sheriffs in town.”

In an effort to make allies rather than adversaries, Bernard Nash, the head of the attorney general practice at Dickstein and the self-proclaimed “godfather” of the field, tells clients that it is essential to build a personal relationship with important attorneys general, part of what his firm boasts as “connections that count.”

“Through their interaction with A.G.s, these individuals will become the ‘face’ of the company to A.G.s, who are less likely to demagogue companies they know and respect,” said a confidential memo that Dickstein sent late last year to one prospective client, Caesars Entertainment.

Executing this strategy means targeting the attorneys general “front office,” a reference to the handful of important decision makers.

“Front office interest or lack of interest in an issue can come from an assessment of media reports and potential media scrutiny; advocacy group requests; political benefit or detriment; legislative inquiries; and ‘pitches’ made by law firms or other professionals in whom the front office has confidence,” Dickstein said in the memo pitching business to executives at Caesars that asked the company to pay $35,000 a month, plus expenses, for lobbying and strategic advice, not including any legal work.

Mr. Nash and his team build relationships through dinners at exclusive spots like the Flagler Steakhouse in Palm Beach, Fla., and Brown’s Beach House Restaurant in Waimea, Hawaii, during attorneys general conferences, as well as with a constant stream of campaign contributions, totaling at least $730,000 in the last five years.

Dickstein is hardly alone.

Other dinner invitations have come from former Attorney General Thurbert E. Baker of Georgia, whose clients have included AT&T and the debt buyers industry; former Attorney General Patrick C. Lynch of Rhode Island, who represents payday lenders, Comcast and makers of online video games; and former Attorney General Rob McKenna of Washington State, who has been retained by Microsoft and T-Mobile.

Photo

BERNARD NASH The head of Dickstein’s attorney general practice and the field’s self-proclaimed “godfather.” Credit Gabriella Demczuk/The New York Times

In several cases, these former officials are clearly acting as lobbyists. Mr. Lynch, who declined several requests for comment, tells prospective clients that he can guide them “through the national network of attorneys general associations and work with them to build relationships,” yet The Times could find no record that he had registered as a lobbyist in more than two dozen states where he has worked.

State lobbying laws generally require registration when corporations hire someone to influence legislation, but appeals targeting attorneys general are not explicitly covered, even if a company is pushing its agenda.

The documents obtained by The Times include dozens of emails that Mr. Lynch has sent to attorneys general on behalf of clients. He is also a regular at the attorney general conferences, which include social events like trap shooting, fitness training and all-terrain-vehicle rides, in addition to cocktail parties and meals.

These conferences also include panels on topics like regulation of oil and natural gas pipelines.

Yet often a seat on these panels is, in effect, for sale. A large donation can secure the right to join a panel or provide an opportunity for a handpicked executive to make a solo presentation to a room full of attorneys general. That is what a top executive from TransCanada, the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, did at two recent attorneys general meetings in Utah and Colorado.

For the attorneys general, there is a personal benefit, too: Their airfare, meals and hotel bills at these elite resorts are generally covered, either by the corporate sponsors or state taxpayers.

Ms. Bondi, the Florida attorney general, for example, received nearly $25,000 worth of airfare, hotels and meals in the past two years just from events sponsored by the Republican Attorneys General Association, state disclosure reports show. That money came indirectly from corporate donors.

She has charged Florida taxpayers nearly $14,000 since 2011 to take additional trips to meetings of the National Association of Attorneys General and the Conference of Western Attorneys General, including travel to Hawaii. Those events were also attended by dozens of lobbyists. Ms. Bondi, in a statement, said the support she had received — directly or through the Republican Attorneys General Association — had not had an impact on any of her actions as attorney general.

But Matthew L. Myers, the president of the nonprofit Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, who was on a panel about e-cigarettes at an event in Park City, Utah, was startled by what he saw: lobbyists from regulated industries — financial, energy, alcohol, tobacco and pharmaceutical companies — socializing with top state law enforcement officers.

“You play golf with somebody, you are much less likely to see them as a piranha that is trying to devour consumers, even if that is just what they are,” said Mr. Myers.

Photo

“My client just received notification that Missouri is on this.” LORI KALANI, a Dickstein partner, discussing the 5-Hour Energy case with the state’s attorney general. Credit Gabriella Demczuk/The New York Times

Mr. Tierney, the former Maine attorney general, said that lobbyists were entitled to set up a meeting with the attorneys general in their offices. But to write a check, for as much as $125,000, to gain days’ worth of private time with the attorneys general is another matter, he said.

“When you start to connect the actual access to money, and the access involves law enforcement officials, you have clearly crossed a line,” he said. “What is going on is shocking, terrible.”

An Ear in Missouri

In Missouri, as in other states, the attorney general’s office has provided a springboard to higher office, either to the governor’s mansion or the Senate. So even before Mr. Koster was sworn in for his second term, he was being mentioned as a candidate for higher office. And that made him an ideal target for the team at Dickstein.

The Dickstein lawyers have donated to his campaigns, invited him and his chief deputy to be featured speakers at law firm events and hosted Mr. Koster at dinners, and stayed in close contact with his office in emails that suggest unusual familiarity.

The relationship seems to have benefited some Dickstein clients.

Pfizer, the New York-based pharmaceutical giant, had hired Dickstein to help settle a case brought by at least 20 states, which accused the company of illegally marketing two of its drugs — Zyvox and Lyrica — for unapproved uses, or making exaggerated claims about their effectiveness.

Instead of participating in the unified investigation with other states — which gives attorneys general greater negotiating power — Mr. Koster’s office worked directly with Mr. Nash and Pfizer’s assistant general counsel, Markus Green.

Mr. Nash negotiated with Deputy Attorney General Joseph P. Dandurand through a series of emails, followed by a visit to Missouri in April 2013.

But both Pfizer and Dickstein had already built a relationship with Mr. Koster. Dickstein had participated in at least four fund-raising events for Mr. Koster, with its lawyers and the firm donating $13,500 to his campaigns, records show.

Several of those contributions came after Mr. Nash had invited Mr. Koster to participate in an “executive briefing” at the Park Hyatt for Dickstein’s clients. That same day, Mr. Koster held a fund-raising event, taking in contributions from Mr. Nash and other lawyers involved in matters that Mr. Koster would soon be, or already was, investigating, the records show.

Photo

“The folks at Pfizer are very appreciative and excited to hear from the General.” J. B. KELLY, a Dickstein partner, writing to a Missouri official about an appearance by the attorney general at an event sponsored by Pfizer. Credit Gabriella Demczuk/The New York Times

Pfizer had directly donated at least $20,000 to Mr. Koster since 2009 — more than it gave to any other state attorney general, according to company records. That does not include the $320,000 that Pfizer donated during the same period to the Democratic Attorneys General Association, which in turn has donated to Mr. Koster’s campaigns.

Mr. Koster said his office was forced to negotiate directly with Mr. Nash and Pfizer because a staff lawyer missed a deadline to participate in the multistate investigation.

“This was an accident,” Mr. Koster said, adding that since he became attorney general in 2009, his office has participated in six cases against Pfizer that brought a total of $26 million to Missouri.

But the emails show that just as the negotiations on the 2013 case were intensifying, Mr. Koster’s chief deputy received an unusual invitation: Would the attorney general be interested in flying to Chicago to be the keynote speaker at a breakfast that Pfizer was sponsoring for its political action committee?

The topic was “the importance of corporations’ building productive relationships with A.G.s,” according to an email in March from Dickstein to Mr. Dandurand.

“As you know, these relationships are important to allow A.G.s and corporations to work together to address important public policy issues of concern to both the A.G. and the corporation,” the invitation said. “The conference participants also would like to hear how these relationships can help to efficiently address A.G.s’ questions or concerns before they escalate into major problems (like multistate investigations or litigation), as well as how they can carry over when A.G.s are elected to higher offices.”

Mr. Dandurand worked to accommodate the request.

“Trying now to clear his calendar,” Mr. Dandurand wrote back to the Dickstein lawyer, before confirming that Mr. Koster would accept the invitation.

“The folks at Pfizer are very appreciative and excited to hear from the General,” J. B. Kelly, a partner at Dickstein, replied.

Five days later — and just before Mr. Koster was scheduled to give the speech — Mr. Dandurand and Mr. Nash met to discuss a settlement in the fraud investigation. They agreed that Pfizer would pay Missouri $750,000 — at least $350,000 less than it would have collected if it had been part of the multistate investigation.

Photo

Rob McKenna of Washington State. Credit Greg Gilbert/The Seattle Times, via Associated Press

“Thank you for the meeting,” Mr. Nash wrote to Mr. Dandurand, after the settlement meeting in Missouri. “Pfizer is pleased.”

Mr. Koster said Missouri received a smaller payment from Pfizer because the state had less leverage after missing the multistate deadline. Oregon, the other state to negotiate directly with Pfizer on the Zyvox matter, secured a settlement worth $3.4 million — four times what Missouri received — even though Oregon’s population is far smaller.

Pfizer was not the only Dickstein client pleased with the firm’s representation before Mr. Koster’s office.

AT&T was also subject to an investigation by Mr. Koster’s office, something that Mr. Nash learned at the conference held at the Loews hotel. And like Ms. Kalani, Mr. Nash pleaded his case directly with Mr. Koster.

Three weeks after the conversation with Mr. Nash, Mr. Koster’s office took a step that questioned the legal strategy of a multistate investigation of AT&T’s billing practices, email records show. Mr. Koster did not officially back out of the inquiry, and Missouri ultimately benefited from a national settlement announced this month.

But frustrating leaders of the multistate investigation, Mr. Koster decided to join a small group of attorneys general who, to the industry’s pleasure, wanted to resolve the matter without subpoenas or the threat of a lawsuit, the emails show.

AT&T has been a major campaign contributor to Mr. Koster’s political causes, donating more than $27,000 in just the last two years, half before and half after his actions regarding the investigation.

Mr. Koster said the donations had no effect on his actions, adding that he was determined to investigate the company for its deceptive billing practices. With 5-Hour Energy, he added, he pulled out of the investigation because he did not believe it was merited — adding that he personally uses the energy drink.

Yet he said he was angry that his staff had not notified him before joining investigations into these two major companies.

Photo

Patrick C. Lynch of Rhode Island. Credit Stew Milne/Associated Press

“Its stock price would move at the mere mention of our involvement,” Mr. Koster said, referring to AT&T.

Mr. Nash’s appeals were not finished.

A month after returning from the Santa Monica meeting, Mr. Koster adopted a new office policy requiring lawyers and managers in his consumer affairs division to get approval from his top aides before opening any investigations involving a publicly traded company or any company with more than 10 employees.

Mr. Nash and Lisa A. Rickard, a senior executive from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, were so pleased with the change that they asked Mr. Koster to give a talk about his new office policy at a meeting of attorneys general in Washington.

“This is going to be titled my Lisa Rickard memorial presentation,” Mr. Koster said at the February 2014 meeting. “She was the one who initiated this idea.”

The email records also reveal the personal nature of the relationship between Mr. Koster’s office and the lawyers at Dickstein.

In an August 2013 exchange, in which the attorney general’s office assured Mr. Nash that it would not share potentially damaging information on a Dickstein client with another state attorney general who was investigating the company — saying the documents were considered confidential — the conversation took a sudden turn away from business.

“Let’s go bowling sometime,” Mr. Dandurand wrote.

“Thanks,” Mr. Nash wrote back. “I’d rather eat and drink with you any time, any place.”

And an Ear in Florida

The email records show a similarly detailed interaction with the office of Ms. Bondi, the Florida attorney general and a fast-rising star in the Republican Party.

Mr. Nash and his partners worked to help Ms. Bondi further her political ambitions at the same time they were lobbying her office on behalf of companies under investigation by it.

Photo

Thurbert E. Baker of Georgia. Credit Associated Press

Accretive Health, a Chicago-based hospital bill collection company, whose operations in Minnesota had been shut down by the attorney general’s office there for abusive collection practices, had turned to Dickstein Shapiro to try to make sure that other states did not follow Minnesota’s lead. Mr. Nash contacted Ms. Bondi’s chief deputy and urged the office to take no action.

“We persuaded A.G.s not to sue Accretive Health following the filing of a lawsuit by the Minnesota A.G.,” Dickstein wrote in a recent marketing brochure.

Bridgepoint Education, a for-profit online school that has been under scrutiny for what Mr. Miller, the Iowa attorney general, called “unconscionable sales practices,” turned to Dickstein to set up meetings with Ms. Bondi’s staff, to urge her not to join in the inquiries underway in several states. Again, her office decided not to take up the matter, citing the small number of complaints about Bridgepoint it has received.

Dickstein set up a similar meeting for Herbalife, which has been investigated by federal and state authorities for sales practices related to its nutritional shakes and other products. No investigation was opened; again, Ms. Bondi’s staff said her office had received few complaints.

Perhaps the greatest victory in Florida for Dickstein relates to a lawsuit filed by Ms. Bondi’s predecessor against online reservation companies, including Travelocity and Priceline, which Dickstein then represented, based on allegations that they were conspiring to improperly withhold taxes on hotel rooms booked in the state.

Local officials in Florida were confounded by the fact that the case, which was filed before Ms. Bondi was sworn in, suddenly seemed to come to a halt.

“As our state’s highest-ranking law enforcement official, and as the people’s attorney, you have the authority to pursue action on behalf of the citizens of Florida,” Mayor Rick Kriseman of St. Petersburg, a Democrat, wrote to Ms. Bondi in 2011, while he was a state legislator, estimating that Florida was losing $100 million a year.

Behind the scenes, Dickstein had been working to get the case dropped.

“Thank you so much for chatting with me last week about the online travel site suit,” said a January 2012 email to Deputy Attorney General Patricia A. Conners from Christopher M. Tampio, a former lobbyist for the convenience store industry who was hired to work in Dickstein’s attorney general practice, even though he is not a lawyer or a registered lobbyist in Florida.

A year later, a second round of emails arrived in Ms. Bondi’s office: first, one inviting Ms. Bondi or her top aide to dinner at Ristorante Tosca in Washington, and then one from a Dickstein lawyer pointing out that similar online travel cases had recently been dismissed by Florida judges.

Photo

HOTEL DEL CORONADO A conference of the Republican Attorneys General Association was held in June in Coronado, Calif. Representatives from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Pfizer, Comcast and Altria, as well as a Dickstein Shapirolawyer, attended the event. Credit Sandy Huffaker for The New York Times

The email records provided to The Times show no response to Dickstein, other than a terse “thanks.” But two months later, Ms. Bondi’s office moved to do what the firm had sought.

“Dismissed before hearing,” the state court docket shows, as the case was closed in April 2013 even before it was officially taken up by the court.

A spokesman for Ms. Bondi said her office had dropped the matter after concluding, as Dickstein had argued, that state tax law was ambiguous. The office urged the State Legislature to clarify the matter. But several Florida counties have continued to pursue the matter, taking it to the State Supreme Court.

Dickstein also took unusual steps to promote Ms. Bondi’s political career.

The firm’s lawyers helped arrange a cover article for Ms. Bondi in a magazine called InsideCounsel, which is distributed to corporate lawyers, and invited her, as it did Mr. Koster, to appear at an event in Washington that included the firm’s clients.

And as with Mr. Koster, the assistance included direct political contributions. Mr. Nash was a sponsor of an elaborate fund-raising event this year in Ms. Bondi’s honor at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach, owned by Donald J. Trump, which is considered one of the most opulent mansions in the United States.

Ms. Bondi, in a statement, said none of these efforts had affected her decisions.

“My office aggressively protects Floridians from unfair and deceptive business practices, and absolutely no access to me or my staff is going to have any bearing on my efforts to protect Floridians,” she said.

The Revolving Door

In at least 31 states and in Congress, elected officials are banned from lobbying their former colleagues during a cooling-off period, which is intended to limit their ability to cash in on their contacts. Once they do start to lobby, they are required to register to disclose the work.

But even in states like Georgia, where the law prohibits state officials from registering as lobbyists or engaging in lobbying for one year after leaving office, a former attorney general made appeals almost immediately to his former office.

Mr. Baker, who left his post as the state’s attorney general in January 2011, wrote repeatedly that year to the office of his successor, Sam Olens, and to Mr. Olens’s chief deputy, who had served in the same role during Mr. Baker’s tenure, to ask them to take actions that would benefit AT&T, which he had been hired to represent.

“Hi Thurbert,” Jeff Milsteen, Georgia’s chief deputy attorney general, replied to one of the emails that Mr. Baker sent to him in 2011, as Mr. Baker sought his successor’s public support for the proposed merger between T-Mobile and AT&T. “I’ll let you know as soon as I can.”

The next day, Mr. Milsteen wrote back. “I’ve talked to Sam,” he said, “and he is fine with you adding him to the letter.”

A spokesman for Mr. Olens said that he saw nothing wrong with the exchanges because Mr. Baker was acting as a lawyer, not as a lobbyist, and therefore was exempt from the one-year ban — which covers only lobbying of the legislature or the governor, not the attorney general.

But Mr. Baker declined, when asked by The Times, to identify a single legal filing concerning AT&T that he had been involved with. He wrote back to say that this definition of “lawyer” was too narrow.

“Lawyers are advocates,” he said.

In Washington State, both Mr. McKenna, the former attorney general, and Mr. Moran, who had been his top deputy, were pressing their former colleagues within months of leaving their jobs last year, on behalf of clients including Microsoft and T-Mobile, emails show.

For Mr. McKenna, it was quite a turnaround. He had sued T-Mobile in September 2011 to block its proposed merger with AT&T. Now, as a corporate lawyer, Mr. McKenna was setting up meetings with his successor, Mr. Ferguson, to ask him to intervene with federal officials on T-Mobile’s behalf in the inquiry over whether the company was seeking to prevent its competitors from acquiring what it thought was too large a share of the available federal wireless spectrum.

“I write today on behalf of the millions of consumers of wireless and mobile computing services,” said a letter, drafted initially by T-Mobile, but sent out by Mr. Ferguson in January, although it made no mention of the role played by the company or the former attorney general.

Email records show a similar intervention by Mr. McKenna on behalf of Washington State-based Microsoft, with outcomes that brought praise from the corporate executives. “I know that Microsoft was very pleased that you made yourself available,” Mr. McKenna wrote to Mr. Ferguson last October. “Thank you again.”

Mr. Baker and Mr. McKenna are both regulars at the attorneys general retreats. As former attorneys general, they are also special guests at events of the Society of Attorneys General Emeritus.

They have good company in the SAGE club: More than a dozen of the members are now lawyers and lobbyists for corporations, or work at plaintiff’s law firms that are seeking to secure commission-based contracts and then sue corporations on a state’s behalf.

The schedule of attorney general conferences for the coming year is laid out — after a pause for the elections — with events set for the Fontainebleau resort in Miami Beach, the Four Seasons Hotel at Mandalay Bay in Las Vegas and the Grand Wailea resort on Maui, among many others. The invitations for corporate sponsorships are already being sent.

==

  1. Neutron Interactive. Last fall, Republic Report exposedSalt Lake City-based Neutron’s bait-and-switch scam — posting fake job listings and then trying to sell the desperate job-seekers overpriced for-profit college programs. Former employees involved in implementing this cruel hoax told me that one customer company was Corinthian. The creditor list provides further evidence that Corinthian and Neutron were in business together. UPDATE 10:40 am: Neutron’s partner call center, [EduTrek, whose employees first blew the whistle on this scam, is also on the creditor list (as “Edu Trek”).]

2. Dickstein Shapiro, the powerhouse Washington DC law firm, one of whose specialties, as described in the New York Times, is currying favor with state attorneys general on behalf of corporate clients, including, as the firm acknowledges in its own promotional brochure, Corinthian Colleges. 37 state attorneys general are now investigating abuses at for-profit colleges.

3. APSCU, the for-profit colleges’ Washington DC lobbying group, which has pressed policymakers to abandon common sense rules that would hold accountable predatory actors like Corinthian. Corinthian is no longer an APSCU member, just an APSCU debtor.

4. Something called the “Higher Ed Allied Leaders Coalition,” located at the same DC address as Akerman LLP, one of the two DC law firms recently registered as lobbyists for Corinthian.

5. The American Council on Education. The Corinthian creditors list includes three different departments of ACE, the leading lobby group for U.S. colleges and universities, including the “membership department.” What was Corinthian’s relationship with ACE? [UPDATE May 8: Corinthian was indeed a member of ACE; it joined in 2007.]

Ms. Kalani’s firm, Dickstein Shapiro, had courted the attorney general at dinners and conferences and with thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. Mr. Koster told Ms. Kalani that he was unaware of the investigation, and he reached for his phone and called his office. By the end of the weekend, he had ordered his staff to pull out of the inquiry, a clear victory for 5-Hour Energy.

==

Zausner - SourceWatch

:{:(style="border-color:#006621;;border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;margin-left:3px;top:8.5px;margin-top:-4px;position:absolute;left:0px"):}:

-

:{Sep 25, 2012 - L. Andrew Zausner (Lawyer, :{Dickstein Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: Morin * Oshinsky LLP): Member of Philip Morris' Appropriations Working Group (c. 1996), which  ...:(style="word-wrap:break-word"):}:

www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Dennis_Hastert

:{:(style="border-color:#006621;;border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;margin-left:3px;top:8.5px;margin-top:-4px;position:absolute;left:0px"):}:

-

:{From :{SourceWatch:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: ... retired from Congress in at the end of 2007 and joined the Public Policy & Law Practice of the lobbying firm :{Dickstein Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: in 2008.:(style="word-wrap:break-word"):}:

www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Albert_Kramer

:{:(style="border-color:#006621;;border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;margin-left:3px;top:8.5px;margin-top:-4px;position:absolute;left:0px"):}:

-

:{Jul 4, 2007 - Albert Kramer "joined :{Dickstein Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: as a partner in 1995 and is head of the Firm's Communications Practice. "Mr. Kramer has extensive  ...:(style="word-wrap:break-word"):}:

www.dicksteinshapiro.com/about-us

:{:(style="border-color:#006621;;border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;margin-left:3px;top:8.5px;margin-top:-4px;position:absolute;left:0px"):}:

-

Dickstein Shapiro:{:(style="border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;top:8.5px;position:absolute;margin-left:6px;margin-top:-3px;border-color:#aaaaaa;"):}:

:{:{Dickstein Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: LLP, Market Leading Specialty Firm(SM), founded in 1953, is internationally recognized for its work with clients, from start-ups to Fortune 500 ...:(style="word-wrap:break-word"):}:

Missing: sourcewatch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Dickstein**_**Shapiro**

:{:(style="border-color:#006621;;border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;margin-left:3px;top:8.5px;margin-top:-4px;position:absolute;left:0px"):}:

-

Wikipedia:{:(style="border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;top:8.5px;position:absolute;margin-left:6px;margin-top:-3px;border-color:#aaaaaa;"):}:

:{:{Dickstein Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: LLP (formerly :{Dickstein:(style="font-weight:bold"):}:, :{Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}:, Morin & Oshinsky) is a large U.S. law firm and lobbying group based in Washington, D.C., with five offices ...:(style="word-wrap:break-word"):}:

Missing: sourcewatch

research.easybib.com/research/index/search?search=%22Pete...

:{:(style="border-color:#006621;;border-style:solid;border-width:4px 4px 0px;width:0px;height:0px;margin-left:3px;top:8.5px;margin-top:-4px;position:absolute;left:0px"):}:

-

:{9 results - :{SourceWatch:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: - http://www.:{sourcewatch:(style="font-weight:bold"):}:.org/index.php?title=Pete_Hoekstra... And Intelligence Committee Chairman, Joins :{Dickstein Shapiro:(style="font-weight:bold"):}: -- WASH.:(style="word-wrap:break-word"):}:

Contents

  [hide] 

Practice areas:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

The firm is divided into six practice groups, each of which handle various aspects of their respective specialties: Complex Dispute resolution, Corporate & Finance, Government Law & Strategy (includes lobbying, political law, regulatory law and government contracts), Insurance coverage, Intellectual property, and Litigation.

Pro Bono

Dickstein Shapiro has been recognized by the DC Bar for its leadership in pro bono representation.[5] It is one of the law firms representing the detainees at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp.

History:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

Dickstein Shapiro was founded by Sidney Dickstein and David I. Shapiro in New York City in 1953. By 1956, the firm moved its headquarters to Washington, DC.[6] The firm quickly established its reputation by winning several high-profile cases, including Silver v. New York Stock Exchange before the United States Supreme Court.

Over the following decades, the firm grew organically and through lateral hiring. In 2001, Dickstein Shapiro merged with Roberts, Sheridan & Kotel, a New York boutique firm that had spun off from Cravath, Swaine & Moore and which was primarily focused on corporate finance and tax law.[7]

In 2012, the firm entered into merger discussions with San Francisco-based international firm Pillsbury Winthrop, but those talks ended by early 2013.[8]

Dickstein Shapiro hired former Republican Speaker of the HouseDennis Hastertas a lobbyist shortly after he resigned his seat in Congress. Hastert was later indicted in May 2015 on charges of illegally withdrawing money from banks to pay hush money to an individual that he committed misconduct against years ago. Hastert resigned his lobbyist position the day the indictment was unsealed. Hastert's biography was quickly removed from the firm's website, and the firm also purged all mentions of Hastert from its previously posted press releases.[9] Hastert's resignation from Dickstein Shapiro following the indictment against him left the law firm and lobbying firm "reeling," according to news reports.[9] The firm's lobbying business had already been struggling;it was reported that the firm had billed $130,000 on behalf of eight clients for the first quarter of 2015, "not close to being on track for its overall 2014 billings, when it brought in $3.7 million for the year."[9] In the few years preceding the indictment, Dickstein Shapiro had already "faced anexodus of ... talent"to rival firms Greenberg Traurig and Cozen O'Connor, as well as "the loss of major client contracts" including Lorillard Tobacco Co., Peabody Energy Corp., Bayer Corp., and Covanta Energy Corp.[9]Following the Hastert indictment, it was reported that Dickstein Shapiro's biggest domestic client, Fuels America, terminated its lobbying contract with the firm.[9]

Offices:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

Notable lawyers and employees:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

Notable alumni:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

Notable Clients:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

References:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

  1. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Kelly's attorney bio
  2. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-AmLaw_2-1) AmLaw200 Performance Statistics, 2007
  3. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Firm Website
  4. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Press release mentioning name change
  5. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ "D.C. Bar Raises $650,000 for Pro Bono". BLT- Blog of the Legal Times. Legal Times. Retrieved 2012-11-30.
  6. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Kashino, Marisa M. (February 1, 2012). "Hey, That’s My Name on the Building". Washingtonian. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
  7. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Balestier, Bruce (January 24, 2001). "Roberts Sheridan Merges With D.C.’s Dickstein Shapiro" (PDF). New York Law Journal. Retrieved November 28, 2012.
  8. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Post, Ashley (14 January 2013). "Pillsbury, Dickstein end merger talks". Inside Counsel. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  9. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Reeling_9-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Reeling_9-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Reeling_9-3) e(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Reeling_9-4) Parti, Tarini; Palmer, Anna (June 4, 2015). "Dennis Hastert’s lobbying firm reeling after indictment". Politico. Retrieved June 11, 2015.
  10. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Glanzer's firm bio
  11. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Cranson, Jeff (February 1, 2011). "Former U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra named senior adviser at Washington law and lobbying firm". The Grand Rapids Press. Retrieved February 23, 2011.
  12. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Hutchinson's firm bio
  13. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Tydings' firm bio
  14. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Wynn's firm bio
  15. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Ford's firm bio
  16. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/243410-hastert-resigns-lobbying-position-after-indictment
  17. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Sorkin's firm bio
  18. ^ :{Jump up to::(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^a b(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-1) c(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-2) d(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-3) e(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-4) f(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-5) g(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-6) h(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-7) i(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-8) j(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-9) k(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-10) l(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-11) m(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-12) n(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-13) o(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-14) p(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-15) q(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-16) r(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-17) s(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickstein_Shapiro#cite_ref-Firm_Experience_18-18) Firm Experience
  19. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ "firm bio of attorney Barry William Levine".
  20. :{Jump up:(style="top:-99999px;clip:rect(1px 1px 1px 1px);overflow:hidden;position:absolute !important;padding:0px !important;border:0px !important;height:1px !important;width:1px !important;-webkit-user-select:none"):}:^ Frankel, Alison (2012-06-27). "Supreme Court forces Nike to defend its right not to defend its trademarks". Thomson Reuters. Retrieved 12/7/2012. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)

External links:{:(style="margin-right:0px;margin-left:0px"):}:[edit:{]}:

Categories: 

Biography

Andrew L. Zausner is a partner at Dickstein Shapiro Morin & Oshinsky LLP and is head of the Firm's Public Policy & Law Group, with an emphasis on the Firm's legislative activities.

Tobacco Lobbying Work

According to the US Senate Lobbying Database, Andrew Zausner and his team at the law firm Dickstein & Shapiro did more that $2.6 million worth of lobby work in 2011 on behalf of tobacco companies.[1]

Zausner is a partner at the Washington, DC based law firm Dickstein & Shapiro and is part of their Public Policy & Law Practice with an emphasis on the company's legislative activities. While Andrew Zausner is listed as lobbying in 2011 on other issues like waste-to-energy and biofuel, the majority of money reported is for work for tobacco companies.

Lorrillard, the third largest US manufacturer of cigarrettes including popular brands like Kent and Newport, paid Dickstein & Shapiro $2.6 million for lobbying services mainly targeting the US Senate, the House of Representatives and the Beurea of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF).

Andrew Zausner and his team worked on many issues on behalf of Lorillard including:

"Monitor[ing] federal legislation and activity related to the tobacco industry."

"Mnitor the implementation of amily Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act." [sic]

The "Candy Tobacco Tax Parity Act of 2011."

Swisher International, the maker of sweet cigars and flavored tobacco, paid Dickson & Shapiro $140,000 in 2011 for lobbying services targeting the US Senate and House of Representatives. Andrew Zausner and his team worked on many issues for Swisher including,

"Monitor the implementation of PACT Act." (A bill designed to prevent tobacco smuggling)

The "Candy Tobacco Tax Parity Act of 2011."

"Healthy Lifestyles and Prevention America Act"

Andrew Zausner and his team are also listed as doing a small amount of work ($11,000) in 2011 for the Cigar Association of America on similar issues as those listed above for Swisher and Lorrilard.

The US Senate Lobbyist Database does not list the exact nature of the lobbying activities, nor does it disclose which members of the US Senate and US House of Representatives that Zausner and his team met with. We do however know how much money was paid to Dickstein & Shapiro for the work and the general issues that they were working on for their clients.

According to his company bio, Zausner has, "has concentrated on are the Energy Policy Act of 1992, the National Energy Security Act of 1991, and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990." There is no mention in his bio of the work he has been doing on behalf tobacco companies. From 1979 to 1985 Zausner worked for Pennzoil, the manufacturer of motor oil and related products. Prior to that Zausner spent two years in the US Department of Energy. Zausner also worked for a short time at the Cigar Association of America.

"Mr. Kramer has extensive experience in matters affecting telecommunications and related equipment, technology, and other issues. He was General Counsel to the North American Telecommunications Association(NATA), then the primary trade association of customer premises equipment manufacturers and vendors. He guided NATA’s efforts from first obtaining permission to interconnect customer-owned equipment to the public-switched telephone network, through the divestiture of AT&T, to the 1996 Telecommunications Act, and on to a completely deregulated state, where the right to interconnect customer equipment to the network is unquestioned and has made possible an explosion of innovation on the edge of the network. By firmly establishing the rights of interconnection, Mr. Kramer helped to achieve NATA’s objectives, and NATA merged with another association...

"Prior to joining Dickstein Shapiro, Mr. Kramer was a partner in telecommunications law at Keck, Mahin & Cate. He served as Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection of the Federal Trade Commission from 1977 to 1981." [1]

External links

==

bs

=

White Collar Criminal Defense & Investigations

When under the government’s microscope, you need an ally who can see the big picture.

At the core of our White Collar Criminal Defense & Investigations Practice—ranked Tier 1 in Washington, DC by U.S. News—is a team of attorneys led by Barry Levine and Barbara “Biz” Van Gelder, many of whom are former federal and state prosecutors, agency enforcement attorneys, and congressional staffers, who have more than 30 years of experience handling government investigations for clients.

"First-rate"

“They provide first-rate counsel based on decades of experience and help navigate extremely tricky matters safely."

Chambers USA

Contact Us

Former Federal Election Commission Chairman Scott Thomas, who leads the firm’s Political Law Practice, regularly advises our attorneys on a wide array of government matters.

Our clients include corporations, board committees, financial institutions—as well as officers, directors, and executives in those organizations—facing high-risk federal, state, or local criminal or regulatory investigations; congressional inquiries; government agency investigations; and complex internal investigations. Our attorneys use their experience and skill to design and implement strategies to resolve these sensitive matters discreetly and without public scrutiny, while helping firm clients maintain business stability. When quiet resolution is not possible, however, our attorneys are aggressive advocates and have an enviable record of litigation success at trial.

Our attorneys assist clients with matters before virtually every federal agency, and our experience crosses a wide range of issues, including:

Antitrust

Banking

Congressional investigations

Customs and export controls

Election law

False Claims Act

Financial services

Food and drug

Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (FCPA)

Government contracts

Government ethics

Health care

Life sciences

Internal investigations

Lobby Disclosure Act

Securities (insider trading)

State Attorneys General actions

White collar criminal defense

Putting Our Full Set of Experience to Work

Our white collar defense team coordinates with our nationally recognized Insurance Coverage Group to review clients’ insurance policies to ascertain whether coverage is available for defense and settlement costs. The team’s work also often intersects with our Financial Restructuring and Bankruptcy and Employment Practices.

Taking advantage of the firm’s experience with federal and state prosecutors, regulators, and State Attorneys General, as well as its extensive capabilities in complex multiparty litigation, we routinely guide clients through the maze of concurrent parallel proceedings, including civil and administrative enforcement actions, derivative and private class actions, and suspension and debarment proceedings.

Our attorneys understand that today’s regulatory environment requires businesses to be particularly sensitive to corporate compliance and strong corporate governance practices. Dickstein Shapiro works closely with our clients to develop policies and procedures designed to detect and resolve issues before they become problems.

==

==

Attorney General Pam Bondi of Florida, after taking a free ride on a chartered jet last year to a resort island far from her home state, made an unusual offer to one of the corporate lawyers from Washington who helped foot the bill: an invitation to stay at her Tampa home while recuperating from surgery.

The hospitality was extended to Lori Kalani, a lobbyist and lawyer from Dickstein Shapiro, the Washington-based firm that specializes in building personal relationships with state attorneys general to help corporate clients avoid becoming targets of investigation.

The circumstances of the trip to Mackinac Island, Mich., and the subsequent offer to host Ms. Kalani in convalescence were uncovered as part of a continuing investigation by The New York Times into the relationship between private lawyers and state attorneys general. They make vivid how aggressively Dickstein and firms like it have worked in recent years to try to influence top state law enforcement officials.