webodec3ARCHIVEPreview
Open in TheBrain

Simon Clark Climate Adam

---

MERRI OK

2 DIFF GUYS // just have think

-=-=

-=-=

Oct 21, 2026 #tomcruise #digger #diggermovie

Tom Cruise's latest Hollywood epic movie is Digger - a tale of an oil tychoon bringing about the end of the world through climate change. And it's a disaster movie in every sense - depicting climate collapse... and also a disaster at the box office - losing millions of dollars. So is Digger a good movie? And is its depiction of fossil fuels and climate change a disaster as well??

METHANE ~ BOMB?

Support ClimateAdam on patreon: / climateadam

#tomcruise #digger #diggermovie #ClimateChange

bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/climateadam....

instagram: / climate_adam

MORE INFO

https://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/14/op...

https://grist.org/culture/digger-movi...

https://carnegieendowment.org/emissar...

THANKS

Climate Scientist Watches Digger Movie (so you don't have to)

---

RCP 8.5

Climate Scientists Were Wrong... That's a good thing - YouTube

BONUS INTERVIEW: Scientist and YouTuber Simon Clark explains why we've been lied to about net zero. 5 26

Is Net Zero Really Destroying the Economy? - YouTube

POD SAVE UK

Climate Change is Destroying Lives... Now - YouTube5 26 4 ppl lives

---

LOMBORG ASKED EPSTEIN FOR $ CLIMATE ADAM

---

Should lying about climate change be illegal? - YouTube

Should lying about climate change be illegal?

Simon Clark

724K subscribers

172,042 views Sep 24, 2025

Lying about climate change has never been more dangerous. What can we do about it? Get learning with Brilliant (and get 20% off): https://brilliant.org/simonclarkMAIN REFERENCES

NUMBERED REFERENCES: https://www.simonoxfphys.com/blog/202...

---

very good on ai hype

Climate Scientist Reacts to AI Overlords - YouTube

Climate Scientist Reacts to AI Overlords

ClimateAdam

66.8K subscribers

26,195 views Jan 28, 2026 #ClimateChange #ai

Artificial Intelligence is here, and it's changing the world. But when it comes to climate change, whether those AI changes are going to save us or doom us depends heavily on who you ask. I take a look at what our AI Overlord CEOs have been saying about climate change, and about AI's huge energy needs. And see just how much they contradict each other and themselves - especially when it comes to the vast amounts of energy our AI future (might) need, and the climate change consequences this would cause. Featuring Sam Altman, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Eric Schmidt, and Sundar Pichai. Support ClimateAdam on patreon: / climateadam

---

Simon Clark

yt Simon Clark - YouTube

---

The misinformation situation is worse than you think - YouTube

nebula strem service

The misinformation situation is worse than you think 54 MIN VERY GOOD

Simon Clark

698K subscribers

78,265 views Dec 23, 2025

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Make your donation have the maximum impact: https://givewell.org (pick YOUTUBE and then Simon Clark at checkout) The handbook: https://zenodo.org/records/15696097Become a patron at / simonoxfphysREFERENCES 1. https://web.archive.org/web/202501040...2. https://www.epa.gov/climatechange-sci...3. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...4. https://www.latimes.com/california/st...5. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/03...6. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...7. https://www.theguardian.com/environme...8. https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/d...9. https://www.politico.com/news/2025/12...10. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...11. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety/ab...12. https://www.merchantsofdoubt.org/13. https://www.barbarafreese.com/industr...14. https://www.amacad.org/publication/da...15. https://www.csis.org/blogs/brexit-bit...16. https://www.weforum.org/press/2024/01...17. https://www.theguardian.com/environme...18. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/us...19. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2...20. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-l...21. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/15/bu...22. https://www.science.org/content/artic...23. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wor...24. https://www.snopes.com/news/2025/12/1...25. https://usclimatealliance.org/26. https://zenodo.org/records/1569609727. https://bbc.com/news/articles/c307zq8...28. https://hsph.harvard.edu/news/usaid-s...29. https://www.impactcounter.com/dashboa...--------- II ---------More about me - https://www.simonoxfphys.com/My second channel - / simonclarkerrataMy book - https://geni.us/firmament--------- II ---------Music by Epidemic Sound: http://nebula.tv/epidemicSome stock footage courtesy of Getty. Edited by Luke Negus. Research by Ian Campbell.

simpson say the line bart

3:49

you should read Merchants of Doubt.

3:51

Yeah.

3:52

Or more recently, Industrial Strength

Denial by Barbara Freeze. In fact,

3:55

there's a whole field called agnattology

3:57

that studies the deliberate creation of

4:00

misinformation and specifically

4:01

culturally induced ignorance or doubt.

4:04

Recently, a lot of researchers attention

4:06

has been paid to how governments

...

4:28

Basically, everyone agrees that this is

4:30

happening and has varying degrees of

4:32

effectiveness. It likely contributed to

4:34

the UK's decision to leave the EU in

4:36

2016, for example. And for a time,

4:37

people started listening to

4:38

misinformation researchers about these

4:40

problems. In 2024, the World Economic

4:42

Forum named disinformation the top

4:44

global risk to the progress of human

4:46

development. In the aftermath of the CO9

4:48

pandemic, political pressure convinced

4:50

social media companies to dedicate

4:52

spending resources to limit the spread

4:54

of false information on their platforms,

4:56

develop new features, and even provide

4:57

some limited support to fact-checking

...

5:48

institutions that produce real

5:50

information in the first place. And

5:52

you're probably already aware of this,

5:53

but what many people don't know is that

5:55

the Trump administration is also going

5:57

after agnitologists, people studying how

6:00

to stop the spread of false information,

6:02

misinformation researchers, content

6:04

moderators, and fact checkers. Earlier

6:07

this year, um they cancelled over a

6:09

billion dollars in misinformation

6:11

research grants and also permanently

6:15

closed many uh research funding sources

6:17

that misinformation researchers relied

6:19

on. For example, they closed the US

6:23

Department of Defense's Minerva program,

6:25

which used social scientists to, you

6:27

know, combat foreign misinformation and

6:30

other threats to national security. The

6:32

biggest one was that cut to existing

6:36

misinformation grants. In fact, so many

6:38

people like me who are at more of a

6:40

junior level just

6:43

we we can't have careers in this

6:45

anymore. It's not funded anymore. Can

6:47

you tell me about the industrial

6:49

censorship complex? Cuz that's the term

6:51

they've been using. They've been holding

6:53

congressional hearings about this,

6:54

right?

6:54

They've come up with a novel legal

6:57

strategy which in normal times would

6:59

just be laughed out of question. any

7:03

sort of content moderation on social

7:06

media, any kind of investigative

7:08

journalism that is engaging in

...

7:12

something's true or not. Misinformation

7:14

research or interventions to stop

7:16

misinformation, fact-checking in

7:18

general, that's censorship. In fact,

7:21

it's infringing on the First Amendment

7:24

rights of I'm I'm checking my notes

7:28

here. the government itself, people in

7:31

government, our elected representatives.

7:34

That's the exact opposite of what the

7:36

First Amendment is about, which is about

7:38

the government not telling anyone else

7:40

what they can and cannot say. It's

7:42

specifically a protection against the

7:45

government censoring other people, not

7:48

the other way around, which is kind of

7:50

ridiculous if you think about it. I was

7:52

literally talking to another

7:54

misinformation researcher who was

7:55

visiting and the very first question

7:58

they had to me when I mentioned, "Oh

8:00

yeah, I work on misinformation

8:02

interventions was, "Oh, have you been

...

00

yeah, I work on misinformation

8:02

interventions was, "Oh, have you been

8:03

subpoenaed yet?" Because they had been.

8:06

Speaking as someone on the outside,

8:08

while the actions of this second Trump

8:10

administration have undoubtedly been

8:12

damaging, far more concerning are their

8:14

efforts to remove the checks and

8:16

balances on their behavior in general.

8:18

In this instance, removing funding for

8:20

misinformation research and checks on

8:21

social media platforms makes future

8:23

disinformation campaigns run by the

8:26

government or I'd like to point out

8:28

other governments far more likely to

8:30

succeed. Incidentally, attacking

8:31

misinformation researchers, especially

8:33

those around the topic of elections, was

8:35

a key part of project 2025, which was

8:38

effectively the agenda for the second

8:40

Trump administration. They told us their

8:42

plan and of course lied about it being

8:44

their plan. Everyt

dr ian campbell

---

Should lying about climate change be illegal? - YouTube

Should lying about climate change be illegal?

Simon Clark

698K subscribers

165,383 views Sep 24, 2025

:{:{Lying about climate change has never been more dangerous. What can we do about it? Get learning with Brilliant (and get 20% off): https://brilliant.org/simonclark}:

MAIN REFERENCES}:

access to good info is hu right bc allows civic action; fossil fuel effects, plastics

NUMBERED REFERENCES: https://www.simonoxfphys.com/blog/202...With thanks to

0:00

This is a website called climatecossmos.com. At first glance, it appears to be a relatively normal website writing

0:06

articles about climate change. But spend more than about 10 seconds on it and you notice that things are a bit odd. Their

0:13

articles are very generic. They don't interview any experts. Their topics of articles are sometimes completely

0:19

bizarre, sandwiching articles with information about climate change between those that push an anti-science agenda.

0:26

And then they published a piece called um what the climate movement isn't

0:31

telling you. And the piece read, "I'll help you write an article about what the climate movement isn't telling you with

0:36

current facts and data. Let me search for the latest information." This website is AI slop. And this is Joey

0:43

Gsturn, a journalist at DMOG, the investigative reporting site specializing in climate misinformation.

0:50

A few months ago, I learned of Climate Cosmos and passed it over to Joey to do some digging. And what he uncovered was

0:57

a bizarre new form of climate misinformation. One that shows how the

1:03

information landscape around climate change is in danger and raises questions

1:08

about what we can and should do to safeguard that landscape.

1:18

To begin with, let's look at Climate Cosmos in a bit more detail. So, you'll have one piece that's like a

1:23

listical saying something like the top 10 snowiest cities in Hawaii or something nonsensey that's very

1:28

obviously like there to draw clickbait and then like sort of every third or fourth article would be like the secret

1:33

hidden costs of the green transition and then quote Bjorn Lomborg who is a kind of very prominent like anti-net zero

1:39

voice. So, we did more of a deep dive into the site, trying to look at who owns the site, who's behind it, you

1:45

know, all these kinds of things. On the about page, they listed staff members, and we found this site maybe 4 months

1:50

ago. Back then, the staff members had AI generated pictures and untraceable

1:55

social media footprints. So, at that point, it was kind of clear, okay, maybe these aren't even real people. Things have changed. They seem to have aligned,

2:02

swapped out these AI generated profiles for real people or what what we think of real people online. We did some digging

2:07

into who owns the companies. It turns out Climate Cosmos is part of a group called NextVision Media. This is a German startup media business. Next

2:15

Vision Media don't just do climate content. They have a few AI generated sites. There were like home decoration sites. There was all kind of like really

2:21

random seeming topics um where you'd think, okay, if this is a a media business dedicated to climate content,

2:27

why do they have a site called Home Harmony that's about how to like decorate your living room? And all of these websites feature AI generated

...

this story gets more interesting. MSN is one of the world's largest news aggregators. That means that it's a web

3:24

service that collects news articles from places like the BBC, Reuters, Alazer,

3:30

whatever, and displays them all in one place. If you are running a Windows

3:35

machine, MSN is the default news aggregator on your desktop. And they

3:41

have a monetization scheme where adverts that are placed next to full articles

3:46

displayed from a third party site get their revenue split between MSN and that third party site. And Climate Cosmos

3:53

gets its content pulled by MSN and pushed into the feeds of millions of

...

4:30

violated its policies on misinformation. And so when Microsoft was made aware of

4:35

the content, it was all pulled. But via the massive reach of MSN, Climate Cosmos's content had escaped into the

4:43

wild, where it was seized upon by an entirely different kind of actor in the

4:49

climate information landscape. From the 1960s, it was very clear to

4:57

scientists working in the fossil fuel industry that the fuels they were selling were leading to carbon building

5:02

up in the atmosphere. In fact, in 1959, physicist Edward Teller warned them that

5:09

this would lead to global warming and sea level rise. In 1965, President Johnson's science advisory committee

5:15

published the Restoring the Quality of Our Environment Report. President of the American Petroleum Institute, Frank

5:21

Ikard, said of the report, "One of the most important predictions of the report is that carbon dioxide is being added to

5:27

the Earth's atmosphere by the burning of coal, oil, and natural gas at such a rate that by the year 2000, the heat

5:33

balance will be so modified as possibly to cause marked changes in the climate beyond local or even national efforts."

5:40

And he did not dispute the links between fossil fuels, CO2, and global warming. In retrospect, it's kind of surprising

5:47

that the fossil fuel industry didn't immediately start disputing those links and climate science as a whole. Because

5:54

after all, if it became public knowledge that their products were threatening the

5:59

climate stability that we all depend on, their industry could just cease to

6:04

exist. Perhaps it was because no government was seriously considering actual climate policy until the 1980s.

6:11

And it was at this time when the existential threat to the industry became clear that the fossil fuel

6:17

companies started fighting back with all the resources of the richest, most

6:24

powerful industry the world has ever seen. They financed think tanks and

6:29

individual scientists who disputed the scientific consensus, saying variously that climate change wasn't real. real

6:36

but not caused by the fossil fuel industry or real but actually beneficial to humanity. Their techniques included

6:42

use of experts outside their fields of study, lobbying policy makers, portraying environmental campaigners as

6:48

outofouch liberal elites, harassment and legal action against individual scientists, and accusing scientists of

6:54

accepting money from industry while paying other scientists to produce studies that supported the industry's

6:59

continued survival. The fossil fuel industry was using a playbook to dispute the science that had been honed by

7:05

previous industrial misinformation campaigns, notably by the tobacco industry when they disputed the science

7:12

linking tobacco smoke and lung cancer. In fact, the fossil fuel industry used some of the same experts from that

7:19

tobacco industry campaign. I would highly encourage you to read Merchants of Doubt by Areskis and Conway, which is

7:26

the authoritative account of how this playbook came to be. Though for more recent reporting, you can also read the

7:32

Union of Concerned Scientists climate deception dossier or most recently

7:37

Barbara Fries's Industrial Strength Denial. The result was that from the 1980s, the climate information landscape

7:44

became a battleground. On the one side, you had climate scientists and institutions taking observations, doing

7:51

analysis, and projecting what kind of damage would occur to the environment if we continued burning fossil fuels.

7:57

Victory for this side meant getting accurate information about climate change to the public and ultimately to

8:03

politicians. The end goal being government policy to

see climate cosmos node

16:06

say though that we have no evidence that this is what Climate Cosmos is doing. It's just a possibility. We still don't

16:12

know their actual motivations. Regardless, the information landscape around climate change is being flooded

16:18

by AI slop. Slop that is creating a feedback loop, intensifying the

16:23

misinformation present in the tools used to create additional content. And scientists aren't just contending with

16:30

AI slop. They are still facing intentional misinformation of varying degrees of severity, some straightup

16:36

denial of the basic science, and increasingly greenwashing by the fossil

16:42

fuel industry. Greenwashing is defined by the United Nations as misleading the public into believing that a company or

16:48

other entity is doing more to protect the environment than they really are, delaying credible action on climate

16:55

change. This can be claiming to be on track to net zero while not actually having a plan to do so, touting

17:01

unrealistic or unproven solutions, or emphasizing one small clean part of

17:06

their operations while ignoring the polluting majority. And this is all in addition to the generic rehabilitation

17:13

of their image that's being attempted through, for example, sponsoring sports to the tune of4 billion pounds. And this

17:19

has the effect of making the public believe that fossil fuel companies are not the root cause of the problem.

17:25

They're dynamic companies leading us into the future and not in fact

17:30

expanding their traditional operations and locking in further emissions. Greenwashing is another form of

17:36

misinformation, just a more subtle one that now appears on the climate information battlefield. But it is not

17:43

the most significant change to that battlefield in recent years. When on the

17:48

campaign trail, Donald Trump was associated with a set of policies known as Project 2025, published by the

17:54

Right-Wing Heritage Foundation. These policies included mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, criminalizing

18:01

abortion, and consolidating power in the executive branch in order to create an authoritarian Christian nationalist

18:08

government. Trump distanced himself from these extreme policies while campaigning. But within hours of winning

18:14

the 2024 election, his allies revealed that Project 2025 was indeed the agenda

18:20

of the new government. And Project 2025 had a lot to say about climate change.

18:25

Notably, it pledged to slash the budget of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Department's renewable

18:31

energy offices and block the expansion of the American grid with clean technologies. And since Trump was

18:37

elected, all of these things have happened. But what I think has gone beyond even the most pessimistic

18:42

observers fears is this administration's explicit attack on the scientific

18:48

establishment. Funding for the Moura Observatory in Hawaii, source of the data in the iconic Keeling curve of CO2

18:55

concentrations, has been cut. Funding for orbiting carbon observatories monitoring CO2 emissions, has been cut,

19:02

quote, to align with the president's agenda and budget priorities. Meanwhile, the Department for Defense announced it

19:08

will no longer share its satellite data with scientists, including hurricane forecasters. References to climate

19:14

change on government websites have been purged, and almost all staff working on climate.gov gov were fired. Hundreds of

19:20

employees have been terminated at the National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration with the Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research having

19:27

almost 3/4 of its budget removed, which will quote eliminate all funding for

19:32

climate, weather, and ocean laboratories and cooperative institutes being activities that quote are misaligned

19:38

with the president's agenda and the express will of the American people. And last month, the administration put out a

19:45

critical assessment of climate science to justify these actions written by five

19:51

handpicked climate skeptics. It contains over a 100 errors in its 140 pages,

19:56

ranging from straight up lies to egregious misrepresentation of actual

20:01

research. The palemic language of project 2025 and thus now the Trump administration especially in this new

20:08

report exactly mirrors that of early fossil fuel propaganda disputing the

20:13

basic science downplaying the risks of climate change and denouncing those who want to reduce emissions as extremists.

...

26:07

clarifications in the report is that states must uh in different timelines

26:12

phase out fossil fuels as an obligation to protect our human rights. And finally, you know, defossilize

26:18

knowledge. So really tackle both the causes and the results of those decades

26:24

of climate disinformation because that in itself impedes progress at the pace

26:29

we need to prevent even more catastrophic impacts of climate change on our lives and well-being.

26:35

Legal challenges to stop climate change have historically not been terribly successful. I mean clearly and one of

26:41

the reasons for this is that historically they have focused on the environmental harms caused by polluters.

26:47

The high watermark for such legal action actually just occurred a few weeks ago when the International Court of Justice

26:53

delivered a unanimous advisory opinion, one of only five unanimous opinions in

26:58

88 years, that countries have obligations under general international law to prevent significant harm to the

27:05

environment and that in principle countries can be held liable for climate damages, including that inflicted by

27:12

private corporations within a country. This is a landmark moment. It is almost certainly going to go in a lot of future

27:19

history textbooks, but it's still an advisory opinion. The ICJ has huge sway

27:25

and its opinions are referred to when domestic courts like here in the UK make their rulings, but this opinion is not

27:33

going to stop fossil fuel producers from selling their products or more relevantly creating misinformation. In

27:39

order for that to happen, a law would need to go on the books somewhere significant. And we'll talk about where

27:44

that might be in the next section that would explicitly criminalize the creation of misinformation about climate

27:51

change and have clear penalties for violations. Professor Mogera in her

...

28:15

argument for this has been made clear by now. Climate misinformation produces clear and demonstrable harms both to the

28:22

environment and to us and our human rights. But the obvious counterargument is, what about my freedom of speech? Why

28:29

can't I say what I want even though I know that something is inaccurate? I mean it is essential to protect

28:35

freedom of speech and in all my work I've always mention how important it is to have as open conversations as

28:42

possible. Now the question here is different if this is a conduct that's been repeated and that over time has led

28:49

to the protection of a vested interest which is uh intrinsically uh opposite to

28:55

the protection of a public good. I mean climate change has been recognized as

29:01

structural violence against children for instance by the UN committee on children's rights and incitation to

29:08

violence um is for instance one of the very few exceptions that has been recognized to freedom of expression. I

29:15

think there's two things to highlight here that Professor Morgetta said. Firstly, this is not a law that is

29:21

criminalizing ignorance about climate change. Like just saying something wrong wouldn't break this hypothetical law.

29:27

We're talking about a law that's quite explicitly targeting the fossil fuel industry that has a long history of

29:35

acting against the public good. And secondly, by basing the argument for this law on human rights

BADVERTISING

Badvertising: https://www.badverts.org/

---

12 25

AI Overview

Simon Clark and Michael Shellenberger are figures involved in the controversial debate regarding whether

offshore wind development poses a threat to the endangered North Atlantic right whale.

Key Points of the Debate

Conservation efforts for the North Atlantic right whale focus on mitigating these established threats from fishing gear and vessel traffic.

---

---

climate development lab

false and injurious claims

the future of climate denial### he future of climate denial]

@SimonClark

https://youtu.be/_OBlKRdH6A4)

Meet the lawyers blocking offshore wind

SIMON CLARK? WINDS BS ASTRO SHILLENBERGER

political targeting

short Meet the lawyers blocking offshore wind - YouTube

---

[### Blowing in the Wind: Offshore Wind Turbines

Marzulla Law, LLC

https://marzulla.com › blog › blowing-in-the-wind-offsh...](https://marzulla.com/blog/blowing-in-the-wind-offshore-wind-turbines/)

Jan 21, 2025 — This website provides general information about our firm. This information does not offer specific legal advice and use of this information does ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Roger J. Marzulla

Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Roger_J._Marzulla](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_J._Marzulla)

Marzulla (born August 12, 1947) is an American attorney ... In 2025, the law firm was notable for representing groups that sought to block offshore wind projects.Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Law Firm Pressures Brown University to Erase Research ...

The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com › 2025/08/25 › climate › bro...](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/climate/brown-university-offshore-wind-marzulla.html)

Aug 25, 2025 — Marzulla Law L.L.C. is representing several groups that are fighting offshore wind, including Green Oceans, a nonprofit organization that is ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Marzulla Law Takes Offshore Wind Turbines to Supreme ...

Marzulla Law, LLC

https://marzulla.com › blog › marzulla-law-takes-offshor...](https://marzulla.com/blog/marzulla-law-takes-offshore-wind-turbines-to-supreme-court/)

Mar 25, 2025 — Our firm filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the US Supreme Court to review the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit's December 2024 decision.Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Law firm threatens Brown's funding over research about ...

The Brown Daily Herald

https://www.browndailyherald.com › article › 2025/09](https://www.browndailyherald.com/article/2025/09/law-firm-threatens-browns-funding-over-research-about-anti-offshore-wind-groups)

Sep 14, 2025 — Representing local anti-offshore wind group Green Oceans, Marzulla Law sent a letter to the University demanding research by the Climate and ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Law Firm Threatens Brown Climate Researchers

Inside Higher Ed

https://www.insidehighered.com › news › 2025/08/26 › l...](https://www.insidehighered.com/news/quick-takes/2025/08/26/law-firm-threatens-brown-climate-researchers)

Aug 26, 2025 — A law firm representing anti–wind energy groups is demanding that Brown University researchers retract findings linking those groups to the ...

[### Offshore wind fight lining lawyers' pockets

Saving Seafood

https://www.savingseafood.org › News › Law](https://www.savingseafood.org/news/law/offshore-wind-fight-lining-lawyers-pockets/)

Nov 7, 2025 — ... Marzulla Law, which was hired last year to fight the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's approval of the US Wind project off Maryland's coast.Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎ATTORNEY

[### Vineyard Wind survives its years of legal drama. Trump's ...

Clark Mindock | Substack

https://www.landmark.earth › trump-offshore-wind-vin...](https://www.landmark.earth/p/trump-offshore-wind-vineyard-lawsuits-climate-change)

Dec 9, 2024 — Roger Marzulla, an attorney who represented fishing industry and business interests in litigation challenging the Vineyard Wind project, told ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Meet the lawyers blocking offshore wind

Instagram · simonoxfphys

15.3K+ likes · 2 months ago](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQEdULCke8R/)

Working with many suspicious community groups to delay and even cancel offshore wind projects that they felt threatened by. They exposed this ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎ATTORNEY

[### RODA asks Supreme Court to hear Vineyard Wind case

National Fisherman

https://www.nationalfisherman.com › northeast › roda-a...](https://www.nationalfisherman.com/northeast/roda-asks-supreme-court-to-hear-vineyard-wind-case)

Mar 11, 2025 — The case was brought March 5 on behalf of fishermen by attorneys Nancie G. Marzulla and Roger J. Marzulla of the Washington D.C. law firm ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

---

12 25

[### Law Firm Pressures Brown University to Erase Research ...

The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com › 2025/08/25 › climate › bro...](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/25/climate/brown-university-offshore-wind-marzulla.html)

Aug 25, 2025 — Marzulla Law L.L.C. is representing several groups that are fighting offshore wind, including Green Oceans, a nonprofit organization that is ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Law firm threatens Brown's funding over research about ...

The Brown Daily Herald

https://www.browndailyherald.com › article › 2025/09](https://www.browndailyherald.com/article/2025/09/law-firm-threatens-browns-funding-over-research-about-anti-offshore-wind-groups)

Sep 14, 2025 — Representing local anti-offshore wind group Green Oceans, Marzulla Law sent a letter to the University demanding research by the Climate and ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Case: Green Oceans v. US Department of the Interior

Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

https://clearinghouse.net › case](https://clearinghouse.net/case/46981/)

This case challenges agency approval of two energy projects, South Fork Wind Project and Revolution Wind Project, that have purported detrimental ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Green Oceans Asks Brown University to Retract Reports ...

ecoRI News

https://ecori.org › green-oceans-asks-brown-university-t...](https://ecori.org/green-oceans-asks-brown-university-to-retract-reports-about-anti-wind-organization/)

Aug 25, 2025 — PROVIDENCE — A law firm representing the anti-wind energy group Green Oceans sent a letter to Brown University earlier this month, ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Green Oceans Files Motion for Summary Judgment to ...

Business Wire

https://www.businesswire.com › news › home › Green-O...](https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250903221909/en/Green-Oceans-Files-Motion-for-Summary-Judgment-to-Vacate-Federal-Approvals-for-Revolution-Wind)

Sep 3, 2025 — Green Oceans' lawyer, Roger J. Marzulla, served as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the U.S. Justice Department's Environment and Natural ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Offshore Wind Opponents Target Work of Brown University

Energy Connects

https://www.energyconnects.com › News › Renewables](https://www.energyconnects.com/news/renewables/2025/august/offshore-wind-opponents-target-work-of-brown-university-researcher/)

Aug 25, 2025 — The group sent the latest letter via Marzulla Law, dated Aug. 11, 2025. Green Oceans asked for “immediate corrective action by Brown ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

[### Meet the lawyers blocking offshore wind

Instagram · simonoxfphys

15.3K+ likes · 2 months ago](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQEdULCke8R/)

{They've been objected to by a community group called green oceans* due to the potential disruption of marine habitats by the wind turbines and in ...Read more}:

Missing: MARZULA ‎ATTORNEY

[### Scientist exposes anti-wind groups as oil-funded. Now they ...

Electrek

https://electrek.co › 2025/08/25 › scientist-exposes-anti-...](https://electrek.co/2025/08/25/scientist-exposes-anti-wind-groups-as-oil-funded-now-they-want-to-silence-him/)

Aug 25, 2025 — Marzulla Law represented one of the disinformation groups which the CDL has highlighted before, the deceptively-named “Green Oceans.” Green ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎ATTORNEY

[### GREEN OCEANS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ... CourtListener

https://www.courtlistener.com › docket › parties › green-...](https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68164402/parties/green-oceans-v-united-states-department-of-the-interior/)

Jan 16, 2024 — ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED. Plaintiff. 226 OCEAN AVENUE MOONWATCH, LLC. Represented by. Roger Joseph Marzulla. (202) 822-6760. Fax: (202) 822-6774.Read more

[### Offshore Wind Opponents Target Work of Brown University ...

Financial Post

https://financialpost.com › pmn › business-pmn › offsh...](https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/offshore-wind-opponents-target-work-of-brown-university-researcher)

Aug 25, 2025 — The group sent the latest letter via Marzulla Law, dated Aug. 11, 2025. Green Oceans asked for “immediate corrective action by Brown ...Read more

Missing: MARZULA ‎| Show results with: MARZULA

---

---